On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 13:51:49 -0500
"Steve Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Jacob S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Debian (and Ubuntu - based on Debian) and FreeBSD all use Exim by
> > default. I'm not sure
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 15:05:22 -0300
Bruno Negrão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >does your boss have a rationale for his doubts, or are they based
> >upon a 'gut' feeling? usually doubts arise based upon shortcomings.
> >what shortcoming does your boss see in qmail (note, small 'q' - it
> >is not "
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I am running qmail 1.03, vpopmail 5.4.5, qmailadmin 1.2.0,
> >squirrelmail> 1.4.2, clamv 0.74, courier IMAP 3.0.5, spamassisn 2.63
> >on my Red Hat> Linux
> >> 7.3 box, I have hosted two email domains virtually using vpopmail
> >5.4.5>
> >>
> >> I have four office in differen
On Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:54:51 -0600
"Fred Colclough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a 'newbie' question:
>
> I just deployed a new mail svr running qmail with vpopmail, mysql,
> qmailadmin. My 'old' server was running qmail, but with vmailmgr
> instead.
>
> I 'used' to be able to create ali
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:36:47 -0700
Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could someone with this problem use strace (or ptrace?) to get a trace
>
> of what happens when vchkpw is called?
>
> It should be as easy as adding: "/usr/bin/strace -ff -o
> /tmp/vchkpw.dump" right before "/home/vpopm
(quoting fixed)
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 14:35:27 -0500
"Dave Kettmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [vchkpw] Migration
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am prese
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:10:17 -0800 (PST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On 27 Jan 2004 11:57:01 -0800
> > Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to
> >my> server. They are from different users. Since the local user
> >doesn't> e
On 27 Jan 2004 11:57:01 -0800
Tom Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm seeing a number of emails like [EMAIL PROTECTED] coming in to my
> server. They are from different users. Since the local user doesn't
> exist, qmail is attempting to bounce the message back to the sender.
> Most of these a
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003 17:06:41 -0600
"Jacob S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For those using a search engine to look for this same information later
on (as I was trying for quite a while):
I was finally able to solve this problem using procmail. I'm sure the
same could be done
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:32:18 -0600
Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 10:08, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 09:17, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> forgot to add, if the user qmail-local is trying to deliver to doesn't
> own the d
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 10:08:26 -0600
Jeremy Kitchen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-12-12 at 09:17, Jacob S. wrote:
> > Ok, I'm having trouble getting qmail's QUEUE_EXTRA feature and
> > vpopmail to play well together.
> >
> > Can someone re
Ok, I'm having trouble getting qmail's QUEUE_EXTRA feature and vpopmail
to play well together.
Can someone remind me how /home/vpopmail/bin/vdelivermail could be
abused if it were chmod u+s vpopmail:vchkpw?
TIA,
Jacob
-
GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135
Never trust an operating system you don't ha
I'm doing some work for a client and ran into some problems I can't find
mentioned in the manual.
According to the following two urls, you can edit extra.h in the qmail
source, recompile and then have a copy of all e-mails going to the
address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Then of course you have to setup a f
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 23:23:49 -0700
Tom Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 11:29 AM, Jacob S. wrote:
> > After successfully troubleshooting a couple of problems, I've now
> > got ezmlm-idx installed and delivering mail just fine, but
Sorry if this is the wrong list... I couldn't find an appropriate list
for qmailadmin and the ezmlm list will only tell you that you shouldn't
be using a web interface. :-)
After successfully troubleshooting a couple of problems, I've now got
ezmlm-idx installed and delivering mail just fine, but
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:44:21 -0400
X-Istence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jesus Ruiz wrote:
>
> > I'm using spamcontrol 2.0.9, but i receive a lot of spam mail from
> > the ip address block that i allow to relay through my MTA.
> >
> > The problem is that the client receive they ip address dinami
16 matches
Mail list logo
