On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 16:48 +, Fraser Adams wrote:
> ... TBH I mainly mentioned it because when I was going
> through my exercise of trying out various AMQP 1.0 subscribers I was
> starting to find the:
>
> --connection-options {protocol:amqp1.0}
>
> A little bit less aesthetically pleasing
> From: "Fraser Adams"
> Sent: Friday, February 7, 2014 10:43:06 AM
> Note that for qpid::messaging this stuff is all in the connection
> options, the actual "URL" is usually just set as just a basic
> :, though actually I *think* that it is an AMQP 0.10 URL and
> you can actually do amqp:: thoug
On 07/02/14 16:00, Gordon Sim wrote:
On 02/07/2014 03:43 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
I do rather wonder that for AMQP 1.0 if the URL could be improved to
accept something like:
amqp://[][:@][:][:]
I think for consistency it would be better to drop the part
and use amqp/amqps as the scheme there.
On 02/07/2014 03:43 PM, Fraser Adams wrote:
I do rather wonder that for AMQP 1.0 if the URL could be improved to
accept something like:
amqp://[][:@][:][:]
I think for consistency it would be better to drop the part and
use amqp/amqps as the scheme there.
Which would make it look more like
Hi Chuck,
I think that the
http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.24/programming/book/connection-options.html
book is indeed where most people would tend to look, but it's not quite
complete
The qpid::messaging API doxygen docs
http://qpid.apache.org/releases/qpid-0.24/messaging-api/cpp/api/
On 02/07/2014 03:00 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote:
I'm writing a how-to document for the Apache.NMS.AMQP Provider (a .NET
subsystem to provide AMQP support to http://activemq.apache.org/nms/). I'm
looking for a pointer to a description of the C++ Messaging API connection URL.
The C++ connection option
I'm writing a how-to document for the Apache.NMS.AMQP Provider (a .NET
subsystem to provide AMQP support to http://activemq.apache.org/nms/). I'm
looking for a pointer to a description of the C++ Messaging API connection URL.
The C++ connection options are easy enough to find:
http://qpid.apache
Great! Thanks!
-Steve
> On Feb 7, 2014, at 7:38 AM, "Justin Ross" wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
>> On the Contributors page, in thanks section, it would be good to mention
>> Coverity for allowing us use of Coverity Scan to do static analysis.
>
> You're rig
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 03:51 PM, Alan Conway wrote:
>>
>> I never noticed "developer central" before - very handy set of
>> shortcuts!
>
> Indeed! I would think this was useful to users and developers alike. Could
> we make it more prominent somehow?
It
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Steve Huston wrote:
> On the Contributors page, in thanks section, it would be good to mention
> Coverity for allowing us use of Coverity Scan to do static analysis.
You're right, of course! I've added them to the companies section of
the contributors page:
ht
On 06/02/14 19:07, CLIVE wrote:
Hi,
[snip]
The first use case requires the dynamic creation of Receivers, but
before creating a new receiver, I would like to know if I already have
a receiver that would match the required binding. This is not possible
at the moment because the binding matchi
11 matches
Mail list logo
