On Friday 06 October 2006 03:18 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm trying to connect to my RealVNC server that I made at my house from
> work, but at my job everything is on a proxy server. It allows traffic on
> ports 20,21,and 22. On my vnc server properties, I accept connections on
> port 22, an
Steve Waltner wrote:
PS: Is there any way to configure the vnc-list mailing list server to
add [vnc-list] to the subject of e-mails? That would make sorting
e-mails a lot easier.
Not that I know of -- it's bugged me too. However, if you can
filter/sort by e-mail headers, the list server adds
I'm trying to connect to my RealVNC server that I made at my house from work,
but at my job everything is on a proxy server. It allows traffic on ports
20,21,and 22. On my vnc server properties, I accept connections on port 22, and
I followed instructions for my WRT54GSv4 linksys router on portf
I've seen a similar issue on our Solaris 9 systems, but I rarely saw
the memory size go above 500 MB. We had been running VNC 3.3.3r2 from
AT&T until very recently when I switched that out with RealVNC (Free)
4.1.2. This upgrade was being done to fix two problems, one of which
was the memor
Hi,
I'm using the 4.1.2 Free Edition on Solaris 10.
Recently (ie this morning!) we noticed that one Xvnc process's virtual memory
size had grown to about 4GB (the worst case), with most of this resident in
memory, forcing other processes to be swapped out.
As I'm used to seeing Xvnc sizes like
Dave,
Either restart the VNC Server service, or just wait for the mark against
that host to timeout.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ure
> Sent: 04 October 2006 18:01
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
>
Desi,
Please submit support requests via http://www.realvnc.com/support.html
Thanks,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mak Desi
> Sent: 06 October 2006 01:11
> To: vnc-list@realvnc.com
> Subject: RealVNC Tool Co
Lothar,
This is normal behaviour for any TCP "client" application. You don't need
to worry about the source port number.
Regards,
Wez @ RealVNC Ltd.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lothar Probst
> Sent: 05 October 2006 20:32
>
> I understand there is a challenge/response mechanism used in RealVNC
> Free Edition, but is this authentication session encrypted? What
> safeguards are in place and how do they compare with a
> default setup of Windows 2K/3K, for example?
VNC Free Edition uses a simple challenge-response schem
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:18:46PM -0700, rama krishna wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Iam sorry for the message. It went accidentally.
> Thank you very much for the reply to my query. Now iam
> able to understand.
No problem.
> I have one more doubt
>
> After client sends Setpixelformat message as follows
10 matches
Mail list logo