Re: SA 3.0.2? Why no mail from announce@spamassassin.apache.org

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:52:31 +0100, "Maurice Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >By just checking the SA website I found out that there is a 3.0.2 release >from 2004-12-16. > >Why isn't there an announce from the announce list? The last announcement that I received from the SpamAssassin-announce l

Re: AWL confusion

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 17:02:06 -0500, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why on earth is a 17-score given to an address in an auto white-list? > Shouldn't an address get a negative score (or, at least, a neutral zero) > if it's in a WL? You may want to read up on the AWL in the WIKI - it explains

AWL confusion

Me new email host is using SA 3.0.1 and I have been watching what gets caught and what doesn't so I can do some user_prefs tuning if necessary. But I don't understand what is going on with this AWL stuff. The host service has it turned on and I get a non-spam message with this score report in i

RE: trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN

|-Original Message- |From: alan premselaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 19 December 2004 03:16 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN | |for some reason i'm getting SPF failures during the 'make test' phase: | |t/spf...Not

Re: SpamAssassin doesn't parse any email

> Yeah, thanks all. I found my problem. That was a syntax errors in my local.cf. > I used the old one (for 2.x). I need some help again. My local.cf: required_hits 5.0 rewrite_header subject [*SPAM*] report_safe 1 use_bayes 1 bayes_auto_learn 1 skip_rbl_checks 0 ok_languages all o

Re: more spam gets through since SA 3.x -- Beg to differ

I read that same install file. But, it just wasn't so... RO Florian Effenberger wrote: Hi, 3.0 requires a higher version of Perl than 2.63 did. I don't recall the exact version required, but I know it is somewhere in the release or upgrade notes. Vague memory says that maybe 5.6.2 was the magic

Re: "uninitialized value" and other errors with SA 3.0.2

On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 10:48:07AM -0500, Brian Kendig wrote: > And when I call it from my Exim 4.43 mail server through SA-Exim, these > errors appear in my mail.log: > > spamd[16237]: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 54762 > spamd[16245]: processing message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> f

Re: SA 3.0.2? Why no mail from announce@spamassassin.apache.org

On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 01:52:31PM +0100, Maurice Lucas wrote: > > Why isn't there an announce from the announce list? > Probably stuck in a moderation queue somewhere. I'm pretty sure I sent one there. Michael pgppz54puBsJ6.pgp Description: PGP signature

"uninitialized value" and other errors with SA 3.0.2

I'm getting errors when I try to use SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (and the same errors with 3.0.1), on Mac OS X 10.3.7. Specifically, when I call it from a command line with no arguments (same as if I give it "-t < sample-spam.txt"): $ spamassassin Global symbol "$re_strict" requires explicit package na

SA 3.0.2? Why no mail from announce@spamassassin.apache.org

By just checking the SA website I found out that there is a 3.0.2 release from 2004-12-16. Why isn't there an announce from the announce list? Archives on GMANE and MARC are both out of date. http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists with kind regards, Met vriendelijke groet, Maurice Lucas

Re: more spam gets through since SA 3.x -- Beg to differ

Hi, 3.0 requires a higher version of Perl than 2.63 did. I don't recall the exact version required, but I know it is somewhere in the release or upgrade notes. Vague memory says that maybe 5.6.2 was the magic number; but that could be wrong. I just checked it - 5.61 is sufficient, according to th

Re: more spam gets through since SA 3.x -- Beg to differ

Hi Richard, Perl 5.6.1 simply didn't work properly. It caused Amavis & SA to strip emails of their subject lines, failed to scan properly, had real problems with spawning multiple processes, and reported errors in spamassassin --lint --debug, many of which I was eventually able to resolve; but

Re: more spam gets through since SA 3.x -- Beg to differ

> > Florian, what version of Perl are you using? Post your amavis.conf file. > > 5.6.1, the Debian standard one. 3.0 requires a higher version of Perl than 2.63 did. I don't recall the exact version required, but I know it is somewhere in the release or upgrade notes. Vague memory says that may

Re: trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN

I think my impression of the note I saw was that this was considered annoying and that someone ought to look at it. (That impression may be wrong, as I said, I really wasn't paying a lot of attention.) So this almost certainly is still a problem in 3.02, since that was just released in the last c

Re: trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN

From: "alan premselaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Loren Wilton wrote: > >>for some reason i'm getting SPF failures during the 'make test' phase: > >> > >>t/spf...Not found: helo_pass = SPF_HELO_PASS > >># Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 > >> Not found: pass =

Re: more spam gets through since SA 3.x -- Beg to differ

Hi Richard, First and foremost, I found it necessary to upgrade to perl 5.8.x. The earlier version (5.6.1 -- installed with Debian) was insufficient for running Spamassassin under Amavis under my configuration. what do you mean by insufficient? Did you receive error messages or what type of proble

Re: "--max-conn-per-child=5" allows spam leakage

Hi, I ran with this configured into my spamd startup incantation. I noticed about 6 out of 200 spams would "leak" right through without any Spam markings whatsoever. If I subsequently fed them to "spamassassin -t could you please check whether it only has "low" scores or it did receive absolutely

Re: trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN

Loren Wilton wrote: for some reason i'm getting SPF failures during the 'make test' phase: t/spf...Not found: helo_pass = SPF_HELO_PASS # Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 Not found: pass = SPF_PASS # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2 t/spf...

upgrading to 3.0 from 2.64 note

I recently upgraded my spamassassin 2.64 to 3.02 on three machines (two Solaris, one FreeBSD). The Solaris installs went according to the upgrade notes/wiki, but the FreeBSD machine was a bit different, in that It required the "Storable" module from CPAN. once I installed it, it went smooth. just

Re: trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN

> for some reason i'm getting SPF failures during the 'make test' phase: > > t/spf...Not found: helo_pass = SPF_HELO_PASS > # Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 > Not found: pass = SPF_PASS > # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2 > t/spf

Re: ISP Awarded $1 Billion in Anti-Spam Suit

From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sat Dec 18, 3:25 PM ET > > > >Technology - AP > > > > DAVENPORT, Iowa - A federal judge has awarded an Internet > > service provider more tha

trying to install 3.0.2 via CPAN

for some reason i'm getting SPF failures during the 'make test' phase: t/spf...Not found: helo_pass = SPF_HELO_PASS # Failed test 1 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 Not found: pass = SPF_PASS # Failed test 2 in t/SATest.pm at line 530 fail #2 t/spf...

OT: ISP Awarded $1 Billion in Anti-Spam Suit

> Sat Dec 18, 3:25 PM ET > >Technology - AP > > DAVENPORT, Iowa - A federal judge has awarded an Internet > service provider more than $1 billion in what is believed to be > the l

"--max-conn-per-child=5" allows spam leakage

I ran with this configured into my spamd startup incantation. I noticed about 6 out of 200 spams would "leak" right through without any Spam markings whatsoever. If I subsequently fed them to "spamassassin -t