Hi list,
I have scanned the pretty light backlogs on the Varnish lists, and I haven't
seen much discussion on the current state of Varnish. There was mention of
problems with lighthttpd, but other than that I couldn't find much..
So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current releas
Denis Brækhus wrote:
So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current release to be?
I cannot comment on the code itself, but I can give a couple of comments
on how I perceive varnish as an end-user:
I have been using varnish in a production environment
(http://www.hio.no) for thr
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?UTF-8?B?S2VubmV0aCBSw7hydmlr?= writes:
>Denis Brækhus wrote:
>> So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current release to be?
>
>I cannot comment on the code itself, but I can give a couple of comments
>on how I perceive varnish as an end-user:
I ha
Denis Brækhus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have scanned the pretty light backlogs on the Varnish lists, and I
> haven't seen much discussion on the current state of Varnish. There
> was mention of problems with lighthttpd, but other than that I
> couldn't find much..
We are currently winding up
- Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The differences between the released version and the svn trunk are
> currently very small (a few bug fixes).
So SVN would actually be more stable then?
> Whether Varnish is usable in a production environment depends on the
> nature of your ap
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =?utf-
8?Q?Denis_Br=C3=A6khus?= writes:
>- Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The differences between the released version and the svn trunk are
>> currently very small (a few bug fixes).
>
>So SVN would actually be more stable then?
>
>> Whet
Denis Brækhus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The differences between the released version and the svn trunk are
> > currently very small (a few bug fixes).
> So SVN would actually be more stable then?
Possibly, if your environment triggers the bugs
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgra
v?= writes:
>Denis Br=E6khus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > The differences between the released version and the svn trunk are
>> > currently very small (a few bug fixes).
>> So
- Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, if a page uses cookies, you can't cache it. That goes for
> any proxy, not just Varnish.
Yes I know that.
> By default, Varnish goes into PASS mode if the client includes a
> cookie in the request. It will however cache a page d
- Kenneth Rørvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Denis Brækhus wrote:
> > So, my question is, how stable do you consider the current release
> to be?
> (http://www.hio.no) for three weeks + now. In that time, there's been
> one major incident, in which varnish suddenly started dropping all
> inc
10 matches
Mail list logo
