ANS4028E
ANS4028E Error processing 'C:': cannot create file/directory entry Any ideas as to why I would be getting the above error on a backup. Everything I can find talks about checking permissions for a restore nothing about this error and backups. TSM ver 5.1.7 windows2003 Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Hurrier I go The Behinder I get ** Unless you have received this email through the Liberty Bank secure email system, before you respond, please consider that any unencrypted e-mail that is sent to us is not secure. If you send regular e-mail to Liberty Bank, please do not include any private or confidential information such as social security numbers, unlisted telephone numbers, bank account numbers, personal income information, user names, passwords, etc. If you need to provide us with such information, please telephone us at (888)570-0773 during business hours or write to us at 315 Main St. Middletown, CT 06457. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer without disclosing it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank. Thank you. **
Re: tape encryption and TSM
I would be more interested in the answer not so much as recovery of data but in securing data. Being a financial institution we have regulatory requirements for data protection, new State laws say I must encrypt all data on tape that is moved off site. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Becar Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:00 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: tape encryption and TSM Unless you are willing to spen $500 an hour and send your tapes to Dallas, at a rate of I believe it was 8MB an hour they can rebuild your database. Then you can get data off your tape. So, yea it is pretty difficult. Just don't loose your encryption keys! Then you should be okay! Wish I had a better answer! [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1/12/2006 2:24:58 PM I know the topic of reading tapes written by TSM without having the DB has come up before, but I'm wondering if anything has changed from a couple of years ago with the implementation of 5.3 so here are a few questions. How hard is it to read tapes without the TSM database tape? Is there any tape encryption with TSM 5.3? Besides encrypting data from the client to the server is there anything else that can be done? What type of hit does encryption take on the client/server when in use? Thanks, Geoff Gill TSM Administrator SAIC M/S-G1b (858)826-4062 Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unless you have received this email through the Liberty bank secure email system, before you respond, please consider that any unencrypted e-mail that is sent to us is not secure. If you send regular e-mail to Liberty Bank, please do not include any private or confidential information such as social security numbers, unlisted telephone numbers, bank account numbers, personal income information, user names, passwords, etc. If you need to provide us with such information, please telephone us at (888)570-0773 during business hours or write to us at 315 Main St. Middletown, CT 06457. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer without disclosing it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank. Thank you.
Exchange 2003
Does anybody know what version of TDP for mail is needed to backup Exchange 2003? Thanks Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are only 10 kinds of people in this world - those that know binary and those that do not. Unless you have received this email through the Liberty bank secure email system, before you respond, please consider that any unencrypted e-mail that is sent to us is not secure. If you send regular e-mail to Liberty Bank, please do not include any private or confidential information such as social security numbers, unlisted telephone numbers, bank account numbers, personal income information, user names, passwords, etc. If you need to provide us with such information, please telephone us at (888)570-0773 during business hours or write to us at 315 Main St. Middletown, CT 06457. The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer without disclosing it. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank. Thank you.
Re: Include statements, I need help.
don't use *.* in the statement just use one star * Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are only 10 kinds of people in this world - those that know binary and those that do not. -Original Message- From: Robert Knutsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 10:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Include statements, I need help. I am running 5.2.2 TSM client on a W2K server backing up to a Z/OS TSM 5.2.2 server. The client has a include statements that does not seem to be working; include d:\hyperion\hypent\budget\data\...\*.* ursfin-data-p0-mgmtcls include d:\hyperion\hypent\main\data\...\*.* ursfin-data-p0-mgmtcls I am trying to test the statements via the command line client and getting 'Directory path not found'. But the directory path does exist; per the picture below. Can anyone help point out what I am doing wrong. Thank you for any help Robert Knutsen The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. ATT646771.gif
Quantum ATL 7100
I know this is not the correct forum for this but my higher up's are adamant that I try. I have a Quantum ATL 7100 with (4) DLT 8000 drives and 245 used DLT tapes that we need to get rid of. I have our Quantum rep looking but is anyone out there interested make an offer. The library is located in Middletown Connecticut. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort. - Herm Allbright (1876-1944) The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: licensing (again... :( )
That's the real vs virtual processors Wanda was talking about, you have only 2 processors for licensing. The extras are virtual and only matter to applications that can use them like Micro$oft SQL2000. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 14:02 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: licensing (again... :( ) Now we have some Intel Xenon processors, for each single physical processor, it shows 2 processors when using the M$ perfmonitor. How many processors do I report? (we have several machines with 2 processors, but it looks like 4 processors to perfmon) I havn't been able to get a satisfactory answer to this too! TIA ... Jack 'bewildered by IBM licensing' C. -Original Message- From: Prather, Wanda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 12:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: licensing (again... :( ) No. That is badly explained everywhere. Took us 3 tries to get quotes for our maint renewal (1st quote was more than double what it should have been) because EVERYONE is confused. First, a TSM client is either a server client or a workstation client depending on how it is used in YOUR organization. If the machine provides SERVICES to other machines, it is a server. If it is used standalone, it is a workstation/desktop. If it is a 12-processor high-end machine used as a standalone research box, it's still a workstation. If it is a 1-processor 130mhz machine used as a print server or firewall, its still a server. License costs, at least for your maintenance contracts, are DIFFERENT depending on whether it is a server or a workstation/desktop. This is documented in the IBM Price lists. For server clients, licensing is based on the number of processors (real, not virtual) in the box. For workstation clients, the number of processors is irrelevant. There are many sites that back up only server clients. As a result apparently some Tivoli folks/Business partners FORGET TO ASK about workstation machines, and just ask how many processors are you backing up, which will result in higher charges than should be. They need to calculate your maint charges on TWO numbers 1) the number of server processors you are backing up, and 2) the number of workstations (not workstation processors). Hope that helps. Sigh. -Original Message- From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 1:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: licensing (again... :( ) From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] since IBM now diffentiates it's TSM licensing fee based on the worksation of server role a system has in the company, I assume that IBM has some definition of what that it thinks a server or a workstation is. Is this true? The last I heard, licensing is by processor count, regardless of the software installed. (100 processors' worth of license could allow for 100 installations of TSM server on 100 1-processor boxes, for instance.) -- Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: TSM 5.2 and BreeceHill Q 9.140 w/DLT
it could be the version of TSM server does not support that library. I just upgraded from 4.2 to 5.1.7 because I have a Quantum M2500 library that is not supported in 5.2. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: John Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 11:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: TSM 5.2 and BreeceHill Q 9.140 w/DLT Greetings, I just recently upgraded from an older NT-based TSM server from 4.2 to a new Win2K server running TSM 5.2.0.1. It has three BreeceHill DLT tape libraries, a Q215, a Q6.210, and a Q9.140. I configured TSM to use it's own drivers, naturally. The Q215 and Q6.10 libraries are working flawlessly, but the Q9.140 is giving us fits. About once every day or two it gets a library error that causes us to have to restart TSM to get it back. Also, frequently TSM fails to initialize one or more of the tape drives, causing the drive to come up online. We can put it back online, but as soon as TSM goes to use it, it gets an error and bails again. Sometimes shutting down the TSM server, and power-cycling the library gets everything back for a awhile. Another strange symptom is that in the library inventory window on the front of the BreeceHill, it shows tape cartridges mounted in the DLTs when they aren't. We think they got this way when we shut down and power-cycled the library one time when there were cartidges mounted we couldn't get TSM to unmount because of the library errors. The Q9.140 is running firmware version 3.00, as is the Q6.210 which is working fine. All three tape drives in the Q9.140 are running DLT firmware 105, the latest version I am aware of. We have tried swapping cables, adapters, etc. everything else in the chain except the library itself. Does any kind soul have an insight into the what may be going wrong? I would like to blame the library as a hardware problem, but the problem didn't exist before under the old version of TSM, so there must be some relationship to that. Thanks in advance, John Schneider The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: ANR8355E
I had a similar problem with version 5.1.7 with a Quantum M2500. The fix turned out to be a reinstall of the TSM Server Device Driver. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: Debi Randolph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 15:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANR8355E Hi all. I'm impatiently awaiting a call back from TSM Support. I just installed a new TSM Server under Windows 2003 - Version 5.2.1.0 Along with it we installed a new IBM 3584 library with IBM LTO drives in it. The problem is that I cannot read, or restore any of the data that has gone off to tape. Basically I cannot read the tapes at all. I tried to do an Audit volume and received the following error: 09/16/2003 14:31:26 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume 85 in drive DRIVE4 (mt4.0.0.5). 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR8381E LTO volume 85 could not be mounted in drive DRIVE4 (mt4.0.0.5). 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume 85 - volume unavailable. 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR1410W Access mode for volume 85 now set to unavailable. 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR2321W Audit volume process terminated for volume 85 - storage media inaccessible. 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR0985I Process 25 for AUDIT VOLUME (REPAIR) running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 14:31:43. I made the tape status Read/Write and still had the same issue. We are using the latest drivers downloaded from the web. Anything I can do while waiting for Tivoli to call? Thanks, Deb Randolph ***N O T I C E*** The information contained in this e-mail, and in any accompanying documents, may constitute confidential and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the designated recipient. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for the delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your system. *** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: ANR8355E
I had to check in the tapes again, the private ones are listed as private but do not show last use. I did a checkin as scratch and the ones in volhist errored then I ran checkin as private. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: Debi Randolph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 16:08 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ANR8355E Jim, Did it fix access to previously cut tapes? or only tapes used from then on out? I updated the drivers again, rebooted, made my tapes available and still get the I/O error when I try to audit one. Thanks. I think I'll call TSM back and escalate my call. Deb Randolph Murray, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BANK.COMcc: Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Re: ANR8355E Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] .EDU 09/16/2003 02:43 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager I had a similar problem with version 5.1.7 with a Quantum M2500. The fix turned out to be a reinstall of the TSM Server Device Driver. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: Debi Randolph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 15:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ANR8355E Hi all. I'm impatiently awaiting a call back from TSM Support. I just installed a new TSM Server under Windows 2003 - Version 5.2.1.0 Along with it we installed a new IBM 3584 library with IBM LTO drives in it. The problem is that I cannot read, or restore any of the data that has gone off to tape. Basically I cannot read the tapes at all. I tried to do an Audit volume and received the following error: 09/16/2003 14:31:26 ANR8355E I/O error reading label for volume 85 in drive DRIVE4 (mt4.0.0.5). 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR8381E LTO volume 85 could not be mounted in drive DRIVE4 (mt4.0.0.5). 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR1402W Mount request denied for volume 85 - volume unavailable. 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR1410W Access mode for volume 85 now set to unavailable. 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR2321W Audit volume process terminated for volume 85 - storage media inaccessible. 09/16/2003 14:31:43 ANR0985I Process 25 for AUDIT VOLUME (REPAIR) running in the BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE at 14:31:43. I made the tape status Read/Write and still had the same issue. We are using the latest drivers downloaded from the web. Anything I can do while waiting for Tivoli to call? Thanks, Deb Randolph ***N O T I C E*** The information contained in this e-mail, and in any accompanying documents, may constitute confidential and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the designated recipient. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for the delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance on this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message from your system. *** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company. ***N O T I C E*** The information contained in this e-mail, and in any accompanying documents, may constitute confidential and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the designated recipient. If you are not the intended recipient (or responsible for the delivery of the message to the intended recipient), you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other
Re: Recovery Plan Retention
Only to ensure your Recovery Plan knows of all versions of your DB. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] No trees were killed sending this message, however several electrons were greatly inconvenienced. -Original Message- From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Recovery Plan Retention Is there any reason you would want your Recovery Plan retention set longer than your DBbackup retention? The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Restore of Active Directory
I was asked to come up with an answer to the question 'How would you restore Active Directory as a whole not just a Domain Controller'. Any thoughts, ideas or best practices? Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: End Of Support V4.2
I agree with this. I have a couple of databases that I keep upgrading to the latest version of SQL server and thus the latest version of TDP for backup and these databases haven't been used in 2 years, but for regulations I have to keep them for 5 more years. If I archive them off who's to say the software I have in 2008 will be able to read the archive. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: Ochs, Duane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 09:12 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: End Of Support V4.2 Very well put and 100% true. But just remember, if you are in the middle of a necessary recovery and you are having serious difficulties whether it is unforeseen issues or self imposed ones, you may be completely reliant on adsm.org as your only resource to turn to. Everything ran fine for quite a while at 4.1.*.* with all the clients at the same level. A couple of restores were causing problems and not being able to call IBM for support only made the problem appear to be worse than it was. I was told that there is no support for 4.1.1.1 or tdp for Exchange 1.1 . I was getting some general assistance from initial phone support but no calls would escalate to level 2 or beyond, which is what I needed. One other thing to mention here, we have 2 years of TDP for Exchange 1.1 backups that can not be restored using 2.2 or 5.1.5 dp for exchange. For legal reasons I am reliant on an unsupported software for the next two years. Duane Ochs Systems Administration Quad/Graphics Inc. 414.566.2375 -Original Message- From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 7:07 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: End Of Support V4.2 So, if I understand you correctly. My 350 clients, which I just upgraded to 4.2, will only be supported until April 15th. ... I think a lot of confusion is being generated by the nebulousness of the term supported in all this. If you review some of the Tivoli announcement letters you will find the definition: End of Service (EOS): Defect support for Tivoli products will generally be provided only for the current release and the most recent prior release. A prior release will be eligible for service for 12 months following general availability of the current release. These releases will be supported at the latest maintenance (point release) level. So, cessation of support means that you can't call in with a problem in the use of a 4.2 client and expect IBM to open the old modules and start writing fixes for them. It in no way means that your software functionally falls apart on that date. The other aspect of supported comes into play as a definition of tested compatibility. This you will find defined in chapter one of the Clients manual, under Upgrade path for clients and servers, the assurance that the 4.2 client will work with the 5.1 server, as determined by architectural design decisions and subsequent vendor testing. If you've been with the product for a period of years, you come to appreciate that you can happily keep and live with an older version/release for quite a while, often far longer than the assured compatibility can guarantee. Your installed software may remain viable longer than you! This all goes to show the agitation that comes from the loose employ of industry terminology. Richard Sims, BU The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: End Of Support V4.2
The announcement came around this time last year, I remember it well because it was one week BEFORE our vendor was coming on board to upgrade us to 4.2. Look Out, we are talking about doing an upgrade to 5.x which will be the death knell for support. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~~ _/) ~~ -Original Message- From: Cardoza, George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 16:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: End Of Support V4.2 *SMers: So, if I understand you correctly. My 350 clients, which I just upgraded to 4.2, will only be supported until April 15th. So the work I have just completed the past 3 months is for not. As I recall, the IBM/Tivoli site published a compatibility matrix for planning purposes. It specifically stated the V4.2 clients would work just fine with 5.X servers. To my delight even the TDPs would work. This may just work, true, on the other hand, if it doesn't we can not call IBM for support or open a PMR. Pretty hard to run a 24/7 shop when IBM gives its customers little time to plan or react to this announcement. Is anyone else in this predicament? Has this been common knowledge? George -Original Message- From: Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: End Of Support V4.2 So does this mean that ALL 4.1 clients MUST be upgraded to at least 4.2 PRIOR to upgrading the server to 5.1.x? -or- can you get away with the clients at 4.1 and the server at 5.1.x? Thanks! ADSM: Dist Stor ManagerTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]cc: RIST.EDUSubject: Re: End Of Support V4.2 04/02/2003 12:53 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager V4 clients are supported with the v5 server but you will want to upgrade to the v5 client to take advantage of the bug fixes and new features. Just to clarify: V4.2 client are supported/compatible with the V5 server (not V4.1). Also, it should not be inferred that the combination of V4.2 client and V5 server will be supported after V4.2 goes out of support. Once V4.2 is out of support, it's out of support. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Software Group Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply) The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked. The command line is your friend. Good enough is the enemy of excellence. David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/2003 10:08 Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: End Of Support V4.2 Is this for Clients AND Server? Are most people planning on upgrading to 5.1? What are the implications of staying at 4.2 or lower? Is there any additional cost to upgrade? V4 clients are supported with the v5 server but you will want to upgrade to the v5 client to take advantage of the bug fixes and new features. Many folks have already upgraded to v5. The current level is 5.1.5. I assume that if people are continuing to run TSM they have or will upgrade. The implication of staying at v4 is that you are running a mission critical business process with no vendor support. Yes, there is an upgrade cost. David The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: Exchange cross system restore?
Not sure about Exchange but it is probably like SQL Server 7 in that it really does not like name changes especially if you are in the 5.5 range. You will probalbly have to install exchange with the production name then restore. More of a Microsoft thing than a Tivoli thing. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are only 10 kinds of people in this world - those that know binary and those that do not. -Original Message- From: Coats, Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 11:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange cross system restore? I have multiple exchange servers with TDP on them. I have another Exchange server used for DR purposes only. I would like to restore one of the Exchange servers to my DR Exchange server. I went into the TDPExchange/dsm.opt and changed the node name to the name of one of the production servers, and was able to restore the production servers data. Now my problem, getting Exchange to start. The services are not starting. Any suggestions? ... or a completely different procedure? I must be able to do this so I can complete the acceptance testing to de-commission a BackupEXEC server we are using for Exchange (everything else that was on BackupEXEC is on TSM now!) TIA ... Jack The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: Journaling
Does this mean that any server attached to a SAN will do a FULL backup of the files on the SAN vice an incremental? Isn't this the API behind the TSM incremental forever philosophy? Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. -Confucius -Original Message- From: Pete Tanenhaus [mailto:tanenhau;US.IBM.COM] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 14:57 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Journaling Unfortunately this is beyond our (development's) control. The Microsoft Win32 api used to monitor file system changes does not support non-local file systems. It might be possible to write some sort of file system extension (filter) to implement this type of support but it would be a major development undertaking and would involve a considerable investment of time and resource which I'm not sure management would be willing to consider. Pete Tanenhaus Tivoli Storage Solutions Software Development email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tieline: 320.8778, external: 607.754.4213 Those who refuse to challenge authority are condemned to conform to it -- Forwarded by Pete Tanenhaus/San Jose/IBM on 11/07/2002 02:52 PM --- Whitlow, Don [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 11/07/2002 02:24:36 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Journaling I may be adding more questions than I am answering, but why should it matter if a disk is SAN-based vs. DAS (local)? I would assume journaling would work at the drive letter (logical) level, meaning it would be clueless as to the underlying disk access method. To the O/S and software, it should just look like a drive/volume. Maybe I'm missing something more to the puzzle. But I would think it would work for you. Good luck Don -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:GEOFFREY.L.GILL;SAIC.COM] Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:28 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Journaling Ok I finally figured out why journaling is not working on this server. It's because the 4 million plus files are on a SAN attached disk and journaling does not support that, only local. What good is that? Is there any good reason to use SAN disk these days anyway? Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail:mailto:gillg;saic.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: Help!!!!!!
where do you change this value? I could not find it under SETOPT. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. -Confucius -Original Message- From: John Naylor [mailto:john.naylor;SCOTTISH-SOUTHERN.CO.UK] Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 11:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Help!! This looks related to a known problem in the 4.2 server code with the resource waiters logic. Suggestion is to try increasing the resourcetimeout value Have a look at query option to see what your resourcetimeout value is. I have mine set to 100 Burak Demircan [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/24/2002 03:32:42 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: Re: Help!! ** The information in this E-Mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It may not represent the views of Scottish and Southern Energy plc. It is intended solely for the addressees. Access to this E-Mail by anyone else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any unauthorised recipient should advise the sender immediately of the error in transmission. Scottish Hydro-Electric, Southern Electric, SWALEC and S+S are trading names of the Scottish and Southern Energy Group. ** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: Audit Library question.
Not so here with an ATL 7100 checklabel=barcode and it Always moves up and down the rows, can only assume it is reading as it goes. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand. -Confucius -Original Message- From: Todd Lundstedt [mailto:Todd_Lundstedt;VIA-CHRISTI.ORG] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 14:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Audit Library question. Not true on my library, Ken... I have run several audits using checklabel=barcode before with success. The arm has never moved in the library with an audit using checkl=b. |+ || KEN HORACEK | || KHORACEK@INCS| || YSTEM.COM| || Sent by: | || ADSM: Dist | || Stor Manager | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || IST.EDU | ||| ||| || 10/22/2002| || 01:03 PM | || Please respond| || to ADSM: Dist| || Stor Manager | ||| |+ --- | | | | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Fax to: | | Subject: Re: Audit Library question. | --- | Not true... With checklabel=barcode, all of the barcodes are read. This is then checked with the internal memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is where. The tape is mounted, only if the barcode is mis-read. Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/2002 10:44:50 AM At 11:29 AM -0400 10/22/02, David Longo said: With checklabel=barcode, what happens is that TSM reads the internal memory of the library as to what the library's inventory says is where. So checklabel=barcode doesn't really mean read the barcodes? It just means check the library's internal memory? I guess that's still useful in some circumstances, if there'e a possibility that TSM and the library have gotten out of sync. But it would be nice if things mean what they say. Suppose I really want it to read the barcodes? Suppose I think the library's internal memory has gotten confused somehow, and I want to do a physical audit of barcode locations to compare with the internal memory? Is this possible? Or is it a function of the library (which I guess might make more sense). So generally that won't take long. And a drive needs to be available for the case where library had a problem reading a barcode label, that tape can be mounted in a tape drive to verify - even if using checkl=b. But how can it have a problem reading the barcode label if check-=b doesn't even try to read the labels? -- Matt Simpson -- OS/390 Support 219 McVey Hall -- (859) 257-2900 x300 University Of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 mailto:msimpson;uky.edu mainframe -- An obsolete device still used by thousands of obsolete companies serving billions of obsolete customers and making huge obsolete profits for their obsolete shareholders. And this year's run twice as fast as last year's. - This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. - GWIASIG 0.07 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: NT4 client install error
We had the identical problem with Win2K app server running a demographic database for our marketing department. It was early enough in the build that we blew it away, reinstalled Win2k and installed TSM 4.2 BEFORE we installed the database app and had no problems. We did the install from the local CD and if you look up the error in TechNet all it talks about is doing an install over the network to terminal services. I recomend rebuild the client if you can. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank 860.638.2919 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a clear disk you can search forever... -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 16:04 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NT4 client install error Sorry, Was installing directly from the client not the network. Plenty of disk space too. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154 -Original Message- From: Seay, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 12:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: NT4 client install error You are probably trying to install over the network. Copy the install to the system's C:drive and it will probably work. Paul D. Seay, Jr. Technical Specialist Naptheon Inc. 757-688-8180 -Original Message- From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT4 client install error This is the first time I've run into this on a client installation. Client is NT4 SP6 trying to install V5.1 and 4.2 have the same failing results. Log file in the temp directory has this error in it. Internal Error 2755. 1631, c:\tsm_images\TSM_BA_Client\baclient\Tivoli Storage Manager Client.msi === Logging stopped: 8/2/02 11:41:05 === Logged in as Admin, Permissions set properly on all directories. There is not an older version of the client installed. Anyone else seen this? Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154 The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
Re: Old Backupsets
If it is the last backup set taken you will never get rid of it. Jim Murray Senior Systems Engineer Liberty Bank [EMAIL PROTECTED] (860)638-2919 Madness takes it's toll... Please have exact change. -Original Message- From: David Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 08:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Old Backupsets A Q VOLHIST TYPE=BACKUPSET lists some old backupsets whose retention period has long past. Q BACKUPSET does not show these backupsets. A DELETE BACKUPSET for them reports No match found using this criteria. How do I remove these from VOLHIST so I can reuse the volumes? The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.
