--Original Message-
> From: Harry Veeder
> To: vortex-l
> Sent: Mon, Jun 18, 2012 12:48 am
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE...
>
> With respect to neutrinos and beta decay, CoE may be a possibility
> rather than a necessity.
> Neutrinos would be regar
This subject thread (which is mostly "on topic") and for which Mark is
guilty of instigating, got me to thinking...
For centuries a plethora of meticulously crafted scientific physics
experiments seem to confirm over and over the fact that we live in a closed
system. This has resulted in an almo
Well pardon me, that seems obvious, but I dont think I saw those words anywhere
in the original post. I wish that folks using abbreviations could do that for
the ones they use.
--- On Mon, 6/18/12, Harry Veeder wrote:
From: Harry Veeder
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE
ha!
Harry
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Robert Lynn <
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Church of England (or possibly Conservation of Energy)
>
> On 18 June 2012 17:10, Harvey Norris wrote:
>
>> What does CoE stand for, I guess it means in a closed system? Thy symbols
>> dont match t
l Resonances
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/
>
> --- On *Sun, 6/17/12, David Roberson * wrote:
>
>
> From: David Roberson
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE...
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Sunday, June 17, 2012, 8:15 PM
>
>
Roberson
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, June 17, 2012, 8:15 PM
Mark, you ask the tough questions. When I consider the possibility of a new
energy form I have to think of the historic past. We are notoriously incapable
of imagining
: vortex-l
Sent: Mon, Jun 18, 2012 12:48 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE...
With respect to neutrinos and beta decay, CoE may be a possibility
ather than a necessity.
eutrinos would be regarded as incomplete entities at the moment of
heir creation. They remain incomplete until
With respect to neutrinos and beta decay, CoE may be a possibility
rather than a necessity.
Neutrinos would be regarded as incomplete entities at the moment of
their creation. They remain incomplete until they are destroyed during
a subsequent interaction. As long as they never interact, they remai
The apparent lack of anti-matter in the universe is also conundrum
from the standpoint of CoE.
harry
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 8:09 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:54 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
> wrote:
>
>> Hence, when someone adamantly relies on CoE, saying that such and such is
>>
as humans are doing science, cognitive dissonance will slow our
discovery of the unknown…
-Mark
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 5:16 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE...
Mark, you ask the tough
beta decay. The
neutrino came to the rescue of the CoE in that case.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Jun 17, 2012 8:09 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The missing half of the Law of CoE...
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:54 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Hence
Mark, you ask the tough questions. When I consider the possibility of a new
energy form I have to think of the historic past. We are notoriously incapable
of imagining things such as this unless some well observed phenomenon is
unknown and accepted as true. Anything our senses can not detect
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 4:54 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
Hence, when someone adamantly relies on CoE, saying that such and such is
> impossible since it would violate CoE, they are not a scientist in my mind.
>
I don't know about the "not a scientist" part, but I personally have no
profound attach
13 matches
Mail list logo
