On ons 01 sep 2010 22:47:36 CEST, Chris Datfung wrote
header IN_NJABL_ORGrbleval:check_rbl('njabl','dnsbl.njabl.org.')
describe IN_NJABL_ORG Received via a relay in dnsbl.njabl.org
tflags IN_NJABL_ORGnet
score IN_NJABL_ORG 5
first errpr is you added it to a pre file, next is that
Hello,
Would you please remove Runbox.com from that list as we have not been a free
email provider since 2001.
Kim
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/FreeMail-plugin-updated-tp23468766p29599495.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Good. My test mail headers rejected here: : P
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient
domain. We recommend contacting the
-- Original Message --
From: Marc Perkel
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:32:40 -0700
> Anyone else seeing an increase in .info spam?
yeah, tons of it.
rejects for last preceding 10 days:
bzegrep -ic "postfix.*reject:.*\.info" /var/log/mx1.hctc.net/maillog.[
escp wrote:
Hi,
i use spamassassin with sidewide setup.
i want to know, if i can ONLY learn spam w/o learning ham. I dont want to
get bad results.
Problem is, that i get a lot of mails every day and cant have a look at all.
so i only want to train spamassassin with the mails my users want to g
Anyone else seeing an increase in .info spam?
I'm running spamassassin version 3.3.1-1 from the Debian package. I added
several RBLs to /etc/mail/spamassassin/init.pre but spamassassin only
queries its built in RBLs and not the ones I added. An example RBL entry to
init.pre is shown below:
header IN_NJABL_ORGrbleval:check_rbl('njabl','dn
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Emin Akbulut wrote:
Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44
MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44
SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box-
My own server & SA scores my own test message
because of FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 and
HELO_NO_DOMAIN checks. I don't kn
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 18:27 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44
> MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44
So you are directly submitting to your MX, it seems.
> SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box-
How does that box get the message?
> My o
On 01.09.10 18:27, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44
>
> MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44
> SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box-
>
> My own server & SA scores my own test message
> because of FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 and
> HELO_NO_DOMAIN checks
Outlook account's SMTP is: 88.255.136.44
MailEnable running IP is: 88.255.136.44
SA running IP is: 192.168.35.210 -dedicated internal box-
My own server & SA scores my own test message
because of FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1 and
HELO_NO_DOMAIN checks. I don't know
what are these.
How can I fix it?
2
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 17:13 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> Yes it's my very own MailEnable mail server, SA integrated.
> I sent the message from home.
Hrm, I'm not sure if that answers the question. Maybe I'm just still too
low on caffeine. So, did you just say your MUA's outgoing SMTP is the
same a
Yes it's my very own MailEnable mail server, SA integrated.
I sent the message from home.
2010/9/1 Karsten Bräckelmann
>
>
>> If that was an SMTP server, fix that. It should, however, not be part of
>> *your* infrastructure, since it's external. If it is under your control,
>> you need to fix you
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 15:42 +0300, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook,
> below are the results. How can I fix these
> two checks -probably at my mail server-
Don't fix the tests. Fix the external host. ;)
> FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
> HELO_NO_DOMAIN
The external host hand
On 9/1/2010 8:42 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook,
> below are the results. How can I fix these
> two checks -probably at my mail server-
>
> FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
> HELO_NO_DOMAIN
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> pts rule name description
> -
On 9/1/2010 8:42 AM, Emin Akbulut wrote:
> Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook,
> below are the results. How can I fix these
> two checks -probably at my mail server-
>
> FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
> HELO_NO_DOMAIN
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> pts rule name description
> -
On 9/1/2010 5:59 AM, escp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i use spamassassin with sidewide setup.
>
> i want to know, if i can ONLY learn spam w/o learning ham. I dont want to
> get bad results.
>
> Problem is, that i get a lot of mails every day and cant have a look at all.
> so i only want to train spamassassi
Hi, I sent a test message from my Outlook,
below are the results. How can I fix these
two checks -probably at my mail server-
FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1
HELO_NO_DOMAIN
Thanks.
pts rule name description
--
--
1.8 FS
[ 3rd attempt to send this message; without it being rejected by
apache.org for being spam... ]
I picked two of those domains at random:
[r...@vm2 tmp]# host -t TXT trigasplumet.net.fresh.spameatingmonkey.net
trigasplumet.net.fresh.spameatingmonkey.net descriptive text "Domain
first seen 2010-
Hi,
i use spamassassin with sidewide setup.
i want to know, if i can ONLY learn spam w/o learning ham. I dont want to
get bad results.
Problem is, that i get a lot of mails every day and cant have a look at all.
so i only want to train spamassassin with the mails my users want to get rid
off.
20 matches
Mail list logo