On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 02:34:30PM -0700, Jeff Victor wrote:
> * When you share a ZFS fs via NFS, what happens to files and
> filesystems that exceed the limits of NFS?
What limits do you have in mind? I'm not an NFS expert, but I think
that NFSv4 (and probably v3) supports 64-bit file sizes, so
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James Dickens wrote:
Hi
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let h
Some miscellaneous questions:
* When you share a ZFS fs via NFS, what happens to files and filesystems that
exceed the limits of NFS?
* Is there a recommendation or some guidelines to help answer the question "how
full should a pool be before deciding it's time add disk space to a pool?"
* Mig
Hello Roch,
Friday, May 19, 2006, 3:53:35 PM, you wrote:
RBPE> Robert Milkowski writes:
>> Hello Roch,
>>
>> Monday, May 15, 2006, 3:23:14 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> RBPE> The question put forth is whether the ZFS 128K blocksize is sufficient
>> RBPE> to saturate a regular disk. There is great
Hello Roch,
Monday, May 22, 2006, 3:42:41 PM, you wrote:
RBPE> Robert Says:
RBPE> Just to be sure - you did reconfigure system to actually allow larger
RBPE> IO sizes?
RBPE> Sure enough, I messed up (I had no tuning to get the above data); So
RBPE> 1 MB was my max transfer sizes. Using
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:37:31 PM, you wrote:
TG> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> Hello Tom,
>>
>> Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 9:46:24 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> TG> Hi,
>>
>> TG> I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
>> TG> the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
>>
>> T
Hello Roland,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:31:37 PM, you wrote:
RM> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> James Dickens wrote:
>> > I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
>> > so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
>> > space how ever he see's fit, if he
Hello James,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:25:10 PM, you wrote:
JD> On 5/23/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 6:43:11 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> JD> Hi
>>
>> JD> I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
>> JD> so if i cr
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 9:46:24 PM, you wrote:
TG> Hi,
TG> I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
TG> the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
TG> I am trying to figure out what the pro's and cons are of these two configs.
TG> One
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> James Dickens wrote:
> > I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
> > so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
> > space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
> > take 5000 snapshots its his filesys
On 5/23/06, Robert Milkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello James,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 6:43:11 PM, you wrote:
JD> Hi
JD> I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
JD> so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
JD> space how ever he see's f
Hello Tom,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 9:46:24 PM, you wrote:
TG> Hi,
TG> I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
TG> the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
TG> I am trying to figure out what the pro's and cons are of these two configs.
TG> One thing I have noticed is tha
Hello James,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 6:43:11 PM, you wrote:
JD> Hi
JD> I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
JD> so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
JD> space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
JD> take 5000 sn
Hello Darren,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 4:19:05 PM, you wrote:
DJM> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>> The problem is that with stronger compression algorithms due to
>> performance reasons I want to decide which algorithms and to what
>> files ZFS should try to compress. For some files I write a lot of dat
Hi,
I have these two pools, four luns each. One has two mirrors x two luns,
the other is one mirror x 4 luns.
I am trying to figure out what the pro's and cons are of these two configs.
One thing I have noticed is that the single mirror 4 lun config can
survive as many as three lun failures.
James Dickens wrote:
Hi
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let him. If he wants to
destro
Just a note about build 39. I tried Tim's smreg add suggestion and it worked, I
now see the ZFS Admin page. But when I click on the link, the next page shows:
Application Error
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /jsp/zfsmodule/DevicesTree.jsp(51,2) The end
tag "http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailma
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 11:49:47AM +0200, Wout Mertens wrote:
> Can that same method be used to figure out what files changed between
> snapshots?
To figure out what files changed, we need to (a) figure out what object
numbers changed, and (b) do the object number to file name translation.
The
Hi
I think ZFS should add the concept of ownership to a ZFS filesystem,
so if i create a filesystem for joe, he should be able to use his
space how ever he see's fit, if he wants to turn on compression or
take 5000 snapshots its his filesystem, let him. If he wants to
destroy snapshots, he create
Robert Milkowski wrote:
The problem is that with stronger compression algorithms due to
performance reasons I want to decide which algorithms and to what
files ZFS should try to compress. For some files I write a lot of data
even if they are compressing quite good i don't want it - too much CPU
w
Steve,
Thanks for the update, I will try again with Build 40. I generally use the CLI
anyway, but when showing ZFS to others it is always nice to include the web GUI
as some people feel more comfortable with it.
Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
Hello Darren,
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 11:12:15 AM, you wrote:
DJM> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>>
But only if compression is turned on for a filesystem.
>>> Of course, and the default is off.
>>>
However I think it would be good to have an API so application can
hey all,
I just posted some stuff I'd been playing around with wrt. more desktop
integration of ZFS functionality, full story at:
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/timf?entry=zfs_on_your_desktop
it's not much, but it's a start...
cheers,
tim
[ Oh, and if you ha
> is anyone else seeing this? I couldn't find any
> references to this in
> the bug database.
>
I'm also seeing this behavior on occasion with b36 and b38...from the b36 box...
Sun Microsystems Inc. SunOS 5.11 snv_36 October 2007
-bash-3.00$ iostat 1
***snip***
ttysd0
Can that same method be used to figure out what files changed between
snapshots?
Wout.
On 22 May 2006, at 08:25, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:23:02PM -0600, Gregory Shaw wrote:
DATASET OBJECT RANGE
1b 2402lvl=0 blkid=1965
I haven't found
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Robert Milkowski wrote:
>>>
But only if compression is turned on for a filesystem.
>>> Of course, and the default is off.
>>>
However I think it would be good to have an API so application can
decide what to compress and what not.
>>> I agree that an AP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
But only if compression is turned on for a filesystem.
Of course, and the default is off.
However I think it would be good to have an API so application can
decide what to compress and what not.
I agree that an API would be good. However I do
27 matches
Mail list logo
