ou a true or false result.
Doing it in Spamassassin applies the principals of fuzzy logic by
assigning a score to the different black lists that should more
precisely reflect the accuracy of the list.
If your black lists never have any false positives, then you're good to
go. :)
Mojo
--
says needs to be enabled) are enabled?
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 14:15 -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
Matthew Lenz wrote:
my girlfriend has been bitching at me for quite some time now to figure
out why spamassassin isn't catching the spam like it used to. I'm using
3.0.2 on a debian
he RLB tests enabled? What happens if you feed it
through spamassassin with the -D flag?
Cheers,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
ow to further
prevent the excessive DNS requests?
Put your own caching DNS on your mail server, so you're not always
banging Covad's DNS. Your spam checks will run a lot faster, too.
Cheers,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
lder.
Here are the user CPU times for each:
SQL 6.578s
DBM 32.798s
I'm running bare mysql, no innodb or anything. I suspect that would
increase the INSERT time, but maybe it would speed up the SELECT time.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Morris Jones wrote:
After installing when I run "spamd -D -x -q" I get "Can't locate
Mail/Spamassassin/BayesStore/SQL.pm in @INC (@INC contains: lib ../lib
I had this line in my local.cf:
bayes_store_module Mail::Spamassassin::BayesStore::SQL
SpamAssassin was missing t
e module.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
sr/lib/perl5/site_perl
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i586-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl) at (eval
30) line 2.
------
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
can be.
Any suggestions?
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
NS
to my name server, but the tech had no idea what I was talking about.
I'll try again later ...)
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
on between residential DSL and business DSL in their
network addresses?
I don't really have a choice of providers for my connection.
My server is currently at a colo in LA, which has its own problems with
having had a spamhaus reputation.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoa
Kevin Curran wrote:
Tests show that an email will get a different score depending on whether
spamassassin or spamc is called.
What's up with that?
Thanks!
You probably need to stop spamd and restart it so it rereads the .cf files.
Cheers,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoak
are affecting the score.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
Forgive me, I completely misread your post. You're right, you should be
getting bayes tests. I wonder if it's picking up the wrong bayes
database ...
Mojo
Morris Jones wrote:
[ the wrong answer ]
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astrono
am.
Assuming you have two mbox files, one full of spam, one full of ham, did
you start out training it like so?:
sa-learn --spam --mbox spamfile
sa-learn --ham --mbox hamfile
Best regards,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
gards,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
Monrovia, CA
http://www.whiteoaks.com
Old Town Astronomers: http://www.otastro.org
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
> Of all the folks seeing memory issues, are you using ok_languages in
> your config somewhere? If not, please speak up as well.
Yes:
ok_languagesen
Mojo
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
6000
> | /usr/bin/spamc
>
> it doesnt do that anymore. Is there a way to route it back to the
> /user/spam?
>
>
>
> > From: Morris Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:25:15 -0700 (PDT)
> > To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" &l
t; > modify your procmailrc to use spamc instead of spamassassin. It's much
> > faster, has lower CPU overhead, and you'll end up with logging in syslog as
> > spamd processes them.
> >
> > Disclaimer: I don't actually use spamd so I'm no expert at it, I use
> > MailScanner which calls the API directly. You might wish to solicit advice
> > on the list about converting to using spamd.
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
did exactly the same experiment with the same result.
You have Bayes turned off, I have it on. I'm also using auto-whitelist.
Clearly there's nothing significant about the triggering message.
I'm doing fine with --max-conn-per-child=10 for now.
Cheers,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones
When I did all my conversions following the UPGRADE procedure as root, I
had to go back in and convert the files back to their correct ownerships.
Check for that.
Best regards,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
avior in 3.0.0 with the --max-conn-per-child option,
and that's worked well for me so far.
That said, the overall performance and especially accuracy of 3.0.0
has been much higher on my server.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Morris Jones wrote:
> >
> > I watched a spamd child grow to 250MB yesterday on a single message. I
> > have a suspicion that the memory usage growth is happening on a whitelist
ase maintenance event of some sort.
One solution might be to have a child terminate after one of these events
to reclaim the memory.
Of course, here I am speculating about it without actually diving into
the code to propose a solution.
Regards,
Mojo
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
hrown in. Repeat runs through
spamc give a two second result and no memory spike.
So something else is causing the memory spike. Something to do with
bayes db maintenance perhaps?
Best regards,
Mojo
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Morris Jones wrote:
> Yesterday I commented that I was seeing spamd
On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, David Brodbeck wrote:
> I've seen this problem. I avoid it by bypassing SpamAssassin for all mail
> larger than 1 megabyte. Very little spam is this large, since it'd be
> inefficient to send.
I'm already bypassing it for anything over 256000 bytes
child
Yesterday afternoon when I killed and restarted spamd, they were all using
about that much.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
load time was never terribly
bad, and they certainly can't leak.
Mojo
--
Morris Jones <*>
Monrovia, CA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.whiteoaks.com
29 matches
Mail list logo