Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
i just wish these guys would stop blowing up my mailbox... hehe take care, Mike np: Heiko Laux-Live at Fuse Pt. 1 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 21:31:59 EST In a message dated 12/6/00 4:35:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >i believe the common goal of techno is to create music that hasn't been >heard before. >i've heard plenty of artists say the same thing most notably juan atkins >and >jeff mills. >is this not enough of a unifying definition and a common goal for ya? : >) > >kao jyan > Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you for saying that. All this "intellectualism" is unnecessary. Music please...maestro? G l y p h - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
At least with politics, you get PAID to talk just to hear the sound of your own voice. --On Thursday, December 07, 2000 9:30 AM -0800 darw_n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Go into politics instead of boring us with pointless discussions about > techno, geeez it's just music!!! > mmm h, riggght... darw_n "create, demonstrate, toneshift..." http://www.mp3.com/stations/clevelandunderground http://www.mp3.com/darw_n http://www.sphereproductions.com/topic/Darwin.html http://www.mannequinodd.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
> Go into politics instead of boring us with pointless discussions about > techno, geeez it's just music!!! > mmm h, riggght... darw_n "create, demonstrate, toneshift..." http://www.mp3.com/stations/clevelandunderground http://www.mp3.com/darw_n http://www.sphereproductions.com/topic/Darwin.html http://www.mannequinodd.com
RE: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
Go into politics instead of boring us with pointless discussions about techno, geeez it's just music!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] > No, I am not saticfied with that, it would imply that we are > pretty boring > and lazy. No, there is causation for everything, things just > don't happen > for the hell of it. There is something to keep in mind, > there is a global > scene in which embodies techno, the rave scene. There is > definate reason > behind that scene, it is not existing for the hell of it, > there is very real > sociological catelysts behind it, and again, there is real > reason for the > rave scene clentching onto techno like it has... > > Another thing, artists often disregard more scientific > explainations in that > science isn't all that artsy, and inderstandably so. But I > propose that > this is why Jeff Mills and others have complete skirted more > scientific > explainations, its not art to do so... > > And so be it, and visa versa, it is my desire to interpret what is > happening. BTW, we have gone nearly 15 years with barely any > analysis... > > and analysis is *definately* needed when a movement overtakes > the entire > globe, almost all authority figures are scared, so on and so forth... > > you cant just brush it off as a social fluke... > > darw_n > > "create, demonstrate, toneshift..." > http://www.mp3.com/stations/clevelandunderground > http://www.mp3.com/darw_n > http://www.sphereproductions.com/topic/Darwin.html > http://www.mannequinodd.com > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
In a message dated 12/6/00 4:35:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >i believe the common goal of techno is to create music that hasn't been >heard before. >i've heard plenty of artists say the same thing most notably juan atkins >and >jeff mills. >is this not enough of a unifying definition and a common goal for ya? : >) > >kao jyan > Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you for saying that. All this "intellectualism" is unnecessary. Music please...maestro? G l y p h
Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
> > i believe the common goal of techno is to create music that hasn't been > heard before. > i've heard plenty of artists say the same thing most notably juan atkins and > jeff mills. > is this not enough of a unifying definition and a common goal for ya? : ) > No, I am not saticfied with that, it would imply that we are pretty boring and lazy. No, there is causation for everything, things just don't happen for the hell of it. There is something to keep in mind, there is a global scene in which embodies techno, the rave scene. There is definate reason behind that scene, it is not existing for the hell of it, there is very real sociological catelysts behind it, and again, there is real reason for the rave scene clentching onto techno like it has... Another thing, artists often disregard more scientific explainations in that science isn't all that artsy, and inderstandably so. But I propose that this is why Jeff Mills and others have complete skirted more scientific explainations, its not art to do so... And so be it, and visa versa, it is my desire to interpret what is happening. BTW, we have gone nearly 15 years with barely any analysis... and analysis is *definately* needed when a movement overtakes the entire globe, almost all authority figures are scared, so on and so forth... you cant just brush it off as a social fluke... darw_n "create, demonstrate, toneshift..." http://www.mp3.com/stations/clevelandunderground http://www.mp3.com/darw_n http://www.sphereproductions.com/topic/Darwin.html http://www.mannequinodd.com
Re: [313] err... darw_n's brain is too big
- Original Message - From: darw_n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Hugh G. Blaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <313@hyperreal.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2000 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [313] err... >> > >Techno has no single political, social, economic banner in which all > stand > > >united, none at all. > > > > What artistic, social or political movement ever has? None. > > > fine rebuttal, but there *was* a general underlying common drive. Every > youth music movement has had a general drive, be it war or whatever. Art, > the surrealists had an actual drafted manifesto, Bauhaus, Realists, ect. > They all had a unifying definition and a common goal. But with techno, has > no general and definable base... --- i believe the common goal of techno is to create music that hasn't been heard before. i've heard plenty of artists say the same thing most notably juan atkins and jeff mills. is this not enough of a unifying definition and a common goal for ya? : ) kao jyan
