Re: Is spam volume really down

Ned Slider schrieb: > fchan wrote: >> "Their back..." the quote form Carol Anne Freeling from the movie >> Poltergeist II. >> I don't know about you but I seen these spikes in spam today which is >> inline what spamcop.net sees: >> http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamstats >> http://www.sp

Re: Is spam volume really down

fchan wrote: "Their back..." the quote form Carol Anne Freeling from the movie Poltergeist II. I don't know about you but I seen these spikes in spam today which is inline what spamcop.net sees: http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamstats http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek h

Re: Is spam volume really down

"Their back..." the quote form Carol Anne Freeling from the movie Poltergeist II. I don't know about you but I seen these spikes in spam today which is inline what spamcop.net sees: http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamstats http://www.spamcop.net/spamgraph.shtml?spamweek http://www.spam

Re: Single URI spam not checked against URIBLs

Bill Landry wrote: > mouss wrote: >> Bill Landry wrote: >>> I've posted a short pharma spam message to: >>> >>> http://www.inetmsg.com/spam.txt >>> >>> and debug output to: >>> >>> http://www.inetmsg.com/sa-debug.txt >>> >>> It displays a single URI linked line in an e-mail client that only >>> dis

Re: exempt a few ids from spam check

On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 17:37 +0530, Vikram Goyal wrote: > Hello, > > I want to exempt a few ids from spam check. How may I do it? Depends on your MTA and how you have integrated SpamAssassin. For example, using amavisd-new, I can just add the users to @spam-lovers-map, or if I just want to remove

exempt a few ids from spam check

Hello, I want to exempt a few ids from spam check. How may I do it? Thanks!

Re: bayes_journal mysteriously disappears - nevermind, foundit

David C. McCall wrote: > DOH! I didn't include --sync in periodic sa-learn runs > > > slaps his forehead and returns into cave. > > > :-( > You shouldn't need --sync, unless you want to force the journal to be synced and deleted when you run sa-learn. In general it will decide if it needs

Re: Location of Spam folder

On Saturday 22 November 2008 13:12:12 mlun wrote: > Thanks Martin, but I am a bit confused now. This text is taken directly > from Spamassassins setup in cpanel: > > "Spam Box > > This feature allows emails you missed two significant points here. First of all spamassasin doesnt have any gui, so

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

mouss schrieb: Micah Anderson a écrit : "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote: postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be white

Re: spamc and extra rules

> Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes: > > Exactly as Theo just mentioned. Use allow_user_rules 1 and place the > > rules in each user's user_prefs file. > > > > Another possibility is to include the rules in your site config with > > scores set to 0 -- thus disabling them by default. Ea

Re: spamc and extra rules

Karsten =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Br=E4ckelmann?= writes: > > > No, spamc has no impact on rules. You could look at putting the rules in > > > the > > > user's user_prefs file, but you'd have to then also set "allow_user_rules > > > 1" > > > in local.cf to allow user preferences to include rules. Be sure

Re: updates

On 23.11.08 15:46, bernier wrote: > i have a debian server with spammassassin 3.03. i guess this has never > been updated upgrade the server, 3.0.3 was default afaik in sarge, which is obsolete and unsupported. Is not possible, there was newer version in volatile and even newer in volatile-slo