[EMAIL PROTECTED] error_log file of 150 Gb!!

2008-11-19 Thread Justin Wright
hours. I read somewhere that apache limited or could limit the size of the log files as it was writing them? I couldn't find any configuration settings like this in the documentation. I would appreciate any suggestions. regards Justin Wright

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect clients

2007-05-26 Thread justin wright
thru mod_proxy_balancer you can do load balancing. - Original Message From: Don Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Saturday, May 26, 2007 11:01:56 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect clients Red al tubor wrote: hello, Any idea about how can we redirect

[EMAIL PROTECTED] High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
I have successfully and consistently run 2.25 million servlet transactions out of 45 million+ requests through a hardware balancer across 8 clusters of 2 jvms for a total of 16 tomcat instances running on two different server grade machines in ~1 hour with little or no errors. Each tomcat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Blank page with Apache and PHP running

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
Have your tried turning debug on? # # LogLevel: Control the number of messages logged to the error_log. # Possible values include: debug, info, notice, warn, error, crit, # alert, emerg. # LogLevel debug - Original Message From: Alexei [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
Also, I just found the following in my dmesg output: httpd[8313]: segfault at 7fff62fa8ff8 rip 00441479 rsp 7fff62fa8fe0 error 6 httpd[10526]: segfault at 7fff62fa8ff8 rip 00441479 rsp 7fff62fa8fe0 error 6 httpd[10532]: segfault at 7fff62fa8ff8 rip

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:29:31 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs? On May 23, 2007, at 1:23 PM, justin wright wrote: IfModule

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
with this? :) (actually, Apache internally tries to handle this misconfig by setting Max to 513, but still, that's a REAL NARROW BAND) On May 23, 2007, at 1:41 PM, justin wright wrote: When I use the default settings apache immediately complains that it reaches the server limit. Therefore, I kept

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
? On 5/23/07, justin wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've set the apache confs to use the following StartServers 512 ServerLimit 1024 MaxClients 1024 MinSpareServers 256 No comment on the ajp stuff, but MinSpareServers is still way too high. Why

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
- Configuration issues or bugs? On May 23, 2007, at 2:49 PM, justin wright wrote: I've set the apache confs to use the following StartServers 512 ServerLimit 1024 MaxClients 1024 MinSpareServers 256 MaxSpareServers 512 MaxRequestsPerChild

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
against tomcat and only consume ~160 busy threads and now its consuming ~1000 threads and is still climbing. Any ideas? Thanks again, J - Original Message From: justin wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:43:14 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: High volume issues using mod_proxy (balancer,http,ajp) on Apache 2.2.4 across multiple tomcat 5.5.23 clusters - Configuration issues or bugs?

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
As soon as I sent that last message everything went into the toilet and now the application servers aren't even responding. - Original Message From: justin wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 3:07:13 PM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd.conf

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
There are commercial tools from Mercury and BMC that will monitor a web sites health, but they aren't cheap. If you simply want to see if its alive, you could use an application server to send an HTTP request like GET / and test to make sure you get a response and that the status is 200 ok and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Probobaly Stupid

2007-05-23 Thread justin wright
Its a LoadModule directive. If you installed the binary from apache, simply search the httpd.conf in the conf folder for the module you are interested in and uncomment (remove the #) the LoadModule directive of interest. This tells apache to the load the module, but depending on the module