Re: client notification
not sure about NT, but in unix, you can enter a line in the dsm.sys file that will execute a command/script for you POSTSCHEDULECMD /auscmvc1/usr/local/adm/adsm.mail and have adsm.mail contain something like. echo "See dsmsched.log for more details" | mail -s "Backup has finished" [EMAIL PROTECTED] shawn ___ Shawn Drew Tivoli IT - ADSM/TSM Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rajesh Oak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/14/2001 11:37:29 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: client notification Everyone, Can we notify a client that the backup was successful/not successful after the backup schedule finishes. Say a screen pops up with the message " Backup's done" or anything thing else which sends a signal to the user about the Satus of his backup. Regards. Rajesh Oak Get 250 color business cards for FREE! at Lycos Mail http://mail.lycos.com/freemail/vistaprint_index.html
Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems
Steve, when doing server2server operation, destination server MUST have a valid ARCHIVEPOOL with volumes ! Check this Have you checked the IBM Redbook, It's really helpfull, and your do not need a third server. I did not managed to do this stuff at the beginning and after having read the redbook, it works fine. send me your definitions of server-type node, and devclass Good luck rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Steve Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : jeudi 15 mars 2001 00:03 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems > > > Herve, > > Good idea but it does not seem to work. I can get all the > defs done and > start an export but it always fails with the errors shown below. > > I think I have an idea why it fails so let me explain. > > Server1 has a diskpool but no tapepools. I have server1 > diskpool migrate > to a virtual volumes in server2's diskpool. The server2 diskpool then > migrates to server2's tapepool, 3494 with two 3590e drives. This has > been working fine for months. > > Now I need to get the data off of server1 and into server2 as > native tsm > data which is why I am doing the export/import. When I start > the export > it has to open a session with server2 to get the data off of > the virtual > volumes and then send it back to the server2 diskpool as > export data. It > should work but does not. > > I have the same kind of problem trying to do reclaimation for the > server1 virtual volumes on server2. It would always fail with some > message indicating that the data was not available. I stopped doing > reclaimations and started using script created move data commands and > they work fine. > > I called tivoli one time about the reclaimation problem but > they didn't > have a clue what the problem might be. > > I just now setup a temporary tsm server called server3 and am doing a > export to it and then a import to server2 from server3. The export is > running now and looks like it will finish ok. Then I'll start > the import > and keep my fingers crossed. > > 031401 11:46:16 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket > 23. Reason > 32. > 031401 11:46:16 ANRD pvrserv.c(854): ServWrite: > Error writing > SERVER >volume W2KTAPE1_LOOPBK_TARGET.EXP.984598810. > rc=30 > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0662E EXPORT NODE: Output error > encountered in >accessing data storage. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0569I Object not processed for REDWOOD-O: > type=Backup, >file space=\\redwood\c$, > object=\ADSM.SYS\REGISTRY\REDWO- >OD\MACHINE\ SAM. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR1361I Output volume > W2KTAPE1_LOOPBK_TARGET.EXP.9845988- >10 closed. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket > 23. Reason > 32. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0794E EXPORT NODE: Processing terminated > abnormally - >error accessing data storage. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0891I EXPORT NODE: Copied 3 optionset > definitions. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 3 file space 0 > archive files, >13 backup files, and 0 space managed files. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0656W EXPORT NODE: Skipped 0 archive files, 1 > backup >files, and 0 space managed files. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 16486 > bytes of data. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by XTSCSMB > as process > 241 has >ended. > 031401 11:46:16 ANR0986I Process 241 for EXPORT NODE running in > the >BACKGROUND processed 20 items for a total of > 16,486 bytes >with a completion state of FAILURE at 11:46:16. > > > > "Chibois, Herve" wrote: > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > I did the trip last month for one of my customer. > > Do not need to export to a shared FS, you can directly > > try "Server-to-server" export. It works fine. > > The "key-step" (which I forgot to do the first time) is the > > "loopback" devclass. > > > > You can have a look at this piece of redbook : > SG245244.PDF, '4.11.2 page > > 130 > > > > Here is the steps I did for my customer. > > > > 1) export node from server1 to server2 (on a diskpool) > > 2) import node from server2 to server2 (that is the trick !) > > > > Good luck > > Rv > > > > > -- > -- > > -- > > CYBORG is an E20 running TSM 3.7 on AIX 4.3.2 > > GLADIATOR is a NT4 srv running TSM 4.1.2. It has to have a > file-devclass > > pointing to your fileserver1 > > > > Source server = CYBORG > > Target server = GLADIATOR > > > > GLADIATOR> REGISTER NODE CYBORG_SRV ?***? DOMAIN=UNIVERS > TYPE=SERVER > > GLADIATOR> DEF SERVER GLADIATOR_SRV HLA=127.0.0.1 LLA=1500 > > NODENAM
AW: TSM Server 4.1.2 for Windows NT/2000 Pulled from Website??
Hi Jeff refresh your browser or take this link to the latest version (4.1.2.12) ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com/storage/tivoli-storage-management/maintenance/ client/v4r1/Windows/i386/LATEST/ Claude -Ursprungliche Nachricht- Von: Jeff Rankin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. Marz 2001 19:05 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: TSM Server 4.1.2 for Windows NT/2000 Pulled from Website?? I just went out to re-download the 4.1.2 install for Windows NT and the website states "Note: The V4.1.2 server package has been temporarily removed. APAR IC29552 is being investigated." Unless I missed it somewhere, this hasn't been announced yet. Does anyone know what's going on? -- Jeff Rankin Associate Technical Analyst, Excel Corporation Phone: 316-291-2903 Fax: 316-266-4415 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
client notification
Everyone, Can we notify a client that the backup was successful/not successful after the backup schedule finishes. Say a screen pops up with the message " Backup's done" or anything thing else which sends a signal to the user about the Satus of his backup. Regards. Rajesh Oak Get 250 color business cards for FREE! at Lycos Mail http://mail.lycos.com/freemail/vistaprint_index.html
DSMAPIPW for UDB backups on Solaris 2.6
We are using TSM to back up our DB2 UDB databases on Solaris 2.6 clients. On the TSM server I have set the password expiry for all of the Solaris nodes to . However after a varying number of days the DB2 backups start failing with 137 api return codes which are fixed by running the dsmapipw password setting job. We ran this job when the nodes were first backed up but every so often we have to run it again. In the manuals it states that the dsmapipw password setting job only ever needs to be run once. Why do we have to continually run this job? I have passwordaccess generate. Thanks Ross Davies Tuning & Storage Admin Centrelink
TDP Domino on NT GUI inferface (Can backup but can't see files to restore from GUI)
Hi all, I have this setup: 2 NT servers (Netfinity)(both installed with TSM 3.7): - 1 is a TSM server 3.7 - both has TDP for Domino - TSM server attached to the IBM 3447 DLT tape library On the TSM client: - the TDP for DOmino (GUI) can do backup and can also list the backup from the restore option BUT On the TSM server: - the TDP for Domino (GUI) can also do backup BUT cannot list the backup from the restore option. On the TSM admin client: - i check the filespace, there is a backup done from both TDP for domino since both TDP Domino is backing up different domains Can anyone help me on why i can't see my backup via TDP DOmino GUI on the TSM server? Thanks and regards Amir __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. http://auctions.yahoo.com/
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
Jeff. I would like to sincerely thank you for that input. You were right on the money. When IBM configured the library, they configured it as four Logical Libraries. I just blew away that configuration and set it up as one LL. Now my servers only see one library with four drives. Thanks Very Much!! -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary I have 3 FC connections from my TSM server (AIX) and one from each (3) SDG into my McData SAN Director (ED-5000). All of those (6) connections are in a zone by themselves. It sounds to me that Jay's problem might be that the control path to the 3584 library is going across each LTO drive instead of just the first drive. But Becky is right... You should see each device on each fibre channel adapter. EXAMPLE: In my situation (see original reply below) I see 19 devices (15 LTO drives, 3 LTO libraries, and one 8mm tape drive). Since the 8mm drive is direct-attached-SCSI, I should see only one. Since I have 3 FCAs into the SAN, I should see all the other devices three times (once for each FCA). I really just have one library with five drives in it. Jay, if you are seeing one library for each drive, I'd start looking at the library for issues. The 3584 library should use the first drive as the control path between the library and the operating system. This is fine as long as that first drive doesn't have SCSI problems... If THAT happens (or if you lose the FCA that controls that first drive) you could lose the whole library (like I did last week). Am I understanding this correctly...? You have ONE 2108 running FOUR drives that live in ONE library... right...? If so, and you see four libraries AND four drives, your control path HAS to be going across each drive. Jeff P.S. - Are you in the 817 area code? -Original Message- From: Davidson, Becky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Zoning for both the San Data Gateways and the Switches will probably help that. If there are for example 4 drives on a san data gateway and 2 paths from the switch to the san data gateway then you will have 8 drives because each path sees all 4 drives. If you then have 2 fibre adapters going to the switch then you will see 16 because each adapter sees everything on the switch. Make sense? -Original Message- From: Volovsek, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary I had that problem when I had too many paths going to the SDG's. I had two FC Switches tiered together and both switches each had a path to two separate SDG's. I removed the link between the FC Switches and the problem went away. In that case, I was seeing 8 libraries and 8 drives. Now I am down to 4 libraries and 4 drives. It should be 1 library and 4 drives. -jay -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Jay, Does your NT server see 4 or 16 drives...? I don't know how much help this is, but I'm running a similar environment here. The only major difference is that my TSM server is an IBM RS/6000 (H80) running AIX 4.3.3... Anyway, within AIX, I see 15 drives and 3 libraries (like this): rmt15 Available 14-08-00-6,0 Differential SCSI 8mm Tape Drive rmt0 Available 17-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 17-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt1 Available 17-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt2 Available 17-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt3 Available 17-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt4 Available 17-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt5 Available 24-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc1 Available 24-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt6 Available 24-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt7 Available 24-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt8 Available 24-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt9 Available 24-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt10 Available 2D-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc2 Available 2D-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt11 Available 2D-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt12 Available 2D-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt13 Available 2D-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt14 Available 2D-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) That's not a problem though, because when I set up the 3584 in TSM, I s
Re: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ...
The problem with the Emerald III based FC cards from JNI is that they do not support the FC-Tape protocol. Their new Emerald IV based FC cards do support FC-Tape. - Original Message - From: "Walker, Lesley R" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:32 PM Subject: Re: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ... > I have two FC64-1063 cards in an E4500, connecting to an EMC array. I > installed the driver supplied by EMC (fcaw259). At this moment I'm not > actually sure whether it's connected direct or through a switch - sounds > nuts, I know, but the server isn't in production yet, and the SAN stuff is > being arranged by other people. > > -Original Message- > From: Alexandre Bicas Caldeira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:52 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ... > > > Hi guys, > > I'm trying to set up a SAN using two IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch, six TSM Servers > and a 3494 with 10 3590E drives > > Four TSM Servers are running smooth (1 M80, 2 Dell with FC Qlogic 2200, 1 > SUN450 with FC Qlogic 2200). All of then are PCI Servers. > I have two other servers (E3500 and a E1) that are SBUS Servers. > > Acording to Tivoli web site, all FC Adapters supported in this configuration > are PCI ! ! ! Both SBUS Servers have an JNI FC64-1063 FC Adapter which is > simillar do JNI FCI-1063 (the PCI Version which is supported)... The FC > adapter establishes link to the 2109-S16 (steady green light) but it doesn't > find any tape devices... > > Is anyone using these kind of FC adapters with SAN ? Is there any special > firware or device driver that should be installed in these sun boxes in > order to put these cards to work ? I updated the switch's firmware do level > 2.2.1a but I had no luck... The IBM 2109-S16 is simillar to a Brocade Switch > which is used by EMC... These FC64-1063 adapter is the one that is used by > most of the SBUS Servers... EMC guys, any tips ?! > > Thanks you all ! > > Alexandre Bicas Caldeira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tivoli Certified Specialist - Tivoli Storage Manager > Service IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br >Sao Paulo:(11) 3040-1960 >Rua Helena, 280, Cj 1106 >CEP 04552-050 - Sco Paulo - SP > Porto Alegre: (51) 212-3666 > Curitiba: (41) 262-8320
Re: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ...
Alexandre, I had a similar problem with a client I am working with and I spoke with IBM and found that they have just certified an EMULEX LP8000S (Sbus version) card. In my case I am working with the 3584 Ultrium Library - but this same card might help in your situation. Adolph - Original Message - From: "Alexandre Bicas Caldeira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ... > Hi guys, > > I'm trying to set up a SAN using two IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch, six TSM Servers > and a 3494 with 10 3590E drives > > Four TSM Servers are running smooth (1 M80, 2 Dell with FC Qlogic 2200, 1 > SUN450 with FC Qlogic 2200). All of then are PCI Servers. > I have two other servers (E3500 and a E1) that are SBUS Servers. > > Acording to Tivoli web site, all FC Adapters supported in this configuration > are PCI ! ! ! Both SBUS Servers have an JNI FC64-1063 FC Adapter which is > simillar do JNI FCI-1063 (the PCI Version which is supported)... The FC > adapter establishes link to the 2109-S16 (steady green light) but it doesn't > find any tape devices... > > Is anyone using these kind of FC adapters with SAN ? Is there any special > firware or device driver that should be installed in these sun boxes in > order to put these cards to work ? I updated the switch's firmware do level > 2.2.1a but I had no luck... The IBM 2109-S16 is simillar to a Brocade Switch > which is used by EMC... These FC64-1063 adapter is the one that is used by > most of the SBUS Servers... EMC guys, any tips ?! > > Thanks you all ! > > Alexandre Bicas Caldeira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tivoli Certified Specialist - Tivoli Storage Manager > Service IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br >Sao Paulo:(11) 3040-1960 >Rua Helena, 280, Cj 1106 >CEP 04552-050 - Sco Paulo - SP > Porto Alegre: (51) 212-3666 > Curitiba: (41) 262-8320
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
I bet you are correct Jeff. Via the front panel, it says the control paths are required for all drives and it won't let me change it. I will work with IBM tomorrow to find out why. -jay PS. I am in the 414 area code. (Milwaukee) -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 4:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary I have 3 FC connections from my TSM server (AIX) and one from each (3) SDG into my McData SAN Director (ED-5000). All of those (6) connections are in a zone by themselves. It sounds to me that Jay's problem might be that the control path to the 3584 library is going across each LTO drive instead of just the first drive. But Becky is right... You should see each device on each fibre channel adapter. EXAMPLE: In my situation (see original reply below) I see 19 devices (15 LTO drives, 3 LTO libraries, and one 8mm tape drive). Since the 8mm drive is direct-attached-SCSI, I should see only one. Since I have 3 FCAs into the SAN, I should see all the other devices three times (once for each FCA). I really just have one library with five drives in it. Jay, if you are seeing one library for each drive, I'd start looking at the library for issues. The 3584 library should use the first drive as the control path between the library and the operating system. This is fine as long as that first drive doesn't have SCSI problems... If THAT happens (or if you lose the FCA that controls that first drive) you could lose the whole library (like I did last week). Am I understanding this correctly...? You have ONE 2108 running FOUR drives that live in ONE library... right...? If so, and you see four libraries AND four drives, your control path HAS to be going across each drive. Jeff P.S. - Are you in the 817 area code? -Original Message- From: Davidson, Becky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Zoning for both the San Data Gateways and the Switches will probably help that. If there are for example 4 drives on a san data gateway and 2 paths from the switch to the san data gateway then you will have 8 drives because each path sees all 4 drives. If you then have 2 fibre adapters going to the switch then you will see 16 because each adapter sees everything on the switch. Make sense? -Original Message- From: Volovsek, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary I had that problem when I had too many paths going to the SDG's. I had two FC Switches tiered together and both switches each had a path to two separate SDG's. I removed the link between the FC Switches and the problem went away. In that case, I was seeing 8 libraries and 8 drives. Now I am down to 4 libraries and 4 drives. It should be 1 library and 4 drives. -jay -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Jay, Does your NT server see 4 or 16 drives...? I don't know how much help this is, but I'm running a similar environment here. The only major difference is that my TSM server is an IBM RS/6000 (H80) running AIX 4.3.3... Anyway, within AIX, I see 15 drives and 3 libraries (like this): rmt15 Available 14-08-00-6,0 Differential SCSI 8mm Tape Drive rmt0 Available 17-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 17-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt1 Available 17-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt2 Available 17-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt3 Available 17-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt4 Available 17-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt5 Available 24-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc1 Available 24-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt6 Available 24-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt7 Available 24-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt8 Available 24-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt9 Available 24-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt10 Available 2D-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc2 Available 2D-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt11 Available 2D-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt12 Available 2D-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt13 Available 2D-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt14 Available 2D-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) That's not a problem though, because when I set up the 3584 in TSM, I set it up to use "smc0" for the library and "rmt0, 1, 7, 8, & 14" for the
Re: STK9714 to STK9710 migration
Hi Laura, On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Galvin, Laura L. wrote: > and I'm getting a STK9710. Will I be able to move the tapes from on library > to another? Or do I need to define another library, checkout the tapes from > the old STK9714 ( 100 tapes ) and check them in to the new library STK9714. We did this about 18 months ago. I wanted to rename the library as well so we did something like this; 1. Checked out every tape in the library with the "remove=no" option. - I first generated a list of scratch tapes. 2. Deleted the 9714 library and drives from ADSM and removed the lb0 and mt devices. 3. Shut down ADSM 4. Opened the door on the 9714 and removed all the tapes. 5. Installed the 9710, connected it up and tested it 6. Opened the door to the 9710 and manually put all the data cartridges into slots. I didn't put the scratch cartridges in, just the data. 7. Rebooted the ADSM server (you could just run cfgmgr, that would work too) 8. Defined the new lb0 and new drives to AIX (mt0..9, lb0) 9. Started ADSM and defined the new drives and library. 10. Issued a checkin with "search=yes". 11. Opened the door and put the scratch tapes in. 12. Issued another checkin, search=yes for the scratch tapes. Then we were up and running. > Are there any special configurations on the STK9710 like FAST LOAD, AUTO > CLEAN etc. That should be set, does any one know? They should be set on the 9710 the same as they are set on the 9714. From memory it's AUTOCLEAN=YES and FASTLOAD=YES. > I know I'll need to define in AIX and TSM the additional tape drives. But > I'm trying to see the easiest way to get the tapes over because I only have > ONE cap ( mailbox, in/out unit ). It would be very time consuming to > checkout/checkin the 100 tapes from one library to another. Not if you use the "remove=no" and "search=yes" parameters and open the door. Carl.
Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems
Herve, Good idea but it does not seem to work. I can get all the defs done and start an export but it always fails with the errors shown below. I think I have an idea why it fails so let me explain. Server1 has a diskpool but no tapepools. I have server1 diskpool migrate to a virtual volumes in server2's diskpool. The server2 diskpool then migrates to server2's tapepool, 3494 with two 3590e drives. This has been working fine for months. Now I need to get the data off of server1 and into server2 as native tsm data which is why I am doing the export/import. When I start the export it has to open a session with server2 to get the data off of the virtual volumes and then send it back to the server2 diskpool as export data. It should work but does not. I have the same kind of problem trying to do reclaimation for the server1 virtual volumes on server2. It would always fail with some message indicating that the data was not available. I stopped doing reclaimations and started using script created move data commands and they work fine. I called tivoli one time about the reclaimation problem but they didn't have a clue what the problem might be. I just now setup a temporary tsm server called server3 and am doing a export to it and then a import to server2 from server3. The export is running now and looks like it will finish ok. Then I'll start the import and keep my fingers crossed. 031401 11:46:16 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 23. Reason 32. 031401 11:46:16 ANRD pvrserv.c(854): ServWrite: Error writing SERVER volume W2KTAPE1_LOOPBK_TARGET.EXP.984598810. rc=30 031401 11:46:16 ANR0662E EXPORT NODE: Output error encountered in accessing data storage. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0569I Object not processed for REDWOOD-O: type=Backup, file space=\\redwood\c$, object=\ADSM.SYS\REGISTRY\REDWO- OD\MACHINE\ SAM. 031401 11:46:16 ANR1361I Output volume W2KTAPE1_LOOPBK_TARGET.EXP.9845988- 10 closed. 031401 11:46:16 ANR8216W Error sending data on socket 23. Reason 32. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0794E EXPORT NODE: Processing terminated abnormally - error accessing data storage. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0891I EXPORT NODE: Copied 3 optionset definitions. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 3 file space 0 archive files, 13 backup files, and 0 space managed files. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0656W EXPORT NODE: Skipped 0 archive files, 1 backup files, and 0 space managed files. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 16486 bytes of data. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by XTSCSMB as process 241 has ended. 031401 11:46:16 ANR0986I Process 241 for EXPORT NODE running in the BACKGROUND processed 20 items for a total of 16,486 bytes with a completion state of FAILURE at 11:46:16. "Chibois, Herve" wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I did the trip last month for one of my customer. > Do not need to export to a shared FS, you can directly > try "Server-to-server" export. It works fine. > The "key-step" (which I forgot to do the first time) is the > "loopback" devclass. > > You can have a look at this piece of redbook : SG245244.PDF, '4.11.2 page > 130 > > Here is the steps I did for my customer. > > 1) export node from server1 to server2 (on a diskpool) > 2) import node from server2 to server2 (that is the trick !) > > Good luck > Rv > > > -- > CYBORG is an E20 running TSM 3.7 on AIX 4.3.2 > GLADIATOR is a NT4 srv running TSM 4.1.2. It has to have a file-devclass > pointing to your fileserver1 > > Source server = CYBORG > Target server = GLADIATOR > > GLADIATOR> REGISTER NODE CYBORG_SRV ?***? DOMAIN=UNIVERS TYPE=SERVER > GLADIATOR> DEF SERVER GLADIATOR_SRV HLA=127.0.0.1 LLA=1500 > NODENAME=CYBORG_SRV PASS=?***? > GLADIATOR> DEF DEV LOOPBACK DEVT=SERVER SERVERNAME=GLADIATOR_SRV MOUNRT=10 > > CYBORG> DEFINE SERVER gladiator_srv pass=?***? hla=172.16.45.5 lla=1570 > nodename=cyborg_srv > CYBORG> DEFINE DEVCLASS GLADCLASS devtype=server servername=gladiator_srv > > CYBORG> export node aigle filed=all devc=gladclass > ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 29. > ANS8003I Process number 29 started. > > -- CONSOLE CYBORG [BEGIN] > --- > ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: EXPORT NODE aigle filed=all > devc=gladclass > ANR0984I Process 29 for EXPORT NODE started in the BACKGROUND at 11:30:00. > ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 29. > ANR0402I Session 264 started for administrator ADMIN (Server) (Memory IPC). > ANR8340I SERVER volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 mou
Re: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ...
Alexandre, I had a similar problem with a client I am working with and I spoke with IBM and found that they have just certified an EMULEX LP8000S (Sbus version) card. In my case I am working with the 3584 Ultrium Library - but this same card might help in your situation. Adolph - Original Message - From: "Alexandre Bicas Caldeira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 11:52 AM Subject: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ... > Hi guys, > > I'm trying to set up a SAN using two IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch, six TSM Servers > and a 3494 with 10 3590E drives > > Four TSM Servers are running smooth (1 M80, 2 Dell with FC Qlogic 2200, 1 > SUN450 with FC Qlogic 2200). All of then are PCI Servers. > I have two other servers (E3500 and a E1) that are SBUS Servers. > > Acording to Tivoli web site, all FC Adapters supported in this configuration > are PCI ! ! ! Both SBUS Servers have an JNI FC64-1063 FC Adapter which is > simillar do JNI FCI-1063 (the PCI Version which is supported)... The FC > adapter establishes link to the 2109-S16 (steady green light) but it doesn't > find any tape devices... > > Is anyone using these kind of FC adapters with SAN ? Is there any special > firware or device driver that should be installed in these sun boxes in > order to put these cards to work ? I updated the switch's firmware do level > 2.2.1a but I had no luck... The IBM 2109-S16 is simillar to a Brocade Switch > which is used by EMC... These FC64-1063 adapter is the one that is used by > most of the SBUS Servers... EMC guys, any tips ?! > > Thanks you all ! > > Alexandre Bicas Caldeira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tivoli Certified Specialist - Tivoli Storage Manager > Service IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br >Sao Paulo:(11) 3040-1960 >Rua Helena, 280, Cj 1106 >CEP 04552-050 - Sco Paulo - SP > Porto Alegre: (51) 212-3666 > Curitiba: (41) 262-8320
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
I have 3 FC connections from my TSM server (AIX) and one from each (3) SDG into my McData SAN Director (ED-5000). All of those (6) connections are in a zone by themselves. It sounds to me that Jay's problem might be that the control path to the 3584 library is going across each LTO drive instead of just the first drive. But Becky is right... You should see each device on each fibre channel adapter. EXAMPLE: In my situation (see original reply below) I see 19 devices (15 LTO drives, 3 LTO libraries, and one 8mm tape drive). Since the 8mm drive is direct-attached-SCSI, I should see only one. Since I have 3 FCAs into the SAN, I should see all the other devices three times (once for each FCA). I really just have one library with five drives in it. Jay, if you are seeing one library for each drive, I'd start looking at the library for issues. The 3584 library should use the first drive as the control path between the library and the operating system. This is fine as long as that first drive doesn't have SCSI problems... If THAT happens (or if you lose the FCA that controls that first drive) you could lose the whole library (like I did last week). Am I understanding this correctly...? You have ONE 2108 running FOUR drives that live in ONE library... right...? If so, and you see four libraries AND four drives, your control path HAS to be going across each drive. Jeff P.S. - Are you in the 817 area code? -Original Message- From: Davidson, Becky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 3:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Zoning for both the San Data Gateways and the Switches will probably help that. If there are for example 4 drives on a san data gateway and 2 paths from the switch to the san data gateway then you will have 8 drives because each path sees all 4 drives. If you then have 2 fibre adapters going to the switch then you will see 16 because each adapter sees everything on the switch. Make sense? -Original Message- From: Volovsek, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary I had that problem when I had too many paths going to the SDG's. I had two FC Switches tiered together and both switches each had a path to two separate SDG's. I removed the link between the FC Switches and the problem went away. In that case, I was seeing 8 libraries and 8 drives. Now I am down to 4 libraries and 4 drives. It should be 1 library and 4 drives. -jay -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Jay, Does your NT server see 4 or 16 drives...? I don't know how much help this is, but I'm running a similar environment here. The only major difference is that my TSM server is an IBM RS/6000 (H80) running AIX 4.3.3... Anyway, within AIX, I see 15 drives and 3 libraries (like this): rmt15 Available 14-08-00-6,0 Differential SCSI 8mm Tape Drive rmt0 Available 17-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 17-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt1 Available 17-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt2 Available 17-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt3 Available 17-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt4 Available 17-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt5 Available 24-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc1 Available 24-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt6 Available 24-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt7 Available 24-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt8 Available 24-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt9 Available 24-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt10 Available 2D-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc2 Available 2D-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt11 Available 2D-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt12 Available 2D-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt13 Available 2D-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt14 Available 2D-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) That's not a problem though, because when I set up the 3584 in TSM, I set it up to use "smc0" for the library and "rmt0, 1, 7, 8, & 14" for the individual drives. This way, fibre channel adapter 0 runs the first SAN Data Gateway (IBM 2108 - R03) which controls the first two drives and the library. FCA 1 runs the next 2108 (and rmt7,8). FCA 2 runs the last 2108 (and rmt14). The only thing left is "rmt15" which is a direct-SCSI attached 8mm Tape Drive that I use for "mksysb" in AIX. Although my server that runs TSM is seeing multiple instances of the same devices, it doesn't affect the way T
Re: Backup Sets
Marc, see my previous append - you CAN restore an individual file using the CLI (NOT the GUI nor the Web Client). You are correct in that you can generate a backupset and specify the filespace(s) you want to have included in the backup set. Joerg Pohlmann Marc Levitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 2001-03-14 05:00:34 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Backup Sets >From my understanding, no. A backupset is a flat file (.ost). It will be restored in it's entirety. However I do believe that you can define what filespace the Backupset originally backs up. In other words, you can backup only what you want to. Hope this helps. Marc Levitan Senior LAN Engineer PFPC Global Fund Services Jane Doe cc: Sent by: Subject: Backup Sets "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 03/13/2001 04:38 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Is it possible to restore a single from from a backupset without restoring the entire set? ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
Re: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ...
Lesley Walker wrote: > I have two FC64-1063 cards in an E4500, connecting to an EMC array. I > installed the driver supplied by EMC (fcaw259). Sorry, forgot to mention, I have also installed patches as specified by EMC (back in November): 106541-12, 107458-10, 106924-06
Re: daemon
I have run into this alot, and it took me hours to figure out what i was doing. (I wasn't running the command as root :) shawn ___ Shawn Drew Tivoli IT - ADSM/TSM Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] bbullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/14/2001 03:29:31 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: daemon It sounds like the 'nohup' command on Solaris 8 now behaves the same as AIX 4.3.3. It is looking for additional input from stdin. Try this and see if it works : nohup /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched -pass= >/dev/null 2>&1 -Original Message- > From: Evans, William C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: daemon > > > Folks, > I have just installed TSM version 3.7.1 on my Sun OS ver. > 5.8 box. When I > start the dsm daemon, it quickly dies but gives me no errors. > I've tried > several variations of; > nohup /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched -pass= 2> > /dev/null & > Each time the daemon starts and then dies without giving me an error. > What am I doing wrong? > TIA, > > Bill Evans, UNIX System Administrator > Phone: 719.535.4194 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Pager: 1-800-pagemci PIN 1438754 > AIM: bievans4194 > > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > the recognized global leader in ensuring clients achieve > superior value in the digital economy >
Re: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ...
I have two FC64-1063 cards in an E4500, connecting to an EMC array. I installed the driver supplied by EMC (fcaw259). At this moment I'm not actually sure whether it's connected direct or through a switch - sounds nuts, I know, but the server isn't in production yet, and the SAN stuff is being arranged by other people. -Original Message- From: Alexandre Bicas Caldeira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SAN - FC Adapters doubt ... Hi guys, I'm trying to set up a SAN using two IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch, six TSM Servers and a 3494 with 10 3590E drives Four TSM Servers are running smooth (1 M80, 2 Dell with FC Qlogic 2200, 1 SUN450 with FC Qlogic 2200). All of then are PCI Servers. I have two other servers (E3500 and a E1) that are SBUS Servers. Acording to Tivoli web site, all FC Adapters supported in this configuration are PCI ! ! ! Both SBUS Servers have an JNI FC64-1063 FC Adapter which is simillar do JNI FCI-1063 (the PCI Version which is supported)... The FC adapter establishes link to the 2109-S16 (steady green light) but it doesn't find any tape devices... Is anyone using these kind of FC adapters with SAN ? Is there any special firware or device driver that should be installed in these sun boxes in order to put these cards to work ? I updated the switch's firmware do level 2.2.1a but I had no luck... The IBM 2109-S16 is simillar to a Brocade Switch which is used by EMC... These FC64-1063 adapter is the one that is used by most of the SBUS Servers... EMC guys, any tips ?! Thanks you all ! Alexandre Bicas Caldeira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tivoli Certified Specialist - Tivoli Storage Manager Service IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br Sao Paulo:(11) 3040-1960 Rua Helena, 280, Cj 1106 CEP 04552-050 - Sco Paulo - SP Porto Alegre: (51) 212-3666 Curitiba: (41) 262-8320
test mesg kindly disregard
This is a test mesg. _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
Re: daemon
It sounds like the 'nohup' command on Solaris 8 now behaves the same as AIX 4.3.3. It is looking for additional input from stdin. Try this and see if it works : nohup /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched -pass= >/dev/null 2>&1 -Original Message- > From: Evans, William C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: daemon > > > Folks, > I have just installed TSM version 3.7.1 on my Sun OS ver. > 5.8 box. When I > start the dsm daemon, it quickly dies but gives me no errors. > I've tried > several variations of; > nohup /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched -pass= 2> > /dev/null & > Each time the daemon starts and then dies without giving me an error. > What am I doing wrong? > TIA, > > Bill Evans, UNIX System Administrator > Phone: 719.535.4194 > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Pager: 1-800-pagemci PIN 1438754 > AIM: bievans4194 > > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > the recognized global leader in ensuring clients achieve > superior value in the digital economy >
Re: Netware client problems
We have the same problem with one of our Netware 5.0 servers after we upgraded the Service Pack to 6A. We applied the service pack to all 5.x boxes (about 10), however only 1 is having problems. Patrick Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/14/2001 11:14:51 AM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: Netware client problems Have you tried using a period in front of the name? eg. .backupuser.orgunit.org Quoting Jim Kirkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Howdy, > > NW Client 4.1.1_18 talking to an ADSM 3.1.2.50 server on OS\390. > > I keep getting a login prompt when the scheduler kicks off, or if I run > a > manual. I'm using the fully qualified login name, and the pwd file has > been > established in two of the three instances. I type in username and > password and > get the error "Login denied to NewWare Target Service Agent > 'blahblah'. > However, the backup runs. > > Any ideas? It's like I'm getting access to the server and context, but > not the > tree. > > thank, > > -- > Jim Kirkman > AIS - Systems > UNC-Chapel Hill > 966-5884 > Staff Sig...
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
Zoning for both the San Data Gateways and the Switches will probably help that. If there are for example 4 drives on a san data gateway and 2 paths from the switch to the san data gateway then you will have 8 drives because each path sees all 4 drives. If you then have 2 fibre adapters going to the switch then you will see 16 because each adapter sees everything on the switch. Make sense? -Original Message- From: Volovsek, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary I had that problem when I had too many paths going to the SDG's. I had two FC Switches tiered together and both switches each had a path to two separate SDG's. I removed the link between the FC Switches and the problem went away. In that case, I was seeing 8 libraries and 8 drives. Now I am down to 4 libraries and 4 drives. It should be 1 library and 4 drives. -jay -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Jay, Does your NT server see 4 or 16 drives...? I don't know how much help this is, but I'm running a similar environment here. The only major difference is that my TSM server is an IBM RS/6000 (H80) running AIX 4.3.3... Anyway, within AIX, I see 15 drives and 3 libraries (like this): rmt15 Available 14-08-00-6,0 Differential SCSI 8mm Tape Drive rmt0 Available 17-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 17-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt1 Available 17-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt2 Available 17-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt3 Available 17-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt4 Available 17-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt5 Available 24-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc1 Available 24-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt6 Available 24-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt7 Available 24-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt8 Available 24-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt9 Available 24-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt10 Available 2D-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc2 Available 2D-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt11 Available 2D-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt12 Available 2D-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt13 Available 2D-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt14 Available 2D-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) That's not a problem though, because when I set up the 3584 in TSM, I set it up to use "smc0" for the library and "rmt0, 1, 7, 8, & 14" for the individual drives. This way, fibre channel adapter 0 runs the first SAN Data Gateway (IBM 2108 - R03) which controls the first two drives and the library. FCA 1 runs the next 2108 (and rmt7,8). FCA 2 runs the last 2108 (and rmt14). The only thing left is "rmt15" which is a direct-SCSI attached 8mm Tape Drive that I use for "mksysb" in AIX. Although my server that runs TSM is seeing multiple instances of the same devices, it doesn't affect the way TSM works because of the way I define the devices within TSM. I don't know what the difference would be in NT, but since it's all SCSI over FC I'd like to think that they would at least be similar among all open systems platforms. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Mark Loy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary If you REALLY want to see something neat, stop and start the device driver. Every time you do that, the SCSI ID increments to the next highest number not used. Our company installed a similar system for a client and encountered this behavior as well as many other issues. Seems that the "SCSI drive code has not been written to fully function properly with the dual fibre path configuration that we have between the SAN Fibre Switches and the servers. They seem to believe that this dual FIBER path is causing the drives to get multi-initiated." Weather this has something to do with multiple libraries showing up, I am not sure but, rest assured, it ain't helping. Hope this helps a little. "Volovsek, Jay" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 Sent by: LTO Lib rary "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EM
daemon
Folks, I have just installed TSM version 3.7.1 on my Sun OS ver. 5.8 box. When I start the dsm daemon, it quickly dies but gives me no errors. I've tried several variations of; nohup /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsmc sched -pass= 2> /dev/null & Each time the daemon starts and then dies without giving me an error. What am I doing wrong? TIA, Bill Evans, UNIX System Administrator Phone: 719.535.4194 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pager: 1-800-pagemci PIN 1438754 AIM: bievans4194 <<...OLE_Obj...>> the recognized global leader in ensuring clients achieve superior value in the digital economy
tdp for ess (r/3)
Hi our TSM 4.1 Server is hosted on S/390 and we have TSM Clients running on different platforms.All these platforms are connected to ESS. these clients are registered through "managedsyslan" : Number of Managed System for LAN licensed: 221 When or why should I license these managed systems for ESSAPPL or ESSR3APPL ?some of these are already licensed to use TDP for R/3 (R3APPL) ! or is it is just to be able to use the FlashCopy feature on the ESS ?? thanks in advance Ruud van Ruler, Shell Services International BV - ISES/31 Our Data Storage Management home page: http://sww2.shell.com/os390/ > Room 1B/G01 > Dokter van Zeelandstraat 1, 2285 BD Leidschendam NL Tel : +31 (0)70 - 3034644, Fax 4012 Mobile +31(0)6-55127646 Email Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] R.vanRuler
Re: TAPE DEFINITION LOST
Strangely, *SM's database backup tapes do not show up when you do a Q VOL xx. This may be true for export tapes as well. You can display them if you do: SELECT * FROM VOLHISTORY WHERE VOLUME_NAME='XX' Of course, replace "XX" with the volser in question. Alan Davenport Selective Insurance [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 14:22:41 -0500 > Subject: TAPE DEFINITION LOST > > TSM spit out a tape this morning with it's DRM offsite tapes. I can not > find where it is defined to our server by doing a q libv or a q vol. When I > try to check it in or redefine it to the server it says that it is already > defined or that it contains export data. What does this mean? How do I get > this tape back? Are there any SQL Select commands I can run to help me out?
Re: SQL BackTrack... Odd Problem with device files
>AIX 4.3.2. TSM 3.7.3.6 client 3.7.2 Informix server 7.3.1 UC2 > >I am having a problem that may or may not be related to TSM... This morning, a >production server running Lawson with an Informix database locked up. All device >files in /dev and two other files in my client BMC SQL-BackTrack for Informix >path were GONE... That's dramatic. If nothing else, check your AIX Error Log, /var/adm/messages, and other logs. Also inspect your AIX accounting records for the period: if a shell script was doing the deed, you'll likely see one or more 'rm' commands reflected. Make sure that /dev is writable only by user root and group system, which limits the culprits. Assure that your root file system is not running out of space. Look for unusual logins around that time: you could have someone maliciously deleting things. Richard Sims, BU
Re: NT server migration to Win2000 server.
-Original Message- From: Zosimo Noriega (ADNOC IS&T) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 4:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT server migration to Win2000 server. Hi All! We're planning to migrate all NT4 servers to Win2000 servers that Adsm environment will be affected because the Adsm server (version 3.1.2.40) and client version 3 are installed on NT4. I'm confused regarding the Adsm version that is compatible to win2000 servers. Do you think i need to upgrade to TSM or use this existing Adsm version? Your help are really appreciated. Thanks, Zosi
Re: TAPE DEFINITION LOST
Q libv only shows tapes that are in your library - once DRM spits the tape out, it won't show up there. Q vol only shows tapes that are in storage pools. Your tape is some other type, probably a data base backup tape (since DRM spits those out along with the copy pool tapes, by default.) Non-storage pool tapes are defined in the volume history file. Try this: q volhist type=dbb It will show up there if it's a data base backup tape. But don't try to check it in or get it back; a DBB tape should go offsite along with your copy pool tapes. They are worthless without a data base backup! -Original Message- From: Steve Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TAPE DEFINITION LOST TSM spit out a tape this morning with it's DRM offsite tapes. I can not find where it is defined to our server by doing a q libv or a q vol. When I try to check it in or redefine it to the server it says that it is already defined or that it contains export data. What does this mean? How do I get this tape back? Are there any SQL Select commands I can run to help me out?
Re: TAPE DEFINITION LOST
It is probably a database backup tape. Try q drm and the volume name... You could look in the volume history file too, it would tell you when it was created and for what purpose. Mark -Original Message- From: Steve Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TAPE DEFINITION LOST TSM spit out a tape this morning with it's DRM offsite tapes. I can not find where it is defined to our server by doing a q libv or a q vol. When I try to check it in or redefine it to the server it says that it is already defined or that it contains export data. What does this mean? How do I get this tape back? Are there any SQL Select commands I can run to help me out?
Scheduled backup failing
We've been working on this problem for months now with no success and I'm hoping someone else has ran into this and found a solution. One of our clients is trying to do a scheduled backup of a Sun server. It always fails with an "unable to contact client" error when using prompted or "client has missed it's scheduled window" when using polling. If we try bringing down and restarting their server it sometimes works (not often) the first time but never a second. They are able to initiate a backup manually and have been doing so since we registered the node, however they would prefer to be able to run the backup during off-hours. We've upgraded the client on their server twice to no avail. They've also upgraded the code on their machine a few times as well. We've added/double checked the DSM_DIR in the environment variables. Examining a core file dump from their system showed the following messages: ANS0101E NLInit: Unable to open message repository '%s'. ANS0110E LogMsg: Unable to open error log file '%s' for output. ANS0118E LogSchedMsg: Unable to open schedule log file '%s' for output. ANS0105E ReadIndex: Error trying to read index for message %u from repository '%s'. ANS0106E ReadIndex: Message index not found for message %u. ANSM Error retrieving message %d from dsmclientV3.cat. ANS0109E ReadMsg: Insufficient memory for allocation of message structure. ANS0107E ReadMsg: Error trying to read header for message %u from repository '%s'. We tried completly wiping out the client and reinstalling it and verifying that the various items mentioned above (message repository...dsmsched...dsmerror..etc) were available. We tried changing the scheduled backup time,used a sniffer to make sure ADSM was reaching the problem server(it was), and the hand full of usuall checks for simple things like the scheduler not running etc.. The odd thing is that we can get the schedule backup to work once every now and then. I should point out that the users running this server are no rookies to ADSM and have about a dozen other servers all running with no problems, some with the same exact setup as this problem server. I found no closed APARs refering to this problem and before I go and open one with Tivoli I thought I'd give this list a try. Any help would be apprectiated. Some info: ADSM Server Version 3, Release 1, Level 2.20 Client server info ( i took out server name and replaced with *) SunOS ** 5.7 Generic_106541-14 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-Enterprise-1 adstar client info Command Line Backup Client Interface - Version 3, Release 1, Level 0.8 Greg Ira ADSTAR/Tivoli/MVS Systems NYS Dept. Health/BHNSM Albany, N.Y. 12237 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. - Isaac Asimov
Re: TAPE DEFINITION LOST
q volhist. See what it thinks the tape was last used for. The try and figure out why it was checked out of the library. That's a good start. -Original Message- From: Steve Hicks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TAPE DEFINITION LOST TSM spit out a tape this morning with it's DRM offsite tapes. I can not find where it is defined to our server by doing a q libv or a q vol. When I try to check it in or redefine it to the server it says that it is already defined or that it contains export data. What does this mean? How do I get this tape back? Are there any SQL Select commands I can run to help me out?
SQL BackTrack... Odd Problem with device files
AIX 4.3.2. TSM 3.7.3.6 client 3.7.2 Informix server 7.3.1 UC2 I am having a problem that may or may not be related to TSM... This morning, a production server running Lawson with an Informix database locked up. All device files in /dev and two other files in my client BMC SQL-BackTrack for Informix path were GONE... That meant that database logging stopped... These device files were: afcprod2: /usr/bmc/IFX/afcprod # ls -la total 16 drwxrwxr-x 2 informix informix 512 Mar 14 07:01 . drwxrwxr-x 12 informix informix 512 Sep 01 2000 .. prw-r--r-- 1 informix informix 0 Mar 14 03:19 fifo.data prw-r--r-- 1 informix informix 0 Mar 14 12:54 fifo.log This happened once before, on Nov 22 last year which was also a Wednesday and also around 7AM in the morning. I looked at all the scripts being executed from cron and could find nothing that might be a culprit. Any ideas or suggestions would be appreciated. TSM is linked through the OBSI module to SQL-BackTrack for Informix. George Lesho Storage / System Admin AFC Enterprises
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
If you REALLY want to see something neat, stop and start the device driver. Every time you do that, the SCSI ID increments to the next highest number not used. Our company installed a similar system for a client and encountered this behavior as well as many other issues. Seems that the "SCSI drive code has not been written to fully function properly with the dual fibre path configuration that we have between the SAN Fibre Switches and the servers. They seem to believe that this dual FIBER path is causing the drives to get multi-initiated." Weather this has something to do with multiple libraries showing up, I am not sure but, rest assured, it ain't helping. Hope this helps a little. "Volovsek, Jay" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 Sent by: LTO Lib rary "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 03/14/2001 12:44 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hello all. I was wondering if anyone had this configuration? I am running TSM 4.1.1 on a Netfinity 6000R with NT4SP6a. The server is connected to a FC Fabric consisting of an IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch. This then connects via longwave fibre to a SDG 2108-G07. Finally we get to attach the 4 tape drives to the gateway. My problem is this: I have four tape drives and NT sees four libraries. I know its a problem with either the SDG or NT driver levels. Here are some specifics about firmware/driver levels 3584 Library NT Drivers: 1.1.7.6 3584 Firmware: 1200 Qlogic 2200 Firmware: 2.1.16 Qlogic 2200 NT Driver: 7.05.05 NT4 IP Qlogic Bios: 1.61 SDG Firmware: 0341.31 FC Switch Firmware: 2.1.7 Please let me know if anyone can help me get my TSM server to see 1 library with 4 drives. Thanks much, Jay Volovsek Miller Brewing Company
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
I had that problem when I had too many paths going to the SDG's. I had two FC Switches tiered together and both switches each had a path to two separate SDG's. I removed the link between the FC Switches and the problem went away. In that case, I was seeing 8 libraries and 8 drives. Now I am down to 4 libraries and 4 drives. It should be 1 library and 4 drives. -jay -Original Message- From: Caffey, Jeff L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 1:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary Jay, Does your NT server see 4 or 16 drives...? I don't know how much help this is, but I'm running a similar environment here. The only major difference is that my TSM server is an IBM RS/6000 (H80) running AIX 4.3.3... Anyway, within AIX, I see 15 drives and 3 libraries (like this): rmt15 Available 14-08-00-6,0 Differential SCSI 8mm Tape Drive rmt0 Available 17-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 17-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt1 Available 17-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt2 Available 17-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt3 Available 17-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt4 Available 17-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt5 Available 24-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc1 Available 24-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt6 Available 24-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt7 Available 24-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt8 Available 24-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt9 Available 24-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt10 Available 2D-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc2 Available 2D-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt11 Available 2D-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt12 Available 2D-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt13 Available 2D-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt14 Available 2D-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) That's not a problem though, because when I set up the 3584 in TSM, I set it up to use "smc0" for the library and "rmt0, 1, 7, 8, & 14" for the individual drives. This way, fibre channel adapter 0 runs the first SAN Data Gateway (IBM 2108 - R03) which controls the first two drives and the library. FCA 1 runs the next 2108 (and rmt7,8). FCA 2 runs the last 2108 (and rmt14). The only thing left is "rmt15" which is a direct-SCSI attached 8mm Tape Drive that I use for "mksysb" in AIX. Although my server that runs TSM is seeing multiple instances of the same devices, it doesn't affect the way TSM works because of the way I define the devices within TSM. I don't know what the difference would be in NT, but since it's all SCSI over FC I'd like to think that they would at least be similar among all open systems platforms. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Mark Loy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary If you REALLY want to see something neat, stop and start the device driver. Every time you do that, the SCSI ID increments to the next highest number not used. Our company installed a similar system for a client and encountered this behavior as well as many other issues. Seems that the "SCSI drive code has not been written to fully function properly with the dual fibre path configuration that we have between the SAN Fibre Switches and the servers. They seem to believe that this dual FIBER path is causing the drives to get multi-initiated." Weather this has something to do with multiple libraries showing up, I am not sure but, rest assured, it ain't helping. Hope this helps a little. "Volovsek, Jay" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 Sent by: LTO Lib rary "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 03/14/2001 12:44 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hello all. I was wondering if anyone had this configuration? I am running TSM 4.1.1 on a Netfinity 6000R with NT4SP6a. The server is connected to a FC Fabric consisting of an IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch. This then connects via longwave fibre to a SDG 2108-G07. Finally we get to attach the 4 tape drives to the gateway. My problem is this: I have four tape drives and NT sees four
Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
Jay, Does your NT server see 4 or 16 drives...? I don't know how much help this is, but I'm running a similar environment here. The only major difference is that my TSM server is an IBM RS/6000 (H80) running AIX 4.3.3... Anyway, within AIX, I see 15 drives and 3 libraries (like this): rmt15 Available 14-08-00-6,0 Differential SCSI 8mm Tape Drive rmt0 Available 17-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc0 Available 17-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt1 Available 17-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt2 Available 17-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt3 Available 17-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt4 Available 17-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt5 Available 24-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc1 Available 24-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt6 Available 24-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt7 Available 24-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt8 Available 24-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt9 Available 24-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt10 Available 2D-08-01-0,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) smc2 Available 2D-08-01-0,1 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP) rmt11 Available 2D-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt12 Available 2D-08-01-2,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt13 Available 2D-08-01-3,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) rmt14 Available 2D-08-01-4,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP) That's not a problem though, because when I set up the 3584 in TSM, I set it up to use "smc0" for the library and "rmt0, 1, 7, 8, & 14" for the individual drives. This way, fibre channel adapter 0 runs the first SAN Data Gateway (IBM 2108 - R03) which controls the first two drives and the library. FCA 1 runs the next 2108 (and rmt7,8). FCA 2 runs the last 2108 (and rmt14). The only thing left is "rmt15" which is a direct-SCSI attached 8mm Tape Drive that I use for "mksysb" in AIX. Although my server that runs TSM is seeing multiple instances of the same devices, it doesn't affect the way TSM works because of the way I define the devices within TSM. I don't know what the difference would be in NT, but since it's all SCSI over FC I'd like to think that they would at least be similar among all open systems platforms. Thank you, Jeff Caffey Enterprise Systems Programmer Pier 1 imports, Inc. - Information Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: (817) 252-6222 Fax: (817) 252-7299 -Original Message- From: Mark Loy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary If you REALLY want to see something neat, stop and start the device driver. Every time you do that, the SCSI ID increments to the next highest number not used. Our company installed a similar system for a client and encountered this behavior as well as many other issues. Seems that the "SCSI drive code has not been written to fully function properly with the dual fibre path configuration that we have between the SAN Fibre Switches and the servers. They seem to believe that this dual FIBER path is causing the drives to get multi-initiated." Weather this has something to do with multiple libraries showing up, I am not sure but, rest assured, it ain't helping. Hope this helps a little. "Volovsek, Jay" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 Sent by: LTO Lib rary "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 03/14/2001 12:44 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Hello all. I was wondering if anyone had this configuration? I am running TSM 4.1.1 on a Netfinity 6000R with NT4SP6a. The server is connected to a FC Fabric consisting of an IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch. This then connects via longwave fibre to a SDG 2108-G07. Finally we get to attach the 4 tape drives to the gateway. My problem is this: I have four tape drives and NT sees four libraries. I know its a problem with either the SDG or NT driver levels. Here are some specifics about firmware/driver levels 3584 Library NT Drivers: 1.1.7.6 3584 Firmware: 1200 Qlogic 2200 Firmware: 2.1.16 Qlogic 2200 NT Driver: 7.05.05 NT4 IP Qlogic Bios: 1.61 SDG Firmware: 0341.31 FC Switch Firmware: 2.1.7 Please let me know if anyone can help me get my TSM server to see 1 library with 4 drives. Thanks much, Jay Volovsek Miller Brewing Company
Re: S.O.S ADSM sunk !!
When I apply the latest PTF which is 3.1.2.90 (Because the old PTF's have become corrupt) the "cfgserv3.log" tells me to use "UPGRADE DB" command before I could start the server. Should I use it before I run the restore db OR afterwards ? Thanks once again. Prasanna -Original Message- From: Chibois, Herve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 12:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: S.O.S ADSM sunk !! Hello Prasanna, Oups, looks like you are ine kernel-panic-mode ! 1) when your reinstall a server and want to restore the DB you need to REFORMAT it before. You can use only the db-an-log primary volumes. $ dsmserv format 2 log_primary.dsm log_addon.dsm 2 db_primary.dsm db_addon.dsm You SHOULD format 1 volume of each (db_addon log_addon) to give TSM some "working space" Then you can restore your DB $ dsmserv RESTOREDB devc=DLTCLASS volume=SP0169 2) when you manage to restore your DB, check if your db if in "ROLL-FORWARD" mode. It could be a reason why your log fills to quickly. Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Ghanekar, Prasanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 14 mars 2001 17:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : S.O.S ADSM sunk !! > > > Being a novice, I'm seeking out the Expert ADSM community to > help me get > back my Flagship above water. > > Here's the snapshot of things: > ADSM Server running on WINNT 4 crashed due to Recovery Log crash. > Expire inventory schedule brought down the server as it > filled the recovery > log, asked for Tape, then filled one Tape and started asking > for another one > and there was no tape . Log kept on increasing and finally > took down the > server. > > Initially tried Restore Db but failed after starting a "Re-Do" on the > recovery log. > Also got the event id: 6 in the nt event log. about another > server being run > at the same time. > > Finally re-installed the server and applied last ptf > (3.1.2.90), server > tells me to use Upgrade DB to bring the database to most > current version. > Don't know when to use it ? > > Then, replaced the core four files with the original configuration and > issued Restore db (Point in time) command to get the database > back. Database > restore completes but when I issue: dsmservr command after > that, it says > ADSM server must be restored before it can be started. I > don't know when to > insert these files in the new installation. > > If I try to do a restore the database without using point in > time option, it > restores, begins server recovery, recovery log mount, starts > redo for the > log and fails at certain point. > > Need serious HELP to get the server back U > > Your Help is greatly appreciated.. > > Thanks for your time. > > Prasanna > > > Prasanna Ghanekar > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > EDS Pontiac East > 2100 S Opdyke Rd > MI 48341 > *: (248) 972-4547 >
Re: STK9714 to STK9710 migration
Hi, We moved from a L18 tape library to a L32 library and just opened up the library and moved the tapes manually. We made sure we kept them in the same order that we pulled them out. We also looked at how the new library labeled the slot numbers. We then put the tapes in those slots, and then we did a audit of the new library. Thanks > -- > From: Galvin, Laura L.[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 9:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: STK9714 to STK9710 migration > > Hi, > I'm in the process of upgrading my STK library. I currently have a > STK9714 > and I'm getting a STK9710. Will I be able to move the tapes from on > library > to another? Or do I need to define another library, checkout the tapes > from > the old STK9714 ( 100 tapes ) and check them in to the new library > STK9714. > The libraries are very similar, the element numbers are the same! I know > I'll need to verify the scsi address of the drives and I can make them the > same. I should be able to cut over to the new library. > Are there any special configurations on the STK9710 like FAST LOAD, AUTO > CLEAN etc. That should be set, does any one know? > > I'm running TSM 3.7.4 on AIX 4.3.3. With three scsi adapters. The old > STK9714 has 6 DLT tape drive with 100 cells and the new STK9710 has 10 DLT > tape drive with 300 cells. > > I know I'll need to define in AIX and TSM the additional tape drives. But > I'm trying to see the easiest way to get the tapes over because I only > have > ONE cap ( mailbox, in/out unit ). It would be very time consuming to > checkout/checkin the 100 tapes from one library to another. > > Thank you, > Laura > IMPORTANT: The security of electronic mail sent through the Internet > is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not > send confidential information to us via electronic mail, including social > security numbers, account numbers, and personal identification numbers. > > Delivery, and timely delivery, of electronic mail is also not > guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send > time-sensitive > or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail, including > authorization to "buy" or "sell" a security or instructions to conduct > any > other financial transaction. Such requests, orders or instructions will > not be processed until Legg Mason can confirm your instructions or > obtain appropriate written documentation where necessary. >
TSM Server 4.1.2 for Windows NT/2000 Pulled from Website??
I just went out to re-download the 4.1.2 install for Windows NT and the website states "Note: The V4.1.2 server package has been temporarily removed. APAR IC29552 is being investigated." Unless I missed it somewhere, this hasn't been announced yet. Does anyone know what's going on? -- Jeff Rankin Associate Technical Analyst, Excel Corporation Phone: 316-291-2903 Fax: 316-266-4415 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM 4.1.1, WinNT 4.0 SP6a, San Data Gateway, and IBM 3584 LTO Lib rary
Hello all. I was wondering if anyone had this configuration? I am running TSM 4.1.1 on a Netfinity 6000R with NT4SP6a. The server is connected to a FC Fabric consisting of an IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch. This then connects via longwave fibre to a SDG 2108-G07. Finally we get to attach the 4 tape drives to the gateway. My problem is this: I have four tape drives and NT sees four libraries. I know its a problem with either the SDG or NT driver levels. Here are some specifics about firmware/driver levels 3584 Library NT Drivers: 1.1.7.6 3584 Firmware: 1200 Qlogic 2200 Firmware: 2.1.16 Qlogic 2200 NT Driver: 7.05.05 NT4 IP Qlogic Bios: 1.61 SDG Firmware: 0341.31 FC Switch Firmware: 2.1.7 Please let me know if anyone can help me get my TSM server to see 1 library with 4 drives. Thanks much, Jay Volovsek Miller Brewing Company
SAN - FC Adapters doubt ...
Hi guys, I'm trying to set up a SAN using two IBM 2109-S16 FC Switch, six TSM Servers and a 3494 with 10 3590E drives Four TSM Servers are running smooth (1 M80, 2 Dell with FC Qlogic 2200, 1 SUN450 with FC Qlogic 2200). All of then are PCI Servers. I have two other servers (E3500 and a E1) that are SBUS Servers. Acording to Tivoli web site, all FC Adapters supported in this configuration are PCI ! ! ! Both SBUS Servers have an JNI FC64-1063 FC Adapter which is simillar do JNI FCI-1063 (the PCI Version which is supported)... The FC adapter establishes link to the 2109-S16 (steady green light) but it doesn't find any tape devices... Is anyone using these kind of FC adapters with SAN ? Is there any special firware or device driver that should be installed in these sun boxes in order to put these cards to work ? I updated the switch's firmware do level 2.2.1a but I had no luck... The IBM 2109-S16 is simillar to a Brocade Switch which is used by EMC... These FC64-1063 adapter is the one that is used by most of the SBUS Servers... EMC guys, any tips ?! Thanks you all ! Alexandre Bicas Caldeira - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tivoli Certified Specialist - Tivoli Storage Manager Service IT Solutions - http://www.service.com.br Sao Paulo:(11) 3040-1960 Rua Helena, 280, Cj 1106 CEP 04552-050 - Sco Paulo - SP Porto Alegre: (51) 212-3666 Curitiba: (41) 262-8320
Re: AIX client dumping core during backup
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 12:15:00PM -0500, David Longo wrote: > The shadow passwd file on AIX is /etc/security/passwd. I would check all the >permissions etc. on this file with some of my other AIX clients and see if there is >any variance. > > I am not aware of *SM doing any checks on files other than - can the user doing >backups access that file and is it newer than the one laready backed , etc. However >maybe it does do something. > > Try excluding this file or the /etc/security directory - Exclude /etc/security/* > and see if problem still happens. Does the sched log show what file/filesystem was >being backed up when failure occurs? > > A few thoughts. Well, running the backup as root so of course no problems with permissions and reading /etc/security/passwd. Also, the fs it fails on is /home, so no point even in excluding /etc/security/*. I even went as far as thinking about deleting the filespace on TSM, but after seeing it fail on another TSM server it had never backed up to previously I'm not convinced it would make any difference... -- Andrea Campi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I.NET S.p.A. http://www.inet.it Direzione Tecnica - R&D phone: +39 02 32863 ext 1 v. Darwin, 85 - I-20019 fax: +39 02 32863 ext 7701 Settimo Milanese (MI), Italy
Re: STK9714 to STK9710 migration
In general... data tapes will be associated with the device class within an atl in other words you may checkout all libvols, delete all drives, & delete the library and all is still well ! Then if you define a new library, define your drives back to that new library, (update your deviceclass for the drives to reference the new library) then do "checkin libvol" commands with status=private against all allocated tape volumes you'll be good to go ;-) You will still be left at getting a list of all unused tapes and checking them in as status=scratch though. AND all the used tapes will (should) go back to scratch status when they are emptied (even though you just checked them in as private but had to 'cause they had data on them) Dwight in moving tsm environments around with 3494's I ended up changing the name of my libraries and the scratch & private codes used within libraries and basically did what I've mentioned above... every thing worked fine (but that was all IBM equipment... S70 servers and 3494 ATLs) -Original Message- From: Galvin, Laura L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 8:43 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: STK9714 to STK9710 migration Hi, I'm in the process of upgrading my STK library. I currently have a STK9714 and I'm getting a STK9710. Will I be able to move the tapes from on library to another? Or do I need to define another library, checkout the tapes from the old STK9714 ( 100 tapes ) and check them in to the new library STK9714. The libraries are very similar, the element numbers are the same! I know I'll need to verify the scsi address of the drives and I can make them the same. I should be able to cut over to the new library. Are there any special configurations on the STK9710 like FAST LOAD, AUTO CLEAN etc. That should be set, does any one know? I'm running TSM 3.7.4 on AIX 4.3.3. With three scsi adapters. The old STK9714 has 6 DLT tape drive with 100 cells and the new STK9710 has 10 DLT tape drive with 300 cells. I know I'll need to define in AIX and TSM the additional tape drives. But I'm trying to see the easiest way to get the tapes over because I only have ONE cap ( mailbox, in/out unit ). It would be very time consuming to checkout/checkin the 100 tapes from one library to another. Thank you, Laura IMPORTANT: The security of electronic mail sent through the Internet is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send confidential information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, account numbers, and personal identification numbers. Delivery, and timely delivery, of electronic mail is also not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send time-sensitive or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail, including authorization to "buy" or "sell" a security or instructions to conduct any other financial transaction. Such requests, orders or instructions will not be processed until Legg Mason can confirm your instructions or obtain appropriate written documentation where necessary.
Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)
Oh might want to double check that statement... last I checked it will not use to determine if the actual "archive" will occur but it WILL (or used to) bind that file to any management class specified... example (last time I checked) if you have the line in your inclexcl.list of exclude /home/myid/testfile 10yrarch_mc and you do something like dsmc archive /home/myid/testfile it will be bound to your/the 10yrarch_mc management class haven't checked lately but my last test indicated the above statement is (was) true Dwight -Original Message- From: arhoads [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 7:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected) Gerrit, Yes. Archive is not using the Include-Exclude list. Steffan Gerrit van Zyl wrote: > > Hi all TSM'ers, > > TSM Client 3.1.0.8 on NT > TSM Server 3.1.2.58 on AIX > > I have the following scenario and hope someone can explain this to me. > When archiving we get the following: > > 03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4952I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects inspected: 461,739 > 03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4953I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects archived: 411,368 > > When we do a incremental backup we get the following: > > 03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4952I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects inspected: 410,653 > 03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4954I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects backed up:3,414 > > Why is there suce a huge difference between objects inspected in the two > cases (5 objects)? The files were not deleted!! This is the same > everytime. > > Is archiving inspecting files differently than incremental backup? > > Thanks and regards. > Gerrit van Zyl > > IT Consultant > Faritec (Pty) Ltd >
Re: AIX client dumping core during backup
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:55:24AM -0500, Richard Sims wrote: > > 03/14/01 17:02:39 B/A Txn Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 > > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8C08 shadow_pass_r > > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8930 shadow_chk_r > > The signal 11 is obviously a Segmentation Fault, which is a sofware > defect that should be reported to Tivoli Support for resolution. Yes I will. I am new to TSM; today I registered for support on the website, but can you please tell me where to send this report? > Looks like it is doing password lookups at the time. It might be > the case it is being thrown off by files in the file system having > a UID but no corresponding user in the passwd file, as is common > when usernames are retired from the passwd file but not all their > files are addressed, to reassign them. You might want to run the > 'find' command with the -nouser option and see if there are any > such files, to supplement the problem resolution with that info. I figured out this, too, but it would be VERY surprising! -- Andrea Campi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I.NET S.p.A. http://www.inet.it Direzione Tecnica - R&D phone: +39 02 32863 ext 1 v. Darwin, 85 - I-20019 fax: +39 02 32863 ext 7701 Settimo Milanese (MI), Italy
Re: AIX client dumping core during backup
The shadow passwd file on AIX is /etc/security/passwd. I would check all the permissions etc. on this file with some of my other AIX clients and see if there is any variance. I am not aware of *SM doing any checks on files other than - can the user doing backups access that file and is it newer than the one laready backed , etc. However maybe it does do something. Try excluding this file or the /etc/security directory - Exclude /etc/security/* and see if problem still happens. Does the sched log show what file/filesystem was being backed up when failure occurs? A few thoughts. David B. Longo System Administrator Health First, Inc. 3300 Fiske Blvd. Rockledge, FL 32955-4305 PH 321.434.5536 Pager 321.634.8230 Fax:321.434.5525 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/14/01 11:55AM >>> > 03/14/01 17:02:39 B/A Txn Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8C08 shadow_pass_r > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8930 shadow_chk_r The signal 11 is obviously a Segmentation Fault, which is a sofware defect that should be reported to Tivoli Support for resolution. Looks like it is doing password lookups at the time. It might be the case it is being thrown off by files in the file system having a UID but no corresponding user in the passwd file, as is common when usernames are retired from the passwd file but not all their files are addressed, to reassign them. You might want to run the 'find' command with the -nouser option and see if there are any such files, to supplement the problem resolution with that info. Richard Sims, BU "MMS " made the following annotations on 03/14/01 12:21:09 -- This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by the entity to give such views or opinions. Ý==
Re: Netware client problems
Have you tried using a period in front of the name? eg. .backupuser.orgunit.org Quoting Jim Kirkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Howdy, > > NW Client 4.1.1_18 talking to an ADSM 3.1.2.50 server on OS\390. > > I keep getting a login prompt when the scheduler kicks off, or if I run > a > manual. I'm using the fully qualified login name, and the pwd file has > been > established in two of the three instances. I type in username and > password and > get the error "Login denied to NewWare Target Service Agent > 'blahblah'. > However, the backup runs. > > Any ideas? It's like I'm getting access to the server and context, but > not the > tree. > > thank, > > -- > Jim Kirkman > AIS - Systems > UNC-Chapel Hill > 966-5884 > Staff Sig...
Re: Netware client problems
Jim Kirkman wrote: > Brian, Richard, et.al, > > Netware is ver. 5.1, tsa nlms are the latest (12/2000). Network admin swears the > dsm login has supervisor equivalency throughout ( and it looks that way to me as > well). The login to netware server > 'Athletics' wants .dsm.uncaa or user and context and establishes the pwd file. The > login to the tree "uncathletics' keeps failing regardless of whether I put in > .dsm.uncaa or .dsm.uncaa.uncathletics. > > I hate this kind of ***t! > > Jim Kirkman wrote: > > > Howdy, > > > > NW Client 4.1.1_18 talking to an ADSM 3.1.2.50 server on OS\390. > > > > I keep getting a login prompt when the scheduler kicks off, or if I run a > > manual. I'm using the fully qualified login name, and the pwd file has been > > established in two of the three instances. I type in username and password and > > get the error "Login denied to NewWare Target Service Agent 'blahblah'. > > However, the backup runs. > > > > Any ideas? It's like I'm getting access to the server and context, but not the > > tree. > > > > thank, > > > > -- > > Jim Kirkman > > AIS - Systems > > UNC-Chapel Hill > > 966-5884 > > -- > Jim Kirkman > AIS - Systems > UNC-Chapel Hill > 966-5884 -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884
Re: S.O.S ADSM sunk !!
Hello Prasanna, Oups, looks like you are ine kernel-panic-mode ! 1) when your reinstall a server and want to restore the DB you need to REFORMAT it before. You can use only the db-an-log primary volumes. $ dsmserv format 2 log_primary.dsm log_addon.dsm 2 db_primary.dsm db_addon.dsm You SHOULD format 1 volume of each (db_addon log_addon) to give TSM some "working space" Then you can restore your DB $ dsmserv RESTOREDB devc=DLTCLASS volume=SP0169 2) when you manage to restore your DB, check if your db if in "ROLL-FORWARD" mode. It could be a reason why your log fills to quickly. Rv > -Message d'origine- > De : Ghanekar, Prasanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoyé : mercredi 14 mars 2001 17:43 > À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : S.O.S ADSM sunk !! > > > Being a novice, I'm seeking out the Expert ADSM community to > help me get > back my Flagship above water. > > Here's the snapshot of things: > ADSM Server running on WINNT 4 crashed due to Recovery Log crash. > Expire inventory schedule brought down the server as it > filled the recovery > log, asked for Tape, then filled one Tape and started asking > for another one > and there was no tape . Log kept on increasing and finally > took down the > server. > > Initially tried Restore Db but failed after starting a "Re-Do" on the > recovery log. > Also got the event id: 6 in the nt event log. about another > server being run > at the same time. > > Finally re-installed the server and applied last ptf > (3.1.2.90), server > tells me to use Upgrade DB to bring the database to most > current version. > Don't know when to use it ? > > Then, replaced the core four files with the original configuration and > issued Restore db (Point in time) command to get the database > back. Database > restore completes but when I issue: dsmservr command after > that, it says > ADSM server must be restored before it can be started. I > don't know when to > insert these files in the new installation. > > If I try to do a restore the database without using point in > time option, it > restores, begins server recovery, recovery log mount, starts > redo for the > log and fails at certain point. > > Need serious HELP to get the server back U > > Your Help is greatly appreciated.. > > Thanks for your time. > > Prasanna > > > Prasanna Ghanekar > <<...OLE_Obj...>> > EDS Pontiac East > 2100 S Opdyke Rd > MI 48341 > *: (248) 972-4547 >
S.O.S ADSM sunk !!
Being a novice, I'm seeking out the Expert ADSM community to help me get back my Flagship above water. Here's the snapshot of things: ADSM Server running on WINNT 4 crashed due to Recovery Log crash. Expire inventory schedule brought down the server as it filled the recovery log, asked for Tape, then filled one Tape and started asking for another one and there was no tape . Log kept on increasing and finally took down the server. Initially tried Restore Db but failed after starting a "Re-Do" on the recovery log. Also got the event id: 6 in the nt event log. about another server being run at the same time. Finally re-installed the server and applied last ptf (3.1.2.90), server tells me to use Upgrade DB to bring the database to most current version. Don't know when to use it ? Then, replaced the core four files with the original configuration and issued Restore db (Point in time) command to get the database back. Database restore completes but when I issue: dsmservr command after that, it says ADSM server must be restored before it can be started. I don't know when to insert these files in the new installation. If I try to do a restore the database without using point in time option, it restores, begins server recovery, recovery log mount, starts redo for the log and fails at certain point. Need serious HELP to get the server back U Your Help is greatly appreciated.. Thanks for your time. Prasanna Prasanna Ghanekar <<...OLE_Obj...>> EDS Pontiac East 2100 S Opdyke Rd MI 48341 *: (248) 972-4547
Re: AIX client dumping core during backup
> 03/14/01 17:02:39 B/A Txn Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8C08 shadow_pass_r > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8930 shadow_chk_r The signal 11 is obviously a Segmentation Fault, which is a sofware defect that should be reported to Tivoli Support for resolution. Looks like it is doing password lookups at the time. It might be the case it is being thrown off by files in the file system having a UID but no corresponding user in the passwd file, as is common when usernames are retired from the passwd file but not all their files are addressed, to reassign them. You might want to run the 'find' command with the -nouser option and see if there are any such files, to supplement the problem resolution with that info. Richard Sims, BU
Re: Experiences from Client-Patch 4.1.2.12 ( and on Ms Clusterserver ) ?
I used TSMCLEAN on 2 different NT 4 server clients. The only issue I had was users complaining of the performance hit because I ran it during the work day. It basically impacts the system the same as a real backup would, except I had about 20 times the normal backup amount because of all the corrupted files. I read all the instructions and readmes several times before I attempted anything. === John Monahan Network Team Coordinator Liberty Diversified Industries (763) 536-6677 === Gunnar Uhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/14/01 07:00 AM Please respond to gunnar.uhr To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Experiences from Client-Patch 4.1.2.12 ( and on Ms Clusterserver) ? Hello everybody. I'm having a number of NT-servers (clients) and Win2000 Servers that I guess would be best to install/run this patch on. Does anybody have any experiences of using the Client-Patch 4.1.2.12 on Win32 ? I also have a few Ms Clusterservers ( NT 4.0 ) that I also have to do this on. Are there anyone of You that has done this - or has any ideas according to this ? Are there anything "special" to concider when running the TSMCLEAN. I would very much like it to be OK "on the first try" - this time;-) Regards Gunnar -- Gunnar Uhr IT-Service KAROLINSKA HOSPITAL STOCKHOLM SWEDEN e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: AIX client dumping core during backup
Interesting, We too have over 70 AIX clients on our TSM server, but I have 1 client that coughs the same error about once a week: 03/11/01 16:00:11 B/A Txn Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 03/11/01 16:00:11 0xD01D0BA0 shadow_pass_r 03/11/01 16:00:11 0xD01D08C8 shadow_chk_r 03/11/01 16:00:11 0xD01D2218 _getpwuid_shadow_r 03/11/01 16:00:11 0xD01D5134 getpwuid 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x10021148 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100210BC *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x10020E5C *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100AE0D8 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100ACB64 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100AC644 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100AB310 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100AB020 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100AA954 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100A9B2C *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100A968C *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100A9110 *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100988AC *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x100988FC *UNKNOWN* 03/11/01 16:00:11 0xD00081FC _pthread_body 03/11/01 16:00:11 0x *UNKNOWN* The client is running AIX 4.3.3, and running TSM client version 4.1.2.0. The server in my case is also an AIX host running AIX 4.3.3 and TSM server version 4.1.1.0. Our library is also a 3494 with 3590E drives. We have tried uninstalling and reinstalling the client but it did not resolve the problem. The odd thing is that during the day, many archive sessions are pushed to TSM with no problem, but the scheduled incremental backup causes this error once in a while. Stopping and starting the daemon on the client fixes it for a few days, but it inevitably comes back. I have not opened a case with Tivoli on this because I have other priorities, but I too find it perplexing... Ben Bullock UNIX Systems Manager Micron Technology Inc. > -Original Message- > From: Andrea Campi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 10:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: AIX client dumping core during backup > > > I have an AIX client which dumps core every time I try to backup > a particular 3.5GB fs. The log shows: > > 03/14/01 17:02:39 B/A Txn Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8C08 shadow_pass_r > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8930 shadow_chk_r > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01CA268 _getpwuid_shadow_r > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01CD16C getpwuid > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x10021148 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100210BC *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x10020E5C *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AE0D8 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100ACB64 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AC644 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AB310 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AB020 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AA954 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100A9B2C *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100A968C *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100A9110 *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100988AC *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100988FC *UNKNOWN* > 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD00081FC _pthread_body > > This is a 4.1.2.0 client, but 3.7 showed the exact same behavior. > > Anybody can help me understand what's up? Other AIX machines are ok. > Servers are also AIX with TSM 3.7.3.8 (and by the way, should I try > upgrading them? We are already planning to go to 4.1 sometimes before > summer), 3494 libraries with 3590E. > > Thanks in advance, bye, > Andrea > > > Bye, > Andrea > > -- > Andrea Campi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I.NET S.p.A. http://www.inet.it > Direzione Tecnica - R&D phone: +39 02 32863 ext 1 > v. Darwin, 85 - I-20019 fax: +39 02 32863 ext 7701 > Settimo Milanese (MI), Italy >
AIX client dumping core during backup
I have an AIX client which dumps core every time I try to backup a particular 3.5GB fs. The log shows: 03/14/01 17:02:39 B/A Txn Consumer thread, fatal error, signal 11 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8C08 shadow_pass_r 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01C8930 shadow_chk_r 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01CA268 _getpwuid_shadow_r 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD01CD16C getpwuid 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x10021148 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100210BC *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x10020E5C *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AE0D8 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100ACB64 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AC644 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AB310 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AB020 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100AA954 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100A9B2C *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100A968C *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100A9110 *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100988AC *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0x100988FC *UNKNOWN* 03/14/01 17:02:39 0xD00081FC _pthread_body This is a 4.1.2.0 client, but 3.7 showed the exact same behavior. Anybody can help me understand what's up? Other AIX machines are ok. Servers are also AIX with TSM 3.7.3.8 (and by the way, should I try upgrading them? We are already planning to go to 4.1 sometimes before summer), 3494 libraries with 3590E. Thanks in advance, bye, Andrea Bye, Andrea -- Andrea Campi mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I.NET S.p.A. http://www.inet.it Direzione Tecnica - R&D phone: +39 02 32863 ext 1 v. Darwin, 85 - I-20019 fax: +39 02 32863 ext 7701 Settimo Milanese (MI), Italy
Re: TSM 4.1 upgrade:PERFLIB error DSMCPERF.DLL is missing
APAR IC28571 deals with this issue. It looks like you've come close to hitting the nail on the head. But, I would suggest reviewing the APAR that Tivoli currently has. John G. Talafous IS Technical Principal The Timken CompanyGlobal Software Support P.O. Box 6927 Data Management 1835 Dueber Ave. S.W. Phone: (330)-471-3390 Canton, Ohio USA 44706-0927 Fax : (330)-471-4034 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.timken.com -Original Message- From: Holger Bitterlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 6:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 4.1 upgrade:PERFLIB error DSMCPERF.DLL is missing Hi everybody, I updated several NT Boxes from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 4.1.16. After a reboot I saw in the eventlog an error something like : "PERFLIB: DSMCPERF.DLL is missing". In this case,I went to the following registry entry, and I`d deleted the 'open' and 'library' key. H KEY LOCAL MACHINE/SYSTEM/CURRENT CONTROL SET/SERVICES/EVENTLOG/SYSTEM/TSM CLIENT PERFORMANCE After that, the error message disapears. But : Is this ok ? What is the impact of doing so? Has anybody experiance in this ? Regards HBit __ Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
STK9714 to STK9710 migration
Hi, I'm in the process of upgrading my STK library. I currently have a STK9714 and I'm getting a STK9710. Will I be able to move the tapes from on library to another? Or do I need to define another library, checkout the tapes from the old STK9714 ( 100 tapes ) and check them in to the new library STK9714. The libraries are very similar, the element numbers are the same! I know I'll need to verify the scsi address of the drives and I can make them the same. I should be able to cut over to the new library. Are there any special configurations on the STK9710 like FAST LOAD, AUTO CLEAN etc. That should be set, does any one know? I'm running TSM 3.7.4 on AIX 4.3.3. With three scsi adapters. The old STK9714 has 6 DLT tape drive with 100 cells and the new STK9710 has 10 DLT tape drive with 300 cells. I know I'll need to define in AIX and TSM the additional tape drives. But I'm trying to see the easiest way to get the tapes over because I only have ONE cap ( mailbox, in/out unit ). It would be very time consuming to checkout/checkin the 100 tapes from one library to another. Thank you, Laura IMPORTANT: The security of electronic mail sent through the Internet is not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send confidential information to us via electronic mail, including social security numbers, account numbers, and personal identification numbers. Delivery, and timely delivery, of electronic mail is also not guaranteed. Legg Mason therefore recommends that you do not send time-sensitive or action-oriented messages to us via electronic mail, including authorization to "buy" or "sell" a security or instructions to conduct any other financial transaction. Such requests, orders or instructions will not be processed until Legg Mason can confirm your instructions or obtain appropriate written documentation where necessary.
Netware client problems
Howdy, NW Client 4.1.1_18 talking to an ADSM 3.1.2.50 server on OS\390. I keep getting a login prompt when the scheduler kicks off, or if I run a manual. I'm using the fully qualified login name, and the pwd file has been established in two of the three instances. I type in username and password and get the error "Login denied to NewWare Target Service Agent 'blahblah'. However, the backup runs. Any ideas? It's like I'm getting access to the server and context, but not the tree. thank, -- Jim Kirkman AIS - Systems UNC-Chapel Hill 966-5884
Re: Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)
Gerrit, Yes. Archive is not using the Include-Exclude list. Steffan Gerrit van Zyl wrote: > > Hi all TSM'ers, > > TSM Client 3.1.0.8 on NT > TSM Server 3.1.2.58 on AIX > > I have the following scenario and hope someone can explain this to me. > When archiving we get the following: > > 03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4952I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects inspected: 461,739 > 03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4953I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects archived: 411,368 > > When we do a incremental backup we get the following: > > 03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4952I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects inspected: 410,653 > 03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4954I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total > number of objects backed up:3,414 > > Why is there suce a huge difference between objects inspected in the two > cases (5 objects)? The files were not deleted!! This is the same > everytime. > > Is archiving inspecting files differently than incremental backup? > > Thanks and regards. > Gerrit van Zyl > > IT Consultant > Faritec (Pty) Ltd >
Re: Backup Sets
A backupset is the first self-discovery media created by Tivoli: you can restore any part or all. The clients have been updated to understand the format of the backupset directly. Marc Levitan wrote: > > >From my understanding, no. A backupset is a flat file (.ost). It will be > restored in it's entirety. However I do believe that you can define what > filespace the Backupset originally backs up. In other words, you can > backup only what you want to. Hope this helps. > > Marc Levitan > Senior LAN Engineer > PFPC Global Fund Services > > Jane Doe > CITE.COM>cc: > Sent by: Subject: Backup Sets > "ADSM: Dist > Stor Manager" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > RIST.EDU> > > 03/13/2001 > 04:38 PM > Please > respond to > "ADSM: Dist > Stor Manager" > > Is it possible to restore a single from from a backupset without restoring > the entire set? > > ___ > Send a cool gift with your E-Card > http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
Re: Backup Sets
>From my understanding, no. A backupset is a flat file (.ost). It will be restored in it's entirety. However I do believe that you can define what filespace the Backupset originally backs up. In other words, you can backup only what you want to. Hope this helps. Marc Levitan Senior LAN Engineer PFPC Global Fund Services Jane Doe cc: Sent by: Subject: Backup Sets "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] RIST.EDU> 03/13/2001 04:38 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" Is it possible to restore a single from from a backupset without restoring the entire set? ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
Experiences from Client-Patch 4.1.2.12 ( and on Ms Clusterserver ) ?
Hello everybody. I'm having a number of NT-servers (clients) and Win2000 Servers that I guess would be best to install/run this patch on. Does anybody have any experiences of using the Client-Patch 4.1.2.12 on Win32 ? I also have a few Ms Clusterservers ( NT 4.0 ) that I also have to do this on. Are there anyone of You that has done this - or has any ideas according to this ? Are there anything "special" to concider when running the TSMCLEAN. I would very much like it to be OK "on the first try" - this time;-) Regards Gunnar -- Gunnar Uhr IT-Service KAROLINSKA HOSPITAL STOCKHOLM SWEDEN e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TSM 4.1 upgrade:PERFLIB error DSMCPERF.DLL is missing
Hi everybody, I updated several NT Boxes from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 4.1.16. After a reboot I saw in the eventlog an error something like : "PERFLIB: DSMCPERF.DLL is missing". In this case,I went to the following registry entry, and I`d deleted the 'open' and 'library' key. H KEY LOCAL MACHINE/SYSTEM/CURRENT CONTROL SET/SERVICES/EVENTLOG/SYSTEM/TSM CLIENT PERFORMANCE After that, the error message disapears. But : Is this ok ? What is the impact of doing so? Has anybody experiance in this ? Regards HBit __ Da E-Mails leicht unter fremdem Namen erstellt oder manipuliert werden koennen, muessen wir zu Ihrem und unserem Schutz die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit der vorstehenden Erklaerungen ausschliessen. Die fuer die Stadtsparkasse Koeln geltenden Regeln ueber die Verbindlichkeit von rechtsgeschaeftlichen Erklaerungen mit verpflichtendem Inhalt bleiben unberuehrt.
Re: Oracle Database Backups
look at copygroup MODE parameter, ABSOLUTE vs MODIFIED. This works for a non-DB files just fine for controlling FULL vs INCREMENTAL. I do not know how well it fits with a DB. I would suspect you would have to go through an API to do an incremental. Matt -Original Message- From: Shekhar Dhotre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 5:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Oracle Database Backups there is no full/incremental in TSM .. Jane Doe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 03/13/2001 04:41:11 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Oracle Database Backups Given the following scenario, Full DB backup on SAT Incremental backup on Sun-Fri If I have a huge database, say 2 TB, Is this a typical scenario as far as schedules are concerned? ___ Send a cool gift with your E-Card http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
Archive (inspected) vs Backup (inspected)
Hi all TSM'ers,
TSM Client 3.1.0.8 on NT
TSM Server 3.1.2.58 on AIX
I have the following scenario and hope someone can explain this to me.
When archiving we get the following:
03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4952I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total
number of objects inspected: 461,739
03/11/2001 03:54:57 ANE4953I (Session: 7758, Node: NTSRV01) Total
number of objects archived: 411,368
When we do a incremental backup we get the following:
03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4952I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total
number of objects inspected: 410,653
03/12/2001 22:57:23 ANE4954I (Session: 8193, Node: NTSRV01) Total
number of objects backed up:3,414
Why is there suce a huge difference between objects inspected in the two
cases (5 objects)? The files were not deleted!! This is the same
everytime.
Is archiving inspecting files differently than incremental backup?
Thanks and regards.
Gerrit van Zyl
IT Consultant
Faritec (Pty) Ltd
"This message may contain information which is confidential, private or
privileged in nature. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not
peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or file which
is attached to this message. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, facsimile or telephone
and thereafter return and/or destroy the original message.
Any views of this communication are those of the sender except where the
sender specifically states them to be those of Faritec (Proprietary)
Limited ("Faritec") and/or Midrange Distribution Services (Pty) Ltd.
Please note that the recipient must scan this e-mail and any attached
files for viruses and the like. While we do everything possible to
protect information from viruses, Faritec accepts no liability of
whatever nature for any loss, liability, damage or expense resulting
directly or indirectly from the access and/or downloading of any files
which are attached to this e-mail message."
Re: ? on export/import using network attached file systems
Hi Steve, I did the trip last month for one of my customer. Do not need to export to a shared FS, you can directly try "Server-to-server" export. It works fine. The "key-step" (which I forgot to do the first time) is the "loopback" devclass. You can have a look at this piece of redbook : SG245244.PDF, §4.11.2 page 130 Here is the steps I did for my customer. 1) export node from server1 to server2 (on a diskpool) 2) import node from server2 to server2 (that is the trick !) Good luck Rv -- CYBORG is an E20 running TSM 3.7 on AIX 4.3.2 GLADIATOR is a NT4 srv running TSM 4.1.2. It has to have a file-devclass pointing to your fileserver1 Source server = CYBORG Target server = GLADIATOR GLADIATOR> REGISTER NODE CYBORG_SRV ?***? DOMAIN=UNIVERS TYPE=SERVER GLADIATOR> DEF SERVER GLADIATOR_SRV HLA=127.0.0.1 LLA=1500 NODENAME=CYBORG_SRV PASS=?***? GLADIATOR> DEF DEV LOOPBACK DEVT=SERVER SERVERNAME=GLADIATOR_SRV MOUNRT=10 CYBORG> DEFINE SERVER gladiator_srv pass=?***? hla=172.16.45.5 lla=1570 nodename=cyborg_srv CYBORG> DEFINE DEVCLASS GLADCLASS devtype=server servername=gladiator_srv CYBORG> export node aigle filed=all devc=gladclass ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 29. ANS8003I Process number 29 started. -- CONSOLE CYBORG [BEGIN] --- ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: EXPORT NODE aigle filed=all devc=gladclass ANR0984I Process 29 for EXPORT NODE started in the BACKGROUND at 11:30:00. ANR0609I EXPORT NODE started as process 29. ANR0402I Session 264 started for administrator ADMIN (Server) (Memory IPC). ANR8340I SERVER volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 mounted. ANR1360I Output volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 opened (sequence number 1). ANR0610I EXPORT NODE started by ADMIN as process 29. ANR0635I EXPORT NODE: Processing node AIGLE in domain UNIVERS. ANR0637I EXPORT NODE: Processing file space \\aigle\c$ for node AIGLE. ANR1361I Output volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 closed. ANR0617I EXPORT NODE: Processing completed with status SUCCESS. ANR0626I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. ANR0627I EXPORT NODE: Copied 1 file space 0 archive files, 855 backup files, and 0 space managed files. ANR0629I EXPORT NODE: Copied 204264420 bytes of data. ANR0611I EXPORT NODE started by ADMIN as process 29 has ended. ANR4006I EXPORT NODE: Volume 1 written by process is GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000. ANR0568W Session 264 for admin ADMIN (Server) terminated - connection with client severed. ANR0986I Process 29 for EXPORT NODE running in the BACKGROUND processed 857 items for a total of 204,264,420 bytes with a completion state of SUCCESS at 11:31:36. -- CONSOLE CYBORG [END] - GLADIATOR> import node * filed=all devc=loopback volume=GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 ANR0609I IMPORT NODE started as process 29. ANS8003I Process number 29 started. -- CONSOLE GLADIATOR [BEGIN] --- ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: IMPORT NODE * filed=all devc=loopback volume=GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 ANR0984I Process 29 for IMPORT NODE started in the BACKGROUND at 11:35:26. ANR0609I IMPORT NODE started as process 29. ANR0402I Session 858 started for administrator ADMIN (Server) (Memory IPC). ANR0406I Session 860 started for node CYBORG_SRV (Windows NT) (Tcp/Ip 127.0.0.1(4136)). ANR8340I SERVER volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 mounted. ANR1363I Input volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 opened (sequence number 1). ANR0610I IMPORT NODE started by ADMIN as process 29. ANR0615I IMPORT NODE: Reading EXPORT NODE data from server CYBORG exported 2001-02-05 11:30:00. ANR0635I IMPORT NODE: Processing node AIGLE in domain UNIVERS. ANR2060I Node AIGLE registered in policy domain UNIVERS. ANR9961W Node entry AIGLE has not been added to this server's definition in Active Directory. ANR2099I Administrative userid AIGLE defined for OWNER access to node AIGLE. ANR0636I IMPORT NODE: Processing file space \\aigle\c$ for node AIGLE as filespace \\aigle\c$. ANR0617I IMPORT NODE: Processing completed with status SUCCESS. ANR0620I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 domain(s). ANR0621I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 policy sets. ANR0622I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 management classes. ANR0623I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 copy groups. ANR0624I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 schedules. ANR0625I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 administrators. ANR0891I IMPORT NODE: Copied 0 optionset definitions. ANR0626I IMPORT NODE: Copied 1 node definitions. ANR0627I IMPORT NODE: Copied 1 file space 0 archive files, 855 backup files, and 0 space managed files. ANR0628I IMPORT NODE: Used 0 volume(s). ANR0629I IMPORT NODE: Copied 204264420 bytes of data. ANR1364I Input volume GLADIATOR_SRV.EXP.981369000 closed. ANR0568W Session 858 for admin ADMIN (Server) terminated - conn
