RE: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-14 Thread Blower, Andy
il 2009 10:36 > To: 'Tapestry users' > Subject: RE: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl > > Thanks Massimo, I'll probably file a Jira issue about this then. Weird > thing is I don't think all my tests that use PageTester are failing. I > need to investigat

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > I've added TAP5-621. > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: >> Looking at the stack trace, it appears that there was an exception, >> and that the PageTester problem occured while rendering out the >> exception repo

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Angelo Chen wrote: > > Hi Massimo, > > What's the Selelium based test? can it replace PageTester? I have tried the > PageTester on the past, and the impression I got is, making it work requires > more effort to write the program itself and test it manually. might l

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
I've added TAP5-621. On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Howard Lewis Ship wrote: > Looking at the stack trace, it appears that there was an exception, > and that the PageTester problem occured while rendering out the > exception report page.  We could change getServerName() to just return > "localho

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Howard Lewis Ship
Looking at the stack trace, it appears that there was an exception, and that the PageTester problem occured while rendering out the exception report page. We could change getServerName() to just return "localhost" rather than throwing an exception. On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Massimo Lusetti

RE: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Blower, Andy
needed to be defined before the JS import) is no longer needed with the latest version of the 3rd party module. > -Original Message- > From: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo [mailto:thiag...@gmail.com] > Sent: 03 April 2009 13:18 > To: Tapestry users > Subject:

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> although most of our javascript seems to be broken (I'll be looking into this > issue next) I had a similar issue and it was caused by Tapestry now including Javascript in the top ( tag) instead of the end of the tag. My Javascript code was referencing some tags by id, but they weren't declare

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Angelo Chen
additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/T5.1.0.2-problem-with-TestableRequestImpl-tp22805378p22867172.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Blower, Andy
ite right so I don't know how much time I'll be able to dedicate to this. > -Original Message- > From: Massimo Lusetti [mailto:mluse...@gmail.com] > Sent: 03 April 2009 10:27 > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl >

Re: T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-04-03 Thread Massimo Lusetti
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Blower, Andy wrote: > I'm in the process of migrating from T5.0.18 to T5.1 and I'm using the > T5.1.0.2 release currently being voted on. I've fixed all the compilation > errors and disabled enough of our custom stuff to get pages rendering, > although most of

T5.1.0.2 problem with TestableRequestImpl

2009-03-31 Thread Blower, Andy
I'm in the process of migrating from T5.0.18 to T5.1 and I'm using the T5.1.0.2 release currently being voted on. I've fixed all the compilation errors and disabled enough of our custom stuff to get pages rendering, although most of our javascript seems to be broken (I'll be looking into this is