Hello Alexandru,
Alright. Please past the output of # virsh dumpxml
Thanks,
Jayanth
From: Alexandru Stan
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2024 2:01:35 am
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Windows VM performance in ACS
Did that and I'm not really sure that the
Changing os type to "Windows PV" looks better. The nic will use virtio
device instead of default e1000 device
-Wei
On Thursday, May 23, 2024, Alexandru Stan
wrote:
> Did that and I'm not really sure that the situation is improved. Right
> after booting I started installing the latest CU for
Did that and I'm not really sure that the situation is improved. Right after
booting I started installing the latest CU for May and it was done in 1 hour
and 30 minutes. I know that these things sometimes take a while to install but
this seems way too much...
-Original Message-
From:
Hello Alexandru,
Thanks for sharing. The reason could be that the VM is using IDE instead of
virtio. Please stop the VM and add the key "rootDiskController" with value
"virtio" and see the difference. You'll have to ensure that virtio drivers are
installed on the VM so that it would be able to
Hi Jayanth,
I don't have that key. In the settings section of the vm there are 2 keys,
Message.ReservedCapacityFreed.Flag and rootdisksize.
I don't have a template yet, actually this vm was installed from a Windows ISO
(that is registered as Windows PV in ACS) and I was hoping to transform it
Hello all,
Quick question. It's time to update the storage for our secondary storage
array. However, I don’t see a way to put the secondary storage into maintenance
mode. Based on how secondary storage is used, I assume that if the backend goes
offline, I will lose access to templates, ISOs,
Hi João Jandre,
I think, it's better to do 4.19.1.0 before 4.20.0.0, and schedule 4.20.0.0
release a month or two after 4.19.1.0 release. Considering the 4.19.1.0
timelines proposed [1], you can target 4.20.0.0 in Q3, around Aug end (or early
Sept). Please let me know your thoughts.
[1]
Hi All,
It's been few months since the proposal, and we've fixed/tested/merged 139
Issues and PRs in the 4.19.1.0 milestone [1]. Currently, we've 202 open items
in the 4.19.1.0 milestone, tracked/triaged through the GitHub project 'Apache
CloudStack 4.19.1' [2].
We can target for the "Must
Hello Alexandru,
I’m not able to see the image. Would you please check the value for the key
“rootDiskController” in both template and the Windows VM if the template OS
type is “Windows PV” already? You’ll find it in the settings section.
Regards,
Jayanth Reddy
From: Alexandru Stan
Date:
Yes, I installed the guest tools right at first boot.
[cid:image001.png@01DAAD25.1CAA02B0]
From: Gary Dixon
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 2:32 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Windows VM performance in ACS
Have you checked in the VM's device manager that all devices are using
Have you checked in the VM's device manager that all devices are using virtio
drivers (disk, disk controller, nic adapter etc)
Gary Dixon
Quadris Cloud Manager
+44 (0) 161 537 4980 +44 (0) 7989 717661
gary.di...@quadris.co.uk
www.quadris.com
Innovation House, 12-13 Bredbury Business Park
Hi Gary,
That’s what I used when registering the ISO. Doesn’t seem to help at all
unfortunately.
From: Gary Dixon
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2024 1:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Windows VM performance in ACS
HI Alexandru
We use "Windows PV" OS type on our Windows VM's -
HI Alexandru
We use "Windows PV" OS type on our Windows VM's - this provides the Hyper-V
enlightenments.
BR
Gary
Gary Dixon
Quadris Cloud Manager
+44 (0) 161 537 4980 +44 (0) 7989 717661
gary.di...@quadris.co.uk
www.quadris.com
Innovation House, 12-13 Bredbury Business Park
Bredbury Park
Hi everyone,
Is there anything that must be done to improve the performance of Windows VMs
in ACS? I tried to deploy a W10 instance, with the virtio drivers, and the
performance is very, very poor (for example it took almost 3 hours to install a
CU, the actual setup took about 50 minutes and
The idea is to allocate the AS number pools in the same way we allocate VLANs
to a zone, with the possibility to enter the AS number manually per network
(depending on offering, just like in the case of VLANs).
>This would solve most use-cases from the start:
>- BGP peer on zone level
> -
GitHub user Pearl1594 added a comment to the discussion: Help with Apache
Cloudstack On a Single Machine
@charlesweng You could use the following resource:
https://github.com/shapeblue/hackerbook/blob/main/1-user.md to bring up an
all-in-one setup.
GitHub link:
Op 22/05/2024 om 14:55 schreef Alex Mattioli:
Thanks for the input Wido,
That said, you could also opt that you can specify BGP peers are zone level and
override them at network level if one prefers. Nothing specified at >the network?
The zone-level peers are used. If you do >specify them
17 matches
Mail list logo