or millions) of users having to do this
manually.
From: Tanstaafl [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org]
Sent: Thu 9/6/2012 10:21 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] RE: Libreoffice and Java
Thanks Stuart...
So, if you (like I always do) first uninstall JRE 1.6, t
or use of a 64-bit build).
Stuart
From: Tanstaafl [mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org]
Sent: Thu 9/6/2012 10:21 AM
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] RE: Libreoffice and Java
Thanks Stuart...
So, if you (like I always do) first uninstall JRE 1.6, then ins
Thanks Stuart...
So, if you (like I always do) first uninstall JRE 1.6, then install 1.7
(32bit of course), will it still be broken?
On 8/28/2012 12:10 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote:
Bob McDonald wrote
JRE 1.7 32 bit edition works if (and only if) JRE 1.6 is installed first
and is pointed to i
8:19
>Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] RE: Libreoffice and Java
>
>Bob,
>
>Sorry, too shrill on my part. Just because it was incorrect doesn't mean
>it was wrong.
>
>Apologies--and please remain engaged.
>
>Stuart
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Bob McDon
ibreoffice.org"
>Sent: Tuesday, 28 August 2012, 17:17
>Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] RE: Libreoffice and Java
>
>Well that was how it worked for me. Since it is completely wrong, I'll quit
>posting about it and watch what happens in the future.
>
>Have fun!
>
e.org
Subject: RE: [libreoffice-users] RE: Libreoffice and Java
Well that was how it worked for me. Since it is completely wrong, I'll
quit posting about it and watch what happens in the future.
Have fun!
Regards,
Bob
--
For unsubscribe instructions e-mail to: users+h...@global.libre
Well that was how it worked for me. Since it is completely wrong, I'll quit
posting about it and watch what happens in the future.
Have fun!
Regards,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: V Stuart Foote [mailto:vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 12:10 PM
> To: user
