[Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

http://www.examiner.com/article/has-the-impossible-em-drive-being-tested-by-nasa-finally-been-explained

Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

Assuming the radiation emitted by a LENR reactor is hawking radiation, it might be possible that the LENR reactor will accelerate in its frame of reference because it changes the nature of the vacuum in its frame of reference relative to the inertial frame of the universe. Hawking radiation makes v

Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement: "Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence principle." *Hawking radiation, Unruh radiation and the equivalence principle* *http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.5564 * On W

Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

11:44 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement: "Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equiva

Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

design away from OU and intentionally over drive them in some manner will always act more like ether brakes than ether drives. Fran From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 11:44 PM To: vortex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM d

Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com

tex-l Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Has the 'impossible' EM drive being tested by NASA finally been explained? | Examiner.com   Here is the reference that explains the justification for this statement:   "Unruh radiation is the same as Hawking radiation by the equivalence p