On Wednesday, November 17, 2004, 11:32:41 AM, Chris Santerre wrote:
That is correct, only the reg domains go in.
Yes, the goal is to list the registrar domains and also to check
those in SURBL applications. The wildcarded parts of subdomains
are usually ignored. We did that deliberately to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ran into a problem importing into postgres. Running with -D didn't help
other than pinpointing to a problem while importing msgids. postgres
logs showed:
2004-11-17 16:20:41 [14205] ERROR: value too long for type character
varying(200)
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rupa Schomaker wrote:
[snip]
2004-11-17 16:20:41 [14205] ERROR: value too long for type character
varying(200)
The bayes_seen table has msgid as a varchar(200).
Changing it to 'test' fixed it for me. Either spamassassin should
err,
At 08:53 -0500 11/15/2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
1) are you SURE you want allow_user_rules set?
positive.
Unless you trust all your users this can be a bit risky.
I trust all my users.
Or, to put it more specifically, I trust the three or four who might bother
to edit their files and the rest
Mike, adding that switch to syslog didnt seem to work. I found some other
posts through google which claim that stopping syslogd and spamd and
starting them again fixes this up, but it hasnt worked for me.
If anyone else has any ideas, they would be greately appreciated.
Thanks,
Regards, Dimitry
brian wrote:
After upgrading to 3.0.1 I've been having problems with bayes. This may
be a question for the mimedefang guys, but I'll start here.
I have upgraded the databases, and its now reading correctly, as I get
bayes scoring now. However autoupdates are failing because of lock
files...
Jason
The default SpamAssassin rules are a good start, but what extra rules
are you running?
There are some very good ones on www.ruleemporium.com.
Also are you using any of the URI RBL's from www.surbl.org? These can
help alot too.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State
Hi
if you are using MailScanner to front end SA, Mailwatch can help - no
cut and paste, but you can run sa-learn on the messages to 'correct'
bayes view of spam.
Also if you have a imap accessible email server (not Exchange 2000 of
later as it mangles the headers) there are quite a few perl
Is there a way of reducing or caping CPU usage spamd by issuing commands or
making changes in config?
Regards
Tunc
Matt Kettler wrote:
First, a word of warning.. 2.63 is subject to DoS if a carefully made
malformed message comes in. Not a huge security risk, but I'd at least
consider upgrading to 2.64 or higher in the near future. (2.64 should be
an easy upgrade from 2.63.. 3.0.x might be a bit more
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=1777629
This poor guy is having some strange issues with SpamAssassin and
RulesDuJour that I can't manage to recreate.
Anyone care to take a look and offer a suggestion or two? :)
The only spam that's getting through on my system these days seems to have
'meds' and 'rx' in common. I would have thought that antidrug was the
ruleset to pick up stuff such as this:
--Spam Start---
Subject: meds saving zone
your
One of my customers received a blank message from Korea which spoofed an
invalid email address on his domain. I was looking at the message and it
contained 3 distinct X-NAS message headers that I don't recognize:
X-NAS-Classification: 0
X-NAS-MessageID: 43604
X-NAS-Validation:
Hi,
I may be mistaken but i think that that's a Norton AntiSpam header.
Best regards.
Bruno Guerreiro
-Original Message-
From: Keith Hackworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 12:31 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: X-NAS-* headers
One of my
Dear all,
I need to use some kind of antispam and decided to use spamassassin.
We just installed and started it but appear not work as well.
I use RedHat 7.3 + kernel 2.4.20-28.7 + sendmail 8.11.6 + procmail 3.22 +
mailscanner 3.27 + Fprot 3.13b (antivirus) + Spamassassin 2.64-1.
Some one can
Hi
so whats the problem?
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic Ltd
tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Jfabricio - Greenwich International wrote:
Dear all,
I need to use some kind of antispam and decided to use spamassassin.
We just installed and started it but appear not work as
At 11:35 AM 11/18/2004 +, Peter Campion-Bye wrote:
I've put in a custom rule to pick up meds in the subject:
header PCB_MEDSSubject =~ /(?:\bmeds|meds\b)/i
describePCB_MEDSSubject contains meds
score PCB_MEDS5
erm.. I'd
Dear Martin,
Thanks for yours quickly reply.
I started spamd yesterday morning, but it does not stop any spam
message.
For example, I usually receive about 130 spams every morning. I checked
this morning and the same number of spam entered on my inbox.
TKS
Jfabricio
On torsdag 18 november 2004, 15:58, Jfabricio - Greenwich International
wrote:
I started spamd yesterday morning, but it does not stop any
spam message. For example, I usually receive about 130 spams every
morning. I checked this morning and the same number of spam entered
on my inbox.
Oh,
J
MailScanner does not use spamd/spamc in order to scan emails, but calls
Spamassassin directly via Perl.
If email is flowing and you've not stopped sendmail before the
MailScanner install then that's the problem.
Also MailScanner 3.x is kinda old (a couple of years at leaast), may I
suggest
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On torsdag 18 november 2004, 15:58, Jfabricio - Greenwich International
wrote:
I started spamd yesterday morning, but it does not stop any
spam message. For example, I usually receive about 130 spams every
morning. I checked this morning and the same number of spam
At 06:58 AM 11/18/2004, you wrote:
Dear Martin,
Thanks for yours quickly reply.
I started spamd yesterday morning, but it does not stop any spam
message.
For example, I usually receive about 130 spams every morning. I
checked
this morning and the same number of spam
I've had servers log with incorrect time before and it was due to the
fact that I was in a different timezone than my server and I set my TZ
environment variable to reflect my timezone and not the timezone that
the server was located. So, when I restarted the server, it inheireted
my TZ variable
On Nov 17, 2004, at 11:07 AM, Michael W Cocke wrote:
Is this normal? I would have expected them to be using the same
amount of memory, unless there's a leak somewhere.
Try not to confuse memory usage with memory leak. It is a very common
trap.
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
+1-301-869-4449 x806
On Thursday 18 November 2004 04:20 am, LOGS (Tunc Eresen) wrote:
Is there a way of reducing or caping CPU usage spamd by issuing commands
or making changes in config?
Regards
Tunc
If you must, nice it down to a lower priority. In your startup script add a
nice adjustment to the spamd
I noticed that Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf describes the search algorithm for
the message sender as follows:
| SpamAssassin will attempt to discover the address used in the
| 'MAIL FROM:' phase of the SMTP transaction that delivered this
| message, if this data has been made available by the SMTP
On 11/17/2004 12:53 PM, Martin wrote:
|I'm looking to use the RelayCountry plugin data but there |doesn't
seem to be any rules. Anybody know of any?
Here's some rules I use, utilising the nerds.dk lists, not sure if its
what you are looking for.
That works perfectly, and doesn't even
Hello,
I'm running spamassassin 3.0.1 on linux 2.4, using milter-spamc to talk
with sendmail milter.
I'm seeing a heavy cpu usage in some process of spamd for a long time
and sometimes they just hang there until I kill them(usage goes from 80%
to 97%).
Also my system is reporting a high iowait
Hi,
Today I updated spamassassin from 2.63 to 3.01 on a linux machine. My
init script does not work anymore because when I kill spamd it creates
five new processes. So, I cannot start the daemon again.Any help is
appreciated. Here is the info.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# ps -ef|grep spam
[EMAIL
At 04:13 PM 11/18/2004, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
I'm seeing a heavy cpu usage in some process of spamd for a long time and
sometimes they just hang there until I kill them(usage goes from 80% to 97%).
Also my system is reporting a high iowait load and a high disk usage that
stops if a
I've been watching these messages concerning high memory and cpu usage
in spamd. In fact it caused me to wait until 3.01. But I have upgraded,
running now for several days. Spamd is quite well behaved, not catching
as much as 2.64 was, but I am still tuning.
I don't know if it matters but I'll
At 05:04 PM 11/18/2004, Pradeep wrote:
Today I updated spamassassin from 2.63 to 3.01 on a linux machine. My init
script does not work anymore because when I kill spamd it creates five new
processes. So, I cannot start the daemon again.Any help is appreciated.
Here is the info.
[EMAIL
Hi Martin,
I think I may have found the issue...It looks like these domains were
added in the auto-whitelist file which were probably decreasing the
score below the standard threshold of 5. The extra rulesets you see
are actually coming from ruleemporium.com.(SARE). That's why I was so
On Nov 11 at 20:31, Matt Kettler spoke:
Besides adjusting your administrator with a clue-by-four, you can run it
through spamassassin --remove-markup
Well I can't use perl on this site.
I'm trying to pipe it throgh `reformime -s 1.2 -e | formail -b`.
This only affects the date in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
At 05:04 PM 11/18/2004, Pradeep wrote:
Today I updated spamassassin from 2.63 to 3.01 on a linux machine. My init
script does not work anymore because when I kill spamd it creates five new
processes. So, I cannot start the
At 06:05 PM 11/18/2004, Justin Mason wrote:
Kill -9 is NOT a good thing to use for general shutdown of processes, it's
really only one step better than having to pull the power plug on the box.
yep -- in fact, it's pretty much equivalent to pulling the power
plug on that process. kill -15 is a
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 06:53:19AM -0800, Rupa Schomaker wrote:
Some questions:
Is bytea really necessary? If I follow the path of the patch, the bytea
change was done prior to adding the index. Since the tokens are binary
data it is probably more correct through, especially if one has a
We ran the 3-beta for a while and recently built out a machine to start
building up our bayes and for a 1:1 comparison of spam scores. We are
running SURBL, multiple SARE rules and AWL/Bayes with MySQL. The spamd
and MySQL processes are running on a shared box for right now. Box
specs are
Hi list,
this is probably some easy configuration issue, but it's now almost 1am
and I just spent the last 4 hours upgrading my system so by now I
wouldn't see a solution if it hit me in the face.
I have everything working, except for spamassassin. I had it working
earlier, but I decided to
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 06:05 PM 11/18/2004, Justin Mason wrote:
Kill -9 is NOT a good thing to use for general shutdown of
processes, it's
really only one step better than having to pull the power plug on
the box.
yep -- in fact, it's pretty much equivalent to pulling the power
plug on that
40 matches
Mail list logo
