At 11:58 PM 10/16/2005, Monty Ree wrote:
Hello, all.
I have used well spamassassin at my local mailserver.
But spamassassin can work at same mailserver using procmail.
It definitely doesn't have to work on the same mailserver as your procmail.
Mine doesn't.
I'd suggest that a very large nu
Title: AWL maintenance...
I just though I’d share this with everyone.
I noticed that our backend MySQL data instance was running a little slow recently with more of a load on it. This instance is shared between 4 front end servers so I figured maybe we were getting a little more of a load
On Montag, 17. Oktober 2005 16:52 Spam Admin wrote:
> So, to temporarily resolve this, I bumped our kill_level to 5.9 and
> am monitoring it; my false positives have pretty much disappeared. Of
> course, I've seen a *slight* increase in fasle negatives versus 2.63,
> so I'll be tuning.
I use 5.0 (
Hancock, Scott wrote:
> Are there any other rules similar to
>
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_adult.cf
>
> This rule (on my system anyway) will only find f in subject but not
> f'ed. So for instance "f'ed in the a" for a subject is not scored.
>
> I don't trust myself to write
From: Craig McLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In addition to all the good responses you've had I would add that if
> you keep the spam after learning, as I do (in case the bayes DB get
> killed) then it can sometimes take a while for sa-learn to finish,
> even though it will skip messages it ha
Are there any other rules similar to
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/70_sare_adult.cf
This rule (on my system anyway) will only find f in subject but not
f'ed. So for instance "f'ed in the a" for a subject is not scored.
I don't trust myself to write regex's but I will if that is my only
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M.Lewis wrote:
>
> Is there a best practices recommendation for how often to run sa-learn ?
In addition to all the good responses you've had I would add that if you
keep the spam after learning, as I do (in case the bayes DB get killed)
then it can so
I'm looking to be able to do a system such as follows:
local.cf (global spam settings)
===
required_hits 100
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag [DEFINITE_SPAM]
body ANG_KILL_RULE_FALSE_VIRUS_SCANNER /\+\+\+ Attachment: No Virus found/
describe ANG_KILL_RULE_FALSE_VIRUS_SCA
From: Spam Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Last week I upgraded our system from SA v2.63 to v3.1; I am
> pleased at how well the process went. However, I immediately
> began to see a lot of false positives. Primarily, it seems
> that v3.1 has increased the BAYES_00 from -4 to -2.599, and
>
Spam Admin wrote:
> I've been running SA as our main inbound SMTP gateway in front of our
> GroupWise system for about 18 months now. I process, filter, and quarantine
> for the whole enterprise and do not offer individual user control. I use
> postfix, amavisd, SA w/ Bayes, RDJ, Razor, some min
I've been running SA as our main inbound SMTP gateway in front of our GroupWise
system for about 18 months now. I process, filter, and quarantine for the whole
enterprise and do not offer individual user control. I use postfix, amavisd, SA
w/ Bayes, RDJ, Razor, some minimal SMTP-level RBLs, CA
At 02:51 AM 10/17/2005, Michael Hrivnak wrote:
My install of SA 3.1.0 uses the option to encapsulate identified spam as an
attachment. I keep all of these messages for future bayes purposes, and I'd
like to be able to extract the encapsulated messages.
Specifically, I'd like to allow other baye
On Samstag, 8. Oktober 2005 12:51 Anders Norrbring wrote:
> > http://zmi.at/x/ebay.txt
> Nope. It's a scam, all eBay e-mails originates from ebay.com
> ebay.co.uk ebay.de etc...
> The e-mail you copied originates from easynet.de
Then why isn't the "spoofed eBay" rule hitting? It should be improve
13 matches
Mail list logo
