Re: Multiple X-Envelope-From and SPF

2008-05-09 Thread ram
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 01:44 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 23:19, mouss wrote: configure postfix to replace previous ones /^(X\-Envelope\-From:.*)/ REPLACE X-$1 envelope from can here be forged Precisely what I am afraid of. But the issue is whatever header I use

Re: triplets.txt

2008-05-09 Thread Matt Kettler
Jeremy Fairbrass wrote: Hi, could someone kindly tell me what the file triplets.txt is used for, and if I need to have it in my rules directory or not? It's used for the TextCat plugin (which provides the ok_languages option). While you should have it in your rules directory, it won't

Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam

2008-05-09 Thread Steve Bertrand
All a spam program would have to do is say [EMAIL PROTECTED] posts lots to that list. His address must be a trusted subscriber. Well, here's one more post from him, muhahaha. If Bob posts a lot to a list(s) and is respected within said list(s), then the other subs of that list will immediately

Re: IE Parse bug olso in SpamAssassin ?

2008-05-09 Thread Justin Mason
Kevin W. Gagel writes: - Original Message - Do you have a reference for discussion of this IE Parsing bug that led you to mention this oddball URI annotation format in the first place? There might be references in that to the definition of the format. John, I'm not sure if

Re: IE Parse bug olso in SpamAssassin ?

2008-05-09 Thread Joseph Brennan
Benny Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i just started this thread to be sure IE parse bug is not in sa aswell since i could see domains not detecked in spam, but i got it now You know about it being an IE parse bug, and that seems to be news to the rest of us. How'd you hear about it?

Re: triplets.txt

2008-05-09 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 08:16:29AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: Hi, could someone kindly tell me what the file triplets.txt is used for, and if I need to have it in my rules directory or not? It's used for the TextCat plugin (which provides the ok_languages option). While you should have it

False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Jeff Koch
Hi: Our users are getting false positives with hits on 4.2 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK and are saying they are 100% certain that the email was sent from MS Outlook Express. Is this a known problem or are these users doing something wrong? Best Regards, Jeff Koch

Re: Multiple X-Envelope-From and SPF

2008-05-09 Thread mouss
Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 23:19, mouss wrote: configure postfix to replace previous ones /^(X\-Envelope\-From:.*)/ REPLACE X-$1 envelope from can here be forged the header check above will rewrite any such header received from the internet. so forgery is not

Re: Multiple X-Envelope-From and SPF

2008-05-09 Thread mouss
ram wrote: On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 01:44 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Thu, May 8, 2008 23:19, mouss wrote: configure postfix to replace previous ones /^(X\-Envelope\-From:.*)/ REPLACE X-$1 envelope from can here be forged Precisely what I am afraid of. But the issue

fractional scores and syntax

2008-05-09 Thread Robert - elists
I am not sure how to ask this We have a test URIBL # # # ### # urirhssub URIBL_TEST uri.test.local.A 2 body URIBL_TEST eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_TEST') describe URIBL_TEST Contains an URL listed in the TEST

Re: fractional scores and syntax

2008-05-09 Thread D Hill
On Fri, 9 May 2008 at 09:42 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated: I am not sure how to ask this We have a test URIBL # # # ### # urirhssub URIBL_TEST uri.test.local.A 2 body URIBL_TEST

RE: fractional scores and syntax

2008-05-09 Thread Robert - elists
If you are referring to this: [42778] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, test_rule .1 is not valid for score, skipping: score test_rule .1 [42778] warn: lint: 1 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for more information You have to prefix all decimal score

Re: False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 09.05.08 12:08, Jeff Koch wrote: Our users are getting false positives with hits on 4.2 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK and are saying they are 100% certain that the email was sent from MS Outlook Express. Is this a known problem or are these users doing something wrong? may be... can you show

Re: triplets.txt

2008-05-09 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 11:21:01AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 08:16:29AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: Hi, could someone kindly tell me what the file triplets.txt is used for, and if I need to have it in my rules directory or not? It's used for the TextCat plugin

Re: fractional scores and syntax

2008-05-09 Thread Loren Wilton
score URIBL_TEST 0 1 0 1 this works... :-) score URIBL_TEST 0 .1 0 .1 And the above presumably doesn't work. As far as the SA parser is concerned, a number needs to start with a digit, so .1 is invalid. score URIBL_TEST 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 Should work. Loren

Re: False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Jeff Koch
Hi Matus: Here's the header. We're seeing a lot of these now: Received: from unknown (HELO jade.xx.com) (216.99.193.136) by 0 with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 6 May 2008 19:13:06 - Received: from server (216-99-214-161.dsl.aracnet.com [216.99.214.161]) by

Re: False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Matus: Here's the header. We're seeing a lot of these now: Received: from unknown (HELO jade.xx.com) (216.99.193.136) by 0 with ESMTPS (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted); 6 May 2008 19:13:06 - Received: from server (216-99-214-161.dsl.aracnet.com

Re: False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Jeff Koch
Hi Randy - here's the whole thing: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 26003 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2008 19:13:09 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 25931, pid: 25942, t: 2.6786s scanners: clamav: 0.88/m:45/d:5939 spam: 3.2.4 Received:

Re: False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Randy - here's the whole thing: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 26003 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2008 19:13:09 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 25931, pid: 25942, t: 2.6786s scanners: clamav: 0.88/m:45/d:5939

Re: False positive on forged_mua_outlook

2008-05-09 Thread Randy Ramsdell
Randy Ramsdell wrote: Jeff Koch wrote: Hi Randy - here's the whole thing: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 26003 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2008 19:13:09 - Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 25931, pid: 25942, t: 2.6786s scanners:

Re: Multiple X-Envelope-From and SPF

2008-05-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, May 9, 2008 08:55, ram wrote: Precisely what I am afraid of. But the issue is whatever header I use for envelope-from all of them can be trivially forged I am trying replacing all the X-Envelope headers before sending them to scan servers dont change headers on trusted routes, you

Re: IE Parse bug olso in SpamAssassin ?

2008-05-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, May 9, 2008 15:42, Joseph Brennan wrote: You know about it being an IE parse bug, and that seems to be news to the rest of us. How'd you hear about it? enabled spam_admin in amavisd-new and readed my logs :-) one SARE hit on IE bug Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ?

Re: IE Parse bug olso in SpamAssassin ?

2008-05-09 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, May 9, 2008 15:27, Justin Mason wrote: so does SpamAssassin parse the URI correctly, or not? as i can see it does, but just currently not pickup the uri in redir.html can webredirect plugin do this ? Benny Pedersen Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098