Julian Kippels wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of setting up a bayes-sql-database but I am unsure
of wether I want to set the bayes_sql_override_username option.
I would like to have per-user-bayes scores, so that scores from user A
will not interfere with messages sent to user B.
If I
Hi,
I am in the process of setting up a bayes-sql-database but I am unsure
of wether I want to set the bayes_sql_override_username option.
I would like to have per-user-bayes scores, so that scores from user A
will not interfere with messages sent to user B.
If I understand it correctly, no
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Troy Settle wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:33:10 -0500:
I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
database and let it start re-learning. Once it kicked in, I again
started getting false hits with BAYES_00=-2.599 on a great many spam/uce
On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 15:19 -0500, Troy Settle wrote:
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Troy Settle wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:33:10 -0500:
I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
database and let it start re-learning. Once it kicked in, I again
started getting
From: Troy Settle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:19:56 -0500
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Troy Settle wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:33:10 -0500:
I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
database and let it start re-learning. Once it
Troy Settle wrote on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:19:56 -0500:
From incoming mail.
well, but how? By auto-learning? In that case you are just multiplying your
problem. It seems a lot of spam gets miscategorized as ham. Auto-learning
that spam as ham means enforcing this miscategorization and that's
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
well, but how? By auto-learning? In that case you are just multiplying your
problem. It seems a lot of spam gets miscategorized as ham. Auto-learning
that spam as ham means enforcing this miscategorization and that's what you
see as a result.
When SpamAssassin decides
James Wilkinson wrote on Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:56:34 +:
well, but how? By auto-learning? In that case you are just multiplying your
problem. It seems a lot of spam gets miscategorized as ham. Auto-learning
that spam as ham means enforcing this miscategorization and that's what you
I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
database and let it start re-learning. Once it kicked in, I again
started getting false hits with BAYES_00=-2.599 on a great many spam/uce
messages.
Can someone point me to some good reading material to better understand
Troy Settle wrote on Mon, 17 Nov 2008 13:33:10 -0500:
I'm having a major problem with the bayes system. I cleared the bayes
database and let it start re-learning. Once it kicked in, I again
started getting false hits with BAYES_00=-2.599 on a great many spam/uce
messages.
How did you
Hoppe someone can help me!!
Iam using Spamassassin 3.0.1
( users stored in mysql and vpopmail and qmail).
Slackware version 10.2
Mysql version 5.0
My problem:
when i use the standart bayes confs ( hard drive .db files) everything
works so fine..
When i change to bayes MYSQL. strange things
Hello,
I installed spamassassin a month agowiththebayes auto learn option, but there is still 60% of spam that is not detected. In my bayes db there was nothing ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# sa-learn --dump magic0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nspam0.000 0
I would like to enable the Bayes system with auto-learning. I thought
that I had my config setup correctly but apparently I don't. My config
looks like this:
##
# How we want to modify the email
rewrite_header subject [**SPAM**]
report_safe 0
#Bayes learning system
use_bayes 1
I can swear I saw this question in at least 20 different messages, not to
mention the website
I really recommend you research your question before asking it.
autolearn=no means that it didn't 'learn' this message.
Other possible states are 'spam, 'ham' and ... 'DISABLED'
If autolearn were to
In an older episode (Friday 13 May 2005 08:38), Geoff Sweet wrote:
I would like to enable the Bayes system with auto-learning. I thought
that I had my config setup correctly but apparently I don't. My config
looks like this:
##
# How we want to modify the email
rewrite_header
Yes, but his scoring list BAYES_99 as one of the scores, which means bayes is active, which means it has been fed the necessary 200 spam and 200 ham. If it hadn't been fed the necessary spam and ham, it would not have been given a BAYES score at all. The fact that the mail was not autolearned
In an older episode (Friday 13 May 2005 12:26), Joe Zitnik wrote:
Yes, but his scoring list BAYES_99 as one of the scores, which means
bayes is active, which means it has been fed the necessary 200 spam and
200 ham. If it hadn't been fed the necessary spam and ham, it would not
have been
At 02:38 AM 5/13/2005, Geoff Sweet wrote:
2005-05-12 23:30:33.432514500 2005-05-13 06:30:33 [88906] i: result: Y 23
-
Also make sure that you updated the DB format if you moved from 2.6x to
3.0.1. Maybe Bayes is turned on, but every time it tastes the DB it doesn't
like the format.
Loren
Hello:
I am running SpamAssassin 3.0.1 and have been having a problem. When I run
sa-learn -D --dump magic I get the following output.
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 1084 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0
Check to make sure that you don't have a phantom local.cf somewhere that's pointing SA
to the wrong directory for bayes. For instance, see if you have both a
/etc/spamassassin and /etc/mail/spamassassin folder.
Make sure it's not putting a new bayes database in your user/.spamassassin
21 matches
Mail list logo
