On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:07 AM wrote:
> Hello,
> Is there any special config to usage dhcp client on Guest VM using
> ovirtmgmt/ovirtmgmt vnic profile ?
>
> Currently I have a VM using the ovirtmgmt/ovirtmgmt NIC profile and this
> interface is configured as DHCP client, and this does not work
Ernest,you need to understand how things work under to hood to answer your
question.
If the traffic needs to pass through the NIC or not matters here.
How things work: For any VM network, a bridge is created on the host and
the vNIC from VM/s are connected to it using a tap device.
When one
Hello Edoardo,
Please provide some more details on where you want the bond.
Are you asking to define a bond on the host/hypervisor or inside the VM?
The later is a Linux task while the first is dome from the oVirt Manager
(Engine).
Thanks,
Edy.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:03 AM Edoardo Mazza
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 5:06 AM wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've a problem, all my ovirt hosts and vms are linked with a bonding mode
> 1(Active-Backup)2x10Gbps
> ovirt version:4.3
> topology:
>--eno2
>
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 6:27 PM Juhani Rautiainen <
juhani.rautiai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 3:01 PM Edward Haas wrote:
> >
> > On boot, VDSM attempts to apply its persisted network desired
> configuration through ifcfg.
> > Even though you
On boot, VDSM attempts to apply its persisted network desired configuration
through ifcfg.
Even though you may have fixed the ifcfg files, the persisted VDSM config
may had been set with DHCP, therefore your changes would get overwritten on
boot or when the synchronization was issued from Engine.
non formal documentation, it will be great.
As previously discussed we should note of course, that this feature is
> currently not officially supported, and adding the routes manually is a
> workaround.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:41 PM Edward Haas wro
As mentioned in this thread oVirt currently does not support customized
routes.
It supports only a host level default route and per network gateways
(default route per network).
If someone understands well the Linux network details, workarounds may be
applied to overcome oVirt limitations.
With
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 4:21 PM Brian Wilson wrote:
> Is there a resource available that would describe the configurable
> maximums for the Ovirt Engine and Ovirt Nodes.
>
> Things like:
> How many Logical Networks per host?
>
>
> If one does not exist does anyone have any experiences with
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 4:08 PM femi adegoke
wrote:
> Property: default route, host - true, DC - false
>
> I have 4 nics.
> bond0 = 2 x 10g
> eno1 = ovirtmgmt
> eno2 = for vm traffic.
>
> eno2 says it's out of sync, hosts network config differs from DC,
> default route: host - true, DC - false.
Where did you managed to get a 4.1 version from?
I would recommend using a supported version (4.2).
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 1:20 PM gregor wrote:
> During installation the firewall was enable or changed therefore I get
> an "NoRouteToHostException" from the Engine to the Host.
> After disabling
Unfortunately you are trying to implement an unsupported setup as discussed
already here:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/thread/O23ICVSO5SHTK5PX6ZFB7XB3ROWJOHAL/
* BTW, I have missed your responses. Please try to keep the ones who
participated in the thread on the email
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:57 PM Josep Manel Andrés Moscardó <
josep.mosca...@embl.de> wrote:
> Thanks for the tips,
> I have set up one NIC on VLAN 1 for storage, one NIC on VLAN 1 for
> Migration , 1 NIC on VLAN 1 for MGMT and one NIV on multiples VLANs for
> VM's.
>
> Does it make sense or I
Yes, not setting any VLAN on a network implies all packets will pass on to
that network from the nic it is configured on.
Please share your host `ip addr` , `brctl show` and the name of the network
you configured.
Do you see relevant packets on the host nic?
Thanks,
Edy.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at
order to connect the external network to the host
network using physnet.
- Introduce support in the OVN solution to enable trunk ports towards the
VM/s.
For the last point an RFE is required.
Thanks,
Edy.
>
> On 10/29/2018 2:39 PM, Edward Haas wrote:
>
> I think that this has been alre
I think that this has been already asked:
https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/users@ovirt.org/thread/USPMFD3NUAGE4PLOV62HSQDNEMHL37TU/?sort=date
It is not supported because of how traffic is passed to a vlan by its base
interface.
When packets arrive to the nic and on top of it there is a vlan,
You can enable NetworkManager, just make sure you restart vdsmd and
supervdsmd services on the machine.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 11:03 AM Nathanaël Blanchet
wrote:
> No problem to enable NM, it is now default activated on ovirt-node, so it
> should be ok on centos as well
> Le
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 5:23 PM Artem Tambovskiy
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a question indirectly related to oVirt - I have a VM with CentOS 6
> running on my cluster, which has 6 virtual interfaces (eth0 - eth5). Now
> its a time to do an upgrade to CentOS 7 based, and I did a VM clone to test
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:56 AM Edward Haas wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Gianluca Cecchi <
>> gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:53 AM Edward Haas wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <
>> gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> sup
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> Hello,
> supposing to have ovirt-ng node 4.2.6 and that ovirtmgmt config regarding
> DNS servers has to be updated, what is the correct way to proceed?
>
DNS should be editable from the network attachment window.
They are applied only
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:02 AM Edward Haas wrote:
>
>> Hello Florian,
>>
>> Thanks for checking the patch and posting the bug.
>>
>> You need to restart vdsmd and supervdsmd.
>> It should no
without upgrading all hosts, because this is a
> huge task.
> When I apply that patch only to this particular file, which service do I
> need to restart?
> I have restarted now all three vdsm services, but I think, I can't do that
> while VMs are running on the hosts, do I?
>
> LG
"txDropped": "0",
> "sampleTime": 1535970960.602359,
> "rx": "5916567956502",
> "txErrors": "0",
> "state": "up",
> "speed": "1",
&
If you manage to recreate this, please collect a few samples from what the
hypervisor reports back:
Run the command: vdsm-client Host getStats
Engine is calculating based on this information the rate.
(and the agent collects it from /sys/class/net//statistics/)
Please also mention on what OS you
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 10:22 AM, wrote:
> But when I do 'ip addr show' the ovirtmgmt interface is there and 'brctl
> show' shows that it's bridged with eno1. This suggests me that ovirtmgmt
> was not removed.
>
Nevertheless, it is no longer owned by oVirt/VDSM.
>
> The host is still listed in
Seems like the persistent configuration was erased and VDSM restored an
empty config, therefore, removed ovirtmgmt.
At 2018-07-29 22:07:29,037, the persistent config existed at:
/var/lib/vdsm/persistence/...
But when VDSM (or the whole host?) was restarted at 2018-07-29 22:17:21,558
, it was no
Please provide the supervdsm.log, most networking related logs are there.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Douglas Landgraf
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> - Might be useful the output from the command (host):
> - tree /var/lib/vdsm
>
> I noticed in host-deploy/engine.log the following error: "Cannot find a
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 1:08 PM, Fabrice Bacchella <
fabrice.bacche...@orange.fr> wrote:
>
>
> Le 24 juil. 2018 à 11:50, Dominik Holler a écrit :
>
> On Tue, 24 Jul 2018 11:04:58 +0200
> Fabrice Bacchella wrote:
>
> To monitoring the network interfaces, I have a script that check if
>
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Michael Watters
wrote:
> You should be able to use bonded interfaces with an IP on each VLAN
> Interface for the ovirt hosts and the engine. For example, here is the IP
> configuration for one of our VLANs.
>
> 10: bond3: mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP group
Please provide a description of your setup in a diagram and how you defined
all the network setting.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:42 PM, wrote:
> VM running with centos is not reaching to any other network other than
> oVirt node. I tried to apply no network filer, clean-filter while creating
>
ygm...@proofpoint.com>
wrote:
> I see, thanks. Maybe I could help add that scenario to the docs for you?
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Edward Haas [mailto:eh...@redhat.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:26 PM
>
> *To:* Justin Zygmont <jzygm...@proofpoint.com>
>
Hi Tibor,
Could you please provide the output of "ip address" and "vdsm-client Host
getCapabilities", "ethtool "?
Also, please mention what is the network name which is defined to use this
device.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:13 PM, Demeter Tibor wrote:
> Hi
IP level.
If you need VM communication, then an IP on a host network is not needed.
The vnics are connected through a bridge, not through a router. So traffic
from a VM is not passing through the L3 stack of the host and its routing
entries on the host do not effect that traffic.
>
>
>
>
>
&
Not sure if I understand what you are asking here, but the need for a
gateway per network has emerged from the need to support other host
networks (not VM networks) beside the management one.
As an example, migration and storage networks can be defined, each passing
dedicated traffic (one for
OVS switch support is experimental at this stage and in some cases when
trying to change from one switch to the other, it fails.
It was also not checked against a hosted engine setup, which handles
networking a bit differently for the management network (ovirtmgmt).
Nevertheless, we are interested
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Mark Steele wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> We had a storage crash early this morning that messed up a couple of our
> ovirt hosts. Networking seemed to be the biggest issue. I have decided to
> remove the bridge information in
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:12 PM, Dmitry Semenov wrote:
> I have a not big cluster on oVirt 4.2.
> Each node has a bond, that has several vlans in its turn.
> I use virtual networks OVN (External Provider -> ovirt-provider-ovn).
>
> While testing I have noticed that in virtual
I could not understand what you exactly have working now and what you are
looking to add.
Perhaps share a diagram or try to describe it in more details.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:00 AM, Wesley Stewart wrote:
> This might be a stupid question. But I am testing
Hi Alex,
Please provide Engine logs from when this is occurring and mention the
date/time we should focus at.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Alex K wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a 3 nodes ovirt 4.1 cluster, self hosted on top of glusterfs. The
> cluster
management (vlan 50) network and the other a VM
network (vlan 10).
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2018 11:31 PM, "Edward Haas" <eh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, maoz zadok <mao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>> I'm new
Engine.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 9:06 AM, maoz zadok <mao...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>> I'm new to oVirt, I'm trying with no success to set up the networking on
>
It is not clear to me what you are attempting to do exactly, but networking
settings should be handled through the setup networks window on Engine.
(Network->Hosts->->[specific host]->Interface tab -> SetupNetwork
You can then define bonds by dragging the nics one over the other.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:57 PM, Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi <gianluca.cec...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <
>> gianluca.cec..
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 8:18 PM, Andrei V wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Made a typo in previous message, sorry.
>
> I'm having difficulty to utilize 2nd NIC on HP Proliant server in order
> to connect guest VM to DMZ (engine, node and all other guest VMs are on
> internal zone).
>
> I
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Gianluca Cecchi <
> gianluca.cec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Marcin Mirecki
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Gianluca,
>>>
>>>
It is not clear what you did exactly, but, if I try to summarize, this
setup should work for you:
- Create a network (network->networks) and mark it as a VM network.
- Create a vNIC profile (network->networks->[network]->Vnic Profiles.
- Attach the network on the relevant NIC on your host
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Paul Dyer wrote:
> It seems that I am using net_persistence = ifcfg, and that I have lost the
> definitions for the logical networks.
>
Could you please share with us when and in what manner you lost these
definitions?
Is it re-creatable?
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:26 AM, Edward Clay <edward.c...@uk2group.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 16:01 -0700, Edward Clay wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2017-11-22 at 00:17 +0200, Edward Haas wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Edward Clay <edward.c...@uk2gr
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Edward Clay <edward.c...@uk2group.com>
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2017-11-21 at 09:00 +0200, Edward Haas wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Edward Clay <edward.c...@uk2group.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:24 AM, Edward Clay
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have an issue where hosts are configured with the public facing nework
> interface as the ovirtmgmt network and it's default route is added to a
> ovirt created table but not to the main routing table.
as a single switch and possibly create a bond across switches, but
> that is not something we have implemented.
>
> Thanks
> Bryan Sockel
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com>
> To: Petr Horacek <phora...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Bry
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Petr Horacek wrote:
> Hello Bryan,
>
> I'm afraid it is not possible with oVirt. You can only attach NICs to a
> bonding via the way Arthur suggested.
>
> Regards,
> Petr
>
> 2017-11-09 16:41 GMT+02:00 Bryan Sockel :
>
Hello Gianluca,
Not sure if I can help with this one, but could you just clarify from where
these DHCPv6 packets arrive?
You mentioned IPv6 is disabled on the VM, therefore I assume these are
ingress packets, right?
If this is the case, then perhaps the stack just drops the ingress packets
(as it
This is a limitation of the brctl tool.
Attempting to define a bridge named 'default' fails:
# brctl addbr default
add bridge failed: Invalid argument
Thanks,
Edy.
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Claudio Soprano wrote:
> Ok
>
> After installed the host, i need
be the mac as the VM. I don't see any reason for
> it to change from within the VM ou outside.
>
> What type of things would make the bridge stop learning a given VM mac
> address ?
>
> Fernando
>
> On 23/07/2017 07:51, Edward Haas wrote:
>
> Have you tried to use tcp
There is a security drawback involved as well, the VM/s can access the host
through that IP.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto <
lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Gianluca,
>
> As far as i know this shouldn't be a problem, you can have ips on any
> interface.
s. THe
> source mac address should be the mac as the VM. I don't see any reason for
> it to change from within the VM ou outside.
>
> What type of things would make the bridge stop learning a given VM mac
> address ?
>
> Fernando
>
> On 23/07/2017 07:51, Edward Haas wrote:
Have you tried to use tcpdump at the VM vNIC to examine if there is traffic
trying to get out from there? And with what source mac address?
Thanks,
Edy,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:36 PM, FERNANDO FREDIANI <
fernando.fredi...@upx.com> wrote:
> Has anyone had problem when using the ovirtmgmt
power of the review (gerrit/github), not a poor alternative.
The only advantage of github over gerrit in this respect is the already
existing rendering
of the md files.
>
>
> Nir
>
>
>> --
>> Martin Sivak
>> SLA
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Ed
Hi Alan,
The oVirt host agent (VDSM) has a multi-gateway/sourceroute feature which
allows gateways to be specified per network, in addition to the host level
routes.
By default and depending on which version you use, only the ovirtmgmt
(management) network defines the host default route but all
Hello,
The sub-interface you are referring to is just an alias for adding a
secondary IP to the same interface.
In networking terms, it is the same network with multiple subnets (some can
even overlap) and there is no separation between them.
oVirt networks are considered layer 2, as such, only
Hi all,
Came back to this thread due to a need to post some design documentation.
After fetching the ovirt-site and looking up where to start the document, I
remembered why I stopped using it.
After exploring several options, including the GitHub wiki, I think that
for the development
Hi,
Just adding to what Charles mentioned the patch that allowed this on the
host side: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/66127/
Note that for a tipical VM network, one would not usually define an IP
address, as it exposes the host to the VM/s.
When a vnic is connected to the network, it will have L2
If the VM/s vnic/s are connected to the same network, then traffic will be
forwarded by the bridge defined for that network, therefore for local VM/s
the traffic will not exit the host.
I'm not exactly clear what do you mean by "configured for bridging".
Thanks,
Edy.
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 2:30
Hi Kai,
DNS configuration should be supported in the next oVirt version (4.2).
In the meantime, editing the config manually as you did is the way to go.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Kai Wagner wrote:
> Ok I found /var/lib/vdsm/persistence/netconf/ and fixed
Hi Brad,
oVirt has originally supporting to set the host default gateway only for
the management network (ovirtmgmt).
The need to set it on a different network has been raised and for 4.1 an
intermediate solution has been given,
solving it in a more integral fashion in 4.2.
The way it is solved
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Alan Cowles wrote:
> Hey Dan,
>
> Here is a layout of my environment setup, and the primary issue I have run
> into, hopefully it helps to clear up the confusion.
>
> Configure 2 hosts identically, eth0, eth1, eth0.502 (mgmt), eth1.504
Hello Fernando,
There is no known problem with such delay figures.
The heartbeat to the hosts is of several seconds.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 5:11 PM, FERNANDO FREDIANI <
fernando.fredi...@upx.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I have a Engine which is hosted in a optimal location for the
I think that Gianluca is referring to: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/74707
We seem to block the scenario where a slave of a bond has a VLAN on top of
it.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> I am not sure I understand your question, though it
> cheers
> Ian
>
> On 16 March 2017 at 17:41, Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Ian,
>>
>> Please share your vdsm.log, supervdsm.log and Engine logs from the time
>> you had this failure.
>> (please specify the date/time you sta
Hello Ian,
Please share your vdsm.log, supervdsm.log and Engine logs from the time you
had this failure.
(please specify the date/time you started the process so we can know where
to look in the log)
Thanks,
Edy.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:31 AM, Ian Neilsen wrote:
>
le at the moment.
As Rogério mentioned, define the VLAN/s on the VM vnic.
>> 2017-03-11 17:47 GMT-03:00 Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com>:
>>
>> Passing a trunk to the vnic is supported long ago.
>> Just create a network over a nic/bond that is connected to a trunk port
>&
Passing a trunk to the vnic is supported long ago.
Just create a network over a nic/bond that is connected to a trunk port and
do not define any VLAN (we call it non vlan network).
In oVirt, a non-vlan network will ignore the VLAN tag and will forward the
packets as is onward.
It is up to the VM
Hello Ben,
It will help if you provide a diagram of what you would like to achieve,
it may help understand your need better.
With oVirt the VM networks are implemented on the hosts as bridges
with one port bind to a nic/bond/vlan for external access.
The connectivity itself on the switch is a
It's unclear what is the current status of your network configuration,
perhaps you can share
your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts content and the output of "ip addr".
Please also include the following information:
- What are the networks you expect to have on the host?
- The persisted VDSM config
st2 to run updates. The Switch type is OVS so are
> there any pitfalls related to changing that to legacy?
>
I would recommend starting from scratch, do not attempt to move from OVS to
legacy on that version.
>
> >>> Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com> 02/09/17 12:55 AM >&g
We have a gap regarding DNS settings and work is under way to allow DNS to
be set from the manager (Engine).
You seem to got into a loop here, due to the way oVirt agent (VDSM) handles
DNS and its configuration.
Please follow these steps and let us know if it helps:
- Update the entries in
to Ovirt, so it would be really
> helpful if you can tell me which ones??
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 4:39 PM, Edward Haas <eh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Please package the logs (tar or zip) and send them.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:05
tch/db.sock:
> connected
> 2017-02-06T09:46:08.039Z|7|bridge|INFO|ovs-vswitchd (Open vSwitch)
> 2.6.90
>
> What should I do now?
>
> The engine says that "Host host2 does not comply with the cluster Default
> networks, the following networks are missing on hos
Your described setup seems correct.
Please attempt to isolate the issue by trying to pass traffic between the
hosts, taking the VM/s out of the equation.
You may also consider connecting the hosts directly to each other, to make
sure this is not a switch problem.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Mon, Feb 6,
It does show the same Guest Agent Data on the user portal.
Assuming you have added the UserRole permission to the VM, you should see
the VM on the user portal under the Extended tab, similar to what is seen
on the admin portal.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 5:25 PM, Alexandr Krivulya
:2017-02-03
> 08:30:01,013::commands::69::root::(execCmd)
> /usr/bin/taskset --cpu-list 0-47 /usr/sbin/tc qdisc show (cwd None)
> MainProcess|jsonrpc/0::DEBUG::2017-02-03
> 08:30:01,016::commands::93::root::(execCmd)
> SUCCESS: = ''; = 0
> MainProcess|jsonrpc/0::DEBUG::2017-02-03 08
Hello Shalabh,
Please provide the logs from your node:
- messages
- vdsm/vdsm.log, vdsm/supervdsm.log
It may be that you are missing openvswitch installed, although VDSM should
not require it for its operation.
Thanks,
Edy.
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Shalabh Goel
The server seems to have a special network configuration that limits its
communication to the Gateway through SCOPE definition.
IPADDR=176.9.146.137
NETMASK=255.255.255.255
SCOPE="peer 176.9.146.129"
oVirt host does not support such a setup.
VDSM acquires the iface and tries to configure it based
Hello,
For OVS, you should use oVirt 4.1.
You should also note that you may experience problems, as we have not fully
tested it in all scenarios.
There are also some features we do not support with it (like QoS).
Please use the latest version (4.1 is a good start) and let us know how it
goes.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 11:46 PM, paul.greene.va wrote:
> Oh, I stumbled onto something relevant.
>
> I noticed on the host that was working correctly that the ifcfg-enp6s0
> file included a line for "BRIDGE=ovirtmgmt", and the other two didn't have
> that line. When
help you debug using tcpdump, just send me the details for
remote connection on private.
It will also help if you join the vdsm or ovir IRC channels.
>
> On Jan 1, 2017 01:26, "Edward Haas" <eh...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:50
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
> I currently only have two IPs assigned to me...I can try and take another,
> but that may not route out of the rack. I've got the VM on one of the IPs
> and the host on the other currently.
>
> The switch is a
On Sun, Jan 1, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Jim Kusznir wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I've got my ovirt cluster up, but am facing an odd situation that I
> haven't pinned down. I've also run into someone on the IRC channel with
> the same bug, no solutions as of yet. Google also hasn't
Guys,
In oVirt, when a host is added to the cluster it must have a NIC/Bond for
management.
Currently, it does not support anything else, unless one uses hooks to fake
things (but I do not recommend it, it will just make things complex and may
collide with other options).
I am not sure if such a
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Kenneth Bingham wrote:
> I suspect this has something to do with macspoofing because I found that I
> was able to start a guest by changing the virtual network interface profile
> to remove network filtering. I verified the guests are able to start
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 5:57 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Perhaps showing my ignorance, but...
>
> Can't you set up three virtual tagged bridges in ovirt? Each bridge
> would be tagged with the proper vlans, and then connect to the correct
>
A tagged/vlan network has one VLAN
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 4:31 PM, David MOUCHOIR
wrote:
> Hi
> Does anyone knows how to configure a VM nic with more than 1 vNIC ?
> Or How to create a vNIC with 2 tagged VLANs ?
>
> I need to transmit 2 tagged (or more) VLANs to only 1 interface in my VM
> Regards
>
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Clint Boggio wrote:
> That is correct. The ib0 in all of the HV nodes are accessing iSCSI and
> NFS over that IB link successfully.
>
> What we are trying to do now is create a network that utilizes the second
> IB port (ib1) on the cards
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Michal Skrivanek <
michal.skriva...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:54, knarra wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have installed latest upstream master on RHEL7.2. When i try to put
> a host in maintenance which runs HE vm i see that vm does
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Chris Cowley
wrote:
> I am installing on a 3 node cluster, with gluster as my storage. Each node
> has a pair of bonds. At the moment, my intention is to use bond0 for all VM
> traffic, with management (and thus ovirtmgmt) on bond1 along
On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:38 AM, Thing wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have installed IPA across 3 nodes. In order to point the ovirt server
> at
> > the new IPA/DNS servers and to clean up I ran
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:55 PM, Fernando Frediani <
fernando.fredi...@upx.com.br> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Quick question between Linux Bridge which is used by default in oVirt and
> macvtap which can be used in libvirt/KVM.
>
> What are the downsides or limitations of using macvtap ? Does it have any
>
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Maxence Sartiaux wrote:
> Okay, i found a workaround.
>
> - Create empty ifcfg-lan on all hosts (touch /etc/sysconfig/network-
> scripts/ifcfg-lan)
> - Assign the bridge to the bond (Ovirt only add MTU=1500 in the file)
> - Unassign the bridge
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo