Hello,
I was comparing a Locale with a String, so please forget my previous message ;)
Everything works as expected now. Thanks for this great idea that is much more
lightweight than writing a link transformer.
Best,
Rafael
> On 2019-06-09, at 01:21 PM, Rafael Bugajewski
>
sult is your default locale.
>
> Cezary
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:45 AM Rafael Bugajewski
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Tapestry supports putting the current locale into the URL path. I’m
>> injecting PersistentLocale and switching between languag
Hello,
Tapestry supports putting the current locale into the URL path. I’m injecting
PersistentLocale and switching between languages as advised in the
documentation:
if (persistentLocale.get() == null) {
persistentLocale.set(new Locale("de"));
} else if ("en".equalsIgnoreCase(persistentLoc
I use the plugin. That’s some sad news :(
Best,
Rafael
> On Jun 18, 2019, at 10:45 PM, Nicolas Bouillon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Not sure if many of you are using the Tapestry plugins of IntellJ Ultimate.
>
> I do and it's very handy to navigate fastly between components and for code
> completion
> On 2018-20-12, at 05:16 AM, Christopher Dodunski
> wrote:
>
> Should simplification, then, be one of the declared objectives going forward?
I would appreciate this as one goal of the future roadmap.
Rafael
-
To unsubscribe
> On 2018-19-12, at 07:32 PM, Carlos Montero Canabal
> wrote:
>
> I'm serving AMP pages with Tapestry (
> https://elcocinerocasero.com/amp/receta/tortilla-de-patata ). I hope to
> upload an example to http://tapestry5.dev-util.com/ this weekend with the
> workaround to do it...
That’s great new
> On 2018-19-12, at 07:01 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> wrote:
>
> What issue, exactly? Exact HTML output? If yes, this is something that
> probably can be either fixed in Tapestry itself or customized implementing
> a MarkupRenderer.
Yes, this basically boils down to Tapestry not modifyi
> On 2018-19-12, at 01:23 PM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> wrote:
>
> Well, some stuff is indeed not simple, and I'd say the form support is the
> part which could use some new components to make at least the simpler
> scenarios simpler to implement (for example, when there are no loops).
> W
> On 2018-19-12, at 02:26 PM, Chris Poulsen wrote:
>
> Perhaps it is possible to find a lightweight,/focused library with a
> compatible license today, that tapestry could rely on, instead of
> attempting to implement this on its own.
I pretty much like this idea in practice. What I mean general
Congratulations! Thanks to the core team for your continuous work and the
effort you put into maintaining Tapestry.
I think the whole industry goes the way of trying to simplify things (just take
a look at the most recent programming languages & frameworks). If we’re talking
about modernizing a
Heya all,
I’m in a similar situation. I started my first Tapestry project 14 months ago
and did a pretty sophisticated research in advance. I haven’t regretted it yet,
and the only worries I had, were about new Java releases compatibility. But
this is something that is already in progress as fa
+1
> On 2018-28-03, at 10:28 AM, JumpStart
> wrote:
>
> Great example!
>
> IMHO, this kind of info should be added to the documentation.
>
>> On 28 Mar 2018, at 3:47 PM, peter.sk...@ooom.at wrote:
>>
>> Hallo Reinhold,
>>
>> Tapestry can be used without classical forms. If you have to inclu
Hello Reinhold,
Peter shares the same sentiments as me. I see Tapestry as a framework that
fulfills some specific needs, and is even capable of async DOM manipulation,
but I don’t see it as a driver for “modern” client-server web-architectures
(whatever this means…).
For architectures like the
In both cases I would expect a hard exception instead of a soft warning.
There’s already enough magic going on in the background.
Best,
Rafael
On October 27, 2017 3:57:59 PM Dmitry Gusev wrote:
Hi Thiago,
I would expect this to throw an exception on application start.
I would also expec
Great work, Barry. Thank you very much. I starred the project and will take a
deeper look at it when I’ll have some spare time in the evening.
Rafael
> On 2016-18-07, at 03:04 PM, Barry Books wrote:
>
> After many years of Tapestry development I decided to put down my thoughts
> on "code less
> On 2016-07-05, at 09:48 AM, Chris Poulsen wrote:
>
> It is not really clear to me what you want to do? Are you talking about
> picking the correct impl once (during initial application setup) or
> selecting the impl. per request. Is the "input parameter" something that is
> defined during regis
Hello,
I use tapestry-ioc in a Jersey JAX-RS application to access my Tapestry
services. I have a LicenseService that generates a software license with the
help of another service. This LicenseGeneratorService has implementations for
different products Product1LicenseGeneratorServiceImpl,
Prod
17 matches
Mail list logo