Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Dmitry

I have this new release: http://www.discogs.com/release/1073327

This is a reissue of classic tracks from Ferox and Russ Gabriel. 
Absolutely brilliant.


ben thompson wrote:

 i have a Too funk release of ferox from the 1995
http://www.discogs.com/release/62572
 that i loved.
hope this is as good.anyone heard yet?

On 1 Nov 2007, at 23:53, Jussi Lehtonen wrote:



Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I 
hope that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.


Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


Jussi Lehtonen

  Metaprogram yourself.



.



Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread ben thompson

 i have a Too funk release of ferox from the 1995
http://www.discogs.com/release/62572
 that i loved.
hope this is as good.anyone heard yet?

On 1 Nov 2007, at 23:53, Jussi Lehtonen wrote:



Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I 
hope that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.


Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


Jussi Lehtonen

  Metaprogram yourself.





Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Matt Kane's Brain

On Nov 2, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Martin Dust wrote:

get some quarters and a jukebox.


That's hardly democracy. Last time I spent money on a jukebox, some  
other dude with more quarters spent like 10 bucks bumping all his  
stuff to the top to prevent me from playing Massive Attack again.


OK, I guess that IS like democracy.

--
matt kane's brain
http://hydrogenproject.com
aim - mkbatwerk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Odeluga, Ken
... In America Martin, yes, where money=votes!

-Original Message-
From: Matt Kane's Brain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 November 2007 11:14
To: Martin Dust
Cc: 313 Distribution List
Subject: Re: (313) have we run out of reality?


On Nov 2, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Martin Dust wrote:
 get some quarters and a jukebox.

That's hardly democracy. Last time I spent money on a jukebox, some  
other dude with more quarters spent like 10 bucks bumping all his  
stuff to the top to prevent me from playing Massive Attack again.

OK, I guess that IS like democracy.

--
matt kane's brain
http://hydrogenproject.com
aim - mkbatwerk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
And this is exactly what would happen on a dance floor with any good
dancers.  And knowing a few dancers they'd turn up at an event where they
knew their bodies were creating the sound and eventually you'd have another
dance circle.  All the good dancers in the middle - showing off one at a
time - and everyone else standing around watching.

MEK

Matt Kane's Brain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/02/2007
06:14:09 AM:

 On Nov 2, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Martin Dust wrote:
  get some quarters and a jukebox.

 That's hardly democracy. Last time I spent money on a jukebox, some
 other dude with more quarters spent like 10 bucks bumping all his
 stuff to the top to prevent me from playing Massive Attack again.

 OK, I guess that IS like democracy.

 --
 matt kane's brain
 http://hydrogenproject.com
 aim - mkbatwerk
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

 Its a complex chain of affairs .. but is the artist the person who
 records the record
 or the person who builds the sound system?  Or is it the Dj who
 plays the record
 or the Engineer who tunes the system and the frequencies that you hear.

It's all of them - if they do it right.  Problem is, few good sound system
designers exist.
Raves have been a black hole of good sound system design.  Line up a bunch
of speakers into a single wall and blast it as loud as you can has been the
rave motto for ages.

 Our societies have ways of isolating these roles and giving one
moreimportance
 over the other .. but if one role can't exist with out the other ..
 which is really
 more important.

eh?  I think those that know speak of all of the legendary
DJs/engineer/sound system designers in the same breath.  Where would Larry
Levan be without Richard Long? Nicky Siano and David Mancuso without Alex
Rosner?

See, the BIG problem is the entire rave culture was outside of the original
DJ nightclub thing (especially the legendary NYC gay nightclubs).  I've
argued countless times with local raves who just Do Not Get It.  They tell
me lasers and other bs are just as important as a sound system which is
complete bull crap.  They don't understand the importance of sound and how
it translates into an experience that can send people into outerspace.

Raves were disassociated from the discos and as a result you've had to deal
with people who don't get it.  As far as I'm concerned they are two totally
different cultures with different histories with only occasional
cross-over.  However, one does not translate well into the other. I see
more DJs from the disco world being asked to perform at raves than I see
rave DJs being asked to perform at the discos that know.

MEK




Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread kent williams
I'm getting tired of people saying It's all been done.

It hasn't all been done. I'm 50 years old, and the world I grew up in
doesn't exist any more.

In a lot of ways, maybe music still repeats existing patterns, maybe
people still have to learn to get along with their signficant others 
families  neighbors the same way they always did.

But in 1969, it wasn't just that we didn't have laptops, or drum
machines, or TB303s, or dance events as they're now known.  We
couldn't even envision such a thing.  We were just getting used to the
possibilities of multitrack recording. Many, if not most, televisions
were black and white and you were lucky to get 4 channels.

A lot of things that are central to people's lives now didn't even
exist in 1969.

If you say It's all been done before really means something to a
greater or lesser extent similar to what happened before is happening
again.  And it happens in a completely different context, which
changes how one perceives it.

The point being, Joshua Bell playing Bach on a 300 year old
Stradivarius in Carnegie Hall is not the same thing as someone playing
the same piece on the same vioin when it was new.  Seeing (as I did
recently) Rhys Chatham performing his Guitar Trio in 2007 isn't the
same thing as Rhys Chatham peforming the piece in downtown NYC in
1971.

I wish people would stop obsessing over what's NEW and worry about what's GOOD.


Re: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

2007-11-02 Thread Martin Dust
Skatter will put it up next week Rob, so just check back on that  
second link in a week or so...


m

On 2 Nov 2007, at 14:40, Robert Taylor wrote:


Brilliant - does anyone know where I get October's mix?


Rob Taylor
VT Librarian
x8599
Hatch Desk x1088
 VT Library Users' Guide

-Original Message-
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 November 2007 13:02
To: 313 Distribution List
Subject: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week


The new mix from Rob Hall, one of my favourite DJ's
http://www.rob-hall.co.uk

if you've missed some of his mixes you can grab them from here:
http://www.skkatter.net/audio

Pinch - Underwater Dancehall
Cloaks EP on Werk Discs

and these Mick Harris interviews:
http://matt.vkool.com/harrisdoc.html


m
## 
###

Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not  
necessarily represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically  
stated. This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for  
the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have  
received this email in

error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under  
English law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .


4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England  
and Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London  
SW1P 2TX.


VAT no: GB 626475817

## 
###






RE: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

2007-11-02 Thread Robert Taylor
Brilliant - does anyone know where I get October's mix?  


Rob Taylor
VT Librarian
x8599
Hatch Desk x1088
 VT Library Users' Guide

-Original Message-
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 November 2007 13:02
To: 313 Distribution List
Subject: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week


The new mix from Rob Hall, one of my favourite DJ's
http://www.rob-hall.co.uk

if you've missed some of his mixes you can grab them from here:
http://www.skkatter.net/audio

Pinch - Underwater Dancehall
Cloaks EP on Werk Discs

and these Mick Harris interviews:
http://matt.vkool.com/harrisdoc.html


m
#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under English law, is 
at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .

4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England and Wales 
has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2TX. 

VAT no: GB 626475817

#


Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread JT Stewart
We've got releases coming on Down Low by a former Ferox artist. He
released as Rei Mitsui on Ferox, and also had a stunning record on
Russ' short-lived Player imprint as Nebraska.

Nebraska - Vicarious Disco 12 feat two Soul 223 remixes - dL-014
--releasedate Nov. 15th

Nebraska - Mixed Up Music For Mixed Up People - dLNEBLP/dLNEBCD --
releasedate Feb. 2008

JT

On 11/1/07, Jussi Lehtonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I hope
 that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.

 Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


 Jussi Lehtonen

Metaprogram yourself.



Re: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

2007-11-02 Thread Nick Breinich
ah thanks for that.  i've been looking for 1-3.  rob hall is amazing.
i'll have to check out that pinch disc.

-nick

On Nov 2, 2007 6:01 AM, Martin Dust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 if you've missed some of his mixes you can grab them from here:
 http://www.skkatter.net/audio


Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread robin



Woo, I look forward to that.

Soul 223 mixes too. Wicked.

robin...


We've got releases coming on Down Low by a former Ferox artist. He
released as Rei Mitsui on Ferox, and also had a stunning record on
Russ' short-lived Player imprint as Nebraska.

Nebraska - Vicarious Disco 12 feat two Soul 223 remixes - dL-014
--releasedate Nov. 15th

Nebraska - Mixed Up Music For Mixed Up People - dLNEBLP/dLNEBCD --
releasedate Feb. 2008




Re: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

2007-11-02 Thread Martin Dust

Yeah, he's only up to number 7 at the minute, all well worth getting.

m


On 2 Nov 2007, at 14:44, Robert Taylor wrote:


Fantastic, cheers Martin - will that be all of them then?


Rob Taylor
VT Librarian
x8599
Hatch Desk x1088
 VT Library Users' Guide

-Original Message-
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 November 2007 14:50
To: 313 Distribution List
Subject: Re: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

Skatter will put it up next week Rob, so just check back on that  
second

link in a week or so...

m

On 2 Nov 2007, at 14:40, Robert Taylor wrote:


Brilliant - does anyone know where I get October's mix?


Rob Taylor
VT Librarian
x8599
Hatch Desk x1088
 VT Library Users' Guide

-Original Message-
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 November 2007 13:02
To: 313 Distribution List
Subject: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week


The new mix from Rob Hall, one of my favourite DJ's
http://www.rob-hall.co.uk

if you've missed some of his mixes you can grab them from here:
http://www.skkatter.net/audio

Pinch - Underwater Dancehall
Cloaks EP on Werk Discs

and these Mick Harris interviews:
http://matt.vkool.com/harrisdoc.html


m
# 
#



###
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically
stated. This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for
the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have
received this email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under
English law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .

4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England
and Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London
SW1P 2TX.

VAT no: GB 626475817

# 
#



###



## 
###

Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not  
necessarily represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically  
stated. This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for  
the use of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have  
received this email in

error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under  
English law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .


4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England  
and Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London  
SW1P 2TX.


VAT no: GB 626475817

## 
###






Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Martin Dust


On 2 Nov 2007, at 11:14, Matt Kane's Brain wrote:


On Nov 2, 2007, at 6:36 AM, Martin Dust wrote:

get some quarters and a jukebox.


That's hardly democracy.


I say screw democracy when it comes to music, no one is ever going to  
erect a statue to a committee and the Wright brothers never had a  
pilots license either, balls to it.



Last time I spent money on a jukebox, some other dude with more  
quarters spent like 10 bucks bumping all his stuff to the top to  
prevent me from playing Massive Attack again.


That's the politics of the jukebox tho :)



OK, I guess that IS like democracy.


As close as you'll probably get.

m


Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Dmitry

Yes. I like more REAL minimal sound of Ferox like Precession for example:
http://www.discogs.com/release/6133

And in Hawtin's mix selection tracks from Ferox absolutely excellent. I 
think Mixmag #20 his best mix maybe with Decks, FX  909...


Dmitry,
www.mixmag.ru
http://www.myspace.com/subborg


Paul Kendrick wrote:

The reissue 12 had a couple of classic tracks on it and nearly
everything that Russ Gabriel does is excellent. Most of the stuff on
ferox is wicked, it was minimal before the current minimal sound you get
today, if you have a look at the track list on this
http://www.discogs.com/release/75030  there is loads on Ferox stuff on
it, it sums up that period really well.. Most of the stuff on the label
is tip top.

http://www.discogs.com/release/17543
http://www.discogs.com/release/17991

Both wicked

-Original Message-
From: Dmitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 November 2007 08:43

To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

I have this new release: http://www.discogs.com/release/1073327

This is a reissue of classic tracks from Ferox and Russ Gabriel. 
Absolutely brilliant.


ben thompson wrote:
  

 i have a Too funk release of ferox from the 1995
http://www.discogs.com/release/62572
 that i loved.
hope this is as good.anyone heard yet?

On 1 Nov 2007, at 23:53, Jussi Lehtonen wrote:


Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I 
hope that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.


Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


Jussi Lehtonen

  Metaprogram yourself.

  

.





  


Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight

 I suppose I see limitations in the singular Dj as a bio feedback
 sensor.  At least I
 don't herald the the role of the Dj as much as I used to.

there's going to be limitations in any situation
it's what you do within those limitations that matter

 Besides .. what I am suggesting is to providing a Dj more input
 sources to work
 more information to manipulate.   Real-time organic inputs that are
 a result of the
 situation that is occuring. Then shifting their position as the
 central figure to one
 that perhaps working in collaboration with many other to
 facilitating the audience
 experience.

right, understand - and this is already done and has been done for ages
see my last comment (I'm working backwards up this post)

 Haven't we been through the whole exercise as Dj being God!

only those who have the misfortune of thinking that way have been through
that exercise

 Maybe we will end up like the chess world where we try to build a machine
that
 can mix better the Jeff Mills ??

you can find videos of DJ machines on youtube
http://youtube.com/watch?v=TfDbyaVOMf0
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2cwtS7_f8cM

problem is, chess can be broken down to a mathematical process
DJing cannot - no matter how much programming you put into it - that's the
soul thing that people always mention
I suppose it all depends though on what a person considers to be a good
DJ.
Some like extreme surgical precision. Others, like Tom and myself, prefer
to hear the human behind the records.

 I'm not particularly interested in the ultimate machine DJ.  But I
 am interested in
 where technology can take the performance of music.

I could see the concept, if executed correctly, being a load of fun but in
the end a novelty.
Others might latch on to it like a baby to a mother's teat.


 I study my history as well.   However as a generation, Rave was our way
of
 capturing the process and finding our own interpretations for mass
 celebration.

 Why are we not allowed to claim some ownership and involvement with how
 we control our environments?

 If everything has happened before and there is nothing new under the sun,
 then where am I supposed to locate myself as a free thinking individual.

 You are prescribing me a role of either being the artist or the audience.

With this concept you've drawn up this situation hasn't been eliminated
though.
There are still a clearly set group of controllers and the audience
interacts within the environment that has been set up for them.
It might seem like the autonomy has been pushed back further but I don't
think it really has.


 What's wrong with removing this separation?  Whats wrong with blurring
the
 line between who is in control and who is being controlled?

Funny that you think the DJ isn't being controlled by his/her audience.
Ever see a DJ clear a floor and then dig for a record that will bring them
all back on.
The control (I prefer communication) goes back and forth in a good
situation.

 One of the documented and often celebrated aspects of original rave
culture
 was how it made everyone part of the experience.  People revelled in the
idea
 that their presence in the dance was significant.

Raves don't have a corner on that market.  It was new to those who hadn't
experienced that before.  However, raves were not where it began in the
20th Century.

 The early inspirations of dance music reflected this positive enthusiasm.

 The music responded to and initiated the tribal, collective nature
 of the dance.
 The shift away from ego centric front of house production enlightened
people
 in a way that was reminiscent of beating drums around a fire ??

 Why is it such a challenge to suggest we continue to explore this more
 collective energy in the music?

sorry, this all calls to mind raver psytrance type cyber-hippy talk

 You are arguing that you want to experience the artist in the music,
 yet you are
 also saying that the artist is a feedback filter to the audience.
 So why not open
 up this process reduce the mediation and increase the feedback?

because not everyone has something to say nor can they express it very well
that's why in tribal groups you have dedicated drummers - because they
understand rhythm and the drum
you have dedicated dancers - because they have a knowledge of body and
movement
you have dedicated singers - because they have a voice that others
appreciate

not having that ability is not a bad thing however
I don't see how getting everyone involved is going to really make it any
better
take a look at the number of crap records in record shops and you can
clearly see that not everyone can do it very well
nor should they

there's a few people I've seen dancing that I think we're all better off
not having their movements translated into sound thank you ;-)


 If technology is enabling us to reproduce, trigger, sample, filter,
effect and
 manipulate music in increasingly complex ways.. why could an artist or
group
 of artists not be enabled to enable the audience to 

RE: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

2007-11-02 Thread Robert Taylor
Fantastic, cheers Martin - will that be all of them then? 


Rob Taylor
VT Librarian
x8599
Hatch Desk x1088
 VT Library Users' Guide

-Original Message-
From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 November 2007 14:50
To: 313 Distribution List
Subject: Re: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week

Skatter will put it up next week Rob, so just check back on that second
link in a week or so...

m

On 2 Nov 2007, at 14:40, Robert Taylor wrote:

 Brilliant - does anyone know where I get October's mix?


 Rob Taylor
 VT Librarian
 x8599
 Hatch Desk x1088
  VT Library Users' Guide

 -Original Message-
 From: Martin Dust [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 02 November 2007 13:02
 To: 313 Distribution List
 Subject: (313) Rocking My Boat This Week


 The new mix from Rob Hall, one of my favourite DJ's
 http://www.rob-hall.co.uk

 if you've missed some of his mixes you can grab them from here:
 http://www.skkatter.net/audio

 Pinch - Underwater Dancehall
 Cloaks EP on Werk Discs

 and these Mick Harris interviews:
 http://matt.vkool.com/harrisdoc.html


 m
 ##

 ###
 Note:

 Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not  
 necessarily represent
 those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically  
 stated. This email
 and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for  
 the use of the
 individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have  
 received this email in
 error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Thank You.

 Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under  
 English law, is at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .

 4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England  
 and Wales has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London  
 SW1P 2TX.

 VAT no: GB 626475817

 ##

 ###


#
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.

Channel Four Television Corporation, created by statute under English law, is 
at 124 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 2TX .

4 Ventures Limited (Company No. 04106849), incorporated in England and Wales 
has its registered office at 124 Horseferry Road, London SW1P 2TX. 

VAT no: GB 626475817

#


Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Guilherme Menegon Arantes
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:33:20AM -0400, JT Stewart wrote:
 We've got releases coming on Down Low by a former Ferox artist. He
 released as Rei Mitsui on Ferox, and also had a stunning record on
 Russ' short-lived Player imprint as Nebraska.


JT,

Is this co-produced by James Mason as the Rei Mitsui on Ferox?
Sounds exciting anyway.

G

--

Guilherme Menegon Arantes, PhD   São Paulo, Brasil
__



Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Dmitry

Yes. I like more REAL minimal sound of Ferox like Precession for example:
http://www.discogs.com/release/6133

And in Hawtin's mix selection tracks from Ferox absolutely excellent. I 
think Mixmag #20 his best mix maybe with Decks, FX  909...


Dmitry,
www.mixmag.ru
http://www.myspace.com/subborg


Paul Kendrick wrote:

The reissue 12 had a couple of classic tracks on it and nearly
everything that Russ Gabriel does is excellent. Most of the stuff on
ferox is wicked, it was minimal before the current minimal sound you get
today, if you have a look at the track list on this
http://www.discogs.com/release/75030  there is loads on Ferox stuff on
it, it sums up that period really well.. Most of the stuff on the label
is tip top.

http://www.discogs.com/release/17543
http://www.discogs.com/release/17991

Both wicked

-Original Message-
From: Dmitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 November 2007 08:43

To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

I have this new release: http://www.discogs.com/release/1073327

This is a reissue of classic tracks from Ferox and Russ Gabriel. 
Absolutely brilliant.


ben thompson wrote:
  

 i have a Too funk release of ferox from the 1995
http://www.discogs.com/release/62572
 that i loved.
hope this is as good.anyone heard yet?

On 1 Nov 2007, at 23:53, Jussi Lehtonen wrote:


Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I 
hope that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.


Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


Jussi Lehtonen

  Metaprogram yourself.

  

.





  


Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Martin Dust


On 2 Nov 2007, at 12:29, Odeluga, Ken wrote:


... In America Martin, yes, where money=votes!


Money and Lies more like, the UK is no different - apathy rules and  
your rights can go take a running jump if you ask me.


m


(313) Rocking My Boat This Week

2007-11-02 Thread Martin Dust


The new mix from Rob Hall, one of my favourite DJ's
http://www.rob-hall.co.uk

if you've missed some of his mixes you can grab them from here:
http://www.skkatter.net/audio

Pinch - Underwater Dancehall
Cloaks EP on Werk Discs

and these Mick Harris interviews:
http://matt.vkool.com/harrisdoc.html


m


Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Martin Dust
With the greatest respect this sounds like something off Tomorrows  
World in the 1970's :)


Give me a good DJ, a chunk of darkness and perhaps a strobe, that's  
enough for me.


All this suggests is that music and djing is some kind of community  
democracy, I shudder at the very thought of that, if that's what you  
want - get some quarters and a jukebox.


m

On 2 Nov 2007, at 01:49, still want to wrote:



well, you either have a person being the control mechanism (DJ)  
who can
observe the room, take in emotional levels, combine them with her/ 
his own,
and spit back out something unexpected (like stopping the music  
and telling

a story to the audience that has some relevance to what's going on)
or
you have a machine take in parameters, numbers, equations, and mix  
them
with something that has been programmed into it (and a slower  
learning
curve) and then spitting it back out hopefully matching where an  
audience

wants to go


I was very inspired by sci -fi writer Paul J. McAuley who described  
a future
rave  where multiple VJ/DJ people controlled extensive banks of bio  
feedback

sensors ..  in this system everyone in the audience provides input and
everyone is able to filter and feedback the input sources onto the  
system
which is an interconnected series of sound systems, holographic  
projectors,

lasers and lights.

There is no specific centre to the situation .. it is a sprawling  
massive of vibe

which he calls the constant Wave.

It was one of the more interesting future account of a rave that I  
had ever read.


http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue33/books.html





Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread robin


Well ... to my knowledge some of the PA setups that we were using  
in the

early 90's had never been done before.

Maybe they don't do it where you guys are.  But here rave systems  
are setup
so that all the speakers face towards the centre. The sound  
surround the

dance floor and envelopes the audience from all sides.

No other event that uses amplified sound for music will do this  
usually.


Have a read of Tim Lawrence's Love Saves the Day and read about some  
of the disco sound systems of the 70s.


However, I take your point that maybe with raves this kind of setup  
became more widespead and that the sound system (the whole setup not  
just the equipment) is more important than people give it credit.




Here in Manchester (UK) no-one takes the sound seriously and I'm  
slightly disillusioned about going to parties as a result. A lot of  
the DJs are lazy too which does help either (but that's a whole other  
rant). I have even DJ'd for people and instead of getting paid  
actually paid to have the soundsystem beefed up. It's a shame no-one  
else seems that bothered.


The music I love means nothing without a decent system.

robin...



Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
On 11/2/07, still want to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I suppose I see limitations in the singular Dj as a bio feedback sensor.  At 
 least I
 don't herald the the role of the Dj as much as I used to.

why? what has changed? seen too many crappy deejays?

 Besides .. what I am suggesting is to providing a Dj more input sources to 
 work
 more information to manipulate.   Real-time organic inputs that are a result 
 of the
 situation that is occuring. Then shifting their position as the central 
 figure to one
 that perhaps working in collaboration with many other to facilitating the 
 audience
 experience.

but that is already EXACTLY what happens.

 Haven't we been through the whole exercise as Dj being God!

im not sure how what i have said can be interpreted as such. in fact,
i said many things exaxctly contrary to that idea.

 Maybe we will end up like the chess world where we try to build a machine that
 can mix better the Jeff Mills ??

 I'm not particularly interested in the ultimate machine DJ.  But I am 
 interested in
 where technology can take the performance of music.

based on what, though? its been years of serato, final scratch,
ableton live, etc etc and none of them have produced an experience
greater than someone with a good set of records and some soul
interacting with a good crowd. why is it that this way can't be the
best way?

 If everything has happened before and there is nothing new under the sun,
 then where am I supposed to locate myself as a free thinking individual.

why do you care?!?! i just dont understand this philosophy: i must be
different simply because i can be.

 You are prescribing me a role of either being the artist or the audience.

and the problem with this is?

 What's wrong with removing this separation?  Whats wrong with blurring the
 line between who is in control and who is being controlled?

because those lines are already as blurred in a deejay set as they can
be. it all works together flawlessly. i dont want joe blow who doesn't
know jack sh*t about music controlling *my* experience. i want the
person whose job it is to be awesome at deejaying to be able to do his
own thing in conjunction with the energy from the crowd.

 One of the documented and often celebrated aspects of original rave culture
 was how it made everyone part of the experience.  People revelled in the idea
 that their presence in the dance was significant.

this was not new. as someone else mentioned, you simply must read
love saves the day, these ideas were what disco culture was built
upon going back to the ealy 70's!

 The music responded to and initiated the tribal, collective nature of the 
 dance.
 The shift away from ego centric front of house production enlightened people
 in a way that was reminiscent of beating drums around a fire ??

 Why is it such a challenge to suggest we continue to explore this more
 collective energy in the music?

its been explored! as you say, this whole idea goes back to some of
the most primitive forms of music and musical interaction.

 You are arguing that you want to experience the artist in the music, yet you 
 are
 also saying that the artist is a feedback filter to the audience.  So why not 
 open
 up this process reduce the mediation and increase the feedback?

in a feedback system, you need to be very precise about what you are
measuring and how you then correct it. its not a hey, lets cram as
many sensors in this as possible and see what we can come up with.
maybe this system can control itself!. thats just not how it works,
not every variable matters, not every idea is going to be a good one.

 If technology is enabling us to reproduce, trigger, sample, filter, effect and
 manipulate music in increasingly complex ways.. why could an artist or group
 of artists not be enabled to enable the audience to be in control of their own
 experience .

because i dont trust 99% of the people who are already in charge of
the music in a club, the supposed deejays, and their job is to
understand how to do this properly. and if they cant do it, what makes
you think that adding the input of every single person is going to
suddenly make it better? youre going to constantly end up with least
common denominator crap. the beauty of the real deejay who knows what
he is doing is that he knows how to give what people want and expect
but also at the same time give them other things that they dont know
or expect.

 In an advanced way this is continuing to take music back to its roots, where
 everyone was a contributor to the rhythm.  Where all the voices in the village
 made the melody together.

this already happens.

 Why not break down this continual separation and isolation of people from each
 other.  Sure its challenging, slightly feral, non-commercial way to think ..

this already happens.

 But in a world where nothing is new, and everything has been done .. then 
 maybe
 this is something that we could do with all our latest toys .. which is to go 
 all the
 

Re: (313) have we run out of music?

2007-11-02 Thread Anya K Stang

(yes, do excuse us please, we haven't run out of music ; ) )

Thanks for that guys, sounds amazing.

Re the long reverb thing, the water reservoir in Cologne had a 45  
second reverb as well and the producer of Vor Der Flut writes that  
the 'intensity is due to the extremely hard, water-impermeable  
coating on the walls and pillars, which stops the sound from being  
absorbed, reflecting it with almost no loss intensity.' Looks like  
the Deep Listening collaboration experienced something quite similar.


These gongs fascinated me recently when I went to Kassel for the  
Dokumenta XII:

http://www.brightcove.tv/title.jsp?title=1130044742channel=1080171031


On 1 Nov 2007, at 17:03, Nik Stoltzman wrote:


YAY! I do believe that's it!

http://www.newalbion.com/NA022/

I will have to check out the samples online to confirm, but the  
description is spot on - the 45

second reverb definitely rings a bell.

Thanks for the help. Much appreciated.

N





Possibly a Pauline Oliveros/Stewart Dempster collaboration?

They did some things with trombones in large metal containers -  
possibly

grain silos or water tanks.  This might be what you're thinking of.

--
Dennis DeSantis

www.dennisdesantis.com
www.myspace.com/dennisdesantis

Mailing List:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Nik Stoltzman wrote:

(excuse this little side-conversation)

No, that's not it - but that also sounds worth checking out!

This thing was definitely *not* jazzy and I don't think it was  
broken down into tracks. The

piece
I heard was about 30 minutes long. Or maybe it was actually one  
minute long and the rest was

echoes choes hoes oes es s..?

N


Very interesting thread this!

Nik, that composition... It wouldn't be Vor der Flut - Hommage an
einen Wasserspeicher would it? It's this fab recording made in an
old water 'silo' in Cologne/Germany in 1984, just before the
flooding. I've been trying to find info online but it's all (or
mostly anyway) in German. Here's a site with a clip http://
www.magicmusic.de/shop/de/act/cd/arg/6740/ and here it is on  
Discogs

http://www.discogs.com/release/1123083
If this is what you were thinking of I could be persuaded to  
scan the

album liner notes, which are in both German and English.
I totally love this album and played the A side almost in its
entirety it at our last party in September. : )

Anya

On 1 Nov 2007, at 11:34, Nik Stoltzman wrote:

Not unprecedented. There are pieces that are centuries old  
that call

for brass players positioned all over the auditorium/cathedral/
whatever.

Sorry to hijack the thread (which, incidentally, is very
interesting) temporarily, but this
reminds me of a composition I heard once and have been trying to
track down ever since.

It was written and arranged to be played in an underground grain
silo. I can't remember the
composer. Basically, the concept was a number of horn players
arranged in a circle around the
perimeter of the circular silo, with the conductor in the centre.
Each musician would perform
short stabs such that the echo within the chamber (which could be
timed quite accurately) would
allow them to build layers of sound.

I'd love to know what it was. Any clues or leads?

Peace,

N

P.S: OT: Any Londoners going to The Cinematic Orchestra gig  
tomorrow?















RE: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Paul Kendrick
The reissue 12 had a couple of classic tracks on it and nearly
everything that Russ Gabriel does is excellent. Most of the stuff on
ferox is wicked, it was minimal before the current minimal sound you get
today, if you have a look at the track list on this
http://www.discogs.com/release/75030  there is loads on Ferox stuff on
it, it sums up that period really well.. Most of the stuff on the label
is tip top.

http://www.discogs.com/release/17543
http://www.discogs.com/release/17991

Both wicked

-Original Message-
From: Dmitry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: 02 November 2007 08:43
To: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

I have this new release: http://www.discogs.com/release/1073327

This is a reissue of classic tracks from Ferox and Russ Gabriel. 
Absolutely brilliant.

ben thompson wrote:
  i have a Too funk release of ferox from the 1995
 http://www.discogs.com/release/62572
  that i loved.
 hope this is as good.anyone heard yet?

 On 1 Nov 2007, at 23:53, Jussi Lehtonen wrote:


 Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I 
 hope that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.

 Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


 Jussi Lehtonen

   Metaprogram yourself.


 .



Re: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
It is an intriguing idea, I do agree with that.  However, the whole thing
about removing the ego is canceled out by multiple VJ/DJ people
controlling the banks of bio feedback sensors.
What you would accomplish by this is taking out the one ego and replacing
it with a small group of egos - which can be even more elitist and
excluding than a single DJ.

If they are controlling the feedback, is it safe to assume they are
selecting and manipulating what sounds the dancers are making via their
movement/emotions?
If so, then aren't the controllers injecting their egos into their
performance or the control of the performance?  I could imagine that after
a while the accusations of egotism often leveled at DJs would just shift to
the controllers of extensive banks of bio feedback sensors.

That said, there is a couple, I think in Amsterdam, that make experimental
instruments, one of which is a massive Theramin type dance floor.  I'll see
if I can find their website.  I think you'd find it very interesting.

MEK



still want to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/01/2007 08:49:45 PM:


  well, you either have a person being the control mechanism (DJ) who can
  observe the room, take in emotional levels, combine them with her/his
own,
  and spit back out something unexpected (like stopping the music and
telling
  a story to the audience that has some relevance to what's going on)
 
  or
 
  you have a machine take in parameters, numbers, equations, and mix them
  with something that has been programmed into it (and a slower learning
  curve) and then spitting it back out hopefully matching where an
audience
  wants to go

 I was very inspired by sci -fi writer Paul J. McAuley who described a
future
 rave  where multiple VJ/DJ people controlled extensive banks of bio
feedback
 sensors ..  in this system everyone in the audience provides input and
 everyone is able to filter and feedback the input sources onto the system
 which is an interconnected series of sound systems, holographic
projectors,
 lasers and lights.

 There is no specific centre to the situation .. it is a sprawling
 massive of vibe
 which he calls the constant Wave.

 It was one of the more interesting future account of a rave that I
 had ever read.

 http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue33/books.html

 ..

 While I respect the right of a few aficionados on the list to
 protect their view
 of reality around music.  My history runs deep into the cultures of rave
and
 sound systems that rally the audiences for electronic music and I
continue
 to find interest in the ways that these communities form and evolve.

 In my area, raving developed completely new music audiences and ways of
 experiencing music.  While this format may have become settled in recent
 years, I still think its interesting to push and progress the format.

 I know that the rave experience has inspired many artist in their work.

 My approach is to continue to create new types of environments both
technical
 and social that can stimulate new ideas in culture.

 The fact that this might present a challenge to the status quo is a
 good thing!

 .simon



Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
I hope it does come out on vinyl.  I've had Aubrey on myspace as well,
speaking of Ferox peeps, and he's got new cuts but they all seem to be just
digital files.  They're really good too and I wish he'd cut them on wax.

MEK

Jussi Lehtonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/01/2007 06:53:51
PM:


 Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I hope

 that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.

 Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)


 Jussi Lehtonen

Metaprogram yourself.



Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread Michael . Elliot-Knight
oh, oh oh oh, oh YEAH!

two of my most favorite labels meeting together like this?  I'm going to go
change my underwear now.

MEK

JT Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/02/2007 08:33:20 AM:

 We've got releases coming on Down Low by a former Ferox artist. He
 released as Rei Mitsui on Ferox, and also had a stunning record on
 Russ' short-lived Player imprint as Nebraska.

 Nebraska - Vicarious Disco 12 feat two Soul 223 remixes - dL-014
 --releasedate Nov. 15th

 Nebraska - Mixed Up Music For Mixed Up People - dLNEBLP/dLNEBCD --
 releasedate Feb. 2008

 JT

 On 11/1/07, Jussi Lehtonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Too Funk - Igra seems to be a download only -EP, haven't heard it. I
hope
  that something tangible wil also appear in a short while.
 
  Anything else in the similar vein that I should be aware of? :)
 
 
  Jussi Lehtonen
 
 Metaprogram yourself.
 



Re: (313) have we run out of music?

2007-11-02 Thread Thomas D. Cox, Jr.
this one didnt go through the first time

On 11/1/07, still want to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I like how you have put the hand brake on here ..  and begun to define the
 parameters for which an artist should/could create new music.

i'm not defining parameters, i am simply pointing out that in the
making of recorded music there are different jobs: producer, musician,
engineer. in most dance music, the producer is also the musician and
the engineer, s/he had the overall idea of what the record should do,
plays everything on it, and programs all the technical stuff
him/herself. there's only so much time in any day, the number of
people who can handle the musician and producer parts the best are not
necessarily the people who are the best engineers. you can come up
with some cases of truly brilliant musicians or producers who
contributed to groundbreaking engineering (king tubby, the beatles,
miles davis come immediately to mind) but their numbers are very few
and for the most part they were not working alone, they had crazy
assistance!

the tendency in electronic music in particular is for the less
talented producers and musicians to substitute heavy engineering for
good songs. sure they make neat noises, but their tunes don't stand
the test of time. and the more complex the engineering required to
make the tracks, the less time and energy the tunes themselves seem to
get (see drum and bass in the 07).

 Again .. I am trying to open doors and suggest new ways to make music,
 to extend its possibilities.

the possibilities were already endless, which is why i think trying to
extend them is a silly idea.

 Why should Dj's replace bands?

they don't have to, but i am not interested in them so much. i like
live music that functions deep in the groove, im not into rockin
guitar solos and dramatic stage presence or whatever. so so so very
few live performers can do that for me (fat freddy's drop is a
standout from recent years where the egos were all subjugated to the
groove!)

 What was wrong with classical music?

the typical performance! sitting around stodgy theatres in a suit,
politely clapping, or maybe even worse when string quartets are hired
to play background music at functions where people just dont give a
sh*t. plus the attitudes of many classical fans is obnoxious. im
definitely very interested in more modern minimal composition and
avant garde stuff where they get rid of all that nonsense, but those
people dont get much love in the classical music realm anyway! theyre
more like techno than 99% of techno artists are without even trying.

 Thinking that the Dj is the ultimate solution to the performance paradigm is
 getting pretty narrow.

do you think so? i dont. the deejay is limited only by his collection
of records. how many musicians can memorize the literally tens of
thousands of songs that any given deejay has to choose from? almost
none! how many can be masters of any genre or style that a deejay with
great knowledge can be? almost none. the deejay has a very unique
position and skill set that can harness the best musicians of all time
and every genre ever and any song as it could best be performed and
use it to shape mood, atmosphere, etc.

 You seem to be clamping down firmly again on your view of reality being
 the only right and correct way for things to happen.

i mean, people are free to do whatever they please. but the results of
people simply trying to do something new have been garbage, by far.
it is a useless pursuit that has led to so many terrible records and
almost no awesome records that i am surprised that anyone thinks it is
a good idea. good music is revolutionary, everything else is just
hype/intellectual crap slapped on by critics and other people
observing it.

 There is nothing new under the sun.  There is nothing new under the sun.
 I'm just not buying it.  I have suggested several ways to do things 
 differently
 and because they are not fitting into your description of what IS then
 they become impossible, irrelevant or simply dismissed.

i mean, my definition of music is the loosest possible definition: an
artistic arrangement of sounds and rhythms. i didnt say that artists
have to put themselves in their music, thats just the way it is! these
things dont come from nowhere. i mean, you can go on believing that
great music will just come from the netherworld through your new
ideas but ill stick with reality.

 I have not mentioned sensors or computer once .. or any form of automation.

then what else is there? if a person is involved, they have input. end
of story. you cannot remove that person from the equation. if you do,
you have nothing!

 What if an artist set up the sensor?  How do you start to differentiate 
 between
 where the composition of music starts and finishes?

brian eno has been dealing with this idea since the early 70's, check
discrete music. this is nothing new! and he is still the man
responsible for his music, without his ideas the music 

Re: (313) Russ Gabriel's latest releases

2007-11-02 Thread JT Stewart
No James is busy with family and kids etc
It's just Ali.

 JT,

 Is this co-produced by James Mason as the Rei Mitsui on Ferox?
 Sounds exciting anyway.

 G

 --

 Guilherme Menegon Arantes, PhD   São Paulo, Brasil
 __




Re: (313) have we run out of music?

2007-11-02 Thread m50

http://www.theonion.com/content/news/pitchfork_gives_music_6_8

Somebody had to say it.

m50


At 13:33 2007.11.02, Thomas D. Cox, Jr. wrote:

this one didnt go through the first time

On 11/1/07, still want to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I like how you have put the hand brake on here ..  and begun to 
define the

 parameters for which an artist should/could create new music.

i'm not defining parameters, i am simply pointing out that in the
making of recorded music there are different jobs: producer, musician,
engineer. in most dance music, the producer is also the musician and
the engineer, s/he had the overall idea of what the record should do,
plays everything on it, and programs all the technical stuff
him/herself. there's only so much time in any day, the number of
people who can handle the musician and producer parts the best are not
necessarily the people who are the best engineers. you can come up
with some cases of truly brilliant musicians or producers who
contributed to groundbreaking engineering (king tubby, the beatles,
miles davis come immediately to mind) but their numbers are very few
and for the most part they were not working alone, they had crazy
assistance!

the tendency in electronic music in particular is for the less
talented producers and musicians to substitute heavy engineering for
good songs. sure they make neat noises, but their tunes don't stand
the test of time. and the more complex the engineering required to
make the tracks, the less time and energy the tunes themselves seem to
get (see drum and bass in the 07).

 Again .. I am trying to open doors and suggest new ways to make music,
 to extend its possibilities.

the possibilities were already endless, which is why i think trying to
extend them is a silly idea.

 Why should Dj's replace bands?

they don't have to, but i am not interested in them so much. i like
live music that functions deep in the groove, im not into rockin
guitar solos and dramatic stage presence or whatever. so so so very
few live performers can do that for me (fat freddy's drop is a
standout from recent years where the egos were all subjugated to the
groove!)

 What was wrong with classical music?

the typical performance! sitting around stodgy theatres in a suit,
politely clapping, or maybe even worse when string quartets are hired
to play background music at functions where people just dont give a
sh*t. plus the attitudes of many classical fans is obnoxious. im
definitely very interested in more modern minimal composition and
avant garde stuff where they get rid of all that nonsense, but those
people dont get much love in the classical music realm anyway! theyre
more like techno than 99% of techno artists are without even trying.

 Thinking that the Dj is the ultimate solution to the performance 
paradigm is

 getting pretty narrow.

do you think so? i dont. the deejay is limited only by his collection
of records. how many musicians can memorize the literally tens of
thousands of songs that any given deejay has to choose from? almost
none! how many can be masters of any genre or style that a deejay with
great knowledge can be? almost none. the deejay has a very unique
position and skill set that can harness the best musicians of all time
and every genre ever and any song as it could best be performed and
use it to shape mood, atmosphere, etc.

 You seem to be clamping down firmly again on your view of reality being
 the only right and correct way for things to happen.

i mean, people are free to do whatever they please. but the results of
people simply trying to do something new have been garbage, by far.
it is a useless pursuit that has led to so many terrible records and
almost no awesome records that i am surprised that anyone thinks it is
a good idea. good music is revolutionary, everything else is just
hype/intellectual crap slapped on by critics and other people
observing it.

 There is nothing new under the sun.  There is nothing new under the sun.
 I'm just not buying it.  I have suggested several ways to do things 
differently

 and because they are not fitting into your description of what IS then
 they become impossible, irrelevant or simply dismissed.

i mean, my definition of music is the loosest possible definition: an
artistic arrangement of sounds and rhythms. i didnt say that artists
have to put themselves in their music, thats just the way it is! these
things dont come from nowhere. i mean, you can go on believing that
great music will just come from the netherworld through your new
ideas but ill stick with reality.

 I have not mentioned sensors or computer once .. or any form of automation.

then what else is there? if a person is involved, they have input. end
of story. you cannot remove that person from the equation. if you do,
you have nothing!

 What if an artist set up the sensor?  How do you start to differentiate 
between

 where the composition of music starts and finishes?

brian eno has been dealing with this idea 

RE: (313) have we run out of reality?

2007-11-02 Thread Anthony Shakir

 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: 
313@hyperreal.org From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:45:54 
-0500 Subject: Re: (313) have we run out of reality? Its a complex chain 
of affairs .. but is the artist the person who records the record or the 
person who builds the sound system? Or is it the Dj who plays the record or 
the Engineer who tunes the system and the frequencies that you hear. It's all 
of them - if they do it right. Problem is, few good sound system designers 
exist. Raves have been a black hole of good sound system design. Line up a 
bunch of speakers into a single wall and blast it as loud as you can has been 
the rave motto for ages. Our societies have ways of isolating these roles 
and giving one moreimportance over the other .. but if one role can't exist 
with out the other .. which is really more important. eh? I think those 
that know speak of all of the legendary DJs/engineer/sound system designers 
in the same breath. Where would Larry Levan be without Richard Long? Nicky 
Siano and David Mancuso without Alex Rosner? See, the BIG problem is the 
entire rave culture was outside of the original DJ nightclub thing (especially 
the legendary NYC gay nightclubs). I've argued countless times with local 
raves who just Do Not Get It. They tell me lasers and other bs are just as 
important as a sound system which is complete bull crap. They don't understand 
the importance of sound and how it translates into an experience that can send 
people into outerspace. Raves were disassociated from the discos and as a 
result you've had to deal with people who don't get it. As far as I'm 
concerned they are two totally different cultures with different histories 
with only occasional cross-over. However, one does not translate well into the 
other. I see more DJs from the disco world being asked to perform at raves 
than I see rave DJs being asked to perform at the discos that know. MEK


AMEN, BROTHER.

Shake Shakir
_
Peek-a-boo FREE Tricks  Treats for You!
http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHMloc=us