[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok. But think that we already have alsa-firmware packages in Medibuntu.
> And this is a well maintained and used repository: there is libdvdcss,
> some restricted codecs, etc... It means users watching dvds on Ubuntu
> are aware of the Medibuntu Project. Maybe we could ju
Cory K. a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Cory K. a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>>>
>>>
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of crea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cory K. a écrit :
>
>> Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to
metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and no
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to
>>> metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and nonfree
Maybe this should be a package we can propose to the Medibuntu project.
Thay already have a metapackage for the w32/w64/ppc codecs packages,
wich choose the good codec package depending on your cpu kind. It should
be possible to add a bigger list of package in this metapackage, I guess.
Toine
Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to
>> metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and nonfree.
>>
>> They would include any audio *and* video codec that fits into
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Cory K. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if we should go through the trouble of creating to
> metapackages for A/V codecs? The obvious free and nonfree.
>
> They would include any audio *and* video codec that fits into either
> category. "Free" could ship o
