I have done a ballpark analysis of the "hidden chemical fuel" scenario
for Rossi's one-hour test. I have looked at the water heater
specifications in my house and also a tabletop butane cook stove. I
conclude that chemical fuel cannot be the source of this heat, for a
number of reasons. To summ
On 01/21/2011 11:13 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> I have done a ballpark analysis of the "hidden chemical fuel" scenario
> for Rossi's one-hour test. I have looked at the water heater
> specifications in my house and also a tabletop butane cook stove. I
> conclude that chemical fuel cannot be the sou
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Jed, you apparently didn't read the message I sent on this in response
to one of your earlier posts.
Thermite provides sufficient energy density, consumes no air, and
produces only solid ash.
I did miss that. Thermite burns very rapidly and produces extremely high
On 01/21/2011 01:12 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>> Jed, you apparently didn't read the message I sent on this in
>> response to one of your earlier posts.
>>
>> Thermite provides sufficient energy density, consumes no air, and
>> produces only solid ash.
>
> I did miss
4 matches
Mail list logo
