Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the release of the gwt-maven-plugin version 2.5.0-rc2.
http://mojo.codehaus.org/gwt-maven-plugin/
To get this update, simply specify the version in your project's
plugin configuration:
org.codehaus.mojo
gwt-maven-plugin
2.5.0-rc2
Did you try running the build with JMX? Watching for memory&cpu consumption?
And doing a thread dump to know where the build is actually stuck could be
interesting.
Cheers
2010/9/24 Jörg Schaible
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Stephen Coy wrote:
>
> > Are you using Surefire 2.6? I believe that has a memory
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Coy wrote:
> Are you using Surefire 2.6? I believe that has a memory leak. See
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/SUREFIRE-647.
Well, most use Surefire 2.5, only the latest projects use already 2.6. I ran
the build with -DskipTests so that this memory leak should not interfer
, the Maven team is
>> seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
>> interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive
>> can get source and binary bundles from this URL:
>>
>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/
Hi
Our build which consists of 57 projects fails with the following on
3.0-RC2 (Ok on 2.2.1)
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin:2.3.1:install
(default-install) on project
site-resources: Execution default-install of goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven
Hi Kristian,
Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> Den 23.09.2010 11:31, skrev Jörg Schaible:
>> Is it possible that the new code for parallel processing unintentionally
>> swallows the OOME? Does someone else observe the same behavior?
>>
> Are you running with the -T option active ?
No.
- Jörg
--
Den 23.09.2010 11:31, skrev Jörg Schaible:
Is it possible that the new code for parallel processing unintentionally
swallows the OOME? Does someone else observe the same behavior?
Are you running with the -T option active ?
Kristian
--
preview of the upcoming release for a test drive can
> get source and binary bundles from this URL:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC2/
>
> Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have a
>
Works fine with my most important builds, including "site".
Jochen
--
I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@m
inary bundles from this URL:
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006/org/apache/maven/apache-
maven/3.0-RC2/
>
> Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have
> a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
>
&g
dles from this URL:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC2/
>
> Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have
> a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
>
> https://cwiki.apache
cool ;-) thanx.
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> kristian wrote:
>
>> any hints are welcome to do the "better".
>
> /** @parameter default-value="${repositorySystemSession}"
> * @readonly
> */
> private RepositorySystemSession repoSession;
>
> ...
>
> request.setRepos
kristian wrote:
any hints are welcome to do the "better".
/** @parameter default-value="${repositorySystemSession}"
* @readonly
*/
private RepositorySystemSession repoSession;
...
request.setRepositorySession( repoSesssion );
Benjamin
or a test drive can
> get source and binary bundles from this URL:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC2/
>
> Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have a
> close look at the c
0, the Maven team is
> seeking your help to discover regressions since Maven 2.x. Everybody
> interested in taking a preview of the upcoming release for a test drive can
> get source and binary bundles from this URL:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006
Great!
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC2/
>
I just performed a 30-something multi-module release (prepare, perform
[deploy, site-deploy]) and I did not n
://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-006/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.0-RC2/
Before reporting any issues found during testing, please be sure to have
a close look at the compatibility notes for Maven 3.x:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Maven+3.x+Compatibility+Notes
If you
gt;> >> Before we do, I'd like to get as many eyes as possible on this latest
>> >> release candidate:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-008/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.1-RC2
>
ut RC1, I think we're in better shape to attempt a
release again.
Before we do, I'd like to get as many eyes as possible on this latest
release candidate:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-008/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.1-RC2
Please file JIRA iss
t; result of testing out RC1, I think we're in better shape to attempt a
> >> release again.
> >>
> >> Before we do, I'd like to get as many eyes as possible on this latest
> >> release candidate:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://r
Before we do, I'd like to get as many eyes as possible on this latest
>> release candidate:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-008/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.1-RC2
>>
>> Please file JIRA issues for anything you come acros
r shape to attempt a
> release again.
>
> Before we do, I'd like to get as many eyes as possible on this latest
> release candidate:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-008/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.1-RC2
>
> Please file JIRA
as a result of testing out RC1, I think we're in better shape to
> attempt a release again.
>
> Before we do, I'd like to get as many eyes as possible on this latest
> release candidate:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-008/org/ap
&g
ny eyes as possible on this latest
release candidate:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-008/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.1-RC2
Please file JIRA issues for anything you come across that still seems
broken. The list of issues we've resolved so far for
No I'm not sure. I just supposed it was it.Sorry
Arnaud
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:13 PM, John Casey wrote:
> I just grepped the uberjar file listing in RC2 for 'ightweight' and came up
> with nothing. Are you sure the lightweight wagon is present in the copy you
> hav
I just grepped the uberjar file listing in RC2 for 'ightweight' and came
up with nothing. Are you sure the lightweight wagon is present in the
copy you have?
Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
I thought the wagon-lightweight was always here.It's with the 2.2.0-RC you
delivered.
Arnaud
ache.maven.shared.release.exec.InvokerMavenExecutor.setupRequest(InvokerMavenExecut
>>> or.java:335)
>>> at
>>>
>>> org.apache.maven.shared.release.exec.InvokerMavenExecutor.executeGoals(InvokerMavenExecut
>>> or.java:377)
>>> at
&g
ository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-010/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
Remember, if you have any problems, report them to:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with Affects-Version: 2.2.0
...then, please reply to this thread to let me know abo
> rgds,
>
> Markku
>
> John Casey wrote:
>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> After finding and cleaning up some code that seems to be tainted during
>> some of our efforts at generifying the codebase, we've respun a new release
>> candidate.
>
rg/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
Remember, if you have any problems, report them to:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with Affects-Version: 2.2.0
...then, please reply to this thread to let me know about the issue! :-)
Thanks for
ing the codebase, we've respun a new
> release
> > candidate.
> >
> > If you have time, please give it a whirl:
> >
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-010/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
>
ntent/repositories/maven-staging-010/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
Remember, if you have any problems, report them to: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG
with Affects-Version: 2.2.0
...then, please reply to this thread to let me know about the
issue! :-)
I've just noticed this whil
>
> If you have time, please give it a whirl:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-010/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
>
> Remember, if you have any problems, report them to:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with Affects-Vers
ive it a whirl:
>
>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-staging-010/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
>
> Remember, if you have any problems, report them to:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with Affects-Version: 2.2.0
>
> ...then, please repl
+1. Just noticed the same problem while mvn releasing a multimodule project.
The rest is fine (mvn clean deploy is ok).
Cheers.
2009/5/5 Paul MERLIN
> Hey,
>
> I had no issue building my projects.
> release:prepare is working but release:perform is not (see the trace
> below).
> I switched to 2
Hey,
I had no issue building my projects.
release:prepare is working but release:perform is not (see the trace below).
I switched to 2.1.0 right after that and the release:perform went well.
I'm using the javasvn scm provider here but I get the same error using the
native one.
/Paul
p...@dosa
pache/maven/apache-maven/2.2.0-RC2/
Remember, if you have any problems, report them to:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG with Affects-Version: 2.2.0
...then, please reply to this thread to let me know about the issue! :-)
Thanks for testing!
Hi all,
Proximity RC2 is here!
Proximity RC2 has moved forward in time, due to an important BUG about
handling aggregated repositories and Maven2 metadata.
If using non-snapshot and snapshot repositories together that contains
same paths (NOT with the default config), RC1 and former releases
On 2/25/06, Johnny l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all
>
> I'm a bit new at maven, so bear with me. I'm trying to build geronimo
> 1.0source and I'm having problems with maven
> 1.0-rc2 (I would update but the place I'm at runs on maven 1.0.2 and won
Hey all
I'm a bit new at maven, so bear with me. I'm trying to build geronimo
1.0source and I'm having problems with maven
1.0-rc2 (I would update but the place I'm at runs on maven 1.0.2 and won't
be upgrading). When I build, I keep on getting dependency errors :
Attem
; > De : Konrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 17:32
> > À : maven
> > Objet : [.war plugin] maven.war.final.name changed
> in 1.0
> > (from 1.0-rc2)?
> >
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Just wondering if anyth
I think that you must use maven:set :
Arnaud
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Konrad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2004 17:32
> À : maven
> Objet : [.war plugin] maven.war.final.name changed in 1.0
> (from 1.0-rc2)?
>
>
> Hello.
Hello.
Just wondering if anything changed with the .war
plugin since 1.0-rc2? In my maven.xml file, I define
the following:
...
In Maven 1.0-RC2, I would get the following as the
.war name:
project-1.0-20040720-1029.war
However, after upgrading to Maven 1.0, the .war name
This won't happen again. In RC1, plugins were built with the release. With
RC2 and beyond, they were built in advance and released as is.
However, many that didn't change were rebuilt for RC2. Its likely the
difference is a new manifest and Apache license.
It isn't something
After fetching RC2 I've noticed that a number of the plugins have diffs
between the one shipped with RC1 versus the one shipped with RC2.
I'm curious about the diffs in the case when the version identifiers are the
same for the jars in question.
For example, in RC1, the plugin 'ma
that change and check that it works under your installation
> with spaces?
> Thanks,
> Brett
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 1:46 PM
> > To: Maven Users List
> >
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 1:46 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: RC2 Windows - Maven.bat does not allow spaces in
> JAVA_HOME
>
>
> Unfortunately the \nul and the quotes appear to be mutually
> exclusive (at
> least
.
> Thanks,
> Brett
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 1:14 PM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: RE: RC2 Windows - Maven.bat does not allow spaces in
> > JAVA_HOME
> &
n Users List
> Subject: RE: RC2 Windows - Maven.bat does not allow spaces in
> JAVA_HOME
>
>
> Brett,
>
> I do not have CVS access because of our firewall (will be
> sorted out next
> week). I have just copy and pasted revision 1.40 from Web
> Access CVS in
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 9:37 AM
> > To: Maven Users List
> > Subject: RE: RC2 Windows - Maven.bat does not allow spaces in
> > JAVA_HOME
> >
> >
> > Brett,
> >
> > I am a newbie at this, but I checked the Web Access CVS
> > before I poste
You're right. The fix was for JAVA_HOME.
Can you submit a tested patch for JAVA_HOME?
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 9:37 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: RE: RC2 Windows - Mave
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 12/05/2004 11:24:31:
> Fixed in CVS.
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 9:23 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RC2 Windows - Maven
Fixed in CVS.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 2004 9:23 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RC2 Windows - Maven.bat does not allow spaces in JAVA_HOME
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I have found an iss
Hi,
I have found an issue in RC2 in maven.bat on line 56:
if exist %JAVA_HOME%\nul goto chkMHome
As there is no quotes around it, it fails when there is spaces in the
JAVA_HOME value e.g. program files.
I got it to work by changing the line to the following:
if exist "%JAVA_HOME%&
I'll take the option with the smiley next to it.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 4:25 PM
To: 'Maven Users List'
Subject: RE: Upgrade to RC2 and then NoSuchGoalException
Ah, this is a bug in xdoc-1.6 whi
: Tuesday, 11 May 2004 9:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Upgrade to RC2 and then NoSuchGoalException
>
>
> I tried clearing the plugin cache and I ran the site goal
> once more, but now maven is complaining about this,
>
> BUILD FAILED
> File..
>
er [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 4:08 PM
To: 'Maven Users List'
Subject: RE: Upgrade to RC2 and then NoSuchGoalException
Clear your plugin cache and try again (rm -rf ~/.maven/plugins on unix)
RC3 fixes the problem
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
Clear your plugin cache and try again (rm -rf ~/.maven/plugins on unix)
RC3 fixes the problem
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 11 May 2004 7:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Upgrade to RC2 and then NoSu
I just recently upgraded from an RC1-SNAPSHOT to RC2 but when I ran the site
goal maven gives me a NoSuchGoalException for maven-license-plugin:register
in the xdoc plugin. Any ideas what might be causing this?
Yoway Buorn
Software Engineer
Imagery Systems Engineering
GENERAL DYNAMICS
Advanced
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 28 April 2004 02:00
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> I finally got it working. And well. Does all the things I had ever
> dreamed an aspectj-plugin would do. :)
>
> I will update the documentation files o
2004 2:00
> Para: Maven Users List
> Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> I finally got it working. And well. Does all the things I
> had ever dreamed an aspectj-plugin would do. :)
>
> I will update the documentation files over the next two or
> three da
ough about and but,
what do you think?
-Mensaje original-
De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:22
Para: 'Maven Users List'
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
Hi Charles / Carlos,
Carlos ha
56
> Para: Maven Users List
> Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> Ok, one more question. :)
> The current maven goal has as a preGoal. So,
> projectC.jar is created and then aspects are created on that
> jar. With we don't have to create the jar first and
s List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
I'd say we should go for 1.2. We can version the plugin as
version 3.0.
Thanks
-Vincent
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7;Maven Users List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> I'd say we should go for 1.2. We can version the plugin as
> version 3.0.
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
-
I'd say we should go for 1.2. We can version the plugin as version 3.0.
Thanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 April 2004 17:00
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
-iajc.html because injars has been deprecated.
Thanks
-Mensaje original-
De: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: viernes, 23 de abril de 2004 2:33
Para: Maven Users List
Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
I should be able to get to this next week.
/dev
guide/antTasks-iajc.html because injars has been deprecated.
Thanks
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: viernes, 23 de abril de 2004 2:33
> Para: Maven Users List
> Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
&
cy
properties. I had though about and but,
what do you think?
-Mensaje original-
De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:22
Para: 'Maven Users List'
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: RE: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
Hi Charles / Ca
dency
properties. I had though about and but,
what do you think?
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:22
> Para: 'Maven Users List'
> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: RE: aspectj plugi
004 18:11
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> A while back I inserted into my plugin.jelly file for the
aspecj
> plugin and its been going great. It gives me the ability to weave an
> aspect into a pre-compiled jar. This feature is avai
-Mensaje original-
> De: Charles N. Harvey III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 18:11
> Para: Maven Users List
> Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> A while back I inserted into my plugin.jelly file
> for the aspecj plu
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 April 2004 00:11
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
I've added the following line in my project.xml and the error seems to
stop :
src/java
Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote:
Now i'm getting this "already defin
it now, you can checkout maven-plugins/xdoc from
CVS
and run "maven plugin:install", but this isn't supported! :)
Cheers,
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Yujin Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2004 2:17 AM
To: Maven Users List
Subject: Re: 3 issues f
ril 2004 00:11
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> I've added the following line in my project.xml and the error seems to
> stop :
>
> src/java
>
>
> Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote:
>
> >Now i'm ge
That line is mandatory
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Daniel Henrique Alves Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: jueves, 22 de abril de 2004 0:11
> Para: Maven Users List
> Asunto: Re: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> I've added the following line i
-
> From: Yujin Kim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2004 2:17 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: 3 issues found while upgrading to rc2
>
>
> Hi
>
> I'm new on this list, but I also experienced this issue.
> I made a quick heck
I've added the following line in my project.xml and the error seems to
stop :
src/java
Daniel Henrique Alves Lima wrote:
Now i'm getting this "already defined" message for all my classes...
Can be a configuration problem ? I don't have any aspectj plugin
property defined in my project
ge-
From: Daniel Henrique Alves Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 April 2004 22:12
To: Maven Users List
Subject: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
Hi, everybody !
I'm trying to use aspectj plugin with maven 1.0rc2 but i'm getting
the following error:
aspectj:weave-internal:
hanks
-Vincent
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Henrique Alves Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21 April 2004 22:12
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> Hi, everybody !
>
> I'm trying to use aspectj plugi
.
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Daniel Henrique Alves Lima [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: miércoles, 21 de abril de 2004 22:12
> Para: Maven Users List
> Asunto: aspectj plugin & maven 1.0 rc2
>
> Hi, everybody !
>
> I'm trying to use aspectj
Hi, everybody !
I'm trying to use aspectj plugin with maven 1.0rc2 but i'm getting
the following error:
aspectj:weave-internal:
[move] Moving 1 files to /projects/new_project/target
copyInjars not required since 1.1.1.
[iajc] ignored: copyInJars at
[iajc] couldn't find aspectjrt.j
?
I've raised MAVEN-1242 in JIRA for the second problem
(clover/JDK131/XML) as you suggested.
As for the third problem it looks like it's similar to the issue
discussed in the "Problem with RC2's site goal" thread. I'm running it
on Unix as well.
Anyway,
discussed
in the "Problem with RC2's site goal" thread. I'm running it on Unix as
well.
Anyway, here's the additional output to the third problem :
- BEGIN SNIPPET ---
[echo] Generating /home/user/ft/target/docs/linkcheck.html from
/home/user/ft/target/linkche
> 1) JAVANCSS fails
> classloader 'maven.root' not found. Adding dependencies to
> the project
> classloader instead
Maven.root never existed, but I think these can be ignored as they are
putting it where it expected to be put.
> javancss:do-html:
> [java]
> [java] (Location of error un
XDOC 1.7 will correct this.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2004 3:31 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: AW: Problem with RC2's site goal
>
>
> I just upgraded as well and am getting t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I ran into what I think was the same problem about a month ago
(it's hard to tell because the original post in this thread did not
include the error messages or line number). I guess there is something
in RC2 that works in Windows doe
st in case: the XDoc-Plugin in Version 1.6
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christian Nill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. April 2004 18:38
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Problem with RC2's site goal
Hello,
This failed build cited below is driving me crazy. After migratin
Just in case: the XDoc-Plugin in Version 1.6
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Christian Nill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 19. April 2004 18:38
An: Maven Users List
Betreff: Problem with RC2's site goal
Hello,
This failed build cited below is driving me crazy.
Hello,
This failed build cited below is driving me crazy. After migrating from RC1 to RC2 the
site goal doesn't succeed any longer. The position on which the build process halts is
the
line marked with the arrow:
--->
What is that line doing? Where does
Hi All,
First, thanks for a terrific product. Now to my concerns. I have found some
issues while upgrading from rc1 to rc2 that I thought you might be
interrested in.
Here's what I did when upgrading:
1) Completely removed the rc1 (including ~/.maven directory)
2) Installed th
Would be required if you use any jelly:xml in cactus.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, 18 April 2004 12:23 AM
> To: 'Cactus Users List'; 'Maven Users List'
> Subject: RE: having trouble
Cactus Users List'
> Subject: Re: having troubles with maven RC2
>
> It is probably a problem in the maven cactus plugin.
>
> To solve it you can add the next dependance to the
> ~/.maven/plugins/cactus-maven-1.6dev-20040226/project.xml
>
>
> commons-
Fixed this morning in CVS. Will all work as of RC3.
- Brett
> -Original Message-
> From: Guillaume Lasnier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, 14 April 2004 3:25 AM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Pb with appserver plugin since rc2
>
>
> Hi,
Hi,
I am having a problem since the rc2 where invoking the goal
appserver:install does not create the tomcat instance directory under
maven.appserver.dir (defined in the plugin.properties of the appserver
plugin). After investigating the problem I realized that the goal calls
the goal
, April 08, 2004 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: HELP! - rc2 - resource exception on download
Thanx Martin - here's my environment spec, to possibly identify
similarities:
os: Sun Solaris 2.6
jdk: tried both 1.3.1, 1.4.1
locale: en
also, I have to go through a proxy for down
MAIL PROTECTED]
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: RE: HELP! - rc2 - resource excepti
Hi Max, just want to let you know that you are not alone on your planet,
I have the exact same problem : With RC2, I must install manually many
jars in my local repository, even when the correct version is present in
the remote repo and the project.properties file is correctly configured
(at least
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Washusen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 11:54 PM
> To: Maven Users List
> Subject: Re: HELP! - rc2 - resource exception on download
>
>I found that upgrading to RC2 also caused me some issues. I just
respond toSubject: Re: HELP! - rc2 - resource
exception on download
users
1 - 100 of 186 matches
Mail list logo