On 05/04/11 04:47, Tim Starling wrote:
> Speaking of "fast", I did a quick benchmark of the [[Barack Obama]]
> article with templates pre-expanded. It took 22 seconds in HipHop and
> 112 seconds in Zend, which is not bad, for a first attempt. I reckon
> it would do better if a few of the regula
User "Tim Starling" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r82778.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/82778#c15725
Comment:
I don't see how doing your own reads is helping with that bug. The duplicates
will be missing whether you get them from
InterlanguageCentralExtension::
User "Nikerabbit" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85412.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85412#c15724
Comment:
Use new Article( $title, 0 ); unless you want hard to track bugs with wrong
articles being acted on.
___
Med
User "Tim Starling" changed the status of MediaWiki.r84997.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/84997#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://li
User "Tbleher" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85296.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85296#c15723
Comment:
We don't have to, but if we don't, why add a b/c function at all?
At the very least, the function is very confusing, because both name and
documentation imp
User "Tim Starling" changed the status of MediaWiki.r84791.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/84791#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://li
User "Dantman" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85296.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85296#c15722
Comment:
Why do we have to support old versions of extensions in new versions of core?
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing li
User "Tim Starling" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r82778.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/82778#c15721
Comment:
In EditPage::showEditForm:fields, you should do what you are doing already. Use
$parser->mOutput->setProperty() in the parser hook, remove the
ArticleS
User "Tbleher" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85296.
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
User "Tbleher" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85296.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85296#c15720
Comment:
Surely getSkin() should return a skin object rather than a Lin
User "Siebrand" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85403.
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
User "Siebrand" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85403.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85403#c15719
Comment:
FIXME:
+var_dump('foo');
_
I need to get back to work on reviews and deployments and other such
strategic things. I hope the work I've done on HipHop support is
enough to get the project started.
Initial benchmarks are showing a 5x speedup for article parsing, which
is better than we had hoped for. So there are big gains
User "MaxSem" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85387.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85387#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wi
User "Kaldari" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85415.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85415#c15718
Comment:
A lot of this rev is reverted in r85417, which is a better fix.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-c
User "Kaldari" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85417.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85417#c15717
Comment:
This is a less clunky fix for bug 27424. The other rev (r85415) was overkill.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing li
I am surely not the only person who gets Blondie's "Rapture" stuck in
their head whenever they see the topic for this thread?
No?
Ugh.
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mail
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Michael Costello wrote:
> Perhaps entirely outside of the scope of GSOC, I think it would be a
> fun project to make wikipedia.org and wikimedia.org accessible over
> IPv6.
>
> I noticed that my login was insecure, and that there was no SSL
> option. Adding a secur
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Michael Costello wrote:
> I noticed that my login was insecure, and that there was no SSL
> option.
There is a secure login option, and the login page has a link to it,
but the link wasn't showing up in the right place in the Vector skin.
I think I've fixed it.[0]
There is an SSL option:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/MediaWiki . However,
making https://www.mediawiki.org would be another useful project.
2011/4/4 Michael Costello
> Hello,
>
> I was encouraged (hello, Sumana) to post a Google Summer of Code idea
> and solicit comments
Hello,
I was encouraged (hello, Sumana) to post a Google Summer of Code idea
and solicit comments. So here goes.
Perhaps entirely outside of the scope of GSOC, I think it would be a
fun project to make wikipedia.org and wikimedia.org accessible over
IPv6.
Also, while creating an account to post
Daniel Friesen wrote:
> What "IS" so evil about actions? Besides the implementation details
> which are just that... something we can make better. In fact something
> we could potentially make work better than SpecialPages would in this
> context.
> Personally, I like tacking on ?action=edit and es
On 03/30/2011 09:22 AM, Magnus Manske wrote:
> Plus, free C++ MediaWiki parser ;-)
>
> Seriously, there should be a way to turn the entire package into a
> (huge) library; maybe transpile it and then replace the C++ code for
> index.php with a manually written library interface?
HipHop has a libra
On 11-04-04 08:12 PM, MZMcBride wrote:
> Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Happy-melon wrote:
>>> If people think it would be
>>> better as a special page we'd make
>>> http://foo.example.com/w/index.php?title=Bar&action=edit a hard redirect to
>>> Special:Edit/Bar; that has t
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Happy-melon wrote:
>> If people think it would be
>> better as a special page we'd make
>> http://foo.example.com/w/index.php?title=Bar&action=edit a hard redirect to
>> Special:Edit/Bar; that has the significant advantage of being able to be
>
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:05 PM, K. Peachey wrote:
> I don't see why we need to spilt it off to another list No reason
> not to do it here on wikitech-l.
Did you realize that that list already exists? There's also no reason
not to use both of them, with the ambassadors list one being more of
Brion Vibber wrote:
> I'd be kind of inclined to separate out the Skin and Linker worlds a bit
> further; really, the HTML formatting of links and such doesn't depend on the
> user (except in some edge cases like stub links which could in principle be
> done differently). The surrounding *skin* dep
User "Tim Starling" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r84782.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/84782#c15716
Comment:
total processing time: 188 days 4520h 57m 51.00s
gained time: 2 days 62h 32m 52.859375s
Too many hours!
_
Continuing with my changes to $wgOut, $wgUser, Skin, and SpecialPage
patterns.
The Linker is now static, $sk->link will still work, however you should
not be requiring a Skin anymore to use linker methods. Please use
Linker::link directly.
The only exception is the method to create an editsecti
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Casey Brown wrote:
>> * Gather a list of tech users[2] and invite them to the new wiki and/or
>> a mailing list.
>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-ambassadors ?
I don't see why we need to spilt it off to another list No reason
not to do
I second the idea of the static Linker class. It's far better than the
subclass system. Skin modification of links should focus on CSS anyway,
rather than trying to overload link generating code.
Daniel Friesen-4 wrote:
>
> On 11-04-04 02:40 PM, Platonides wrote:
>> I like it. Specially the Link
On 11-04-04 02:40 PM, Platonides wrote:
> I like it. Specially the Linker change. It really looks the way to have it.
>
>> I'm considering
>> making the Parser get it's linker via $po->getLinker(); (either
>> ParserOutput or ParserOptions, I need another look)
> The linker would be an input paramet
User "Reedy" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85402.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85402#c15713
Comment:
Making it private and the whitespace? Probably not
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists
User "Happy-melon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85302.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
User "Happy-melon" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85302.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85302#c15714
Comment:
Fixed in r85403
_
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Some steps to take:
> * Finally create global gadgets.
> * Create a central wiki for javascript sharing [1]
It seems like this always comes up for a number of different things --
"global pages" for interwiki transclusion and interlanguage extens
User "Dantman" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85403.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85403#c15715
Comment:
You can also drop $wgUser->getSkin( $wgTitle ); // set skin title
it's not needed.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mail
User "Happy-melon" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85402.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85402#c15712
Comment:
This is half of r79542. Is it worth merging the rest of that rev?
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
medi
User "Tim Starling" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r79108.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/79108#c15711
Comment:
I'm not sure. It's stopped happening now.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.
On 04/05/2011 07:31 AM, Platonides wrote:
> Having to create a reflection class and look for exceptions just to
> check for class existance is really ugly.
> However, looking at https://github.com/facebook/hiphop-php/issues/314 it
> seems to be a declaration before use problem (even though class_ex
User "Reedy" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85385.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85385#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.
On 04/05/2011 04:31 AM, Inez Korczynski wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> I have no problem running foo.php and test.php that you sent in hphpi, but
> also it compiles and run without any problems with hphp. What command
> exactly do you use to compile and then execute?
To compile:
hphp --target=cpp --format=
Very interesting! :-)
I'm a beginner in js stuff, but I realized how much js can be useful in a
number of ways (presently I am a "very simple gadgets maker" t help users
engaged into proofreading into wikisource). I'm a little worried about
additional server load coming from AJAX, and I suggest d
I think the source of the problems is the decentralizated process that
wikimedia javascript have followed.
Medium-size wikis will have 2-3 tech people. Small wikis will be lucky
to have 1 js-savy sysop.
Even wikis with no local expert may have just forked the Monobook.js
from its mother project and
User "Brion VIBBER" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85385.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85385#c15710
Comment:
Oh poop, I still haven't retrained my muscle memory for our space style. ;) The
empty() should be fine for arrays, but if it makes you feel better chang
User "Reedy" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85385.
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
User "Reedy" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85385.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85385#c15709
Comment:
empty? :P
Also, should have more spaces on your if statement ;)
User "Jeroen De Dauw" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85335.
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85335#c15708
Comment:
The current MW convention for fields AFAIK is $fieldName, not $m_fieldName.
Just saying, doesn't matter that much in any case
On 04/04/2011 02:20 PM, Platonides wrote:
> Michael Dale wrote:
>> Eventually it would be ideal to be able to 'just test your extension'
>> from the core bootstraper (ie dynamically generate our suite.xml and
>> namespace the registration of extension tests) ... but for now at least
>> not having t
I like it. Specially the Linker change. It really looks the way to have it.
> I'm considering
> making the Parser get it's linker via $po->getLinker(); (either
> ParserOutput or ParserOptions, I need another look)
The linker would be an input parameter, so it is a ParserOptions
Tim Starling wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 10:48 AM, Platonides wrote:
>> I was expecting this the week hip-hop hit. What would be required "to
>> target hip-hop"? How does that differ from working from Zend?
>
> I've explored the issues and made some initial changes to my working
> copy. I'm now waitin
User "Brion VIBBER" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85177.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85177#c15707
Comment:
Passing a string doesn't work either -- the timezone parameter needs to be a
DateTimeZone object.
___
Media
Michael Dale wrote:
> Eventually it would be ideal to be able to 'just test your extension'
> from the core bootstraper (ie dynamically generate our suite.xml and
> namespace the registration of extension tests) ... but for now at least
> not having to wait for all the core tests as you write you e
User "Reedy" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r39635.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/39635#c15706
Comment:
Better late than never? :P
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://l
User "Dantman" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r39635.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/39635#c15705
Comment:
@_@ I'm being told this 3 years later?
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia
User "Reedy" changed the status of MediaWiki.r39635.
Old Status: ok
New Status: fixme
User "Reedy" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r39635.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/39635#c15704
Comment:
Line 251 now in trunk has an undefined $name usage
___
User "Reedy" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85376.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85376#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wik
User "^demon" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85373.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85373#c15703
Comment:
Did you check it first? If so, you should bump the version in the README.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
me
User "Platonides" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85317.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85317#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://list
User "Platonides" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85302.
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
User "Platonides" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85302.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85302#c15702
Comment:
parserTests.php creates a new OutputPage.
_
User "Nikerabbit" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85361.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85361#c15701
Comment:
[[wikipedia:Byte order mark]] - and PHP doesn't like it.
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coder
User "Mdale" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85361.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85361#c15700
Comment:
not intentionally... What is BOM?
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
ht
User "Nikerabbit" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85361.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85361#c15699
Comment:
Did you add or remove BOM in
trunk/extensions/TimedMediaHandler/TimedMediaHandler.hooks.php?
___
MediaWiki-C
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85048.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85048#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wiki
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85328.
Old Status: new
New Status: deferred
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85328#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@list
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85276.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85276#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wiki
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r84637.
Old Status: new
New Status: resolved
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/84637#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@list
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85144.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85144#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wiki
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r84627.
Old Status: new
New Status: resolved
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/84627#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@list
User "^demon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85177.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: reverted
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85177#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://
User "Catrope" changed the status of MediaWiki.r84929.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL:
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/mediawiki/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/84929#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wiki
User "^demon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85358.
Old Status: new
New Status: ok
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85358#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wi
User "Nikola Smolenski" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85232.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85232#c15698
Comment:
Hey, it actually works :)
I reverted this revision in r85356, however in order to simulate [edit] links I
had to make an addition to SkinTemplate::
Hi Tim,
I have no problem running foo.php and test.php that you sent in hphpi, but
also it compiles and run without any problems with hphp. What command
exactly do you use to compile and then execute?
Inez
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tim Starling wrote:
> On 03/29/2011 10:48 AM, Platonides
Ah, sorry, realized what you mean a second after sending...
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Magnus Manske
wrote:
> http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIFTW ;-)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
>> Maybe my brain just made a leap here, but is there a plan for
>> implementing
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WYSIFTW ;-)
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> Maybe my brain just made a leap here, but is there a plan for
> implementing a web-based Javascript editor for MediaWiki?? This would be
> a hugely awesome feature. I've used jsFiddle (http://jsfiddle
I had a bit of a documentation challenge approaching the problem of
writing phpunit test for extensions, mostly because many of the
extensions do this very differently and the manual did not have any
recommendations.
It appears many extension have custom bootstraping code ( somewhat hacky
path dis
User "Platonides" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r79108.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/79108#c15697
Comment:
Works for me. How is Wiki::restInPeace() getting called for you?
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawi
User "^demon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85151.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
User "^demon" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85151.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85151#c15696
Comment:
Yay for followups :D
__
Also see the freebase / google acre system inline editor:
http://wiki.freebase.com/wiki/Acre
What is more impressive than the online editor, is the template and
integrated data query system in an seamless sandboxed server / client
javascript system. Its not perfect, but definitely includes some id
User "Tbleher" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r83080.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/83080#c15695
Comment:
This change breaks the CommentBox extension, which has a special page to add
comments to pages. The special page creates a FauxRequest which it submits to
t
User "^demon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85080.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
User "^demon" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85080.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85080#c15694
Comment:
All the concerns here have been addressed -> new.
_
User "^demon" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85080.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85080#c15693
Comment:
Grabbed the ones mentioned in this rev, see r85343
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@list
Maybe my brain just made a leap here, but is there a plan for
implementing a web-based Javascript editor for MediaWiki?? This would be
a hugely awesome feature. I've used jsFiddle (http://jsfiddle.net/)
which is really slick - syntax color-coding, tabbing that works, a Tidy
button(!), integrate
User "^demon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85211.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
User "^demon" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85211.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85211#c15692
Comment:
Merged the first 3.
The last two look merged to me, The regexes
User "Happy-melon" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85302.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
User "Happy-melon" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85302.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85302#c15691
Comment:
Heaven knows :D Should be fixed in r85332 though.
__
On 3 Apr 2011 at 10:56, Brion Vibber wrote:
> (Breaking this out from 'Focus on sister projects' thread.)
>
> I just want to give an official shout out, as Lead Software Architect for
> the Wikimedia Foundation, that Wikipedia's sister projects are important and
> that they need more love. Not on
User "Reedy" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85327.
Old Status: fixme
New Status: new
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85327#c0
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.
User "Raymond" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85302.
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
User "Raymond" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85302.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85302#c15690
Comment:
I am unsure if this revision is the right culprit for this fat
On 2 Apr 2011 at 16:08, Ryan Kaldari wrote:
> What do you guys think would be more useful:
>
> 1. Helping sister projects write up proposals for the Berlin Hackathon
If it is going to get selected and have outcome for my favourite wiki, then yes
;-)
> 2. Creating "The Complete Idiot's Guide to
User "Raymond" changed the status of MediaWiki.r85327.
Old Status: new
New Status: fixme
User "Raymond" also posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85327.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85327#c15689
Comment:
Seen on Translatewiki and on my local wiki:
Warning: require_
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Happy-melon wrote:
> If people think it would be
> better as a special page we'd make
> http://foo.example.com/w/index.php?title=Bar&action=edit a hard redirect to
> Special:Edit/Bar; that has the significant advantage of being able to be
> formed as an internal lin
On 04/04/2011 11:28 PM, Happy-melon wrote:
> For either case in the backend I would think we'd want to create an
> ActionPage base class and an EditActionPage from that, which looks
> internally rather like a SpecialPage construct, might even subclass it.
We had this discussion in January. That's
In the beginning, there was Article.php. And the Article class had methods
like Article::view(), Article::delete(), Article::protect(), etc. And the
fundamental codeflow of Mediawiki consisted of something along the lines of:
$article = new Article( $title );
$action = wfGetTheActionSomehow();
User "Tim Starling" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r79108.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/79108#c15688
Comment:
I get
Running test Interlanguage link, with prefix links... A database error has
occurred. Did you forget to run maintenance/update.php after upgrad
User "Siebrand" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85296.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85296#c15687
Comment:
Isn't it good practice to support this without warnings for at least one
release (1.18), have it whine the next release (1.19), and remove it in the 3rd
(1
User "Nikerabbit" posted a comment on MediaWiki.r85296.
Full URL: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Code/MediaWiki/85296#c15686
Comment:
You sure didn't give a lot of time to fix this...
___
MediaWiki-CodeReview mailing list
mediawiki-coderev...@l
93 matches
Mail list logo
