Hoi,
Obviously I know. My point is that when we talk about diversity, it is
because it was recognised as a problem ... When papers of 2011 are quoted
in 2015 when diversity is mentioned, it does not give us a clue if the
problem is as bad, worse or very much improved. Consequently it is very
much b
Hi GerardM,
why not have a guess ;-)
Claudia
-- Original Message ---
From:Gerard Meijssen
To:Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Sent:Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:42:08 +0100
Subject:Re: [Wiki-research-l] a cautious note on gender stats Re: Fwd:
[Gendergap] Wikipedia reader
Mako Hill and Aaron Shaw wrote a paper which combined a 2008 WMF survey
with Pew Research to try to find a less biased estimation of the Wikipedia
gender gap. Their paper is titled "The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited:
Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation", and
is at
Hoi,
What year are we living ?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 14 February 2015 at 17:24, wrote:
> my2cents re figures on percentages (... in a gender binary paradigm),
> well...
>
> I'd suggest to take into account User:Pundit's thoughtful considerations,
>
> author of: Jemielniak, Dariusz (2014), Com
my2cents re figures on percentages (... in a gender binary paradigm), well...
I'd suggest to take into account User:Pundit's thoughtful
considerations,
author of: Jemielniak, Dariusz (2014), Common knowledge? An ethnography
of Wikipedia, Stanford University Press, pp. 14-15
Dariusz Jemielniak w
Forwarding here in case anyone has information that could benefit Yana
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jane Darnell
Date: Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 9:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Gendergap] Wikipedia readers
To: "Addressing gender equity and exploring ways to increase the
participation of women wi
