RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders
First forgive my ignorance, I didn't that the group should only exist in the forest root domain. But how is it possible that CHILDDOMAIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders has permissions on the child domain in ADUC when there shouldn't be a CHILDDOMAIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders? > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matheesha Weerasinghe > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 19:37 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > Its only in the forest domain IIRC ;-) > > M@ > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No??? Child domain. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 17:38 > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders > > > > By the way you are looking for this on the forest root right? > > > > M@ > > > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yep logged in as Domain Admin. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of > > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 13:00 > > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate > BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > > Trust Builders > > > > > > I am wondering if there are ACLs defined on > the group itself > > > or the OU above to prevent you from seen it. > Do you see it as > > > the Administrator account of the domain? > > > > > > M@ > > > > > > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > Problem is I don't see it anymore in the BUILTIN > > > container. Strange thing is > > > that if I look at the security of the > domain object in > > > ADUC Incoming Forest > > > Trust Builders is there. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ] On Behalf Of > > > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:22 > > > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > <mailto:ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org> > > > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate > > BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > > > Trust Builders > > > > > > > > I dont think so. objectsid attribute > is a systemonly > > > > attribute. Personally I am impressed > of that "smart > > > > co-worker" that managed to delete it. > > According to the AD > > > > Delegation appendices > > > > > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29dba > > > > e88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en > > > > > > <http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29db > > > > ae88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en> its > > > not > possible to move > > > delete rename this group. > > > > > > > > May be he exploited the dynamic objects > > feature in Windows > > > > 2003 RTM? > > > > > > > > > > http://blogs.dirt
RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders
No??? Child domain. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matheesha Weerasinghe > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 17:38 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > By the way you are looking for this on the forest root right? > > M@ > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yep logged in as Domain Admin. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 13:00 > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders > > > > I am wondering if there are ACLs defined on the group itself > > or the OU above to prevent you from seen it. Do you see it as > > the Administrator account of the domain? > > > > M@ > > > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > Problem is I don't see it anymore in the BUILTIN > > container. Strange thing is > > that if I look at the security of the domain object in > > ADUC Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders is there. > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of > > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:22 > > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate > BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > > Trust Builders > > > > > > I dont think so. objectsid attribute is a systemonly > > > attribute. Personally I am impressed of that "smart > > > co-worker" that managed to delete it. > According to the AD > > > Delegation appendices > > > > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29dba > > e88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en > > > > <http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29db > > ae88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en> its > > not > possible to move > > delete rename this group. > > > > > > May be he exploited the dynamic objects > feature in Windows > > > 2003 RTM? > > > > > > http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/archive/2006/06/23/1175.aspx > > > > > > > > > M@ > > > > > > > > > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > A smart co-worker deleted the > BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > > Trust Builders group. > > > Is it possible to recreate this group > with the same > > > well known SID? > > > Authoritative restore is out of the question, > > > deletetion is too long ago. > > > > > > Han Valk. > > > List info : > http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > <http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx> > > > List FAQ: > http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > > List archive: > http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > <http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > <http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx> > > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders
Yep logged in as Domain Admin. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matheesha Weerasinghe > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 13:00 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > I am wondering if there are ACLs defined on the group itself > or the OU above to prevent you from seen it. Do you see it as > the Administrator account of the domain? > > M@ > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Problem is I don't see it anymore in the BUILTIN > container. Strange thing is > that if I look at the security of the domain object in > ADUC Incoming Forest > Trust Builders is there. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] On Behalf Of > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:22 > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders > > > > I dont think so. objectsid attribute is a systemonly > > attribute. Personally I am impressed of that "smart > > co-worker" that managed to delete it. According to the AD > > Delegation appendices > > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29dba > e88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en > > <http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29db > ae88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en> its > not > possible to move > delete rename this group. > > > > May be he exploited the dynamic objects feature in Windows > > 2003 RTM? > > > http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/archive/2006/06/23/1175.aspx > > > > > > M@ > > > > > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > A smart co-worker deleted the BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders group. > > Is it possible to recreate this group with the same > > well known SID? > > Authoritative restore is out of the question, > > deletetion is too long ago. > > > > Han Valk. > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > <http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx> > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders
It should not be possible to move that group. I did a search but did not find it > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Johnson > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 12:52 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > Maybe the user moved it to another OU? Have you done a full forest > search for the account? > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Han Valk > Sent: 14 August 2006 12:37 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > Problem is I don't see it anymore in the BUILTIN container. Strange > thing is > that if I look at the security of the domain object in ADUC Incoming > Forest > Trust Builders is there. > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Matheesha Weerasinghe > > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:22 > > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders > > > > I dont think so. objectsid attribute is a systemonly > > attribute. Personally I am impressed of that "smart > > co-worker" that managed to delete it. According to the AD > > Delegation appendices > > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29dba > e88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en > > <http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29db > ae88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en> its not > > possible to > move > delete rename this group. > > > > May be he exploited the dynamic objects feature in Windows > > 2003 RTM? > > http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/archive/2006/06/23/1175.aspx > > > > > > M@ > > > > > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > A smart co-worker deleted the BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > > Trust Builders group. > > Is it possible to recreate this group with the same > > well known SID? > > Authoritative restore is out of the question, > > deletetion is too long ago. > > > > Han Valk. > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > > > > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > Disclaimer: > The Development Bank of Southern Africa exercises no control > over information contained in any e-mail message originating > from within the organisation. The Bank makes no > representation relating to the completeness or accuracy and > accepts no responsibility for any loss, damage or liability > that is incurred by reliance on the content hereof by the > recipient or any other party. Each page attached hereto must > also be read in conjunction with any disclaimer, which forms > part of it. > Confidentiality: > The e-mail is privileged and confidential and for use of the > addressee only. Should you have received this e-mail in > error, please return it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dissemination, disclosure, copying or any similar actions of > the content of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders
Problem is I don't see it anymore in the BUILTIN container. Strange thing is that if I look at the security of the domain object in ADUC Incoming Forest Trust Builders is there. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Matheesha Weerasinghe > Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 10:22 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders > > I dont think so. objectsid attribute is a systemonly > attribute. Personally I am impressed of that "smart > co-worker" that managed to delete it. According to the AD > Delegation appendices > http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29dba e88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en > <http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=29db ae88-a216-45f9-9739-cb1fb22a0642&DisplayLang=en> its not > possible to move delete rename this group. > > May be he exploited the dynamic objects feature in Windows > 2003 RTM? > http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/tomek/archive/2006/06/23/1175.aspx > > > M@ > > > > On 8/14/06, Han Valk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > A smart co-worker deleted the BUILTIN\Incoming Forest > Trust Builders group. > Is it possible to recreate this group with the same > well known SID? > Authoritative restore is out of the question, > deletetion is too long ago. > > Han Valk. > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx > > > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
[ActiveDir] Recreate BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders
Hi, A smart co-worker deleted the BUILTIN\Incoming Forest Trust Builders group. Is it possible to recreate this group with the same well known SID? Authoritative restore is out of the question, deletetion is too long ago. Han Valk. List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.activedir.org/ml/threads.aspx
RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
We've performed tests with one VM (using ESX Server) with Exchange installed on it. This VM had a blade all for itself. With this configuration we could only host 1500 mailboxes and still have acceptable response times. When we did the same tests on bare metal (same blade) we could host 4000 mailboxes. Vmware has a nice paper on virtualization of Exchange 2003 with ESX Server. Han. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Depp, Dennis M. > Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 15:31 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > Yes Exchange is a resource hog. If I run Exchange (virtualized) on it > own set of hardware? This should provide sufficient > resources (assuming > you have high quality hardware) and also give you the benefits of > virtualization. Or consider running multiple Exchange servers on a > 32-way machine. Each machine would have its own dedicated Disk > controllers (either SCSI or Fibre) Memory and CPU. If you > need more/cpu > simply reconfigure the virtual machine. Granted this would > be more for > large enterprises rather than SMBs but I would not simply dismiss the > idea. > > Dennis > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Medeiros, Jose > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 5:29 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > I could not have worded that better. > > Sincerely, > Jose Medeiros > ADP | National Account Services > ProBusiness Division | Information Services > 925.737.7967 | 408-449-6621 CELL > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 6:53 AM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > > I couldn't agree more with Tony -- Exchange is a resource hog > and should > not be done on VMWare except for testing purposes. Just > because you can > doesn't mean you should > > Chuck Gafford > Systems Architect > Unisys > Mobile: (405) 819-6766 > > > -Original Message- > From: Medeiros, Jose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 15:39:35 -0700 > Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > > Hi Tony, > > I have to respond to this. Many IT managers think you can just > virtualize any > application because of all the marketing hype. Be very careful, I/O is > critical > to Exchange and any other database application which may make > running it > on > VMWARE or VIRTUAL SERVER unpractical not to mention Exchange is also > very > resource intensive and will take whatever it can. Now I am sure if you > have a > very small environment that it may make sense, but with > Microsoft Small > Business > server why would you want to? > > Any body else car e to throw in there two cents? > > Sincerely, > Jose Medeiros > ADP | National Account Services > ProBusiness Division | Information Services > 925.737.7967 | 408-449-6621 CELL > > -- > -- > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Tony Murray > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:49 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > > Microsoft has introduced support for Exchange 2003 SP2 and later on > Virtual > Server 2005 R2. This article has just been released. > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;320220 > > I guess this means we can now run a DC and Exchange on the > same physical > > hardware without any of the previous limitations. > > Tony > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware
Hi, I have seen tests conducted with loadsim on Exchange Server 2003 running on bare metal and on Vmware ESX Server 2003 running on the same hardware. The conclusion was that one can host a lot more mailboxes on bare metal. There's a white paper on Vmware's site that says not to host more than 1000 mailboxes on a single vitualized Exchange Server 2003. Han. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Medeiros, Jose > Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 00:40 > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: # Jose Medeiros-IBM (E-mail) > Subject: [ActiveDir] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > Hi Tony, > > I have to respond to this. Many IT managers think you can > just virtualize any application because of all the marketing > hype. Be very careful, I/O is critical to Exchange and any > other database application which may make running it on > VMWARE or VIRTUAL SERVER unpractical not to mention Exchange > is also very resource intensive and will take whatever it > can. Now I am sure if you have a very small environment that > it may make sense, but with Microsoft Small Business server > why would you want to? > > Any body else car to throw in there two cents? > > Sincerely, > Jose Medeiros > ADP | National Account Services > ProBusiness Division | Information Services > 925.737.7967 | 408-449-6621 CELL > > -- > -- > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Murray > Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:49 PM > To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org > Subject: [ActiveDir] [OT] Exchange now supported on virtual hardware > > > Microsoft has introduced support for Exchange 2003 SP2 and > later on Virtual Server 2005 R2. This article has just been released. > > http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;320220 > > I guess this means we can now run a DC and Exchange on the > same physical hardware without any of the previous limitations. > > Tony > > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx > List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx > List archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ > List info : http://www.activedir.org/List.aspx List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/ListFAQ.aspx List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
RE: [ActiveDir] Applications on 2003 DC
Hi, Exchange 2003 will work on a DC. Just keep in mind that because of a 'bug' a shutdown/reboot of that combination takes quite some time. Best regards, Han Valk. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Chris Flesher Sent: Wed 07-Jan-04 17:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ActiveDir] Applications on 2003 DC We are short on test hardware, and were wondering if the rumors were true that one is unable to install SQL 2000 or Exchange 2003 on a DC? This isn't a production idea, but just for test purposes so we don't have to buy a separate box for the application. Thank you in advance for the help. Chris Flesher The University of Chicago NSIT/DCS 1-773-834-8477 List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/ List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm List archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/activedir%40mail.activedir.org/
