Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Hello,
instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
bayes_ignore_header and ending up in strange configs like:
bayes_ignore_header Return-Path
bayes_ignore_header Received
bayes_ignore_header X-Spam-Flag
just saw this one in email. terra.com/ spamcop.com./br are hosting trojans.
but this email uses flash to load this:
param name=movie value=http://www.terra.com.br/cartoes/datas/amor.swf;
(which redirects to http://cartoes.terra.com.br/datas/amor.swf )
than trys to load a binary:
Hi all,
We have an amavisd/spamassassin/clamav gateway before our Exchange server.
I've trained spamassassin with about 3500 hams / 3500 spams, it should work
correctly, and I'm training it regularly.
But we're receiving some spams yet.
I've looked into the headers of spams received
Sheeen,
We have an amavisd/spamassassin/clamav gateway before our Exchange server.
I've trained spamassassin with about 3500 hams / 3500 spams, it should work
correctly, and I'm training it regularly.
But we're receiving some spams yet.
I've looked into the headers of spams received
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
SA extensively parses the headers. It parses *all* headers, even
nonstandard ones that I could randomly configure a server to add like
X-Matts-funky-header: Hi!.
If at a later date you add a header to the ignore list, does Bayes
forget that it's
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Matt Kettler wrote:
SA extensively parses the headers. It parses *all* headers, even
nonstandard ones that I could randomly configure a server to add like
X-Matts-funky-header: Hi!.
If at a later date you add a header to the ignore list, does Bayes
Michael Scheidell wrote:
just saw this one in email. terra.com/ spamcop.com./br are hosting
trojans.
but this email uses flash to load this:
param name=movie value=http://www.terra.com.br/cartoes/datas/amor.swf;
(which redirects to http://cartoes.terra.com.br/datas/amor.swf )
than trys to
Thanks for your reply, I'll check my local.cf amavisd.conf.
Have a nice day =)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/I-think-SpamAssassin-does-not-check-every-mails-tp22576920p22579097.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 08:00 +0100, fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net wrote:
Is there any reason to think headers make bad tokens?
For example the X-Spam-Flag: NO can cause Problems if you don't
remove it before parsing and don't set it yourself. (You'll
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 21:32 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
Michael Scheidell wrote:
ram across this bug posting about a rumored problem with freebsd,
amd64 and spamassassin.
trying to follow the bug url, got 'you are not allowed to view this bug'
FWIW, this bug is not made public due to
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Michael Scheidell wrote:
both files still exist on the hosts, and neither was identified by
clamav, and neither triggered any ET (snort) rules, SA didn't trigger
any rules except these:
HTML_EMBEDS=0.056, HTML_EXTRA_CLOSE=2.809,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
* Georgy Goshin go...@inbox.ee:
7.7 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
What is AWL rule? Why it gives so different amount of points? How to
resolve this?
AutoWhiteList
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netzwerk
Charité -
I understood the spelling of AWL, but why the scores is different? How to
tune them?
G.
- Original Message -
From: Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:47 PM
Subject: Re: What is AWL?
* Georgy Goshin
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, Georgy Goshin wrote:
6.6 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
another:
9.0 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
and another:
7.7 AWLAWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
What is AWL
On 18-Mar-2009, at 12:07, John Hardin wrote:
It's intended to allow an occasional spammy-looking message from a
historically hammy correspondent to get through, hence auto
whitelist.
Well, it works just as well to prevent the occasional hammy message
from getting through from a spammy
I normally disable bayes, because without proper training it tends to make
spamassassin less reliable. But I've got one installation that is stubbornly
running bayes even though I have disabled it.
I set use_bayes 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
I set use_bayes 0 in
From: Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Hello,
instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
bayes_ignore_header and ending up in strange configs like:
bayes_ignore_header
Jeff Mincy j...@delphioutpost.com writes:
From: Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
shouldn't SpamAssassins bayes mechanism just ignore the complete
message header and just look at the body?
This seems useful in my opinion.
It
John Hardin wrote:
plug type=shameless
My email sanitizer successfuly defends against this attack.
/plug
:)
mine did too... but it quarantined it in my 'this was only stopped due
to custom rules, maybe SA group would like to see it' pile.
and, didn't see any SA rules (or SARES rules)
From: Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:33:31 -0400
Jeff Mincy j...@delphioutpost.com writes:
From: Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
shouldn't SpamAssassins bayes mechanism just ignore the
Dan,
I normally disable bayes, because without proper training it tends to make
spamassassin less reliable. But I've got one installation that is
stubbornly running bayes even though I have disabled it.
I set use_bayes 0 in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
I set use_bayes 0 in
Michael Scheidell wrote:
just saw this one in email. terra.com/ spamcop.com./br are hosting
trojans.
but this email uses flash to load this:
param name=movie value=http://www.terra.com.br/cartoes/datas/amor.swf;
(which redirects to http://cartoes.terra.com.br/datas/amor.swf )
-Original Message-
From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:uh...@fantomas.sk]
Sent: Tuesday, 17 March 2009 10:17 p.m.
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: JoeJobbed - Vbounce plugin - SPF?.
On 17.03.09 14:02, Michael Hutchinson wrote:
I'm running Spamassassin 3.1.7, with netqmail
I'm a new administrator at a site and have been tasked with updating
Spam Assassin, something I have never worked with before.
I am running /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/sa-update daily as a cronjob, but I'm
not sure if this is accomplishing anything.
I have read through FAQs and documentation, but
http://pastebin.com/m2fcbe7b5
Thanks for posting the sample.
plug type=shameless
My email sanitizer successfuly defends against this attack.
/plug
:)
--
John Hardin
no disrespect intended yet i would like to understand...
u, if your email sanitizer
I am having trouble with the standard White List BlackList
configuration in the SpamAssassin user preferences file.
The Manual White List user guide at
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ManualWhitelist
states Adding a user to your whitelist gives them a -100 score, which has
the effect of
RobertH a écrit :
http://pastebin.com/m2fcbe7b5
Thanks for posting the sample.
plug type=shameless
My email sanitizer successfuly defends against this attack.
/plug
:)
--
John Hardin
no disrespect intended yet i would like to understand...
u, if your
Bryan Lee a écrit :
I'm a new administrator at a site and have been tasked with updating
Spam Assassin, something I have never worked with before.
I am running /usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/sa-update daily as a cronjob, but I'm
not sure if this is accomplishing anything.
I have read through FAQs and
Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Hello,
instead of disabling a lot possibly set message headers using
bayes_ignore_header and ending up in strange configs like:
From: Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:49:53 -0400
Jeff Mincy wrote:
From: Matt Kettler mkettler...@verizon.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:30:02 -0400
fl...@pbartels.info wrote:
Hello,
instead of
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009, dsh979 wrote:
I have found that when I add manually a user to the whitelist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get inconsistent results:
...
I have also found that when I manually a user to the blacklist (in the
SpamAssassin user preferences file) I get the
¿Qué tiene que ver Software Libre con educación?
Más tarde o más temprano, la computadora va a pasar a formar parte del
herramental educativo. Una vez que se haya asentado el polvo levantado por
los profetas de la panacea electrónica, que pretenden resolver dificultades
estructurales del sistema
32 matches
Mail list logo
