On 29/06/10 20:20, Alan Lord (News) wrote:
> On 29/06/10 20:08, Rob Beard wrote:
>> Now running one of these streams is fine, it starts fine and goes into
>> the background. If I run a second stream (basically start the next
>> init.d script) it will start to run the script but then come up with a
@Alan: Exactly my thought! It's a shame that if there are any, that they
weren't released (or at least not without public knowledge). I suppose
contacting Universities would be a futile attempt ;) (saying that if I
thought it would bring results I would do it!)
If anything can be found I would be w
Message: 7 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 22:19:24 +0100 From: John Stevenson
Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] Optional headless server...
To: UK Ubuntu Talk Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On 28 June 2010 22:12,
Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> > As long as the card is on the bus, it
Actually in its defense, I have found Dragon NS to be quite surprisingly
accurate after 10-15 minutes of training, so I don't think the perfect
model is too far away, at least for closed-source payware. Open-source
I'm not too sure but there's always a negative spin every time this
subject pops up.
Roy Jamison wrote:
> Hi all. Have been looking at the Ubuntu wiki and googled around for
> quite a while trying to find an answer but there doesn't appear to be
> anything concrete for linux regarding speech recognition programs.
> I mean, there are developer-only orientated things like sphinx and
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:08:45 +0100, Roy Jamison
wrote:
> Hi all. Have been looking at the Ubuntu wiki and googled around for
> quite a while trying to find an answer but there doesn't appear to be
> anything concrete for linux regarding speech recognition programs.
> I mean, there are developer
Hi all. Have been looking at the Ubuntu wiki and googled around for
quite a while trying to find an answer but there doesn't appear to be
anything concrete for linux regarding speech recognition programs.
I mean, there are developer-only orientated things like sphinx and
julius in our repos, but is
On 29/06/10 20:08, Rob Beard wrote:
> Now running one of these streams is fine, it starts fine and goes into
> the background. If I run a second stream (basically start the next
> init.d script) it will start to run the script but then come up with an
> error about it already running.
PIDs.
The
Hi folks,
Further to my post a couple of days ago about Shoutcast and streaming
radio, I've decided to bite the bullet and go for Icecast, mainly
because it appears to be better supported on Ubuntu 64-bit.
Now I've got Icecast running, I can run multiple Icecast sessions
(there's about 6 in to
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 07:49:09 +0100
> From: da...@boavon.plus.com
> Subject: Re: [ubuntu-uk] 10.04 Wireless Toshiba Portege PP041E
> To: ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
> Message-ID:
> <1eb6b7d3bbe753c5f550abd7e9a619c8.squir...@webmail.plus.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=
>> > Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy
>> > The IT
>> > Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
>> I have a female friend who doesn't appreciate BBT having only one
>> female lead character who is portrayed as ditzy and clueles
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 14:41 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
> Matt,
>
> On 29/06/10 12:53, Matthew Daubney wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29/06/10 11:35, Jon Spriggs wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 29 June 2010 11:
Matt,
On 29/06/10 12:53, Matthew Daubney wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
>>
>> On 29/06/10 11:35, Jon Spriggs wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang
On 29 June 2010 11:29, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
>> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
>> Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
>>
>
> I have a female friend who doesn't appreciate BBT having only one
> female
Me too!
On 29/06/10 12:53, Matthew Daubney wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
On 29/06/10 11:35, Jon Spriggs wrote:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
Well, it's not nearly as good as
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 11:53 +0100, Tony Arnold wrote:
>
> On 29/06/10 11:35, Jon Spriggs wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> >> On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
> >>> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
> >>> Crowd. Bit silly
On 29/06/10 11:35, Jon Spriggs wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>> On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
>>> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
>>> Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
>> I have a female friend
I thought Leslie Winklier was great. There's also Raj's childhood friend
who prefers Sheldon. Not to mention Leonard's mother who has me in
stitches.
Penny sort of represents Middle America rather than any idiocy
specifically of womankind, I thought. She had to be a woman, the geeks
obviously
On 29 June 2010 11:32, Steve Garton wrote:
> I would argue that Jen (in ITC) was portrayed as ditzy & clueless too
> (remember the episode where she won Employee of the Month?)
>
I don't think she likes the IT Crowd either, for much the same reason.
Cheers,
Al.
--
ubuntu-uk@lists.ubuntu.com
ht
On 29 June 2010 11:35, Jon Spriggs wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
>> On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
>>> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
>>> Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
>> I have a female frie
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
>> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
>> Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
> I have a female friend who doesn't appreciate BBT having only one
> f
An excellent point - which I probably should've noticed ;)
Paula
On 29/06/10 11:32, Steve Garton wrote:
On 29/06/10 11:29, Alan Pope wrote:
On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
Crowd. Bit silly but when was
On 29/06/10 11:29, Alan Pope wrote:
> On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
>> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
>> Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
>>
>
> I have a female friend who doesn't appreciate BBT having only one
> female lead
On 29 June 2010 11:22, pmgazz wrote:
> Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The IT
> Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
>
I have a female friend who doesn't appreciate BBT having only one
female lead character who is portrayed as ditzy and cluele
Well, it's not nearly as good as The Big Bang Theory but I do enjoy The
IT Crowd. Bit silly but when was a Brit sitcom not silly?
Paula
On 28/06/10 23:48, Steve Flynn wrote:
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:26 PM, javadayaz wrote:
I agree. The it crowd is really quite good
Like I said,
25 matches
Mail list logo
