I would also consider Contribute, but only if the site information
architecture is relatively small and unlikely to change.
You can create areas within your perfectly crafted html that the
customer can edit and update with a desktop application. For the most
part, it seems to function well from w
It has been mentioned before, but I find Drupal has been great. It has
modules for most things, has a fabulous extensible content system where you
can define custom content types, a very powerful theming engine, and an
incredibly modular approach to core functionality.
When you learn how to use t
On 11-Jul-07, at 4:09 AM, Kevin Ross wrote:
Now that I have a realization that I need to incorporate some sort
of a CMS solution, can anyone lead me to resources that may help to
teach me the ropes? I am leaning towards PHP, as I am somewhat
familiar with the language. Thanks.
Hi Kevin,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.123interactive.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Collins
Sent: 11 July 2007 15:17
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits
Funny you should send that one Kevin, I am literally just
On 11-Jul-07, at 4:09 AM, Kevin Ross wrote:
Now that I have a realization that I need to incorporate some sort
of a CMS solution, can anyone lead me to resources that may help to
teach me the ropes? I am leaning towards PHP, as I am somewhat
familiar with the language. Thanks.
Hi Kevin,
dotnetnuke has some nice functionality, but out of the box is an
accessibility nightmare.
On 7/11/07, Paul Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Funny you should send that one Kevin, I am literally just scoping
around for a similar solution to the site I have just built. I was
recommended these tw
Funny you should send that one Kevin, I am literally just scoping
around for a similar solution to the site I have just built. I was
recommended these two aparrently free CMS solutions by another client.
http://www.dotnetnuke.com/
http://www.cmsmadesimple.org/
I am only just taking a look now so
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kevin Ross
Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 8:39 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits
I find it very disappointing that very few clients really appreciate the
amount of hard work that goes into designing and building a si
I find it very disappointing that very few clients really appreciate the
amount of hard work that goes into designing and building a site (in my
experience). This particular client wants to save a few bucks by
maintaining the site herself. She doesn't seem to realize that her time is
valuable as
Kevin Ross wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to find a solution to a nagging problem. Most of my
client's sites are not very dynamic and I update them as the client
requires. Because the updates are very infrequent, I have not been
charging very much for this ongoing support. However, I have a ne
sday, 10 July 2007 1:20 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] Client - Site Edits
Kevin Ross wrote:
> I am wondering for advice on this situation and I am also wondering
> how others handle ongoing updates after the initial design has been
> implemented.
>
> I am also
Thanks guys... I'm going to see what's happening on the CMS List.
Regards...
On 7/9/07, Jermayn Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In short yes it would probably be best...
I had the same problem with a client and so I gave him the website in
WordPress, so now I only do major style/ structure c
In short yes it would probably be best...
I had the same problem with a client and so I gave him the website in
WordPress, so now I only do major style/ structure changes and he
handles the content changes himself
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/2007 11:36:34 am >>>
I am also wondering if a CMS sys
Kevin Ross wrote:
I am wondering for advice on this situation and I am also wondering
how others handle ongoing updates after the initial design has been
implemented.
I am also wondering if a CMS system would, in any way, be a solution
to a situation like this.
Probably more appropriate for t
14 matches
Mail list logo
