TSM and QoS

2006-04-06 Thread Henrik Wahlstedt
Hello,

Since most IT departments like the word centralize I wonder how other achieve a 
centralized TSM enviroment.

We have smaller sites with 10-40 servers connected to main office with 
20-155Mbit. One way to setup backup and recovery is to attach all servers to a 
networked storage system. Clone/snapshot the data for a local recovery.
TSM handles (historical) backups and archives which are send to the main office 
over WAN. We can do recovery at the main office for a destroyed office.

The tricky thing here is to get all the data over WAN. TSM doesn´t QoS tag the 
pacakges and TSM is happy to use all available bandwith and all other resources 
it can lay it hands on.

Am I forced to use Manual Hacks in my routers to automaticly prioritize TSM 
traffic. Or are there any other way to prioritize the traffic?


Thanks
Henrik



---
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.


how to define msl 6060 (or neo 4000)

2006-04-06 Thread Nigel Howard

all,
I am using aix 5.3 and tsm5.3.3 with a 3583 3xlto2 quite happily.
I want to add a msl 6060 but cannot get tsm/aix to see it.

I have tried smit-dev-tsm-dev, cfgmgr but nothing will become
available.

how do I get to the point where I can DEF LIBR?

I also can test a neo 2000 if necessary.

I have googled but all hits just mention defining drive
onwards...

--
regards Nigel

.   Registered Linux User #266491
.   (there are 10 types of people in the world.
. those who know binary, and those who don't!)


Re: how to define msl 6060 (or neo 4000)

2006-04-06 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Nigel!
I haven't got any experience with non-IBM devices, but as far as I know,
you will have to use the TSM Device Support driver for non-IBM tape
devices.
Did you check the IBM technote for the MSL 6000 series? Here it is:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663uid=swg21116751
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Nigel Howard
Sent: donderdag 6 april 2006 10:29
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: how to define msl 6060 (or neo 4000)

all,
I am using aix 5.3 and tsm5.3.3 with a 3583 3xlto2 quite
happily.
I want to add a msl 6060 but cannot get tsm/aix to see it.

I have tried smit-dev-tsm-dev, cfgmgr but nothing will become
available.

how do I get to the point where I can DEF LIBR?

I also can test a neo 2000 if necessary.

I have googled but all hits just mention defining drive
onwards...

--
regards Nigel

.   Registered Linux User #266491
.   (there are 10 types of people in the world.
. those who know binary, and those who don't!)


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
**


AW: [ADSM-L] Install errors

2006-04-06 Thread Otto Chvosta
Geoff,

It seem's that en_US is missing in your AIX-Environment - see TSM
Installation requirements (Installation Guide):

United States English (ISO8559), the en_US Cultural convention and Language
translation environment, is a required installation regardless of the
language environment you are using.

Regards,
Otto

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 01:26
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Install errors

I am installing as root the TSM 5.3 server on an AIX box running 5.3. Below
are the errors I get. Anyone have info as to why the issue on a fresh
install of AIX 5.3 with no other software installed?



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



restore: 0511-126 Cannot open /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server: A file
or directory in the path name does

not exist.

Mount volume 1 on /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.

Press the Enter key to continue.

0503-405 installp:  An error occurred while running the restore command.

Use local problem reporting procedures.



installp:  CANCELLED software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



Filesets processed:  3 of 7  (Total time:  31 secs).



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0



0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.

Check path name and permissions.





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: TSM server automation products

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Rhodes
You describe an environment like our own, and is why we are moving off of
this product.  I would say no, it doesn't fit your environment.

Rick




 Thomas Denier
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 FFERSONHOSPITAL.O  To
 RG   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Sent by: ADSM:cc
 Dist Stor
 Manager  Subject
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: TSM server automation products
 .EDU


 04/05/2006 12:29
 PM


 Please respond to
 ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU






- Richard Rhodes wrote: -

We have successfully used StorServer Manager for automation for
a number of years. It works well as long as your processing
follows standard way TSM want's to run. At times it gets confused,
but in general we have been happy with it.  It's worth a look and
demo try.

Our environment has several features that arguably fall outside
the bounds of the standard way TSM want's to run:

1.We have 64 sets of storage pools with a disk pool, a primary
tape pool, and a copy tape pool in each set (we are still at 5.2,
so we do not have the option of using collocation groups).

2.We find it necessary to have tape reclamation run concurrently
with inventory expiration.

3.We have an unusual approach to vaulting recovery plan files:
'prepare' command, 'dsmc' to back up the recovery plan file,
'generate backupset' to create a backup set containing the
recovery plan file, and 'checkout libvol' to eject the tape
containing the backup set.

Is StorServer Manager flexible enough support these features of
our environment?



-
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.


DRM module changes in TSM 5.3.2.3

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Mochnaczewski
Hi Everybody,

I just upgraded from TSM 5.1.6 to TSM 5.3.2.3 on AIX. Does anyone have a link 
or information other than the redbook regarding changes in the DRM module ?

Rich


multiple dsmcad procs running

2006-04-06 Thread Vlijmen, M. van
Goodday,

We have IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.3.2.0 running on a ppc64 redhat
 machine One of the clients is a hp 9000 with hpux 11.i V1.
By accident I started three instances of adsmcad. I killed two of them and
happily went home at the end of the day.
The next day I found out that the backup didn't run because the TSM server
was unable to contact the client.
In the dsmsched.log I found that the last scheduled action was one of the
killed dsmcad processes.

Am I right in assuming that correct authentication only takes place between
the server and the dsmcad process that initiated the first
contact with the server? So, in this case the TSM server didn't recognize
the dsmcad process?

Thanks in advance for your reply.
Kind regards,
Michiel van Vlijmen

Disclaimer :

Aan de inhoud van dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
De informatie is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde.
Gebruik door anderen is verboden.
Openbaarmaking, vermenigvuldiging en verstrekking van deze
informatie aan derden is niet toegestaan.


Re: multiple dsmcad procs running

2006-04-06 Thread Jurjen Oskam
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 03:25:58PM +0200, Vlijmen, M. van wrote:

 Am I right in assuming that correct authentication only takes place between
 the server and the dsmcad process that initiated the first
 contact with the server? So, in this case the TSM server didn't recognize
 the dsmcad process?

What probably happened (no way to be sure without the logs): the first
dsmcad process you started began listening to the default port number,
probably 1581. The processes you started after that couldn't use that port,
since it was in use. Then you killed some dsmcad processes, including the
one that was listening on 1581. The dsmcad that you left running was
listening on an unknown (by the TSM server) port.

The TSM server then tried to contact the dsmcad process on its default
port, but on that port nothing was listening so communication failed.

--
Jurjen Oskam

Savage's Law of Expediency:
You want it bad, you'll get it bad.


Re: multiple dsmcad procs running

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Sims

On Apr 6, 2006, at 9:25 AM, Vlijmen, M. van wrote:


Goodday,

We have IBM Tivoli Storage Manager 5.3.2.0 running on a ppc64 redhat
 machine One of the clients is a hp 9000 with hpux 11.i V1.
By accident I started three instances of adsmcad. I killed two of
them and
happily went home at the end of the day.
The next day I found out that the backup didn't run because the TSM
server
was unable to contact the client.
In the dsmsched.log I found that the last scheduled action was one
of the
killed dsmcad processes.

Am I right in assuming that correct authentication only takes place
between
the server and the dsmcad process that initiated the first
contact with the server? So, in this case the TSM server didn't
recognize
the dsmcad process?


Michiel - The concept of port acquisition pertains here...

Like the Scheduler itself, the CAD uses a single, defined port number
for incoming communication from the server.  And only one process can
acquire a given port number.  Kill of the port-holder process, and
then there's nobody listening.

See IBM Technote 1079454 for the gospel on this.

  Richard Sims


Re: Client Schedule Sysobj Backup Keeps Failing

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Raibeck
It is very difficult to provide specific answers when there is very little 
detail provided. For example, output from QUERY SCHEDULE F=D for the 
schedule you defined.

In general, it would probably be better to put the command into a script, 
then have the scheduler run the script.

For example:

REM BEGIN SCRIPT
set BACKUPLOG=SysState.log
cd /d c:\program files\tivoli\tsm\baclient
echo.  %BACKUPLOG%
echo 

 
 %BACKUPLOG%
echo %date% %time% Beginning system state backup  %BACKUPLOG%
dsmc backup systemstate  %BACKUPLOG% 21
echo %date% %time% System state backup ended with return code %ERRORLEVEL% 
 %BACKUPLOG%
REM END SCRIPT

On another note, I happened to notice the following from your original 
post:

   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Schedule Name: DKSHH03_INCR 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Action:Incremental 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Objects:   c:\ d:\ e:\ 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Options:   -subdir=yes 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Server Window Start:   02:30:00 on 04/05/2006 

I do no know why you have your objects specified like this, but in 
general, I would recommend setting the schedule with these settings:

   objects=c: d: e: options=

to get full incremental backup processing of your drives.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page: 
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/05/2006 
21:56:23:

 We tried the full path and all kinds of method yet it doesn't work .
 This command works on another server , so tried on this.
 Any backup systemstate commands worked manually but not being on 
 schedules.
 
 
 
 
 
 Bruno Melo - Suporte Informática [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 04/04/2006 09:20 AM
 Please respond to
 ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 
 
 To
 ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 cc
 
 Subject
 Re: [ADSM-L] Client Schedule Sysobj Backup Keeps Failing
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Isn't it a path issue?
 Did you try the full path command?
 Ex:
 c:\progra~1\Tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmc backup systemstate
   - Original Message - 
   From: Dksh Cssc 
   To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 
   Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 6:05 AM
   Subject: Client Schedule Sysobj Backup Keeps Failing
 
 
 
   Hi all , 
 
   We are trying to backup DKSHH03 system state ( Windows Server 2003). 
 However the backup seems to fail all the time. 
   We schedule the system state backup under DKSHH03_SYSOBJ at 15:00:00 
but 
 failed. Later around 15:04:00 the backup is completed successfully but 
 under schedule named DKSHH03_INCR. 
 
   1) Could anyone help to enlighten me why the system state backup event 

 goes under different backup schedule name? What is the implication of 
such 
 event? 
   2) Supposingly once a backup failed, the same backup event would NOT 
be 
 re-tried again ; but why does this case happened? 
 
   Here goes the dsmsched.log : 
 
   04/04/2006 15:00:06 Node Name: DKSHH03 
   04/04/2006 15:00:06 Session established with server KULTSM01P: 
 AIX-RS/6000 
   04/04/2006 15:00:06   Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0 
   04/04/2006 15:00:06   Server date/time: 04/04/2006 15:00:31  Last 
 access: 04/04/2006 15:00:27 
 
   04/04/2006 15:00:06 Executing Operating System command or script: 
  dsmc backup systemstate 
   04/04/2006 15:00:34 Finished command.  Return code is: 12 
   04/04/2006 15:00:34 ANS1909E The scheduled command failed. 
   04/04/2006 15:00:34 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'DKSHH03_SYSOBJ' failed. 
 Return code = 12. 
   04/04/2006 15:00:34 Sending results for scheduled event 
 'DKSHH03_SYSOBJ'. 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Results sent to server for scheduled event 
 'DKSHH03_SYSOBJ'. 
 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Querying server for next scheduled event. 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Node Name: DKSHH03 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Session established with server KULTSM01P: 
 AIX-RS/6000 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36   Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36   Server date/time: 04/04/2006 15:01:01  Last 
 access: 04/04/2006 15:00:33 
 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY BEGIN 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 --- SCHEDULEREC QUERY END 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Next operation scheduled: 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 
  
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Schedule Name: DKSHH03_INCR 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Action:Incremental 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Objects:   c:\ d:\ e:\ 
   04/04/2006 15:00:36 Options:   

Re: Loaded client/server question

2006-04-06 Thread Prather, Wanda
You don't mention what client this is - but the newly released ones
(5.3.3) support journaling for AIX as well as Windows.
That might help with the incremental backup issue.  Could be a lot of
the time is just in navigating the file tree.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bell, Charles (Chip)
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Loaded client/server question


I've posed the sob story on here before, but I have a client that has 39
NTFS mounts with millions of files on each. When backing this up on an
incremental basis, it takes multiple days now. Also, the TSM database
grows at a rapid rate, and I have PMRs open on both issues.

 

Now...my question is should I have a separate TSM server serving this
client or should I have 2 instances? I can't back up this client to the
current TSM server because we can't continue to feed the Enterprise DB
for this one client. I seriously need some suggestions and how-to's
because I've never experienced client behavior such as this.  :-(

 

Feel free to email me directly if you have any ideas...

 

God bless you!!! 

Chip Bell 
Network Engineer I
IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional (ITSM 5.2)
Baptist Health System 
Birmingham, AL 



 




-
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information and intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
and retain no copies of any of this information.


Re: Random Access Disk Pools

2006-04-06 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Rod!
TSM stores backups as aggregates. An aggregate can contain multiple
client backup files. The client files within an aggregate will expire
over time and thus occupy space within the aggregate.
When you use a file device class or a tape, you can reclaim the wasted
space these expired files occupy within the aggregates by moving
unexpired files to new aggregates. This is done through reclamation.
Since reclamation is only available for sequential acces storage pools,
you cannot reclaim diskpools and thus the wasted space within an
aggregate will only be reusable when all the files in an aggregate are
expired and the aggregate is deleted. If you have backups with a very
long retention in your shop, it could take quite some time before an
aggregate becomes completely empty.
Hope this clears thing up for you.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Park, Rod
Sent: donderdag 6 april 2006 15:31
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Random Access Disk Pools

 anyone? Ideas?

-Original Message-
From: Park, Rod
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:10 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools

So, can someone explain the difference at the TSM level and aggregate
level. Really I'm trying to understand, if I have a primary disk pool
that does not migrate, it will be the final onsite resting place of
data. As data expires and fragmentation occurs. That space is unusable
if I'm not migrating to another primary area? Eventually I'll have to
allocate more? Below is what comparison doc showed as consideration of
fragmentation for random access pools. Guess I'm not sure what the diff
is between tsm level and aggregate level.

TSM level - fragmentation will occur as TSM allocates and frees space
within the Storage Pool.  Migration tends to relieve this fragmentation

Aggregate level - fragmentation occurs as files expire within an
aggregate.  DISK pools cannot reclaim this wasted space until all files
in the aggregate have expired

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rushforth, Tim
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 11:21 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools

See http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0uid=swg21218415 for
comparison of disk vs devclass=file




This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the
intended addressee, then you have received this email in error and any
use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is
strictly prohibited. Please notify us immediately of your unintended
receipt by reply and then delete this email and your reply. Tyson Foods,
Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates will not be held liable to any
person resulting from the unintended or unauthorized use of any
information contained in this email or as a result of any additions or
deletions of information originally contained in this email.


**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), 
its subsidiaries and/or its employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or 
incomplete transmission of this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for 
any delay in receipt.
**


Re: Loaded client/server question

2006-04-06 Thread Bell, Charles (Chip)
You're right! Started out at v5.3.0 on Win 2003. Have upgraded to
v5.3.2.2, v5.3.3, and downgraded back down to 5.3.0 to work through
various issues (win error 1450, insufficient resources). Journaling may
not be answer either, though I would love for it to be, because there is
a high degree of file movement on this client (can you say buffer
overflow?). And oh yes, it is taking its sweet time in file inspection.
But there has to be way to handle this... 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Loaded client/server question

You don't mention what client this is - but the newly released ones
(5.3.3) support journaling for AIX as well as Windows.
That might help with the incremental backup issue.  Could be a lot of
the time is just in navigating the file tree.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Bell, Charles (Chip)
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:26 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Loaded client/server question


I've posed the sob story on here before, but I have a client that has 39
NTFS mounts with millions of files on each. When backing this up on an
incremental basis, it takes multiple days now. Also, the TSM database
grows at a rapid rate, and I have PMRs open on both issues.

 

Now...my question is should I have a separate TSM server serving this
client or should I have 2 instances? I can't back up this client to the
current TSM server because we can't continue to feed the Enterprise DB
for this one client. I seriously need some suggestions and how-to's
because I've never experienced client behavior such as this.  :-(

 

Feel free to email me directly if you have any ideas...

 

God bless you!!! 

Chip Bell 
Network Engineer I
IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional (ITSM 5.2)
Baptist Health System 
Birmingham, AL 



 




-
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information and intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
and retain no copies of any of this information.


DSM.OPT option file

2006-04-06 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Hi all

Is there anyone out there that have a best practice DSM.OPT file for
Win2k servers and Win2003 servers 

If so ... can I have a copy to look at it ..

Thanks

Luc Beaudoin
Network Administrator/Storage
Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D.
Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254


Re: Loaded client/server question

2006-04-06 Thread Gerald Michalak
You might try backing up each mount point as a separate client. You'll need
several dsm.opt files with the proper include and clientname options.

We do this on some of our large Novell clusters treating each volume as a
distinct client.


Gerald Michalak
630-691-4819
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/06/2006
09:26:09 AM:

 You're right! Started out at v5.3.0 on Win 2003. Have upgraded to
 v5.3.2.2, v5.3.3, and downgraded back down to 5.3.0 to work through
 various issues (win error 1450, insufficient resources). Journaling may
 not be answer either, though I would love for it to be, because there is
 a high degree of file movement on this client (can you say buffer
 overflow?). And oh yes, it is taking its sweet time in file inspection.
 But there has to be way to handle this...

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Prather, Wanda
 Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 9:08 AM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Loaded client/server question

 You don't mention what client this is - but the newly released ones
 (5.3.3) support journaling for AIX as well as Windows.
 That might help with the incremental backup issue.  Could be a lot of
 the time is just in navigating the file tree.



 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Bell, Charles (Chip)
 Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:26 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Loaded client/server question


 I've posed the sob story on here before, but I have a client that has 39
 NTFS mounts with millions of files on each. When backing this up on an
 incremental basis, it takes multiple days now. Also, the TSM database
 grows at a rapid rate, and I have PMRs open on both issues.



 Now...my question is should I have a separate TSM server serving this
 client or should I have 2 instances? I can't back up this client to the
 current TSM server because we can't continue to feed the Enterprise DB
 for this one client. I seriously need some suggestions and how-to's
 because I've never experienced client behavior such as this.  :-(



 Feel free to email me directly if you have any ideas...



 God bless you!!!

 Chip Bell
 Network Engineer I
 IBM Tivoli Certified Deployment Professional (ITSM 5.2)
 Baptist Health System
 Birmingham, AL








 -
 Confidentiality Notice:
 The information contained in this email message is privileged and
 confidential information and intended only for the use of the
 individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
 intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
 distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
 prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
 notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
 and retain no copies of any of this information.


Re: Install errors

2006-04-06 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
Well you would think that because of the error that would be the case but it
is not. The file is there. The question I have is, the message reports,
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server is missing, the file that was in the download
is  tivoli.tsm.msg.EN_US.server. So is it failing because of the name
being different or is there something wrong with the file I wonder.

If I change the name of the file and try to install then I get a new
message:

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0

0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.
Check path name and permissions.

installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0

Filesets processed:  1 of 2  (Total time:  0 secs).

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.
Check path name and permissions.

installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

Thanks,
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Otto Chvosta
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: AW: [ADSM-L] Install errors

Geoff,

It seem's that en_US is missing in your AIX-Environment - see TSM
Installation requirements (Installation Guide):

United States English (ISO8559), the en_US Cultural convention and Language
translation environment, is a required installation regardless of the
language environment you are using.

Regards,
Otto

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 01:26
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Install errors

I am installing as root the TSM 5.3 server on an AIX box running 5.3. Below
are the errors I get. Anyone have info as to why the issue on a fresh
install of AIX 5.3 with no other software installed?



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



restore: 0511-126 Cannot open /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server: A file
or directory in the path name does

not exist.

Mount volume 1 on /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.

Press the Enter key to continue.

0503-405 installp:  An error occurred while running the restore command.

Use local problem reporting procedures.



installp:  CANCELLED software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



Filesets processed:  3 of 7  (Total time:  31 secs).



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0



0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.

Check path name and permissions.





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Install errors

2006-04-06 Thread LeBlanc, Patricia
This happened to me and I had to have my UNIX guy check on some part of the 
server language stuff that wasn't installed.I believe it was called 
something like ISO8559.  I think someone else mentioned this as well.

After he fixed the unix part..my install was fine.   

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gill, 
Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Install errors

Well you would think that because of the error that would be the case but it is 
not. The file is there. The question I have is, the message reports, 
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server is missing, the file that was in the download is 
 tivoli.tsm.msg.EN_US.server. So is it failing because of the name being 
different or is there something wrong with the file I wonder.

If I change the name of the file and try to install then I get a new
message:

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0

0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory 
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.
Check path name and permissions.

installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0

Filesets processed:  1 of 2  (Total time:  0 secs).

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory 
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.
Check path name and permissions.

installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

Thanks,
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Otto 
Chvosta
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: AW: [ADSM-L] Install errors

Geoff,

It seem's that en_US is missing in your AIX-Environment - see TSM Installation 
requirements (Installation Guide):

United States English (ISO8559), the en_US Cultural convention and Language 
translation environment, is a required installation regardless of the language 
environment you are using.

Regards,
Otto

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Gill, 
Geoffrey L.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 01:26
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Install errors

I am installing as root the TSM 5.3 server on an AIX box running 5.3. Below are 
the errors I get. Anyone have info as to why the issue on a fresh install of 
AIX 5.3 with no other software installed?



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



restore: 0511-126 Cannot open /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server: A file or 
directory in the path name does

not exist.

Mount volume 1 on /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.

Press the Enter key to continue.

0503-405 installp:  An error occurred while running the restore command.

Use local problem reporting procedures.



installp:  CANCELLED software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



Filesets processed:  3 of 7  (Total time:  31 secs).



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0



0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory 
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.

Check path name and permissions.





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Install errors

2006-04-06 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
Swell... Not having been delivered the CD's for AIX is it possible to
download these files? Does anyone know the fileset name I need to look for?

Thanks,
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
LeBlanc, Patricia
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:41 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Install errors

This happened to me and I had to have my UNIX guy check on some part of the
server language stuff that wasn't installed.I believe it was called
something like ISO8559.  I think someone else mentioned this as well.

After he fixed the unix part..my install was fine.   

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Install errors

Well you would think that because of the error that would be the case but it
is not. The file is there. The question I have is, the message reports,
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server is missing, the file that was in the download
is  tivoli.tsm.msg.EN_US.server. So is it failing because of the name
being different or is there something wrong with the file I wonder.

If I change the name of the file and try to install then I get a new
message:

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0

0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.
Check path name and permissions.

installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0

Filesets processed:  1 of 2  (Total time:  0 secs).

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.
Check path name and permissions.

installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

Thanks,
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Otto Chvosta
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: AW: [ADSM-L] Install errors

Geoff,

It seem's that en_US is missing in your AIX-Environment - see TSM
Installation requirements (Installation Guide):

United States English (ISO8559), the en_US Cultural convention and Language
translation environment, is a required installation regardless of the
language environment you are using.

Regards,
Otto

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 01:26
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Install errors

I am installing as root the TSM 5.3 server on an AIX box running 5.3. Below
are the errors I get. Anyone have info as to why the issue on a fresh
install of AIX 5.3 with no other software installed?



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



restore: 0511-126 Cannot open /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server: A file
or directory in the path name does

not exist.

Mount volume 1 on /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.

Press the Enter key to continue.

0503-405 installp:  An error occurred while running the restore command.

Use local problem reporting procedures.



installp:  CANCELLED software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



Filesets processed:  3 of 7  (Total time:  31 secs).



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0



0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.

Check path name and permissions.





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator

SAIC M/S-G1b

(858)826-4062

Email:  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]


off mailing list

2006-04-06 Thread Dan Brown
Please take me off your list


Admin CLI issue and library config

2006-04-06 Thread Mario Behring
Hi list,

I have just installed TSM Server 5.3.2 on a Windows 2003 boxI was about 
to define the library (Dell PowerVault 132T) and its drives. The problem is 
that I cannot open the Administrative Command Line.once I click on its 
icon, the prompt window opens and closes immediatelly...I cannot even read 
the error message, but it seems to say somethng about the option file...

Also, I've tried to configure the tape library through the Device Driver 
wizard..it shows the following:
lb0.0.0.4
Unknown
Unknown
mt1.0.0.4
mt2.0.0.4
I was supposed to drag and drop both drives into the library, but it's not 
working. The Tape Library is a DELL PowerVault 132T with 2 QUANTUM drives.

Any ideas ?

Thanks

Mario


Re: TSM DB backup question

2006-04-06 Thread Rajesh Oak
For our local sites we vault daily, i.e we send copypool tapes to the vault 
daily. For our remote sites since we do not any local vault person, we have a 
contract with a company and the copypool tapes are sent to the vault once a 
week.
The DR tapes should be sent evry day if possible else in case of a real 
disaster you would lose over a weeks data if you send DR tapes once a week.

Rajesh

 - Original Message -
 From: Vats.Ashok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:25:06 -0700
 
 
 hi Rajesh,
 WHat do you mean by not vault daily ? We send DR tapes once a week.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
 Rajesh Oak
 Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 2:20 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM DB backup question
 
 
 Ashok,
 For our remote sites where we have a small library and do not vault 
 everyday, we backup the database to disk. You have to be a little 
 careful here because with your 161 DB database you would need a lot 
 of diskspace to keep the db backup for a number of days.
 The device class has to be file and you have to make the size big 
 enough when you define it.
 
 Let me know if you have any issues.
 
 Rajesh
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Remeta, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
  Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:05:28 -0400
 
 
  The other factor to consider is that you should have the delay period for
  volume reuse on your tape storage pools set equal to the length of time you
  keep your database backups. Depending on how often you perform reclamation
  of those pools, these could add up too!
 
  Mark
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
  Prather, Wanda
  Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:53 PM
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 
 
  The factor to decide:
 
  If you somehow had a TSM data base crash, or corruption in the TSM data
  base, how far would you be willing to restore your data base backwards
  in time?
 
  If you think you would never use that 30 day old TSM DB backup, you
  don't need to keep it.
  I think a DB retention of 5-10 days is more common.
 
  And no, you can't put the TSM DB backups in a storage pool.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
  Vats.Ashok
  Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:39 PM
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 
 
  Hi List,
  We have tsm 5.3.00 on AIX. We run TSM database backup which runs once /
  every day  consumes media from scratch pool. We keep these backups for
  at least 30 days. consuming almost 30 *200 GB tape media. Our data base
  is about 161 GB so my question is can we reduce the retention time of
  TSM db backup to 7 days. I am not sure what are the factors which
  decides how long we need to keep these volumes around. Also Does anybody
  have a storage pool defined for TSM DB backups. is it possible to do
  that ?
 
  Thanks,
  Ashok
 
  Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
  person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain
  confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
  dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
  than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error,
  please delete this material immediately.
  Please be advised that someone other than the intended recipients, including
  a third-party in the Seligman organization and government agencies, may
  review all electronic communications to and from this address.
 
 
 
 
 --
 ___
 
 Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.  -Lycos Yellow Pages
 
 http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10




-- 
___

Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.  -Lycos Yellow Pages

http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10


Re: TSM DB backup question

2006-04-06 Thread Lawrence Clark
Is the DB backup of any use after the next db backup is taken. The data
on the volumes changes, and data is expired and tapes reclaimed...so
what is the value of older db backups?

We back up the db to disk and ftp a copy over to a remote site.

Our backup data is kept in one tape library and the copypool in a
separate library, both at separate sites. So if our main site has a
fire, the backup data is available from the separate site. If that
backup site has a fire, the copypool in the main site can be used to
recreate the backup storage pools.



 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/06/2006 2:05:53 PM 
For our local sites we vault daily, i.e we send copypool tapes to the
vault daily. For our remote sites since we do not any local vault
person, we have a contract with a company and the copypool tapes are
sent to the vault once a week.
The DR tapes should be sent evry day if possible else in case of a real
disaster you would lose over a weeks data if you send DR tapes once a
week.

Rajesh

 - Original Message -
 From: Vats.Ashok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:25:06 -0700


 hi Rajesh,
 WHat do you mean by not vault daily ? We send DR tapes once a week.

 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of
 Rajesh Oak
 Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 2:20 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM DB backup question


 Ashok,
 For our remote sites where we have a small library and do not vault
 everyday, we backup the database to disk. You have to be a little
 careful here because with your 161 DB database you would need a lot
 of diskspace to keep the db backup for a number of days.
 The device class has to be file and you have to make the size big
 enough when you define it.

 Let me know if you have any issues.

 Rajesh

  - Original Message -
  From: Remeta, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
  Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:05:28 -0400
 
 
  The other factor to consider is that you should have the delay
period for
  volume reuse on your tape storage pools set equal to the length of
time you
  keep your database backups. Depending on how often you perform
reclamation
  of those pools, these could add up too!
 
  Mark
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of
  Prather, Wanda
  Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:53 PM
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 
 
  The factor to decide:
 
  If you somehow had a TSM data base crash, or corruption in the TSM
data
  base, how far would you be willing to restore your data base
backwards
  in time?
 
  If you think you would never use that 30 day old TSM DB backup,
you
  don't need to keep it.
  I think a DB retention of 5-10 days is more common.
 
  And no, you can't put the TSM DB backups in a storage pool.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
  Vats.Ashok
  Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:39 PM
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 
 
  Hi List,
  We have tsm 5.3.00 on AIX. We run TSM database backup which runs
once /
  every day  consumes media from scratch pool. We keep these backups
for
  at least 30 days. consuming almost 30 *200 GB tape media. Our data
base
  is about 161 GB so my question is can we reduce the retention time
of
  TSM db backup to 7 days. I am not sure what are the factors which
  decides how long we need to keep these volumes around. Also Does
anybody
  have a storage pool defined for TSM DB backups. is it possible to
do
  that ?
 
  Thanks,
  Ashok
 
  Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only
for the
  person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain
  confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
retransmission,
  dissemination or other use of this information by persons or
entities other
  than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in
error,
  please delete this material immediately.
  Please be advised that someone other than the intended recipients,
including
  a third-party in the Seligman organization and government agencies,
may
  review all electronic communications to and from this address.

 


 --
 ___

 Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.  -Lycos
Yellow Pages


http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10





--
___

Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.  -Lycos
Yellow Pages

http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default.asp?SRC=lycos10


The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 

Re: TSM DB backup question

2006-04-06 Thread Pugliese, Edward
Have you considered sending the data to a virtual volume copypool at you
local TSM server and then sending those tapes offsite ?  That way you
could send data daily and have daily offsite copies.
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rajesh Oak
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:06 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM DB backup question

For our local sites we vault daily, i.e we send copypool tapes to the
vault daily. For our remote sites since we do not any local vault
person, we have a contract with a company and the copypool tapes are
sent to the vault once a week.
The DR tapes should be sent evry day if possible else in case of a real
disaster you would lose over a weeks data if you send DR tapes once a
week.

Rajesh

 - Original Message -
 From: Vats.Ashok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:25:06 -0700
 
 
 hi Rajesh,
 WHat do you mean by not vault daily ? We send DR tapes once a week.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf 
 Of Rajesh Oak
 Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 2:20 PM
 To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] TSM DB backup question
 
 
 Ashok,
 For our remote sites where we have a small library and do not vault 
 everyday, we backup the database to disk. You have to be a little 
 careful here because with your 161 DB database you would need a lot of

 diskspace to keep the db backup for a number of days.
 The device class has to be file and you have to make the size big 
 enough when you define it.
 
 Let me know if you have any issues.
 
 Rajesh
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Remeta, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
  Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 14:05:28 -0400
 
 
  The other factor to consider is that you should have the delay 
  period for volume reuse on your tape storage pools set equal to the 
  length of time you keep your database backups. Depending on how 
  often you perform reclamation of those pools, these could add up
too!
 
  Mark
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

  Of Prather, Wanda
  Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:53 PM
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 
 
  The factor to decide:
 
  If you somehow had a TSM data base crash, or corruption in the TSM 
  data base, how far would you be willing to restore your data base 
  backwards in time?
 
  If you think you would never use that 30 day old TSM DB backup, you 
  don't need to keep it.
  I think a DB retention of 5-10 days is more common.
 
  And no, you can't put the TSM DB backups in a storage pool.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of Vats.Ashok
  Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 1:39 PM
  To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
  Subject: Re: TSM DB backup question
 
 
  Hi List,
  We have tsm 5.3.00 on AIX. We run TSM database backup which runs 
  once / every day  consumes media from scratch pool. We keep these 
  backups for at least 30 days. consuming almost 30 *200 GB tape 
  media. Our data base is about 161 GB so my question is can we reduce

  the retention time of TSM db backup to 7 days. I am not sure what 
  are the factors which decides how long we need to keep these volumes

  around. Also Does anybody have a storage pool defined for TSM DB 
  backups. is it possible to do that ?
 
  Thanks,
  Ashok
 
  Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only 
  for the person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may 
  contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, 
  retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information by 
  persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.

  If you receive this in error, please delete this material
immediately.
  Please be advised that someone other than the intended recipients, 
  including a third-party in the Seligman organization and government 
  agencies, may review all electronic communications to and from this
address.
 
 
 
 
 --
 ___
 
 Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.  -Lycos 
 Yellow Pages
 
 http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/defau
 lt.asp?SRC=lycos10




--
___

Search for businesses by name, location, or phone number.  -Lycos Yellow
Pages

http://r.lycos.com/r/yp_emailfooter/http://yellowpages.lycos.com/default
.asp?SRC=lycos10


This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged 
information. Any dissemination or use of the information by a person other than 
the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately 

Re: TSM DB backup question

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Sims

On Apr 6, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Lawrence Clark wrote:


Is the DB backup of any use after the next db backup is taken. The
data
on the volumes changes, and data is expired and tapes reclaimed...so
what is the value of older db backups?  ...


You're kidding...right?
We make and retain multiple backup versions - of all kinds - because
of the possiblities of both destruction and initially-undetected
corruption.  And Reusedelay keeps storage pool volumes intact for
contingency purposes after expiration and reclamation.

What would you do, for example, if damage or corruption in your TSM
db lay dormant for several days, and was suddenly exposed by fresh
activity in that area - and you had only the most recent db backup tape?

The issues of data integrity assurance over time is well described in
industry literature, and is certainly implicit in using a premier
product such as TSM.

Richard Sims


Database backup

2006-04-06 Thread Brenda Collins
We are running a database backup that has been going for approx. 4 hrs.
now, it has been on the final page for 1 1/2 hrs.  Are others seeing this
same issue?  If so, is there anything that can be done about it?


TSM Server - AIX 5.2, TSM5.2.6.2
Database size 100GB +

Brenda Collins
Storage Management
IBM Global Services

Phone: 612-342-3839
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Admin CLI issue and library config

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I cannot speak to your drive issue, but regading dsmadmc:

1) Check the properties for the admin command line link, and make sure the
Target and Start in paths point to the correct directory
location.where dsmadmc.exe exists.

2) Make sure dsm.opt exists in the directory with dsmadmc.exe. If you do
not have a dsm.opt file, or you use an options file with a name other than
dsm.opt, or dsm.opt is located in a different directory, then the admin
CLI will not start.

As a basic test, try this:

a) open an OS command line prompt.

b) CD into the directory containing dsmadmc.exe (i.e., cd c:\program
files\tivoli\tsm\baclient).

c) run dsmadmc and see what happens.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/06/2006
10:43:26:

 Hi list,

 I have just installed TSM Server 5.3.2 on a Windows 2003 box
 I was about to define the library (Dell PowerVault 132T) and its
 drives. The problem is that I cannot open the Administrative Command
 Line.once I click on its icon, the prompt window opens and
 closes immediatelly...I cannot even read the error message, but
 it seems to say somethng about the option file...

 Also, I've tried to configure the tape library through the Device
 Driver wizard..it shows the following:
 lb0.0.0.4
 Unknown
 Unknown
 mt1.0.0.4
 mt2.0.0.4
 I was supposed to drag and drop both drives into the library, but
 it's not working. The Tape Library is a DELL PowerVault 132T with 2
 QUANTUM drives.

 Any ideas ?

 Thanks

 Mario


Re: Database backup

2006-04-06 Thread Ben Bullock
I have a similar configuration and I see in the process table
that when a DB backup completes, it sometimes sits there for a few
minutes before the process disappears, but I can't say I have ever seen
1.5 hours. Is the TSM server extremely busy with expiring inventory or
something else?

Ben
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Brenda Collins
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:54 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Database backup

We are running a database backup that has been going for approx. 4 hrs.
now, it has been on the final page for 1 1/2 hrs.  Are others seeing
this same issue?  If so, is there anything that can be done about it?


TSM Server - AIX 5.2, TSM5.2.6.2
Database size 100GB +

Brenda Collins
Storage Management
IBM Global Services

Phone: 612-342-3839
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Install errors

2006-04-06 Thread John Monahan
Did you download the software from Passport and happen to expand these 
files on Windows (before moving them up to the AIX server)?  Windows is 
not case sensitive so I have seen problems in the past where people use 
Winzip or another Windows tool to untar the files and a fileset with en_US 
will get overwritten with the same fileset with EN_US in the name.  I 
believe you should see a en_US and a EN_US version of that fileset going 
off of memory here.  If this is the case, wait to untar the download 
package until after you move it to AIX and it should work.


__
John Monahan
Consultant Infrastructure Solutions Group
Computech Resources, Inc.
Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109
Cell: 952-221-6938
http://www.computechresources.com




Gill, Geoffrey L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
04/06/2006 11:13 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: Install errors






Swell... Not having been delivered the CD's for AIX is it possible to
download these files? Does anyone know the fileset name I need to look 
for?

Thanks,
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
LeBlanc, Patricia
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 8:41 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Install errors

This happened to me and I had to have my UNIX guy check on some part of 
the
server language stuff that wasn't installed.I believe it was called
something like ISO8559.  I think someone else mentioned this as well.

After he fixed the unix part..my install was fine. 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 11:34 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Install errors

Well you would think that because of the error that would be the case but 
it
is not. The file is there. The question I have is, the message reports,
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server is missing, the file that was in the 
download
is  tivoli.tsm.msg.EN_US.server. So is it failing because of the name
being different or is there something wrong with the file I wonder.

If I change the name of the file and try to install then I get a new
message:

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0
 
0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.
Check path name and permissions.
 
installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0
 
Filesets processed:  1 of 2  (Total time:  0 secs).

installp:  APPLYING software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0
 
0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.
Check path name and permissions.
 
installp:  CANCELLED software for:
tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0

Thanks,
 
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
PeopleSoft Sr. Systems Administrator
SAIC M/S-G1b
(858)826-4062
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Otto Chvosta
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:50 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: AW: [ADSM-L] Install errors

Geoff,

It seem's that en_US is missing in your AIX-Environment - see TSM
Installation requirements (Installation Guide):

United States English (ISO8559), the en_US Cultural convention and 
Language
translation environment, is a required installation regardless of the
language environment you are using.

Regards,
Otto

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Gill, Geoffrey L.
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 01:26
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: [ADSM-L] Install errors

I am installing as root the TSM 5.3 server on an AIX box running 5.3. 
Below
are the errors I get. Anyone have info as to why the issue on a fresh
install of AIX 5.3 with no other software installed?



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



restore: 0511-126 Cannot open /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server: A file
or directory in the path name does

not exist.

Mount volume 1 on /tmp/tsm/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server.

Press the Enter key to continue.

0503-405 installp:  An error occurred while running the restore command.

Use local problem reporting procedures.



installp:  CANCELLED software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.server 5.3.0.0



Filesets processed:  3 of 7  (Total time:  31 secs).



installp:  APPLYING software for:

tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices 5.3.0.0



0503-006 installp:  Cannot change to directory
/usr/lpp/tivoli.tsm.msg.en_US.devices.

Check path name and permissions.





Thanks,



Geoff Gill

TSM Administrator

PeopleSoft Sr. Systems 

Re: Database backup

2006-04-06 Thread Andrew Carlson
Is your log extrememly full? I have been told in the past that when the
DB backup ends, the log pages are appended on the back, and played back
if the DB is restored.  

--- Brenda Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We are running a database backup that has been going for approx. 4
 hrs.
 now, it has been on the final page for 1 1/2 hrs.  Are others seeing
 this
 same issue?  If so, is there anything that can be done about it?
 
 
 TSM Server - AIX 5.2, TSM5.2.6.2
 Database size 100GB +
 
 Brenda Collins
 Storage Management
 IBM Global Services
 
 Phone: 612-342-3839
 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


Andy Carlson 
---
Gamecube:$150,PSO:$50,Broadband Adapter: $35, Hunters License: $8.95/month,
The feeling of seeing the red box with the item you want in it:Priceless.


Re: Admin CLI issue and library config

2006-04-06 Thread Mario Behring
Thank you Andrew!! Indeed the dsm.opt file was not there..

Mario

- Original Message 
From: Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thursday, April 6, 2006 3:55:26 PM
Subject: Re: Admin CLI issue and library config


I cannot speak to your drive issue, but regading dsmadmc:

1) Check the properties for the admin command line link, and make sure the
Target and Start in paths point to the correct directory
location.where dsmadmc.exe exists.

2) Make sure dsm.opt exists in the directory with dsmadmc.exe. If you do
not have a dsm.opt file, or you use an options file with a name other than
dsm.opt, or dsm.opt is located in a different directory, then the admin
CLI will not start.

As a basic test, try this:

a) open an OS command line prompt.

b) CD into the directory containing dsmadmc.exe (i.e., cd c:\program
files\tivoli\tsm\baclient).

c) run dsmadmc and see what happens.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.

ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU wrote on 04/06/2006
10:43:26:

 Hi list,

 I have just installed TSM Server 5.3.2 on a Windows 2003 box
 I was about to define the library (Dell PowerVault 132T) and its
 drives. The problem is that I cannot open the Administrative Command
 Line.once I click on its icon, the prompt window opens and
 closes immediatelly...I cannot even read the error message, but
 it seems to say somethng about the option file...

 Also, I've tried to configure the tape library through the Device
 Driver wizard..it shows the following:
 lb0.0.0.4
 Unknown
 Unknown
 mt1.0.0.4
 mt2.0.0.4
 I was supposed to drag and drop both drives into the library, but
 it's not working. The Tape Library is a DELL PowerVault 132T with 2
 QUANTUM drives.

 Any ideas ?

 Thanks

 Mario


DSM.OPT file

2006-04-06 Thread Tyree, David
I've got a question about the usage of the
TCPSERVERADDRESS line in the dsm.opt file on the clients.

Currently I have the IP address of the TSM server listed in
the dsm.opt file on the clients. We will be implementing a new
addressing scheme for all of our servers in a couple of months and that
includes the TSM server itself.  

In our case the DNS name of the server happens to match the
name of the TSM server instance. Since our TSM server only has one NIC
and thus only one IP address I went ahead and changed the line to show
the DNS name of the TSM server instead of the IP on a few of the
clients. The DNS name of the TSM server will not be changing, only the
IP address. I wasn't sure at the time if the TSM client would work with
the DNS name instead but I since found in the TSM docs it would. And
found that it actually did work just fine.

The next issue is that we are thinking about adding another
NIC in the TSM at some point in the future to help split the load on the
network. At that point the TSM server will then have two IP's. Any
clients that I want to have come into the TSM server on the second NIC
would have to have the IP of the second NIC in its dsm.opt file. That
part makes complete sense.

But what about any clients that I have with the DNS name of
the TSM server in the dsm.opt file instead of the IP address? Which NIC
would they connect to? If I absolutely wanted to ensure that the clients
came into the TSM server on the right NIC I would make sure I had the
right IP listed in that clients options file. But what would happen if I
left the DNS entry in the options file? 



 

David Tyree 
Enterprise Backup Administrator 
South Georgia Medical Center 
229.333.1155 

Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

 


CLEANUP EXPTABLE / SHOW VERIFYEXPTABLE

2006-04-06 Thread Josh-Daniel Davis

Does anyone know how to tell how big the expiration table is?

The reason is that I ran CLEANUP EXPTABLE on Monday.
On one of my servers, it finished up almost immediately.
On the other, it's been running for almost 3 days.


Because of this, when I try to run EXPIRE INV, I get:

tsm: SERVERexpire inv
ANS8001I Return code 4.


tsm: SERVERq act begint=-00:01
04/06/06 14:43:34 ANR2017I Administrator OPERATOR issued command: EXPIRE
   INVENTORY (SESSION: 239372)
04/06/06 14:43:34 ANR4298I Expiration thread already processing - unable
   to begin another expiration process. (SESSION: 239372)
04/06/06 14:43:34 ANR2017I Administrator OPERATOR issued command: ROLLBACK
   (SESSION: 239372)


It doesn't show up in Q PROC, and tracing IM* and more only shows failure 
to obtain the lock.



I know it's running because of SHOW THREAD and Q ACT.


SHOW THREAD will shows this:

Thread 129: ImVerifyExpTabThread
 tid=33076, ktid=2588793, ptid=0, det=1, zomb=0, join=0, result=0, sess=0
  Awaiting cond waitP-waiting (0x18d5ffe20), using mutex TMV-mutex 
(0x111b091f8), in tmLock (0x100041a08)

  Stack trace:
0x09382554 _cond_wait_global
0x09382f64 _cond_wait
0x09383a2c pthread_cond_wait
0x0001d91c pkWaitCondition
0x000100041a10 tmLock
0x00010016cc5c ImLockFsId
0x00010016cafc ImLockFileSpace
0x00010067f168 LockFilespace
0x000100681710 ImVerifyExpTabThread
0x0001e9dc StartThread
0x0936c50c _pthread_body



Q ACT has been showing many many of these message pairs:

04/06/06 13:19:04 CLEANUP EXPTABLE:   resetting 'hasactive', 
objId=0:574058714  (SESSION: 134418)


04/06/06 13:19:04 CLEANUP EXPTABLE:   'HasActive' flag set incorrectly 
for objId=0:574877220 (\ADSM.SYS\ÿþÿÿÿþCLUSTERDBÿþÿÿÿþ), 
nodeName=NODENAME, fsName=\\nodename\c$ÿþÿÿÿþ  (SESSION: 134418)


There are 125000 lines of this in the actlog in the last 67 hours.

The object IDs are not in order, so I have no idea how much longer it's 
going to run.


I'm assuming it will parse the entire Expiring.Objects table.


SHOW OBJDIR
... Expiring.Objects(78)


SHOW NODE 78
It's a b-tree root node with 99 subnodes.
It's 4 levels deep, and each node has a different number of children.
MaxCapacity is 1004, so potentially 1004^4.
I manually traversing the tree isn't feasible.


SHOW TREE Expiring.Objects
This just hangs for a long time.


I'm leaving it running, redirected to an outfile, but it's been 10 mins 
for both the node that completed the CLEANUP quickly and the node that 
didn't.


When expiration was OK, it would take 6-10 hours with SKIPD=YES and up to 
a day and a half with SKIPD=NO, vs 4 hours on the good node.


There's no CANCEL CLEANUP or similar.

I'm hesitant to kill off the server and restart it simply because of the 
number of objects it's correcting.


So, should I just wait for the SHOW TREE to complete, or is there some 
other, faster and more simple way to see?



Thanks for any assistance.

-Josh-Daniel Davis

Re: DSM.OPT file

2006-04-06 Thread Josh-Daniel Davis

If it's by hostname, then it should be vaguely round-robin, if your DNS
has multiple address records.  All connections for the cient would use the
IP chosen by that clients' resolver libraries.

You could also try using etherchannel.  If set up correctly, you would
simply have two NICs with the same IP.  If you used src/dest port hashing,
you could get a rough semblance of load balancing across them.  This would
require a switch that supports etherchannel, and an OS or device drivers
that supports it.

Another option would be to upgrade to gigabit if you're 100mbit, or to
10gigabit if you're already gigabit.

Finally, you could just run 2 networks, and the second network could be
for a small number of large clients, and the first would serve everyone
else.

On 06.04.06 at 15:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:50:41 -0400
From: Tyree, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DSM.OPT file

   I've got a question about the usage of the
TCPSERVERADDRESS line in the dsm.opt file on the clients.

   Currently I have the IP address of the TSM server listed in
the dsm.opt file on the clients. We will be implementing a new
addressing scheme for all of our servers in a couple of months and that
includes the TSM server itself.

   In our case the DNS name of the server happens to match the
name of the TSM server instance. Since our TSM server only has one NIC
and thus only one IP address I went ahead and changed the line to show
the DNS name of the TSM server instead of the IP on a few of the
clients. The DNS name of the TSM server will not be changing, only the
IP address. I wasn't sure at the time if the TSM client would work with
the DNS name instead but I since found in the TSM docs it would. And
found that it actually did work just fine.

   The next issue is that we are thinking about adding another
NIC in the TSM at some point in the future to help split the load on the
network. At that point the TSM server will then have two IP's. Any
clients that I want to have come into the TSM server on the second NIC
would have to have the IP of the second NIC in its dsm.opt file. That
part makes complete sense.

   But what about any clients that I have with the DNS name of
the TSM server in the dsm.opt file instead of the IP address? Which NIC
would they connect to? If I absolutely wanted to ensure that the clients
came into the TSM server on the right NIC I would make sure I had the
right IP listed in that clients options file. But what would happen if I
left the DNS entry in the options file?





David Tyree
Enterprise Backup Administrator
South Georgia Medical Center
229.333.1155

Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.





Re: DSM.OPT file

2006-04-06 Thread Ford, Phillip
We use two card or one.  We have both TSM names in the DNS  tsm_primary
and tsm_backup.  We then use the name we want to use in the dsm.opt
file.  The backup is a private network we use just for backups.  We do
not route to or from this network.  Thus we can be sure that a server is
not going out the primary and then across a bridge or router to the
backup network.  If it wants to go out the primary looking for
tsm_backup then it will fail and we can look at the routing tables to
find out what to fix.  If the system only has a primary connection then
we use tsm_primary in its dsm.opt.  This has worked great for us.  When
we move tsm to a newer machine we get it working and then just change
the dns names and that night everybody goes to the new server.


--
Phillip
(901)320-4462
(901)320-4856 FAX



-Original Message-
From: Tyree, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 2:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] DSM.OPT file


I've got a question about the usage of the
TCPSERVERADDRESS line in the dsm.opt file on the clients.

Currently I have the IP address of the TSM server listed in
the dsm.opt file on the clients. We will be implementing a new
addressing scheme for all of our servers in a couple of months and that
includes the TSM server itself.  

In our case the DNS name of the server happens to match the
name of the TSM server instance. Since our TSM server only has one NIC
and thus only one IP address I went ahead and changed the line to show
the DNS name of the TSM server instead of the IP on a few of the
clients. The DNS name of the TSM server will not be changing, only the
IP address. I wasn't sure at the time if the TSM client would work with
the DNS name instead but I since found in the TSM docs it would. And
found that it actually did work just fine.

The next issue is that we are thinking about adding another
NIC in the TSM at some point in the future to help split the load on the
network. At that point the TSM server will then have two IP's. Any
clients that I want to have come into the TSM server on the second NIC
would have to have the IP of the second NIC in its dsm.opt file. That
part makes complete sense.

But what about any clients that I have with the DNS name of
the TSM server in the dsm.opt file instead of the IP address? Which NIC
would they connect to? If I absolutely wanted to ensure that the clients
came into the TSM server on the right NIC I would make sure I had the
right IP listed in that clients options file. But what would happen if I
left the DNS entry in the options file? 



 

David Tyree 
Enterprise Backup Administrator 
South Georgia Medical Center 
229.333.1155 

Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message

*
This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient. If you 
are not the intended recipient, disclosure, copying, use or distribution of the 
information included in this message is prohibited -- Please immediately and 
permanently delete.


Re: DSM.OPT file

2006-04-06 Thread Remeta, Mark
What kind of scheduling do you use? If you use prompted scheduling then it's
the TSM server that will contact the client for backup not the other way
around. As far as which ip the client will connect to if you leave the dns
entry, it will connect to the ip address that the dns entry resolves too. I
don't know what kind of tsm server you have but with windows, you can create
a load balancing team with multiple adapters so you do not need to assign
multiple address to each nic card. That is the ideal way of doing it. If you
can't do load balancing on the server then I suggest a separate network for
backups.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Tyree, David
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 3:51 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: DSM.OPT file


I've got a question about the usage of the
TCPSERVERADDRESS line in the dsm.opt file on the clients.

Currently I have the IP address of the TSM server listed in
the dsm.opt file on the clients. We will be implementing a new
addressing scheme for all of our servers in a couple of months and that
includes the TSM server itself.

In our case the DNS name of the server happens to match the
name of the TSM server instance. Since our TSM server only has one NIC
and thus only one IP address I went ahead and changed the line to show
the DNS name of the TSM server instead of the IP on a few of the
clients. The DNS name of the TSM server will not be changing, only the
IP address. I wasn't sure at the time if the TSM client would work with
the DNS name instead but I since found in the TSM docs it would. And
found that it actually did work just fine.

The next issue is that we are thinking about adding another
NIC in the TSM at some point in the future to help split the load on the
network. At that point the TSM server will then have two IP's. Any
clients that I want to have come into the TSM server on the second NIC
would have to have the IP of the second NIC in its dsm.opt file. That
part makes complete sense.

But what about any clients that I have with the DNS name of
the TSM server in the dsm.opt file instead of the IP address? Which NIC
would they connect to? If I absolutely wanted to ensure that the clients
came into the TSM server on the right NIC I would make sure I had the
right IP listed in that clients options file. But what would happen if I
left the DNS entry in the options file?





David Tyree
Enterprise Backup Administrator
South Georgia Medical Center
229.333.1155

Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.



Confidentiality Note: The information transmitted is intended only for the
person or entity to whom or which it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error,
please delete this material immediately.
Please be advised that someone other than the intended recipients, including
a third-party in the Seligman organization and government agencies, may
review all electronic communications to and from this address.


Re: CLEANUP EXPTABLE / SHOW VERIFYEXPTABLE

2006-04-06 Thread Josh-Daniel Davis

OK, I finally figured it out.
It's processing by NODES.REG_TIME, then by FSID.
I have 75 of 479 nodes left.
I'll look in my occupancy extracts to see how much more there is.


On 06.04.06 at 16:55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 16:55:50 -0500
From: Josh-Daniel Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: CLEANUP EXPTABLE / SHOW VERIFYEXPTABLE

Turns out, I can't wait for SHOW TREE.
I gave it an hour, but it held a heavy lock (I didn't pull SHOW LOCK)
and it prevented some simple Q commands, specifically, Q FI.

I thought maybe the SHOW IMV output might help, but I don't know what HWM
means:
  Last Object Id : 0 580917567
   HWM Object Id : 0 580918273
HWM Compression Object Id : 0 577239041
...


I guess it's feasible that we have 13 million objects;
however, the actlog doesn't say anything about the OK objects, just the
fixed ones.

So, again, any clue as to how to find out how long to expect this to run
would be helpful.

-Josh

On 06.04.06 at 15:03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 15:03:01 -0500
From: Josh-Daniel Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: CLEANUP EXPTABLE / SHOW VERIFYEXPTABLE

Does anyone know how to tell how big the expiration table is?

The reason is that I ran CLEANUP EXPTABLE on Monday.
On one of my servers, it finished up almost immediately.
On the other, it's been running for almost 3 days.


Because of this, when I try to run EXPIRE INV, I get:

tsm: SERVERexpire inv
ANS8001I Return code 4.


tsm: SERVERq act begint=-00:01
04/06/06 14:43:34 ANR2017I Administrator OPERATOR issued command: EXPIRE
  INVENTORY (SESSION: 239372)
04/06/06 14:43:34 ANR4298I Expiration thread already processing - unable
  to begin another expiration process. (SESSION: 239372)
04/06/06 14:43:34 ANR2017I Administrator OPERATOR issued command: ROLLBACK
  (SESSION: 239372)


It doesn't show up in Q PROC, and tracing IM* and more only shows failure
to
obtain the lock.


I know it's running because of SHOW THREAD and Q ACT.


SHOW THREAD will shows this:

Thread 129: ImVerifyExpTabThread
tid=33076, ktid=2588793, ptid=0, det=1, zomb=0, join=0, result=0, sess=0
 Awaiting cond waitP-waiting (0x18d5ffe20), using mutex TMV-mutex
(0x111b091f8), in tmLock (0x100041a08)
 Stack trace:
   0x09382554 _cond_wait_global
   0x09382f64 _cond_wait
   0x09383a2c pthread_cond_wait
   0x0001d91c pkWaitCondition
   0x000100041a10 tmLock
   0x00010016cc5c ImLockFsId
   0x00010016cafc ImLockFileSpace
   0x00010067f168 LockFilespace
   0x000100681710 ImVerifyExpTabThread
   0x0001e9dc StartThread
   0x0936c50c _pthread_body



Q ACT has been showing many many of these message pairs:

04/06/06 13:19:04 CLEANUP EXPTABLE:   resetting 'hasactive',
objId=0:574058714  (SESSION: 134418)

04/06/06 13:19:04 CLEANUP EXPTABLE:   'HasActive' flag set incorrectly
for objId=0:574877220 (\ADSM.SYS\CLUSTERDB), nodeName=NODENAME,
fsName=\\nodename\c$  (SESSION: 134418)

There are 125000 lines of this in the actlog in the last 67 hours.

The object IDs are not in order, so I have no idea how much longer it's
going
to run.

I'm assuming it will parse the entire Expiring.Objects table.


SHOW OBJDIR
... Expiring.Objects(78)


SHOW NODE 78
It's a b-tree root node with 99 subnodes.
It's 4 levels deep, and each node has a different number of children.
MaxCapacity is 1004, so potentially 1004^4.
I manually traversing the tree isn't feasible.


SHOW TREE Expiring.Objects
This just hangs for a long time.


I'm leaving it running, redirected to an outfile, but it's been 10 mins for
both the node that completed the CLEANUP quickly and the node that didn't.

When expiration was OK, it would take 6-10 hours with SKIPD=YES and up to a
day and a half with SKIPD=NO, vs 4 hours on the good node.

There's no CANCEL CLEANUP or similar.

I'm hesitant to kill off the server and restart it simply because of the
number of objects it's correcting.

So, should I just wait for the SHOW TREE to complete, or is there some
other,
faster and more simple way to see?


Thanks for any assistance.

-Josh-Daniel Davis




Re: CLEANUP EXPTABLE / SHOW VERIFYEXPTABLE

2006-04-06 Thread Richard Sims

On Apr 6, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Josh-Daniel Davis wrote:


I thought maybe the SHOW IMV output might help, but I don't know
what HWM
means:


It most commonly means High Water Mark.

   Richard Sims


Sending of object failed

2006-04-06 Thread Paul Dudley
One of the windows servers we back up via TSM has been showing the
errors below in the log for the past couple of days.


04/06/2006 19:50:04 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\qmaster\c$\adsm.sys\EVENTLOG' failed
04/06/2006 19:50:04 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\qmaster\c$\adsm.sys\WMI' failed
04/06/2006 19:50:04 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\qmaster\c$\adsm.sys\xml.state' failed
 
These seem to be TSM related files. Any idea why it would start failing
on these files all of a sudden?

Paul Dudley
ANL IT Operations Dept.
ANL Container Line
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





ANL DISCLAIMER

This e-mail and any file attached is confidential, and intended solely to the 
named addressees. Any unauthorised dissemination or use is strictly prohibited. 
If you received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by 
return e-mail from your system. Please do not copy, use or make reference to it 
for any purpose, or disclose its contents to any person.