(313) Re: Theo Parrish Online Interviews
Someone posted a link to a Theo Parrish interview lately, wondered does anyone still have it? This one is dope... http://www.kcrw.org/cgi-bin/db/kcrw.pl?show_code=ccair_date=7/9/03tmplt_ty pe=show
RE: (313) Kenny and Jeff
That was already done by 'The Scientist' :) -- http://matrix.iroprax.com -Original Message- From: placid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Kenny and Jeff Next ep will be the exorcist... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2004 18:25 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Kenny and Jeff So Jeff Mills has the Exhibitionist Kenny Larkin has The Narcissist do I see a trend developing? MEK
Re: (313) Kenny and Jeff
i am waiting here for some to make the joke that the next UR record will be from The Anarchist ;) Oh i saw Plaid The Rephlex disco assault system last friday and they rocked! If you can see them somewhere make sure you go. Cyclob played some amaxing records, DMX Crew live where brilliant and The Bug's liveset was extremely bass heavy :) On 1-feb-04, at 16:42, Gerald wrote: That was already done by 'The Scientist' :) -- http://matrix.iroprax.com -Original Message- From: placid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: RE: (313) Kenny and Jeff Next ep will be the exorcist... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 January 2004 18:25 To: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) Kenny and Jeff So Jeff Mills has the Exhibitionist Kenny Larkin has The Narcissist do I see a trend developing? MEK
Re: (313) capturing a live mix.
I think that any mix represented as 'Live' should be presented without edits, but certainly things like removing silence from then ends, big clicks, etc is certainly fair cricket. But more than anything being able to maximise the average level of a mix after the fact will make it better listening. I have put up mixes of mine in the past, where it was painfully obvious that I didn't edit out mistakes. On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: edit?! Kent - that's cheatin' ;)
(313) roy cordu?
i've been listening to roy cordu's 'parce que je reve' 12 again the past couple of days, and was wondering if he/he/they had released anything else? anyone know? jurren _ Talk with your online friends with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.nl/
Re: (313) RIAA v. DJ's
sorry jurren but that's incorrect. in a piece of recorded music there are two copyrights: 1) the copyright in the sound recording (generally owned by the recording company) 2) the copyright in the musical work or composition (ultimately owned by the composer(s) who may be represented by a publisher) if you want to copy a song from a cd/vinyl to another medium you need to clear both copyrights. if you wanted to to cover a song (ie. just use the composition but not the recording) you only need the permission of the owner of the musical work. BUMA/STEMRA (NL), SACEM/SDRM (FR), BMI/ASCAP/SESAC/FOX (US), APRA/AMCOS (AUS), MCPS/PRS (UK) are composer based organisations - they have nothing to do with record company associations like RIAA (US), BPI (UK), ARIA (AUS). Typically the relationship between composers and record companies is adverserial. For record companies, payment to composers represents a leakage of profits and generally record companies will do everything they can to underpay composers for the use of their copyright works. you won't be able to license the use of singular sound recordings through associations like the RIAA. you will need to go directly to the label itself. the riaa may however offer 'blanket' licenses for the use of a whole heap of their sound recordings on a radio or tv station. on 2/2/04 1:06 AM, jurren baars at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Michael Elliot-Knight wrote: OK - so here's another question It's the Record Industry Association of America - which I then assume excludes UK, Japan, Euro, Oz, etc. labels so then, hypothetically, I could make a mix CD consisting solely of labels and artists from these countries and the RIAA then legally can't touch it because it has no jurisdiction over the content. no. the RIAA is the organisation that controls the copyrights in America, like BUMA/STEMRA in the Netherlands or SECAM in France. this means that if you use copyrighted material IN the US, you'll have to go through the RIAA to get permission. if you use it in the Netherlands, you'll have to go through BUMA/STEMRA. the RIAA, BUMA and others exchange their revenues, so in the end every coppyright owner gets what he/she deserves. so even if you use - for example - pepe braddock's 'deep burnt' on a mix, you have to license it through the RIAA, who in turn will make sure the money goes to SECAM, who will give it to pepe or his recordcompany. jurren _ Talk with your online friends with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.nl/
Re: (313) RIAA v. DJ's
Michael Elliot-Knight wrote: OK - so here's another question It's the Record Industry Association of America - which I then assume excludes UK, Japan, Euro, Oz, etc. labels so then, hypothetically, I could make a mix CD consisting solely of labels and artists from these countries and the RIAA then legally can't touch it because it has no jurisdiction over the content. no. the RIAA is the organisation that controls the copyrights in America, like BUMA/STEMRA in the Netherlands or SECAM in France. this means that if you use copyrighted material IN the US, you'll have to go through the RIAA to get permission. if you use it in the Netherlands, you'll have to go through BUMA/STEMRA. the RIAA, BUMA and others exchange their revenues, so in the end every coppyright owner gets what he/she deserves. so even if you use - for example - pepe braddock's 'deep burnt' on a mix, you have to license it through the RIAA, who in turn will make sure the money goes to SECAM, who will give it to pepe or his recordcompany. jurren _ Talk with your online friends with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.nl/
