PureDisk is def cheaper up front. However, dedupe rates and ingest performance
are no where near what a DD box can do.
Factor in also, if you did you "Older," servers, what is the 3,4, and 5 yr
maintenance costs on that, for those servers? Not to mention the storage.
IMO, while a higher up fro
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Sesar,
Steven L.
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 12:13 PM
To: Marelas, Peter; Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Pu
esday, February 15, 2011 5:40 PM
To: Ed Wilts; Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
I don't buy that rational. How often do you think you are going to turn over
an appliance? It is more likely you will add to the pool of appliances.
auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Wednesday, 16 February 2011 3:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M
<77fre...@gmail.com<mailto:77fre...@g
orage.
Just my $0.02.
-Jonathan
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 11:46 AM
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Fred M <77fre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
> de-duplication.
>
One of the selling advantages of the PureDisk appliances is that you only
buy the de-dupe licenses once. All hardware eventually gets old. W
When I looked at these options a couple of years ago a key difference that
mattered to us was that the PureDisk appliance was not 'owned' by any NetBackup
domain. That meant several domains can use the same appliance, and so e.g. to
replicate both ways between 2 DCs a pair of appliances was eno
fores...@mylan.com
Phone: +1.304.554.6039
Cell: +1.412.805.5313
From: "Pat McDonald"
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Cc: "Pat McDonald"
Date: 02/14/2011 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
Sent by:veritas-bu-boun...@mailm
To: Fred M
Cc: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] PureDisk vs. DataDomain
We use both here and have been for over 4 years. We use Data Domain
for all of our data center backups and Puredisk (the original appliance based
version) for all
89-8282
Cell: 618-520-3401
P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to
From: veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-bu-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Fred M
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:14 PM
To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.ed
Hi all,
My employer is requesting I evaluate PureDisk and DataDomain for
de-duplication. While I can setup a demo of each and get the numbers, and
ask the sales guys what makes them great and why their competitors aren't, I
can't trust that is nothing more than sales drivel. So, I ask you expert
u
11 matches
Mail list logo
