Evan Platt a écrit :
At 10:48 PM 2/17/2006, you wrote:
Today I got a spam message which seems, at least for a newbie like me,
succeeded in passing SA for some reason!
I'm calling SA through amavisd-new and have my Rules Du Jour updated
(manual updates so far)
I would like to block such
Yousef Raffah a écrit :
Received: from emailmarketingmasters.com (i538754C0.versanet.de
[83.135.84.192]) by kansai.savoladns.com (Postfix) with SMTP id
7B42810073 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 18:43:21 +0300 (AST)
you could
- use njabl's dynablock to block the client (83.135.84.192).
Hi Youzef,
I am suggesting something that has been discussed controversially in the past:
dont let the mail even reach SA
I would assume that mail reaching my mailserver and saying it is from my domain
would be mail submitted by one of my users, so I have changed the MTA to require
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:05 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Youzef,
Hello Wolfgang
I am suggesting something that has been discussed controversially in the past:
dont let the mail even reach SA
I would assume that mail reaching my mailserver and saying it is from my
domain
would
Today I got a spam message which seems, at least for a newbie like me,
succeeded in passing SA for some reason!
I'm calling SA through amavisd-new and have my Rules Du Jour updated
(manual updates so far)
I would like to block such messages therefore, I'm seeking your kind
assistance in
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote:
Without the entire
message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem
with
your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the
spammer is good at what they do. BTW, it is helpful to see what rules
hit.
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote:
Without the entire
message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem
with
your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the
spammer is good at what they do. BTW, it is helpful to see what rules
hit.
This
...
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote:
Without the entire
message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem
with
your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the
spammer is good at what they do. BTW, it is helpful to see what rules
A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor,
and Pyzor) will kill these.
As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you
aren't running the URIBLs and digests, you won't ever get them (though MTA
RBLs to kill off zombie delivery will
A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor,
and Pyzor) will kill these.
As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you
aren't running the URIBLs and digests, you won't ever get them (though MTA
RBLs to kill off zombie delivery will
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 09:53 -0700, Gary V wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 08:45 -0700, Gary V wrote:
Without the entire
message I don't think anyone can determine if there is some problem
with
your system, or if this particular spam simply scored low because the
spammer is good at
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 17:13 -0700, Gary V wrote:
A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor,
and Pyzor) will kill these.
As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you
aren't running the URIBLs and digests, you won't ever get them (though MTA
On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 08:30 +0300, Yousef Raffah wrote:
On Sat, 2006-02-18 at 17:13 -0700, Gary V wrote:
A knowledge of history and a good BAYES + digest tests (DCC, Razor,
and Pyzor) will kill these.
As far as I know, net tests are the way to catch these. So if you
aren't
At 10:48 PM 2/17/2006, you wrote:
Today I got a spam message which seems, at least for a newbie like me,
succeeded in passing SA for some reason!
I'm calling SA through amavisd-new and have my Rules Du Jour updated
(manual updates so far)
I would like to block such messages therefore, I'm
14 matches
Mail list logo
