restore windows files to mac

2005-04-27 Thread Tim Piqueur
Hi all,

One of our employees switched to a PowerBook from his windows laptop.
He has a lot of documents (approx. 50GB) on that laptop that I want to restore 
to the new Mac. I installed the TSM client on both machines (5.2.3 on the 
windows XP (SP2) machine and 5.2.1 on the mac (OS X 10.3.9)).
I have added the mac machine to the node access list on the windows TSM 
client. It only has a C:drive and I defined the following permission: 

Set Access Backup \\lap021\c$\*\* LAP029

Where lap021 is the windows machine and LAP029 is the powerbook.
Now, if I try access another node from the Mac client it gives me the 
possibility to select the local filesystem of LAP021 but I cannot browse into 
the directories.
I also noticed that it asks me for a username when I try to access the windows 
machine from the mac. However, no matter which username I enter (even 
non-existent names), it still gives me (limited) access to LAP021. Also, it 
never asks me for a password for those usernames.

Where am I going wrong?
Anyone who has experience in this matter?

BTW: I could FTP the files from one machine to the other but then I'd lose all 
timestamps of the files.

Thanks!

Tim

 
 
 DISCLAIMER **
This e-mail and any attachments thereto may contain information which is 
confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended 
for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above.
Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, 
total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) by 
persons other than the designated recipient(s) is prohibited. 
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by 
telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer. 
Thank you for your cooperation.


Re: Preparing a tape storage pool volume for reuse

2005-03-30 Thread Tim Piqueur
Rob,

I couldn't agree more with Mark. Please read the introduction to TSM.
When I look at the name of your copy storage pool (3581_week2) it seems
that you are still working in a full/incremental way. This is not how
TSM works.
This is about the 'progressive backup' in TSM and  taken from the TSM
Concepts Redbook:

[Progressive backup] Saves time and disk space by backing up only new
files and modified files. The progressive backup feature uses its own
relational database to track data wherever it is stored, delivering
direct one-step file restore. This eliminates the need for
base-plus-incrementals tapes, commonly used for restore procedures in
other storage management products.

Furthermore, reclamation isn't something that 'fits' in your backup
strategy. It is something that is part of TSM and should be used; it has
nothing to do with your backup strategy.

Again, please refer to the Redbooks provided by IBM...
(http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/index.jsp)

Regards,

Tim

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rob Berendt
Sent: maandag 28 maart 2005 19:12
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Preparing a tape storage pool volume for reuse

Judging by one of your other emails, is reclaimation a process to merge
partial tapes together?  If so, that really doesn't interest us.  It
doesn't fit into our backup strategy.

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





Mark D. Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
03/25/2005 03:56 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Preparing a tape storage pool volume for reuse






Rob,

Again this is a fundamental concept in TSM as I stated in my previous
post I think you will need to develop your skill set in the TSM area.

No, you do not want to do DELete VOLume!  What you should be doing on
some regular basis is running reclamation on that storage pool.
Reclamation will then empty the partially used tapes.  Please refer to
the admin guide where you will find several sections discussing managing
storage pools and volumes.

--
Regards,
Mark D. Rodriguez
President MDR Consulting, Inc.


===
MDR Consulting
The very best in Technical Training and Consulting.
IBM Advanced Business Partner
SAIR Linux and GNU Authorized Center for Education
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert, CATE
AIX Support and Performance Tuning, RS6000 SP, TSM/ADSM and Linux
Red Hat Certified Engineer, RHCE

===



Rob Berendt wrote:

Unlike my previous post regarding a BACKUP DB volume, now I have a
question about a Copy Storage Pool tape volume.

After I used a tape volume for
backup stg backuppool lto_3581_week2
I want to reuse it.  Do I just:
delete volume 12wk2 discarddata=yes wait=no

Are there any other steps I need?
If I am running TSM 5.2.2 on OS/400 V5R3 under PASE, do I need to
INZTAP
also?

Rob Berendt
--
Group Dekko Services, LLC
Dept 01.073
PO Box 2000
Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





offsite archives?

2005-03-11 Thread Tim Piqueur
Hi,

I was wondering if there is a way to move archives to an offsite
location?
We have several archives (varying in size from 10 to 250GB). Since this
takes several tapes I was wondering if I could move those archives to
tapes that I can take out of the library to make room for others? (TSM
5.2.3.1 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3)

Thank you in advance,

Tim


file retention

2005-02-03 Thread Tim Piqueur
Hi,

I am relatively new to TSM so this might seem a stupid question...
Our management requires us (for IP reasons) to have a copy of every file
that has ever been created in our company. Of course, only user files
(e.g. excel, word, ppt, etc) ; we do not have to include database
backups etc.
Now I could set RETONLY to NOLIMIT but this would mean a dramatic
increase of storage requirements. 
To limit the size of the storage pools I was wondering if there would be
any method to copy the files that have been deleted to tapes that we can
keep offsite. After which of course, those deleted files should
expire...

Any ideas?

Thanks!

Tim


unable to define path

2004-11-29 Thread Tim Piqueur
Hi,

We have a 3583 library with two LTO2 drives. For some reason one drive became 
unavailable (TSM server running on Linux). Since a reboot of both the server 
and the library didn't help I deleted the path and the drive from TSM.
I then tried to define a new drive with the following command:

tsm: RADIOHEADdefine drive 3583TL LTO01 serial=autod online=yes element=256
ANR8404I Drive LTO01 defined in library 3583TL.

So far so good it seems, but when I want to define a path, this is the result:

tsm: RADIOHEADdefine path RADIOHEAD LTO01 srctype=server desttype=drive 
device=/dev/IBMTape0 library=3583TL online=yes
ANR8420E DEFINE PATH: An I/O error occurred while accessing drive LTO01.
ANS8001I Return code 15.

Although it seems that the drive is online and properly connected to the 
server, so I think that I can exclude any hardware problem:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# cat /proc/scsi/scsi 
Attached devices: 
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 00
  Vendor: IBM  Model: ULT3580-TD2  Rev: 4772
  Type:   Sequential-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 03
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 01 Lun: 01
  Vendor: IBM  Model: ULT3583-TL   Rev: 5.22
  Type:   Medium Changer   ANSI SCSI revision: 02
Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 02 Lun: 00
  Vendor: IBM  Model: ULT3580-TD2  Rev: 4772
  Type:   Sequential-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 03
Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
  Vendor: ADAPTEC  Model: RAID-5   Rev: 3A0L
  Type:   Direct-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02

I verified the element number of the drive but I am really sure that it is the 
same as before. I also ran IBMtapeconfig with the following output:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# IBMtapeconfig
Creating IBMtape special files
 major number: 254
 Attached devices: 0 1 
 mknod -m 0666 /dev/IBMtape0 c 254 0
 mknod -m 0666 /dev/IBMtape0n c 254 64
 mknod -m 0666 /dev/IBMtape1 c 254 1
 mknod -m 0666 /dev/IBMtape1n c 254 65
Creating IBMchanger special files
 major number: 254
 Attached devices: 0 
 mknod -m 0666 /dev/IBMchanger0 c 254 128

I also ran some tests with IBMtapeutil but they all seemed to be successful.

Several reboots of both the server and the library didn't help either.

So I assume that there is an error somewhere inside TSM but I really can't find 
it. 

Anyone who has any ideas?

Thank you!

Tim




System Administration
Devgen NV
Technologiepark 30
B -9052 Zwijnaarde
Belgium
Web: http://www.devgen.com 
 
 DISCLAIMER **
This e-mail and any attachments thereto may contain information which is 
confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended 
for the sole use of the recipient(s) named above.
Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, 
total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) by 
persons other than the designated recipient(s) is prohibited. 
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by 
telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer. 
Thank you for your cooperation.


backup on LTO1 volumes

2004-11-16 Thread Tim Piqueur
Hi,

We have a 3583TL Library and have both LTO2 and LTO1 tapes.
We want to use our LTO2 tapes for onsite backups. The LTO1 tapes only
for offsite backups.
There are two storage pools we want to have on an offsite copy, one on
tape and one on disk. I take a daily copy storage pool of those two
storage pools.

Sometimes we have both LTO2 and LTO1 scratch volumes in the library (the
copy storage pool and the other tape storage pool are in the same
library). I want to avoid that TSM takes an LTO2 scratch volume to add
to the copy storage pool.

Is there a way to automatically 'disable' those scratch LTO2 volumes so
that is only takes LTO1 scratch volumes to make the copy storage pool?
I don't want to check out all the LTO2 volumes each day...

Thanks for your help!


Re: backup on LTO1 volumes

2004-11-16 Thread Tim Piqueur
Thanks!
This was the command I was looking for

-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: dinsdag 16 november 2004 16:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: backup on LTO1 volumes

On Nov 16, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Tim Piqueur wrote:

 ...
 Is there a way to automatically 'disable' those scratch LTO2 volumes
so
 that is only takes LTO1 scratch volumes to make the copy storage pool?

Tim - The conventional way to accomplish this, without subdividing the
   library, is to perform Define Volume to assign LTO1 tapes to the
offsite pool.  Volumes defined to a storage pool are used before
scratches.

   Richard Sims