Benny Pedersen a écrit :
> On Mon, December 8, 2008 05:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> mouss said:
>
> bug:
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg("FromInTo: Comparing '$from' and
> '$To");
>
> fixed line:
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg("FromInTo: Comparing '$from' and
> '$To'");
>
Thanks!
>> we
Benny Pedersen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, December 8, 2008 05:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > mouss said:
>>
>> bug:
>> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg("FromInTo: Comparing '$from' and
>> '$To");
>>
>> fixed line:
>> Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg("FromInTo: Comparing '$from' and
>> '$To'");
>>
On Mon, December 8, 2008 05:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> mouss said:
bug:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg("FromInTo: Comparing '$from' and
'$To");
fixed line:
Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::dbg("FromInTo: Comparing '$from' and
'$To'");
> well, I send mail to myself sometimes. The only way that t
mouss said:
>>
>> >
>> > The implementation of it is not my concern. It's a pretty basic rule to
>> > require that addresses a commonly exploited spam attack vector.
>>
>> having the same address in the From and To is also seen in legitimate mail:
>> - I send mail to myself
>> - some people use
support a écrit :
> On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 23:45 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:00:10PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>>> mechanism for. Devs: there've been wishes for this before; how hard
>>> would it be to add the ability to match on the substring match captured
>>> by an
Yavuz Maslak a écrit :
> Let me explain my problem and goal;
>
> For instance, a spammer installs a smtp server and he has a tool to send
> his mails. He writes [EMAIL PROTECTED] in from adress and He sends his
> mails using his smtp server. Namely, he doesn't use gmail's servers. I
> want to giv
Let me explain my problem and goal;
For instance, a spammer installs a smtp server and he has a tool to send his
mails. He writes [EMAIL PROTECTED] in from adress and He sends his mails using
his smtp server. Namely, he doesn't use gmail's servers. I want to give high
score for these sort of
Yavuz Maslak a écrit :
> Ok
> I have started to use dkim verification. I defined whitelists in
> local.cf. it works.
> But I could not find how I give high score for a spammer who doesn't
> use gmail's mail servers.
>
The link that I suggested in my previous post contains spamassassin rules.
Just that most of the spam with a gmail.com sender *is* coming from Gmail
..
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
On Sun, December 7, 2008 15:52, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> There is no direct way (to my knowledge) to do this.
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf see whitelist_auth
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DKIM
but okay make a default spam score for DKIM signed mails works :)
and subtract it when i
From: "Giampaolo Tomassoni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:52:10 +0100
> -Original Message-
> From: Yavuz Maslak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 3:02 PM
>
> Ok
> I have started to use dkim verification. I defined whitel
> > From: Yavuz Maslak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 3:02 PM
> > But I could not find how I give high score for a spammer who doesn't
> > use gmail's mail servers.
> >
> > Although a domain has domain keys, how can I give positive score for a
> > mail which comes
> -Original Message-
> From: Yavuz Maslak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2008 3:02 PM
>
> Ok
> I have started to use dkim verification. I defined whitelists in
> local.cf.
> it works.
> But I could not find how I give high score for a spammer who doesn't
> use
> g
Ok
I have started to use dkim verification. I defined whitelists in local.cf.
it works.
But I could not find how I give high score for a spammer who doesn't use
gmail's mail servers.
Although a domain has domain keys, how can I give positive score for a mail
which comes from a fake smtp se
> I've been getting a bit of spam recently via Sourceforge mailing lists
> that punts live.space websites. As this is easy to detect without
> running much risk of FPs, I've written a rule.
>
Getting so much spam, and no response from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Should just give
a 2.0 to uri rule and
I've been getting a bit of spam recently via Sourceforge mailing lists
that punts live.space websites. As this is easy to detect without
running much risk of FPs, I've written a rule.
describe MG_LIVESF Spam via SourceForge but contains spaces.live.com URI
uri __MG_LSF1 /^http:.{1,40}\.sp
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 23:45 -0500, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 08:00:10PM -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> > mechanism for. Devs: there've been wishes for this before; how hard
> > would it be to add the ability to match on the substring match captured
> > by another rule? Add a fl
17 matches
Mail list logo
