-Protocol violation detected.

2000-08-09 Thread Jesper Kjer

Hello all of you !

How do I correct this error :"-Protocol violation detected."

I see it in the dsmsched.log of a lot of NT 4.0 servers. And in the actlog.

I do not know what to do. Any idears ?

Regards
Jesper Kjer
Denmark



Re: TSM 3.7 Sun Sol Server error

2000-08-09 Thread Gogos, Michael

Hello,
I also have the same problem.  TSM 3.7, Solaris 2.7 on part of an E1,
the library is a Sun StorEdge L1000.
I've edited the /usr/kernel/drv/mt.conf for the two drives (SCSI id 2, LUN 0
 SCSI id 3, LUN 0) and also /usr/kernel/drv/lb.conf for the library (SCSI
id 0, LUN 0).  add_drv for both mt and lb fail with the same message as
Boris.
I'm new to both Sun and TSM, so I'd appreciate any help, even something that
may seem blatantly obvious to some of you.



Michael Gogos
Unix Systems Support
ANZ Banking Group
227 Toorak Road
South Yarra 3141
Victoria, Australia
phone: (+613) 9869-6840
fax: (+613) 9869-3447
email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-Original Message-
From: Boris Feldman (Udi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM 3.7 Sun Sol Server error


Hi All,

We are using TSM 3.7 Server on Sun Solaris server (Ultra 60) with AIT2 tapes
in QualStar 4440 library.
I got the failed installation process (on the mt drive definition point :
add_drv ).
The error was : the mt drive was successfully added to system but failed to
attach.
As result of this problem we have not the mt driver files in /dev/rmt/
directory.
Any ideas?

TNXS.
___
Boris Feldman - Product Manager
IBM Storage  TSM
UDI Millenium Ltd.
1G Yoni Netanyahu Str.
Or-Yehuda 60256, ISRAEL
Tel : (972)-3-5333555 ext. 357
Fax : (972)-3-5333676
Mobile : (972)-54-929357
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___



Re: ADSM JOB POSTINGS??

2000-08-09 Thread arhoads

Yes.  www.ibm.com

Joyce Woods wrote:

 Hello Everyone:

 Does anyone know where positions are posted for fellow ADSM'ers looking for a
 new job???

 Thanks !



Re: TSM 3.7 Sun Sol Server error

2000-08-09 Thread Joe Gross

You're trying to use a 32 bit driver under a 64 bit OS.

Before 3.7.3 there were no 64 bit drivers. Try upgrading your server to
3.7.3 or above and it should work okay.

On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 04:26:51PM +1000, Gogos, Michael wrote:
 Hello,
 I also have the same problem.  TSM 3.7, Solaris 2.7 on part of an E1,
 the library is a Sun StorEdge L1000.
 I've edited the /usr/kernel/drv/mt.conf for the two drives (SCSI id 2, LUN 0
  SCSI id 3, LUN 0) and also /usr/kernel/drv/lb.conf for the library (SCSI
 id 0, LUN 0).  add_drv for both mt and lb fail with the same message as
 Boris.
 I'm new to both Sun and TSM, so I'd appreciate any help, even something that
 may seem blatantly obvious to some of you.


 
 Michael Gogos
 Unix Systems Support
 ANZ Banking Group
 227 Toorak Road
 South Yarra 3141
 Victoria, Australia
 phone: (+613) 9869-6840
 fax: (+613) 9869-3447
 email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


 -Original Message-
 From: Boris Feldman (Udi) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 4:54 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: TSM 3.7 Sun Sol Server error


 Hi All,

 We are using TSM 3.7 Server on Sun Solaris server (Ultra 60) with AIT2 tapes
 in QualStar 4440 library.
 I got the failed installation process (on the mt drive definition point :
 add_drv ).
 The error was : the mt drive was successfully added to system but failed to
 attach.
 As result of this problem we have not the mt driver files in /dev/rmt/
 directory.
 Any ideas?

 TNXS.
 ___
 Boris Feldman - Product Manager
 IBM Storage  TSM
 UDI Millenium Ltd.
 1G Yoni Netanyahu Str.
 Or-Yehuda 60256, ISRAEL
 Tel : (972)-3-5333555 ext. 357
 Fax : (972)-3-5333676
 Mobile : (972)-54-929357
 E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ___



TSM and Lotus Notes Archiving

2000-08-09 Thread Winfried Heilmann

Hi,

does anybody have any experience with the product " IBM Content Manager CommonStore 
for Lotus" which has an interface to tsm for archiving "Lotus-Notes-Documents".

Regards winfried



Re: ADSM Solaris client

2000-08-09 Thread Richard Sims

We are using Solaris 2.6 backup client to back up our unix servers. Every
week or so after having started the dsm scheduler the scheduler crops out
saying that "cannot open the dsmsched.log file".

You didn't provide us with any information about the operating environment
or the context of the problem so that we can better advise, so what we can
provide will be limited...
Is there a dsmerror.log being produced, with some info in it about this?
Did the problem just start happening after months of no problems doing
backups?  If so, pursue what changed in the environment.
Do the permissions on the directory or the log file change over time, as in
something altering them?  Is the backup being started with the current
directory being in a file system with some odd (weekly) housekeeping going on?
Is the file system going full at some times of the day?  Make sure the file
systems are being monitored by some alerting program.
Is the process or the system running out of file handles at event time?
Use 'lsof' or comparable program to check what files this process has open,
and potentially have cron do so hourly to accumulate info to see what's
occurring when the problem thresholds.

Richard Sims, BU



Scheduler Problems on AIX - SCHEDMODE=PROMPTED???

2000-08-09 Thread Sean McNamara

Hello All,

I upgraded my AIX TSM clients to 3.7.2.14 yesterday and now I am having
a problem with the TSM scheduler process.  The backups were missed for the 6
boxes I upgraded last night.  I arrived this morning and thought maybe I had
forgotten to restart the scheduler, but the schedulers were all running.  I
investigated by looking in the activity log and I received the following error
for all of the clients -   ANR2716E Schedule prompter was not able to contact
client client name using type 1 (IP Address 1501).  The schedule mode for these
clients was set to PROMPTED.  I switched the schedule mode to POLLING and the
scheduled backups ran.  Is there a problem with the TSM scheduler at this level?
Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Sean

Sean McNamara
Senior Analyst
PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
(610)666-4206



Re: Scheduler Problems on AIX - SCHEDMODE=PROMPTED???

2000-08-09 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM

Hi Sean!
If you switch from polling to prompted mode, you will have to restart all
the scheduler clients.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon


-Original Message-
From: Sean McNamara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 09 August, 2000 15:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Scheduler Problems on AIX - SCHEDMODE=PROMPTED???


Hello All,

I upgraded my AIX TSM clients to 3.7.2.14 yesterday and now I am
having
a problem with the TSM scheduler process.  The backups were missed for the 6
boxes I upgraded last night.  I arrived this morning and thought maybe I had
forgotten to restart the scheduler, but the schedulers were all running.  I
investigated by looking in the activity log and I received the following
error
for all of the clients -   ANR2716E Schedule prompter was not able to
contact
client client name using type 1 (IP Address 1501).  The schedule mode for
these
clients was set to PROMPTED.  I switched the schedule mode to POLLING and
the
scheduled backups ran.  Is there a problem with the TSM scheduler at this
level?
Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Sean

Sean McNamara
Senior Analyst
PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
(610)666-4206


**
This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and privileged material 
intended for the addressee only. If you are not the addressee, you are notified that 
no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be disclosed, copied or distributed, and 
that any other action related to this e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and 
may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart 
Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for 
the incorrect or incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor 
responsible for any delay in receipt.
**



Please Help - Server Down

2000-08-09 Thread Long Nguyen

Has anyone encounter this before???  The server was terminated and can't be
brought back up.  Messages from log and dsmserv errpt below.


The followings are error messages from the log:

nohup.out  file from "nohup /opt/IBMadsm-s/bin/dsmserv" command:

ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager for Sun Solaris 2.6/7
Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.20

Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

5639-B22 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 1998. All rights reserved.
U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 10:46:31 on Mar 26 1999.
ANR7801I Subsystem process ID is 4938.
ANR0900I Processing options file /opt/IBMadsm-s/bin/dsmserv.opt.
ANR0990I ADSM server restart-recovery in progress.
ANR0214W Database volume /apps/adsm/db_mirror/mir.db2.dsm is in the offline
state - VARY ON required.
ANR0215W Recovery log volume /apps/adsm/db_mirror/mir.log2.dsm is in the
offline state - VARY ON required.
ANR0214W Database volume /apps/adsm/db_mirror/mir.db3.dsm is in the offline
state - VARY ON required.
ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 3704 megabytes.
ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 7552 megabytes.
ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress.
ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress.
ANR0354I Recovery log redo pass in progress.
ANR0355I Recovery log undo pass in progress.
ANRD logseg.c(493): Log space has been overcommitted (no empty segment
found) - base LSN = 164471.0.0.
ANR7824S Server operation terminated.
ANR7823S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected.
ANRD Trace-back of called functions:
ANRD   0x0007E43C  AbortServer
ANRD   0x0007B7E0  pkAbort
ANRD   0x0056294C  LogAllocSegment
ANRD   0x0055C830  ForceLogPages
ANRD   0x0055AD50  LogWriterThread
ANRD   0x0007E628  StartThread
ANRD   0xEF764C40  *UNKNOWN*
ANRD   0x0007E550  StartThread

output form dsmserv.errl
==
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7824S Server operation terminated.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7823S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD Trace-back of called functions:
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007E43C  AbortServer
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007B7E0  pkAbort
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0056294C  LogAllocSegment
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0055C830  ForceLogPages
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x00559F9C  LogWriterThread
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007E628  StartThread
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0xEF764C40  *UNKNOWN*
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007E550  StartThread
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 1 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 2 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 3 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 4 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 5 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 6 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 7 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 8 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 9 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 10 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 11 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 12 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 13 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 14 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 15 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 16 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 17 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 18 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 19 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 20 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 21 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 22 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 23 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 24 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 25 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 26 terminated in response to
program abort.
08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 27 terminated in 

Re: Scheduler Problems on AIX - SCHEDMODE=PROMPTED???

2000-08-09 Thread Shekhar Dhotre

Just kill shedule and again restart it.




"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 08/09/2000 09:43:43 AM
Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400
cc:

Subject: Scheduler Problems on AIX - SCHEDMODE=PROMPTED???

Hello All,

I upgraded my AIX TSM clients to 3.7.2.14 yesterday and now I am having
a problem with the TSM scheduler process.  The backups were missed for the 6
boxes I upgraded last night.  I arrived this morning and thought maybe I had
forgotten to restart the scheduler, but the schedulers were all running.  I
investigated by looking in the activity log and I received the following error
for all of the clients -   ANR2716E Schedule prompter was not able to contact
client client name using type 1 (IP Address 1501).  The schedule mode for these
clients was set to PROMPTED.  I switched the schedule mode to POLLING and the
scheduled backups ran.  Is there a problem with the TSM scheduler at this level?
Any help is appreciated.

Thanks,

Sean

Sean McNamara
Senior Analyst
PJM Interconnection L.L.C.
(610)666-4206



Re: Please Help - Server Down

2000-08-09 Thread Cook, Dwight E

Long, check the availability of your db  log files from your operating
system...
looks like you probably had a volume group go unavailable...
also you might have to add to and extend your log to get back up...
DSMSERV EXTEND LOG (Emergency Log Extension)
Use this command to extend the size of the recovery log when you need
additional log
space to restart the server. After the server is running, you can do the
following:
v Back up the database, which frees the recovery log space.
v Adjust the size of the recovery log, the database backup trigger full
percentage, or
both to allow for successful future database backups.
Note: Use the DSMFMT utility to format a new recovery log volume.
Syntax
DSMSERV EXTEND LOG volume_name megabytes
Parameters
volume_name(Required)
Specifies the name of a new, formatted volume available for use as the
recovery
log extension.
megabytes(Required)
Specifies the size, in megabytes, of the new volume. The size must be a
multiple
of 4MB and 1MB less than the size of the volume specified in the volume_name
parameter. For example, if the volume is 5MB, specify a value of 4.

 --
 From: Long Nguyen[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
 Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 8:43 AM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Please Help - Server Down

 Has anyone encounter this before???  The server was terminated and can't
 be
 brought back up.  Messages from log and dsmserv errpt below.


 The followings are error messages from the log:

 nohup.out  file from "nohup /opt/IBMadsm-s/bin/dsmserv" command:
 
 ADSTAR Distributed Storage Manager for Sun Solaris 2.6/7
 Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.20

 Licensed Materials - Property of IBM

 5639-B22 (C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 1998. All rights reserved.
 U.S. Government Users Restricted Rights - Use, duplication or disclosure
 restricted by GSA ADP Schedule Contract with IBM Corporation.

 ANR7800I DSMSERV generated at 10:46:31 on Mar 26 1999.
 ANR7801I Subsystem process ID is 4938.
 ANR0900I Processing options file /opt/IBMadsm-s/bin/dsmserv.opt.
 ANR0990I ADSM server restart-recovery in progress.
 ANR0214W Database volume /apps/adsm/db_mirror/mir.db2.dsm is in the
 offline
 state - VARY ON required.
 ANR0215W Recovery log volume /apps/adsm/db_mirror/mir.log2.dsm is in the
 offline state - VARY ON required.
 ANR0214W Database volume /apps/adsm/db_mirror/mir.db3.dsm is in the
 offline
 state - VARY ON required.
 ANR0200I Recovery log assigned capacity is 3704 megabytes.
 ANR0201I Database assigned capacity is 7552 megabytes.
 ANR0306I Recovery log volume mount in progress.
 ANR0353I Recovery log analysis pass in progress.
 ANR0354I Recovery log redo pass in progress.
 ANR0355I Recovery log undo pass in progress.
 ANRD logseg.c(493): Log space has been overcommitted (no empty segment
 found) - base LSN = 164471.0.0.
 ANR7824S Server operation terminated.
 ANR7823S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected.
 ANRD Trace-back of called functions:
 ANRD   0x0007E43C  AbortServer
 ANRD   0x0007B7E0  pkAbort
 ANRD   0x0056294C  LogAllocSegment
 ANRD   0x0055C830  ForceLogPages
 ANRD   0x0055AD50  LogWriterThread
 ANRD   0x0007E628  StartThread
 ANRD   0xEF764C40  *UNKNOWN*
 ANRD   0x0007E550  StartThread

 output form dsmserv.errl
 ==
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7824S Server operation terminated.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7823S Internal error LOGSEG871 detected.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD Trace-back of called functions:
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007E43C  AbortServer
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007B7E0  pkAbort
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0056294C  LogAllocSegment
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0055C830  ForceLogPages
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x00559F9C  LogWriterThread
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007E628  StartThread
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0xEF764C40  *UNKNOWN*
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANRD   0x0007E550  StartThread
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 1 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 2 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 3 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 4 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 5 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 6 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 7 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 8 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 9 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  ANR7820S ADSM thread 10 terminated in response to
 program abort.
 08/08/2000 23:14:54  

Re: What determines what is to be backed up?

2000-08-09 Thread John Naylor

Jack,
Has some attribute of the file other than the time stamp changed.
With the netware client for example ADSM will look at attributes such as file
size and trustee rights.
If you only want it to consider timestamp then look at the incrbydate option.
If you do use incrbydate remember that you should still run full incrementals on
a regular basis.
If you search through the particular client manual you are interested in, you
should be able to find the file attributes ADSM will use to decide if a backup
is required.
John





Palmadesso Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/09/2000 02:43:25 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject:  What determines what is to be backed up?



Good Morning,

What criteria does ADSM use to determine what files are to be backed up
incrementally.  Does it go just by last date modified or by the actual
contents of the file or something else? I have some clients that show they
backed up some files last night that have not been modified since 8/2.  Why
is this happening?

Jack






**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.

Scottish Hydro-Electric and Southern Electric are trading names of
Scottish and Southern Energy Group
**



Impatient clients on ADSM with 3494

2000-08-09 Thread Robert Cross

I've got a funny 'fault' with our system, (3.1.2.40 server with attached four
drive 3494),
as follows:

Clients set restores going, and most of the time there's no problems. But,
every so
often, we get a restore which needs data on a lot of tapes, (for example 30 or
more).
Invariably this restore will fail at some point, and the problem appears to be
that
it thinks that there are no mount points (drives) free. Most of the time this
appears
to true, although the drives are at status 'idle', (why doesn't it dismount the
tapes!?).
Other times it appears that the server just cannot load the tape quick enough to
satisfy the client - which ends up with the now-dreaded 'data unavailable to
server'
message. Worst still, on occasion we have drives 0 and 2 free, 1 and 3 in use
and
the clients regard this as 'no mount points available' - why?

Our most consistent workaround appears to be keep an eye on the restore and
manually dismount the tape it's just finished with, especially if the restore
is using
drives 1 or 3. We've tried setting the mountretention's on both drive and
library
device classes down to five minutes but this doesn't help.

Is there some other timeout value, esp. on the client, that I've overlooked?

And has anyone seen problems like this with the 3494's?

Any assistance greatly welcome, even 'no idea - report to Tivoli/IBM'.

Bob Cross.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This message is confidential.  It may also be privileged or
protected by other legal rules.  It does not constitute an
offer or acceptance of an offer, nor shall it form any part
of a legally binding contract.  If you have received this
communication in error, please let us know by reply then
destroy it.  You should not use, print, copy the message or
disclose its contents to anyone.

E-mail is subject to possible data corruption, is not
secure, and its content does not necessarily represent the
opinion of this Company.  No representation or warranty is
made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information
and no liability can be accepted for any loss arising from
its use.

This e-mail and any attachments are not guaranteed to be
free from so-called computer viruses and it is recommended
that you check for such viruses before down-loading it to
your computer equipment.  This Company has no control over
other websites to which there may be hypertext links and no
liability can be accepted in relation to those sites.

Scottish  Newcastle plc
Registered in Scotland, Registered Number 16288
Registered Office: 50 East Fettes Avenue, Edinburgh, EH4 1RR
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: Impatient clients on ADSM with 3494

2000-08-09 Thread Debbie Denham

Hello Bob,

We also had an issue with the mount retention.  At the present time our mount 
retention is 1 minute.
We also made the decision to transfer all data to disk pool first and then to tape 
pool. Restores from disk are 100 times faster than tape.

Have a great day,
Debbie Denham

 Robert Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/09/00 10:26AM 
I've got a funny 'fault' with our system, (3.1.2.40 server with attached four
drive 3494),
as follows:

Clients set restores going, and most of the time there's no problems. But,
every so
often, we get a restore which needs data on a lot of tapes, (for example 30 or
more).
Invariably this restore will fail at some point, and the problem appears to be
that
it thinks that there are no mount points (drives) free. Most of the time this
appears
to true, although the drives are at status 'idle', (why doesn't it dismount the
tapes!?).
Other times it appears that the server just cannot load the tape quick enough to
satisfy the client - which ends up with the now-dreaded 'data unavailable to
server'
message. Worst still, on occasion we have drives 0 and 2 free, 1 and 3 in use
and
the clients regard this as 'no mount points available' - why?

Our most consistent workaround appears to be keep an eye on the restore and
manually dismount the tape it's just finished with, especially if the restore
is using
drives 1 or 3. We've tried setting the mountretention's on both drive and
library
device classes down to five minutes but this doesn't help.

Is there some other timeout value, esp. on the client, that I've overlooked?

And has anyone seen problems like this with the 3494's?

Any assistance greatly welcome, even 'no idea - report to Tivoli/IBM'.

Bob Cross.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This message is confidential.  It may also be privileged or
protected by other legal rules.  It does not constitute an
offer or acceptance of an offer, nor shall it form any part
of a legally binding contract.  If you have received this
communication in error, please let us know by reply then
destroy it.  You should not use, print, copy the message or
disclose its contents to anyone.

E-mail is subject to possible data corruption, is not
secure, and its content does not necessarily represent the
opinion of this Company.  No representation or warranty is
made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information
and no liability can be accepted for any loss arising from
its use.

This e-mail and any attachments are not guaranteed to be
free from so-called computer viruses and it is recommended
that you check for such viruses before down-loading it to
your computer equipment.  This Company has no control over
other websites to which there may be hypertext links and no
liability can be accepted in relation to those sites.

Scottish  Newcastle plc
Registered in Scotland, Registered Number 16288
Registered Office: 50 East Fettes Avenue, Edinburgh, EH4 1RR
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *



Re: TSM and Lotus Notes Archiving

2000-08-09 Thread Davidson, Becky

We use CommonStore with SAP if that is any help.  It is fairly easy to use.

-Original Message-
From: Winfried Heilmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 7:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: TSM and Lotus Notes Archiving


Hi,

does anybody have any experience with the product " IBM Content Manager
CommonStore for Lotus" which has an interface to tsm for archiving
"Lotus-Notes-Documents".

Regards winfried



Re: Impatient clients on ADSM with 3494

2000-08-09 Thread John Naylor

Robert,
Set your mount retention on the storage pool  down to 1 minute.
Also check the mount limit on the device class of your tapes, if you have this
defaulted that is why you are only using 2 of the 4 drives.
John




Robert Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/09/2000 03:26:09 PM

Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject:  Impatient clients on ADSM with 3494



I've got a funny 'fault' with our system, (3.1.2.40 server with attached four
drive 3494),
as follows:

Clients set restores going, and most of the time there's no problems. But,
every so
often, we get a restore which needs data on a lot of tapes, (for example 30 or
more).
Invariably this restore will fail at some point, and the problem appears to be
that
it thinks that there are no mount points (drives) free. Most of the time this
appears
to true, although the drives are at status 'idle', (why doesn't it dismount the
tapes!?).
Other times it appears that the server just cannot load the tape quick enough to
satisfy the client - which ends up with the now-dreaded 'data unavailable to
server'
message. Worst still, on occasion we have drives 0 and 2 free, 1 and 3 in use
and
the clients regard this as 'no mount points available' - why?

Our most consistent workaround appears to be keep an eye on the restore and
manually dismount the tape it's just finished with, especially if the restore
is using
drives 1 or 3. We've tried setting the mountretention's on both drive and
library
device classes down to five minutes but this doesn't help.

Is there some other timeout value, esp. on the client, that I've overlooked?

And has anyone seen problems like this with the 3494's?

Any assistance greatly welcome, even 'no idea - report to Tivoli/IBM'.

Bob Cross.


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
This message is confidential.  It may also be privileged or
protected by other legal rules.  It does not constitute an
offer or acceptance of an offer, nor shall it form any part
of a legally binding contract.  If you have received this
communication in error, please let us know by reply then
destroy it.  You should not use, print, copy the message or
disclose its contents to anyone.

E-mail is subject to possible data corruption, is not
secure, and its content does not necessarily represent the
opinion of this Company.  No representation or warranty is
made as to the accuracy or completeness of the information
and no liability can be accepted for any loss arising from
its use.

This e-mail and any attachments are not guaranteed to be
free from so-called computer viruses and it is recommended
that you check for such viruses before down-loading it to
your computer equipment.  This Company has no control over
other websites to which there may be hypertext links and no
liability can be accepted in relation to those sites.

Scottish  Newcastle plc
Registered in Scotland, Registered Number 16288
Registered Office: 50 East Fettes Avenue, Edinburgh, EH4 1RR
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *







**
The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern
Energy plc.
It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by
anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient,
any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted
to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of
the error in transmission.

Scottish Hydro-Electric and Southern Electric are trading names of
Scottish and Southern Energy Group
**



Re: Help with scheduling ADSM tasks into blocks of time.

2000-08-09 Thread Thomas Denier

 Start Oracle hot backups (2 at a time)  6am - 6pm

Oracle recommends that hot backups be done during periods of low update
activity because updates generate unusually large amounts of redo log data
during hot backups. When a database update occurs logging normally records
which fields are affected and how the fields are changed. When an update
occurs during a hot backup the 'after' version of every block affected by the
change is written to the redo logs. This allows the recovery process to bring
'fuzzy' backups of the .dbf files back to a consistent state. The size of a
block is between 1024 and 8192 bytes, depending on the configuration. Most of
the time you have earmarked for hot backups falls within the normal work day.
Are you sure you have the disk space and I/O bandwidth to support the
intensive logging associated with hot backups during the work day?



Immediate Backup does not start immediately

2000-08-09 Thread Werner Nussbaumer

I defined an immediate backup, but the node says that the next try to get a
schedule will be in 1 hour.

What schedule mode do I have to define on the client and on the server? I would
like that the server starts the backup and the node would permanently listen.

Thank you for any help,
Kind regards
Werner Nussbaumer



Moving Tapes from AIX to NT

2000-08-09 Thread Riddle, Hal

No such thing as a dumb question, Right!

If I migrate my server from AIX to NT, I can export  import  the DB but
what happens to the tapes we have accumulated? Can a tape be read by an NT
TSM server that was created by an AIX server?

No such thing as a dumb 



Retrieving limitations

2000-08-09 Thread Darren Perry

Does anyone know what the limitations are retrieving files across different platforms.

Example

Archive files on a Novell platform and retrieve the files from a Unix client.

Can this be done?

Thanks
Darren Perry
Publishers Printing Co.
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: DIRMC not working???

2000-08-09 Thread Richard Sims

I'm being told by the Unix administrator he is having a problem with "only
one" of his clients. Of the 10 clients he has, I have them all in the same
domain. In that domain there are 4 management classes so I've asked him to
add the line DIRMC to his dsm.sys file.

Why?  Is this being confused with specifying a management class on an
Include statement?  A DIRMC in most Unix systems is irrelevant because the
directory info is basic and, like an empty file, is recorded in the *SM
database, not in a storage pool.

ANS1105E The management class for this file does not have a valid
 backup copy group. This file will not be backed up.

The server policy definitions need to be checked out, according to this
message.

  Richard Sims, BU



Restoring files

2000-08-09 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.

Someone please enlighten me. I have a Unix Administrator who has root access
to all of his computers. He basically wants to give all of his users the
right to restore files anytime they want. His reasoning is because he
doesn't have access, here is his note to me:

Note that we're talking about one pseudo-DBA on the Data Warehouse server.
He doesn't have root access.  He does have "oracle" access (which I don't)
which means he can only restore database related stuff (which I don't have
responsibility for).

He makes it sound like he can't do this but I get the feeling he just
doesn't want to. Someone please help me understand why he couldn't do these
restores because of his access. I am trying to limit the number of users
that can do restores so this doesn't get out of hand.

Thanks,
 Geoff Gill
 NT Systems Support Engineer
 Computer Systems Group
 E-Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone:  (858) 826-4062
 Pager:   (888) 997-9614




TSM Windows 4.1.0 Client Install from Electronic Distribution

2000-08-09 Thread Richard Hintz

Trying to install the Windows 2000 V4.1.0 client I see that the READ1STC.TXT
file says, for electronic distribution as when downloading from Internet:

"TBD Will try to remain as close to 3.7 structure as possible."

I guess the document was still in draft when released.  Are there final
instructions on how to install?  It's not obvious, at least to me.  Sorry if
this has been discussed, I'm just checking back in after an absence.
  Rich



Re: Windows 2000 profession B/u issues

2000-08-09 Thread Joshua S. Bassi

I am successfully backing up my W2K laptop to an RS6K TSM server.
Unfortunately I cannot help you with your problem because I have
not tried to backup shares.


--
Joshua S. Bassi
Senior Technical Consultant
Symatrix Technology, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Robinson, Cris
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 8:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Windows 2000 profession B/u issues


Is anyone out there backing up Windows 2000 professional clients. We are
looking to migrate to 2000 but there are issues with user privileges to
files and folders.
I have gone through the documentation but have not been able to get TSM to
see a user share. It will only see the default \\localmachine\C$ admin
share.

We are looking to "lock down most of the device except 1 folder which we set
up a share to. This folder is called "scratch". Not my idea for a name so
don't go there ;-)

so, we have a domain \\localmachine\scratch in addition to the c$ share.

has anyone been able to get this or any other approach to work?


Thanks -
CR

__
Cris Robinson
Backup  Recovery Engineering
Information Technology Support Services
Liberty Mutual Insurance
Portsmouth, New Hampshire
603.431.8400.54837
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Retrieving limitations

2000-08-09 Thread Richard Sims

Does anyone know what the limitations are retrieving files across
different platforms.

The file systems must be compatible for cross-platform operations
to succeed - even Query's!  For example, a FAT file system is common
to Windows, DOS, NT, and OS/2, but not to most Unix systems, which
prevents interoperation.
  Richard Sims, BU



Re: NetWare Client Passwords

2000-08-09 Thread S W Branch

Joshua,

Try adding the option "nwpwfile yes". I used to intermittently see this
problem when the scheduler attempted to connect to Netware - I would type
in the Netware user id and password again and it would run fine for months.
I haven't seen this problem at all since I added this option.

Steve Branch
Phillips Petroleum
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





"Joshua S. Bassi" [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 08/09/2000
11:52:25 AM

Any replies will be addressed to: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent by:  "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]


To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cc:


Subject:  NetWare Client Passwords


All,

I am trying to setup a nightly schedule to backup a NetWare 4.1.1
server.  The TSM client is 4.1.0.0 and the server is W2K TSM 3.7.3.

When I connect to the server, I am not prompted for a password.  I
can backup/restore just fine.  But when I try to schedule a nightly
backup through the scheduler, I get the schedule info displayed,
but when the server contacts the client, it requests the password
for user .backup.  I do not believe it should be doing this
due to the fact that I have passwordaccess set to generate!

Below is my option file, can somebody please help?


--
Joshua S. Bassi
Senior Technical Consultant
Symatrix Technology, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


cha   0
commm tcp
*commmipx
compressa n
compressi n
dom   all-local nds
errorlogr 10
largecom  y
maxcmdr   4
nwus  .cn=backup.o=whatever
passworda generate
processor 1000
quiet
resour10
retryp10
schedlogr 10
schedmod  pr
suy
tapep n
tcpb  31
*tcpb 512
tcps  ???
tcpw  64
*txnb 25600 *Use this option when backing up to tape



Hail the power of SQL!

2000-08-09 Thread Daniel Swan/TM

Today I've been learning SQL to help gather info about my ADSM setup, and
I'm absolutely ecstatic it's power and flexibility.

A week ago, a 'SQL for ADSM' cheat sheet would have been indispensible to
me, but I didn't know of one.  Does such a thing
exist?  If it doesn't, I think I'll write one up and post it to the list,
for the sake of other ADSM newbie admins. ("help select" was somewhat
useful, but doesn't really make the grade).

While we are on the topic, does anyone have any favorite SQL statements
they'd like to share?



Re: Hail the power of SQL!

2000-08-09 Thread Lawrence Clark

dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=x 'select stgpool_name,count(*) from volumes group by  
stgpool_name'


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/09/00 03:15PM 
Today I've been learning SQL to help gather info about my ADSM setup, and
I'm absolutely ecstatic it's power and flexibility.

A week ago, a 'SQL for ADSM' cheat sheet would have been indispensible to
me, but I didn't know of one.  Does such a thing
exist?  If it doesn't, I think I'll write one up and post it to the list,
for the sake of other ADSM newbie admins. ("help select" was somewhat
useful, but doesn't really make the grade).

While we are on the topic, does anyone have any favorite SQL statements
they'd like to share?



Re: Hail the power of SQL!

2000-08-09 Thread Richard Sims

A week ago, a 'SQL for ADSM' cheat sheet would have been indispensible to
me, but I didn't know of one.  Does such a thing exist?

Daniel - That and much more misc. accumulated tidbits are to be found in
 my ADSM functional directory at http://people.bu.edu/rbs .
Look under "REFERENCES AND OTHER RESOURCES" toward the bottom of the file,
and "SQL" therein.  There are also various sample SELECT statements
sprinkled throughout the categorized file.
  Richard Sims (just another ADSMer, and compulsive documenter), BU



Re: Retrieving limitations

2000-08-09 Thread Keith Higgs

Richard,

So if I have files archived via a Novell client, can I retrieve them with an NT client?

Thanks,
Keith Higgs

 Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/09/00 01:33PM 
Does anyone know what the limitations are retrieving files across
different platforms.

The file systems must be compatible for cross-platform operations
to succeed - even Query's!  For example, a FAT file system is common
to Windows, DOS, NT, and OS/2, but not to most Unix systems, which
prevents interoperation.
  Richard Sims, BU



Re: Recommended ADSM hardware

2000-08-09 Thread arhoads

1. Go for an *80, whatever you can afford.  Disk (SSA) is more important
than RAM.  Couldn't justify much more than 256MB on ADSM -- havn't any
evidence for TSM.  AIX will use the extra so go for a gig or two...

2. Go for a 3494 with at least 3 (pref. 4) 3590-E1A drives.  Too much?
Buy used from ICC  upgrade.  Still too much?  Buy a new, large
capacity, 3575 with at least 4 (pref. 6) 3570C drives.  Too much?  Buy
used from ICC  upgrade.  Still too much?  Go to work for a better
company!

Does my preference for IBM hardware show?  Go browse ADSM-L archives and
then review 8mm  DLT recording technology and decide for yourself.

"Marc D. Taylor" wrote:

 Hello All,

 I am tasked with the responsibility of developing a proposal for a new ADSM
 server.  Presently, we have an IBM J40 w/ 256 MB ram, 25 GB of disk
 storage.  We are using dlt2000 drives.

 What I would like to poll from you all is:  What IBM AIX box you would use
 and what tape technology you would use.  I have gotten info on dlt8000's
 and the ait drives.  Are there others I should be considering?  What are
 people using today.

 Thanks for your input and I have learned a lot from being on this list.

 I will share the results if anyone is interested.

 Marc Taylor
 ===
 Marc D. Taylor
 Research Programmer
 Beckman Institute Systems Services
 Room 1714
 Office:  217-244-7373, Fax:  217-333-8206
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.beckman.uiuc.edu/groups/biss



Re: Hail the power of SQL!

2000-08-09 Thread Richard Sims

 This thread reminds me of a question I've been meaning to ask. I have
 several SQL queries that run as cron jobs to keep me current on system
 status. About two months ago the server started crashing every Sunday at the
 same exact time. The problem was traced to an automated query that runs
 every day, which has been running for almost two years. Once I modified the
 statement, the crashes stopped. Support said that it was because of the
 "group by" portion of the query, and that this is a know issue. My questions
 are:

 1. Why would this start happening when I have been using this script every
 day for over a year?

Well, the crash should not be happening - we would more expect a message like
ANR2958E SQL temporary table storage has been exhausted.
But SQL queries require workspace, and that comes from the TSM database, and
certainly yours has grown, been used, and changed over time.  The workspace
usually needs to be contiguous, as well, and when things get tight, untoward
events can transpire.  How TSM is actually servicing some of these queries
also plays a part.  Your mileage may vary, things change, and all that.
   Richard Sims, BU