ParameterPropertyWorker
if the component is not active a setXX call to the param property sets the
value of "default" field that is automagically added by javassist. the
assocaited accessor and mutator then interact with the default field.
EstablishDefaultParameterValuesVisitor
if a binding h
i have an @EventListener attached to an JS method on a Hidden component.
during the rendering of the page the ComponentEventConnectionWorker will
contribute the results of the ComponentEvent.script for each component that has
ajax events. as part of that rendering the component's extendedId is
this ML) is to have
a separate form just for the uploads or (even better) investigate how
to integrate
one of those flash uploaders...
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Carlos F wrote:
> After trying to async submit a form with a file upload field for a few hours
> I trolled around t
After trying to async submit a form with a file upload field for a few hours I
trolled around the message board and JIRA and ran across this:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAPESTRY-1348
Is trying to async submit a form with a file upload field a DEAD END?
We tried to add the IFrame trans
has anyone been able to successfully build the dojo 0.4.3 docs? I am asking
here because:
1- tap 4.1.x uses it (so I am hoping someone else has done this),
2 - the dojo site's copy doesn't work, and
3 - folks have been asking about it for 2+ weeks on the dojo forums and it is
still not function
I am displaying a tabular list of records inside of a form. Each row in the
tabular list includes a checkbox, an up and down arrow image and info about the
detail record in question. When the user clicks on the up and down arrow image
the detailed record should be resorted in a backing list a
The value of getClientId() seems critical to the proper use of clientside
javascript. However, unless a component includes a call torenderIdAttribute()
while rendering its open element tag, the componentseems unable to display its
id property. I ran across this when itried to use an Image as
The value of getClientId() seems critical to the proper use of client side
javascript. However, unless a component includes a call to
renderIdAttribute() while rendering its open element tag, the component
seems unable to display its id property. I ran across this when i tried to
use an Image a
Chris,
take everything i say with a grain a salt. I am having limited success
getting this to work with tap 4.1.3. I can get the client side JS call to
trigger . . . however i can't see to get it to execute the right server side
listener method.
Chris Norris-2 wrote:
>
> The first question i
using tap 4.1.3
I am trying to tie an arbitrary client side JS method call to a server side
listener method as per "Accessing intercepted functions' parameters on the
server-side" on the tap 4.1 event listener page
(http://tapestry.apache.org/tapestry4.1/ajax/eventlistener.html)
i can't get the
BTW - I have only used spring 1.2.x. Maybe spring 2.x has a cleaner way of
inter-servlet context bean sharing.
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Using-Alfresco-from-within-Tapestry-tf4831087.html#a13861374
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble
hbf wrote:
>
> and everything works beautifully up to the load order of the webapps:
> As my module starts before Alfresco, I cannot reference the (yet non-
> existing) bean of Alfresco that represents the Alfresco Node Service!
>
> . . .
>
> Everything works fine up to the point when I cha
carlos f wrote:
>
> If you are using tap 4.x . . .
>
Maybe if I looked at the subject of the original message I would have seen
the "T5" staring at me ;)
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/T5%3A-How-to-initialize-a-session-variable-in-a-
andyhot wrote:
>
> On the meantime, maybe the @Cached annotation can help you.
> http://tacos.sourceforge.net/tacos4.1/tacos-annotations/index.html
> It's in the 4.1.1-SNAPSHOT and it annotates a normal non-abstract method,
> caching its result and returning it on further invocations.
>
Thanks
jeffrey ai wrote:
>
> I am looking for the best way to initialize a session variable(@Persist)
> in a page render request once, so I could access it in the next action
> request.
>
Jeffrey,
I am not sure about the particulars of your situation. If you are using tap
4.x, you might want to lo
carlos f wrote:
>
> This occurs when i am executing tests as part of my selenium integration
> tests.
>
> . . .
>
> Is this a configuration/user error on my side, or is the framework still
> purposefully evaluating these OGNL expressions 4 times?
>
I am stil
BUMP . . . just trying to make sure this didn't get lost in all the T5
messages over the weekend .
Does anyone know what I can do to eliminate the duplicate calls?
Thanks in advance.
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/OGNL-Expression-evaluated-4-times-on-tap-4.1.2-r
Tap 4.1.2 release
tapestry-test 5.0.5
selenium 0.8.1 (with Jetty baked into Jar)
win xp pro sp/2
java 1.5.0_05
This occurs when i am executing tests as part of my selenium integration
tests. I have not looked into how this behaves in a more typical deployment
environment. As far as I can tell
Renat Zubairov wrote:
>
> Your assumptions are completely correct, you can address anything you want
> from the library (e.g. pages) inside the library namespace via
> namespace:BlahBlah format.
>
Renat, thanks for the reply.
Unfortunately I thought namespace handling would be a bit more seam
I would like to override the InjectPageWorker used by the tapestry framework.
However, the contribution for this worker uses the instance object provider:
. . .
When I attempt to "override" it by contributing another worker with a "page"
type I get the "Value for attribute 'typ
carlos f wrote:
>
> I am working under the assumption that page/component resolution is
> "scoped" inside of a library. So that unqualified references (e.g.
> "ComponentName" versus "myLibrary:ComponentName") are treated as local to
> the library.
&
For a variety of reasons I am attempting to convert a large portion of a free
standing tapestry web application into a library.
A page in my library contains an @InjectPage annotation. This annotation
use the name of a page specified in the library. I double checked the
library specification fi
Hugo,
Have you run into any snags using this in the past month?
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Integration-testing-Tapestry-4-applications-tf3927683.html#a12283397
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Michael Sims wrote:
>
> I don't mean to speak for Norman, but the point of this thread has been
> that
> detached objects are not thread safe, so if you are going to store them in
> the
> HttpSession, you have to serialize access to it in order to avoid
> potentially trying
> to re-attach the sa
Sorry, my questions have nothing to do with Tapestry - put a few things you
mentioned piqued my interest.
Norman Franke wrote:
> In my case, my DAO has an
> "assertUnchanged" method that throws an exception if the two objects
> differ, e.g. my detached object and the one read from the databa
carlos f wrote:
>
> Also I can't seem to get anonymous access working to the svn repo -
> http://svn.javaforge.com/svn/tapestry/tapestry-acegi/trunk
>
anonymous/anon works - chalk that up to user error
Carlos
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.c
Not sure if there is an issue on my end, but the the tapestry-acegi URL is
not responding --
http://www.carmanconsulting.com/tapestry-acegi/
Also I can't seem to get anonymous access working to the svn repo -
http://svn.javaforge.com/svn/tapestry/tapestry-acegi/trunk
I am also having general iss
Howard Lewis Ship wrote:
>
> But an integration test (either relatively contained, such as creating the
> EnhancementOperationImpl, or wider, such as firing up the app and testing
> with selenimum) is the only worthwhile way to
> ensure that generated code is correct.
>
I would like to as tigh
I have written an enhancement worker that adds some conditional logic to a
component.
The unit tests I have written rely on mock objects to verify the behavior
under test is appropriate. This is similar to the design of the unit tests
in the tapestry-framework project.
look at testStandard() as
29 matches
Mail list logo