Hello,
I developed a SOAP service which is encapsulated in a kar archive. Then, I
made a custom karaf distribution from Karaf 4.0.4. Everything works fine (no
error message in the log files and the service works fine).
The problem is when I try to do the same thing with Karaf 4.0.8, I got this
me
The missing requirement indicates that you need a Log Service implementation
(i.e. someone to provide you with the service). The dependency that you’re
compiling against is just the API (which is a good thing to compile against)
but you actually need an implementation at runtime. Your build tool
I forgot to say that in the file blueprint.xml, I have :
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049594.html
Sent from the Karaf - User maili
Tim,
Thank you for your answer.
I discovered with the command :
service:list LogService
that the bundle OPS4J Pax-Logging provides the log service :
karaf@root()> service:list LogService
[org.apache.karaf.log.core.LogService]
--
service.bundleid = 37
servi
For this next step you’ll need someone more familiar with how Karaf adds its
logging service in the “normal” distribution.
Best Regards,
Tim
> On 22 Feb 2017, at 09:22, Olivier21 wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> I discovered with the command :
>
> service:list LogService
As Tim explained your bundle has the requirement for a LogService OSGi
service in its Manifest. Since I think karaf 4.0.5 requirements for
services are also checked by the feature service of karaf. In version
before these requirements were ignored.
The problem now is that not all bundles that
Ok Thanks Tim!
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049599.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Actually it's not really a bug in Pax-Logging, as the feature.xml is
provided by Karaf.
And it's easy to fix for us, cause we just need to add this capability to
the feature.xml of the pax-logging feature we have in Karaf.
we just need to add the following snippet to the feature.xml
osgi.service
Thank you very much Christian.
I just tried your first solution and the problem seems to be solved
regarding LogService.
I have no more the error message.
Nevertheless, when i execute the command "bundle:list", I have no result.
In the log file, i have 2 missing dependencies (that I have not
I do not see any error in the log. Can you try bundle:list -t 0 ?
Christian
On 22.02.2017 10:55, Olivier21 wrote:
Thank you very much Christian.
I just tried your first solution and the problem seems to be solved
regarding LogService.
I have no more the error message.
Nevertheless, when i ex
Hi Olivier,
Can you check with la command (it's an alias to bundle:list -t 0) ?
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 10:55 AM, Olivier21 wrote:
Thank you very much Christian.
I just tried your first solution and the problem seems to be solved
regarding LogService.
I have no more the error message.
Neve
Just a quick detail: as the default system level is 80, bundle:list will
show only bundles greater than 80 (considered as user bundles). The 'la'
command (bundle:list -t 0) displays all bundles (system and user).
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 10:55 AM, Olivier21 wrote:
Thank you very much Christia
bundle:list -t 0
give me this result :
karaf@root()> bundle:list -t 0
START LEVEL 100 , List Threshold: 0
ID | State| Lvl | Version | Name
0 | Active | 0 | 5.6.1| System Bundle
1
Hi Olivier,
In your command, I guess you have @Reference to KarService, correct ?
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 11:05 AM, Olivier21 wrote:
bundle:list -t 0
give me this result :
karaf@root()> bundle:list -t 0
START LEVEL 100 , List Threshold: 0
ID | State| Lvl | Version | Name
-
Hi JB!
In fact, I have a maven module to generate my custom distribution of Karaf
and the pom.xml is :
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd";>
Any chance to share your project ? It would be easier as I can fix
directly on your stuff.
Thanks,
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 11:14 AM, Olivier21 wrote:
Hi JB!
In fact, I have a maven module to generate my custom distribution of Karaf
and the pom.xml is :
http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0";
xm
JB,
I sent you the project by email.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049609.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Great !
Thanks
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 11:34 AM, Olivier21 wrote:
JB,
I sent you the project by email.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/missing-requirement-osgi-service-effective-active-filter-objectClass-org-osgi-service-log-LogService-tp4049593p4049609
Are we looking at a release of 4.1 soon? I realize it's sort of a "it'll be
done when it's done" situation but I've seen a number of people mention it
recently but since the download page isn't showing it I assume they're using a
snapshot. The tone of the recent discussion leads me to believe
4.1.0 is already out.
https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/4.1.0/
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 4:42 PM Leschke, Scott wrote:
> Are we looking at a release of 4.1 soon? I realize it’s sort of a “it’ll
> be done when it’s done” situation but I’ve seen a number of people mentio
I was wondering. I’ve just been periodically taking a peek at
http://karaf.apache.org/download.html as it’s been my experience in the past
that this gets updated pretty much right away.
Anyway, thanks for the heads up.
From: James Carman [mailto:ja...@carmanconsulting.com]
Sent: Wednesday, Feb
Hi Scott,
I'm updating website this morning (I finalized the release while on
vacation with a limited Internet connection ;)).
By the way 4.1.1 should be out in 3 weeks.
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 11:05 PM, Leschke, Scott wrote:
/I was wondering. I’ve just been periodically taking a peek at
22 matches
Mail list logo