Re: Restore error message

2015-03-23 Thread André Roy
Hi,

Maybe if you restore the vm with a new name...

Before check these values for your backup

select * from summary_extended where sub_entity=''



De :"McWilliams, Eric" 
A : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU, 
Date :  2015-03-23 16:39
Objet : [ADSM-L] Restore error message
Envoyé par :"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 



I haven't received any replies so I thought I would re-post.

Please forgive me if you've see the post already.

Is there any way to recover from this error?  I'm trying to restore a full 
vm.  I deleted the vm but before I could get the tape back to do a restore 
someone created a new vm with the same name.  The backup ran and backed up 
the new vm.  I've deleted the new vm it but am now getting this error.

Error: ANS2809E The backupid '52909974' in the input file does not match 
the vmname 'ALTO' being restored.

Thanks,
Eric

**
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** 

 This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and 
are intended only for the addressee. The contents of this message contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally 
protected. Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or 
use of such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you 
are not the addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the 
sender of the delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at 
postmas...@medsynergies.com.


Ce message est confidentiel et est à l'usage exclusif du destinataire 
identifié ci-dessus. Toute autre personne est, par les présentes, avisée 
qu'il lui est strictement interdit de le diffuser, de le distribuer, d'en 
dévoiler le contenu ou de le reproduire. Si vous avez reçu cette 
communication par erreur, veuillez en informer l'expéditeur par courrier 
électronique immédiatement et détruire l'original de ce message ainsi que 
toute copie.
Devez-vous vraiment imprimer ce courriel? Pensons à l'environnement.


Restore error message

2015-03-23 Thread McWilliams, Eric
I haven't received any replies so I thought I would re-post.

Please forgive me if you've see the post already.

Is there any way to recover from this error?  I'm trying to restore a full vm.  
I deleted the vm but before I could get the tape back to do a restore someone 
created a new vm with the same name.  The backup ran and backed up the new vm.  
I've deleted the new vm it but am now getting this error.

Error: ANS2809E The backupid '52909974' in the input file does not match the 
vmname 'ALTO' being restored.

Thanks,
Eric

**
*** CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE *** 

 This message and any included attachments are from MedSynergies, Inc. and are 
intended only for the addressee. The contents of this message contain 
confidential information belonging to the sender that is legally protected. 
Unauthorized forwarding, printing, copying, distribution, or use of such 
information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the 
addressee, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender of the 
delivery error by e-mail or contact MedSynergies, Inc. at 
postmas...@medsynergies.com.


Error Message after deleting Recovery Database TDP for Exchange 7.1.0.2

2014-09-01 Thread Michael Roesch
Hi everyone,

today I installed TDP for Exchange on an Exchange 2013 server with a single
database, no DAGs. The backup went OK and the restore went OK too. Problem
now is, after telling the restore assistant to close and delete the
Recovery Database, the "MSExchange Mailbox Replication" service is
complaining in the event log with event ID 1006, that it cannot complete
some tasks, because a database was missing.

The only way to get rid of those messages is to reboot the server
completely.

So my question to the more experienced TDP for Exchange users: do you
really have to reboot the server to get rid of those messages? Do they
disappear after a certain amount of time? Have I maybe missed something? Is
there a better way to handle this situation?

Any hints welcome

Regards,
Michael Roesch


Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-08-28 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Thomas,

I haven't forgotten about this... I did find one place in our code where,
if a memory allocation fails, a message is logged only to a trace file (not
the dsmerror.log file). This is currently targeted for a future release.

I do not know if this covers all the various scenarios you encountered, but
it sounds closest to the issue you initially reported (the RC 12 with no
other error message).

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-22
10:36:01:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
> Date: 2014-07-22 10:39
> Subject: Re: Backup fails with no error message
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Andy,
>
> It looks like the problem was in fact a shortage of memory. The
> problem starting occurring again this past Saturday. A backup with
> tracing after an earlier occurrence of the problem ran out of stack
> space. I attempted to raise the stack size limit from its default of
> about 32 MB to its hard limit of about 4 GB before running another
> backup with tracing. For some reason I only got half the requested
> limit. The backup failed, but produced a useful error message for
> the first time in the history of this problem: an ANS1225E message
> indicating that the client software was unable to obtain memory
> needed for file compression. I was able to rerun the backup
> successfully after using the 'ulimit' command to allow unlimited
> memory size and data segment size. The default soft limits are in
> fact much smaller than the corresponding values on most of our other
> systems. The default data segment size is about 128 MB and the
> default memory size is about 1 GB. I am currently trying to get the
> system vendor to sign off on a request to allow unlimited memory and
> data segment sizes for backups of the resource group disks.
>
> Thomas Denier
> Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:44 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message
>
> It is a puzzler.
>
> Just to verify: you have checked dsmerror.log as well for error
> messages and found nothing? Another thought is to check the TSM
> server activity log for any tell tale error or warning messages that
> might provide a hint.
>
> The TSM client return codes are derived directly from the severity
> of the messages issued during whatever operation is running.
> ANSI messages are RC 0; ANSW are RC 8; and ANSE or
> ANSS are RC 12. The exceptions are related to skipped files:
> these "exception" messages are ANSE but the return code handling
> sets the RC to 4. The highest severity prevails, so if, for example,
> an ANSW (RC 8) and ANSE (RC 12) are issued, then the RC will
> be 12. We have had the odd "skipped file" message that is not
> setting the RC to 4, but those have been fixed via APARs, and in any
> case I would still expect some error message in the log. If you
> inspect the error log, let me
>
> The "GlobalRC" trace example I showed you illustrates when a non-
> zero producing message sets the return code. Thus when whatever
> message is processed that trips the RC 12, I would expect to see it
> in the trace. If you have trace files from when the problem did not
> occur, and the RC was 0, then I would not expect to see any of the
> "GlobalRC" messages in the trace.
>
> I am a little surprised if no such error message appears in the
> dsmerror.log file. I have recently seen one case where the client
> experiences an "out of memory" error but no message was written to
> the console, schedule log, or error log. However the SERVICE trace
> is still sufficient to reveal the problem. What are the ulimits set
> to for this client, and are there an unusually large number files in
> any of these file systems? Are we talking about millions of files,
> and maybe the file system is on the cusp of running out of memory
> during backup? It's a 

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-22 Thread Thomas Denier
Andy,

It looks like the problem was in fact a shortage of memory. The problem 
starting occurring again this past Saturday. A backup with tracing after an 
earlier occurrence of the problem ran out of stack space. I attempted to raise 
the stack size limit from its default of about 32 MB to its hard limit of about 
4 GB before running another backup with tracing. For some reason I only got 
half the requested limit. The backup failed, but produced a useful error 
message for the first time in the history of this problem: an ANS1225E message 
indicating that the client software was unable to obtain memory needed for file 
compression. I was able to rerun the backup successfully after using the 
'ulimit' command to allow unlimited memory size and data segment size. The 
default soft limits are in fact much smaller than the corresponding values on 
most of our other systems. The default data segment size is about 128 MB and 
the default memory size is about 1 GB. I am currently trying to get the system 
vendor to sign off on a request to allow unlimited memory and data segment 
sizes for backups of the resource group disks.

Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:44 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message

It is a puzzler.

Just to verify: you have checked dsmerror.log as well for error messages and 
found nothing? Another thought is to check the TSM server activity log for any 
tell tale error or warning messages that might provide a hint.

The TSM client return codes are derived directly from the severity of the 
messages issued during whatever operation is running. ANSI messages are RC 
0; ANSW are RC 8; and ANSE or ANSS are RC 12. The exceptions are 
related to skipped files: these "exception" messages are ANSE but the 
return code handling sets the RC to 4. The highest severity prevails, so if, 
for example, an ANSW (RC 8) and ANSE (RC 12) are issued, then the RC 
will be 12. We have had the odd "skipped file" message that is not setting the 
RC to 4, but those have been fixed via APARs, and in any case I would still 
expect some error message in the log. If you inspect the error log, let me

The "GlobalRC" trace example I showed you illustrates when a non-zero producing 
message sets the return code. Thus when whatever message is processed that 
trips the RC 12, I would expect to see it in the trace. If you have trace files 
from when the problem did not occur, and the RC was 0, then I would not expect 
to see any of the "GlobalRC" messages in the trace.

I am a little surprised if no such error message appears in the dsmerror.log 
file. I have recently seen one case where the client experiences an "out of 
memory" error but no message was written to the console, schedule log, or error 
log. However the SERVICE trace is still sufficient to reveal the problem. What 
are the ulimits set to for this client, and are there an unusually large number 
files in any of these file systems? Are we talking about millions of files, and 
maybe the file system is on the cusp of running out of memory during backup? 
It's a long shot, but figured I'd mention it.

If you are willing to continue to run the tracing, it would be a good idea.
If the problem persists but you are unable to obtain a trace, open a PMR and 
we'll have to come up with an alternative way to figure out what is going on.

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-09
11:41:51:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 2014-07-09 11:42
> Subject: Re: Backup fails with no error message Sent by: "ADSM: Dist
> Stor Manager" 
>
> The regularly scheduled backup ran successfully on Tuesday morning.
> The scheduled backup this morning failed with exit status 12 and no
> error message. The backup start and end times indicated that the
> failure occurred while processing a different file system in the same
> resource group.
>
> I ran a backup of the file system with service tracing enabled. The
> TSM client eventually crashed with a segmentation fault.  I found two
> trace files, neither of w

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-10 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Thomas,

Neither myself nor a knowledgeable colleague I checked with can think of
anything definitive that would cause the client to blow the stack like that
(we do not have any specific "best practice" recommendations in this area).

It is conceivable that these issues are all rooted in the same cause. If
you still have the SERVICE trace file(s) from the time of the core, you
could open a PMR and submit that for us to look at. Maybe we could find
something in the trace, like anomalous recursion in the file system, that
leads to this. If you go this route, let me know the PMR number.

Also, did you happen to run down Matthew Glanville's suggestion from the
other day? Maybe something odd is going on with the mount point(s) for the
involved file systems.

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-10
12:46:28:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
> Date: 2014-07-10 12:47
> Subject: Re: Backup fails with no error message
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> The error log entries for each day usually include a few messages about
> files not found or files that changed while TSM was reading them. There
> is a warning message each day noting that a specific directory is
excluded.
> The directory is named in an 'exclude.dir' statement and is the top level
> directory for a file system listed in a 'domain' statement. I have asked
th=
> e
> system vendor for clearance to remove the file system from the domain
> statement. I have not gotten a response so far. There are no messages
that
> have any evident connection to the exit status of 12 or to stopping the
> backup prematurely.
>
> The file system in which the backup stopped from June 27 to July 7 has
> about 12.6 GB of free space. The file system in which the backup stopped
> yesterday has about 6.5 GB of free space. The file system used for TSM
logs
> has about 3.8 GB of free space. Neither of the file systems in which the
> backup stopped at one time or another has millions of files; a successful
> backup of the entire resource group early this morning inspected 559,009
> files.
>
> The backup that got a segmentation fault apparently ran out of stack
space;
> the error report in the output from 'errpt -a' includes the words 'Too
many
> stack elements'. The soft limit on the stack size for root is 65,536 512
by=
> te
> blocks. The hard limit is 8,388,608 blocks. Are there any published
> recommendations for resource limits for the TSM client?
>
> I looked over the other error reports in the output from 'errpt -a'. I
didn=
> 't
> find anything recognizably relevant around the times when 'dsmc' ended
> with exit status 12, in the interval between the successful /main/UT
backup
> on June 26 and the failed backup on June 27, or in the interval between
the
> success  /main/U backup on July 8 and the failed backup on July 9
>
> Thomas Denier
> Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
An=
> drew Raibeck
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:44 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message
>
> It is a puzzler.
>
> Just to verify: you have checked dsmerror.log as well for error messages
an=
> d found nothing? Another thought is to check the TSM server activity log
fo=
> r any tell tale error or warning messages that might provide a hint.
>
> The TSM client return codes are derived directly from the severity of the
m=
> essages issued during whatever operation is running. ANSI messages
are =
> RC 0; ANSW are RC 8; and ANSE or ANSS are RC 12. The
exceptions=
>  are related to skipped files: these "exception" messages are ANSE
but =
> the return code handling sets the RC to 4. The highest severity prevails,
s=
> o if, for example, an ANSW (RC 8) and ANSE (RC 12) are issued,
then=
>  the RC will be 12. We have had the odd "skipped file" message that is
not =
> setting the RC to 4, but those have been fixed via APARs, and in any case
I=
>  would still expect some error message in the log. If you inspect 

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-10 Thread Thomas Denier
   

  
<73a8ba4a53ee4dcea9852cbfa85a6...@by2pr05mb631.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
 
In-Reply-To: 

Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.140.233.16]
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:
x-forefront-prvs: 0268246AE7
x-forefront-antispam-report: 
SFV:NSPM;SFS:(6009001)(189002)(199002)(377424004)(51704005)(377454003)(85714005)(479174003)(13464003)(93886003)(77982001)(99286002)(15975445006)(76482001)(20776003)(2171001)(87936001)(2656002)(33646001)(64706001)(105586002)(19580405001)(92566001)(88552001)(15202345003)(79102001)(101416001)(50986999)(66066001)(19580395003)(107886001)(83322001)(76176999)(31966008)(99396002)(83072002)(46102001)(76576001)(85306003)(74662001)(106356001)(74316001)(54356999)(95666004)(19625735002)(81342001)(86362001)(74502001)(551544002)(89122001)(80022001)(21056001)(107046002)(85852003)(81542001)(75432001)(108616002)(567094001)(24736002);DIR:OUT;SFP:;SCL:1;SRVR:BY2PR05MB629;H:BY2PR05MB631.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;MX:1;LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jefferson.edu
X-VPM-MSG-ID: e00d0915-4ef0-4ad4-b390-b317d5f556a7
X-VPM-HOST: xvm127.jefferson.edu
X-VPM-GROUP-ID: ca56bb30-8f8c-4377-8f9e-1371248b9de3
X-VPM-ENC-REGIME: Plaintext
X-VPM-CERT-FLAG: 0
X-VPM-IS-HYBRID: 0
X-Barracuda-Connect: zixgateway01.jefferson.edu[147.140.20.158]
X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1405010793
X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA
X-Barracuda-URL: http://148.100.49.28:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at marist.edu
X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=3.5 
QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests=
X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.7405
Rule breakdown below
 pts rule name  description
 -- 
--

The error log entries for each day usually include a few messages about
files not found or files that changed while TSM was reading them. There
is a warning message each day noting that a specific directory is excluded.
The directory is named in an 'exclude.dir' statement and is the top level
directory for a file system listed in a 'domain' statement. I have asked th=
e
system vendor for clearance to remove the file system from the domain
statement. I have not gotten a response so far. There are no messages that
have any evident connection to the exit status of 12 or to stopping the
backup prematurely.

The file system in which the backup stopped from June 27 to July 7 has
about 12.6 GB of free space. The file system in which the backup stopped
yesterday has about 6.5 GB of free space. The file system used for TSM logs
has about 3.8 GB of free space. Neither of the file systems in which the
backup stopped at one time or another has millions of files; a successful
backup of the entire resource group early this morning inspected 559,009
files.

The backup that got a segmentation fault apparently ran out of stack space;
the error report in the output from 'errpt -a' includes the words 'Too many
stack elements'. The soft limit on the stack size for root is 65,536 512 by=
te
blocks. The hard limit is 8,388,608 blocks. Are there any published
recommendations for resource limits for the TSM client?

I looked over the other error reports in the output from 'errpt -a'. I didn=
't
find anything recognizably relevant around the times when 'dsmc' ended
with exit status 12, in the interval between the successful /main/UT backup
on June 26 and the failed backup on June 27, or in the interval between the
success  /main/U backup on July 8 and the failed backup on July 9

Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of An=
drew Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 10:44 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message

It is a puzzler.

Just to verify: you have checked dsmerror.log as well for error messages an=
d found nothing? Another thought is to check the TSM server activity log fo=
r any tell tale error or warning messages that might provide a hint.

The TSM client return codes are derived directly from the severity of the m=
essages issued during whatever operation is running. ANSI messages are =
RC 0; ANSW are RC 8; and ANSE or ANSS are RC 12. The exceptions=
 are related to skipped files: these "exception" messages are ANSE but =
the return code handling sets the RC to 4. The highest severity prevails, s=
o if, for example, an ANSW (RC 8) and ANSE (RC 12) are issued, then=
 the RC will be 12. We have had the odd "skipped 

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-09 Thread Andrew Raibeck
It is a puzzler.

Just to verify: you have checked dsmerror.log as well for error messages
and found nothing? Another thought is to check the TSM server activity log
for any tell tale error or warning messages that might provide a hint.

The TSM client return codes are derived directly from the severity of the
messages issued during whatever operation is running. ANSI messages are
RC 0; ANSW are RC 8; and ANSE or ANSS are RC 12. The exceptions
are related to skipped files: these "exception" messages are ANSE but
the return code handling sets the RC to 4. The highest severity prevails,
so if, for example, an ANSW (RC 8) and ANSE (RC 12) are issued,
then the RC will be 12. We have had the odd "skipped file" message that is
not setting the RC to 4, but those have been fixed via APARs, and in any
case I would still expect some error message in the log. If you inspect the
error log, let me

The "GlobalRC" trace example I showed you illustrates when a non-zero
producing message sets the return code. Thus when whatever message is
processed that trips the RC 12, I would expect to see it in the trace. If
you have trace files from when the problem did not occur, and the RC was 0,
then I would not expect to see any of the "GlobalRC" messages in the trace.

I am a little surprised if no such error message appears in the
dsmerror.log file. I have recently seen one case where the client
experiences an "out of memory" error but no message was written to the
console, schedule log, or error log. However the SERVICE trace is still
sufficient to reveal the problem. What are the ulimits set to for this
client, and are there an unusually large number files in any of these file
systems? Are we talking about millions of files, and maybe the file system
is on the cusp of running out of memory during backup? It's a long shot,
but figured I'd mention it.

If you are willing to continue to run the tracing, it would be a good idea.
If the problem persists but you are unable to obtain a trace, open a PMR
and we'll have to come up with an alternative way to figure out what is
going on.

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-09
11:41:51:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 2014-07-09 11:42
> Subject: Re: Backup fails with no error message
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> The regularly scheduled backup ran successfully on Tuesday morning.
> The scheduled backup this morning failed with exit status 12 and no
> error message. The backup start and end times indicated that the
> failure occurred while processing a different file system in the same
> resource group.
>
> I ran a backup of the file system with service tracing enabled. The
> TSM client eventually crashed with a segmentation fault.  I found two
> trace files, neither of which contained 'GlobalRC'. The core file from
> the crash consumed nearly all of the remaining space in the root file
> system. As far  as I can tell, a system administrator responding to an
> automated alert removed the core file without consulting me.
>
> I ran a backup of the entire resource group without tracing. This was
> successful.
>
> I am thinking of upgrading the client software, even though none of
> the bug fixes listed has any obvious connection to the behavior I am
> seeing.
>
> Should I just keep trying the tracing every time a backup fails and
> hope I eventually get lucky and obtain a useful trace?
>
> Thomas Denier
> Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 4:19 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message
>
> Thomas,
>
> Run the failing backup command and this time add these parameters:
>
> -traceflags=service -tracefile=/sometracefilename
>
> For example:
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN -traceflags=service -
> tracefile=/tsmtrace.out
>
> Name the trace file whatever you want, just make sure ot put it in a
> file system with room for a potentially large trace file.
>
> Note: If you anticipate G

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-09 Thread Thomas Denier
The regularly scheduled backup ran successfully on Tuesday morning.
The scheduled backup this morning failed with exit status 12 and no
error message. The backup start and end times indicated that the
failure occurred while processing a different file system in the same
resource group.

I ran a backup of the file system with service tracing enabled. The
TSM client eventually crashed with a segmentation fault.  I found two
trace files, neither of which contained 'GlobalRC'. The core file from
the crash consumed nearly all of the remaining space in the root file
system. As far  as I can tell, a system administrator responding to an
automated alert removed the core file without consulting me.

I ran a backup of the entire resource group without tracing. This was
successful.

I am thinking of upgrading the client software, even though none of
the bug fixes listed has any obvious connection to the behavior I am
seeing.

Should I just keep trying the tracing every time a backup fails and
hope I eventually get lucky and obtain a useful trace?

Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 4:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message

Thomas,

Run the failing backup command and this time add these parameters:

-traceflags=service -tracefile=/sometracefilename

For example:

dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN -traceflags=service 
-tracefile=/tsmtrace.out

Name the trace file whatever you want, just make sure ot put it in a file 
system with room for a potentially large trace file.

Note: If you anticipate GB and GB of output, you can add the option
-tracemax=1024 to wrap the trace file at 1 GB. The risk is, if whatever happens 
is not immediately causing the backup to stop, the needed trace lines could be 
written over due to wrapping. But based on your description, off-hand I'd say 
the backup stops when the problem occurs so the risk due to wrapping should be 
low.

After the backup finishes with the RC 12, scan the trace "GlobalRC" (without 
the quotes) and you should find lines like these:

07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp ( 428): 
msgNum = 1076 changed the Global RC.
07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp ( 429): 
Old values: rc = 0, rcMacroMax = 0, rcMax = 0.
07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp ( 443): 
New values: rc = 12, rcMacroMax = 12, rcMax = 12.

This will show you which message is driving the RC change. In my example, 
"msgNum = 1076" corresponds to ANS1076E

Based on the message, you might be able to figure out the rest; but at the 
least you have a trace file you can send in to support.

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-07
15:59:57:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 2014-07-07 16:00
> Subject: Backup fails with no error message Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
> Manager" 
>
> We have an AIX system on which backups of a specific file system
> terminate with exit status 12 but with no error message indicating a
> reason for this exit status.
> If I execute the command
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN
>
> as root, I will see typical messages about the number of files
> processed and about specific files being backed up, followed by the
> usual summary messages. The exit status will be 12. The summary
> statistics will show a number of files
examined
> equal to about half the number of files present in the file system.
> There will not
> be any error message explaining the exit status or the failure to
> examine
the
> entire file system.
>
> The DCIP1_MAIN stanza in dsm.sys has some unusual features because it
> is
used
> to back up one of the resource groups for a clustered environment. The
stanza
> includes three 'domain' statements listing the file systems in the
> resource group.
> The stanza includes a 'nodename' option specifying the node name that
owns the
> backup files from the resource group. The stanza includes an 'asnode'
option
> specifying the node name used to authenticate sessions from the
&g

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-08 Thread Matthew Glanville
I have a guess as to what it is.

Unmount that filesystem /main/UT

Then see if there are any files or directories in /main/UT

You may have mounted that filesystem over top of them, and what is in
there may be what is actually causing the issue.

Also this could be why the backup of /main/ut/ -subdir=yes works, it has a
different starting point.

If there are files /directories there, delete them, then mount /main/UT
back
or maybe keep them, if they are important...

I have seen this before on Solaris 9 OS backup a few years ago
Matthew Glanville | WWIS GI Server team |
Eastman Kodak Co. | 343 State St | Rochester, NY 14650-1232 |
matthew.glanvi...@kodak.com | 585 724-7523 Office |
www.kodak.com


"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 07/08/2014
10:18:08 AM:

> From:
>
> Thomas Denier 
>
> To:
>
> ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu
>
> Date:
>
> 07/08/2014 10:18 AM
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: Backup fails with no error message
>
> Sent by:
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> Andy,
>
> The failure did not occur when I ran the backup with service
> tracing. Further testing
> revealed that the failure no longer occurred even in the absence of
> tracing. I don't
> know whether the circumventions mentioned in my original e-mail ever
> had any real
> effect.
>
> Thomas Denier
> Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Andrew Raibeck
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 4:19 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message
>
> Thomas,
>
> Run the failing backup command and this time add these parameters:
>
> -traceflags=service -tracefile=/sometracefilename
>
> For example:
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN -traceflags=service -
> tracefile=/tsmtrace.out
>
> Name the trace file whatever you want, just make sure ot put it in a
> file system with room for a potentially large trace file.
>
> Note: If you anticipate GB and GB of output, you can add the option
> -tracemax=1024 to wrap the trace file at 1 GB. The risk is, if
> whatever happens is not immediately causing the backup to stop, the
> needed trace lines could be written over due to wrapping. But based
> on your description, off-hand I'd say the backup stops when the
> problem occurs so the risk due to wrapping should be low.
>
> After the backup finishes with the RC 12, scan the trace "GlobalRC"
> (without the quotes) and you should find lines like these:
>
> 07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut
> \GlobalRC.cpp ( 428): msgNum = 1076 changed the Global RC.
> 07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut
> \GlobalRC.cpp ( 429): Old values: rc = 0, rcMacroMax = 0, rcMax = 0.
> 07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut
> \GlobalRC.cpp ( 443): New values: rc = 12, rcMacroMax = 12, rcMax = 12.
>
> This will show you which message is driving the RC change. In my
> example, "msgNum = 1076" corresponds to ANS1076E
>
> Based on the message, you might be able to figure out the rest; but
> at the least you have a trace file you can send in to support.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Andy
>
>

>
> Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
> stor...@us.ibm.com
>
> IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
> Product support:
> http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/
> Tivoli_Storage_Manager
>
> Online documentation:
>
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
> +Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
> Product Wiki:
>
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
> +Storage+Manager/page/Home
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-07
> 15:59:57:
>
> > From: Thomas Denier 
> > To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> > Date: 2014-07-07 16:00
> > Subject: Backup fails with no error message Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
> > Manager" 
> >
> > We have an AIX system on which backups of a specific file system
> > terminate with exit status 12 but with no error message indicating a
> > reason for this exit status.
> > If I execute the command
> >
> > dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN
> >
> > as root, I will see typical messages about the number of files
> > processed and about specific files being backed up, followed by the
> > usual summary messages. The exit status will be 12. The summary
> > statistics will show a number of files
> examined
> > equal t

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-08 Thread Thomas Denier
Andy,

The failure did not occur when I ran the backup with service tracing. Further 
testing
revealed that the failure no longer occurred even in the absence of tracing. I 
don't
know whether the circumventions mentioned in my original e-mail ever had any 
real
effect.

Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Andrew 
Raibeck
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2014 4:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Backup fails with no error message

Thomas,

Run the failing backup command and this time add these parameters:

-traceflags=service -tracefile=/sometracefilename

For example:

dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN -traceflags=service 
-tracefile=/tsmtrace.out

Name the trace file whatever you want, just make sure ot put it in a file 
system with room for a potentially large trace file.

Note: If you anticipate GB and GB of output, you can add the option
-tracemax=1024 to wrap the trace file at 1 GB. The risk is, if whatever happens 
is not immediately causing the backup to stop, the needed trace lines could be 
written over due to wrapping. But based on your description, off-hand I'd say 
the backup stops when the problem occurs so the risk due to wrapping should be 
low.

After the backup finishes with the RC 12, scan the trace "GlobalRC" (without 
the quotes) and you should find lines like these:

07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp ( 428): 
msgNum = 1076 changed the Global RC.
07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp ( 429): 
Old values: rc = 0, rcMacroMax = 0, rcMax = 0.
07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp ( 443): 
New values: rc = 12, rcMacroMax = 12, rcMax = 12.

This will show you which message is driving the RC change. In my example, 
"msgNum = 1076" corresponds to ANS1076E

Based on the message, you might be able to figure out the rest; but at the 
least you have a trace file you can send in to support.

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead | 
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-07
15:59:57:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 2014-07-07 16:00
> Subject: Backup fails with no error message Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor
> Manager" 
>
> We have an AIX system on which backups of a specific file system
> terminate with exit status 12 but with no error message indicating a
> reason for this exit status.
> If I execute the command
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN
>
> as root, I will see typical messages about the number of files
> processed and about specific files being backed up, followed by the
> usual summary messages. The exit status will be 12. The summary
> statistics will show a number of files
examined
> equal to about half the number of files present in the file system.
> There will not
> be any error message explaining the exit status or the failure to
> examine
the
> entire file system.
>
> The DCIP1_MAIN stanza in dsm.sys has some unusual features because it
> is
used
> to back up one of the resource groups for a clustered environment. The
stanza
> includes three 'domain' statements listing the file systems in the
> resource group.
> The stanza includes a 'nodename' option specifying the node name that
owns the
> backup files from the resource group. The stanza includes an 'asnode'
option
> specifying the node name used to authenticate sessions from the
> cluster
node
> involved (we and the system vendor were not able to agree on an
acceptable
> arrangement for storing a TSM password within the resource group).
> This stanza works fine for the other file systems in the same resource
> group,
and
> worked fine for /main/UT up until June 26.
>
> I have found two ways to circumvent the problem. One circumvention is
> to
run
> the command
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT/ -subdir=y -servername=DC1P1_MAIN
>
> to back up the top level directory of the file system rather than the
> file system as such. An 'lsfs' command shows nothing unusual about the
> file system;
it is
> a jfs2 file system, like all the other file systems, and uses the same
mount
> options as the other file sys

Re: Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-07 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Thomas,

Run the failing backup command and this time add these parameters:

-traceflags=service -tracefile=/sometracefilename

For example:

dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN -traceflags=service
-tracefile=/tsmtrace.out

Name the trace file whatever you want, just make sure ot put it in a file
system with room for a potentially large trace file.

Note: If you anticipate GB and GB of output, you can add the option
-tracemax=1024 to wrap the trace file at 1 GB. The risk is, if whatever
happens is not immediately causing the backup to stop, the needed trace
lines could be written over due to wrapping. But based on your description,
off-hand I'd say the backup stops when the problem occurs so the risk due
to wrapping should be low.

After the backup finishes with the RC 12, scan the trace
"GlobalRC" (without the quotes) and you should find lines like these:

07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp
( 428): msgNum = 1076 changed the Global RC.
07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp
( 429): Old values: rc = 0, rcMacroMax = 0, rcMax = 0.
07/07/2014 16:12:14.122 [003772] [3812] : ..\..\common\ut\GlobalRC.cpp
( 443): New values: rc = 12, rcMacroMax = 12, rcMax = 12.

This will show you which message is driving the RC change. In my example,
"msgNum = 1076" corresponds to ANS1076E

Based on the message, you might be able to figure out the rest; but at the
least you have a trace file you can send in to support.

Regards,

- Andy



Andrew Raibeck | Tivoli Storage Manager Level 3 Technical Lead |
stor...@us.ibm.com

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager links:
Product support:
http://www.ibm.com/support/entry/portal/Overview/Software/Tivoli/Tivoli_Storage_Manager

Online documentation:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Documentation+Central/page/Tivoli+Storage+Manager
Product Wiki:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/wikis/home/wiki/Tivoli
+Storage+Manager/page/Home

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2014-07-07
15:59:57:

> From: Thomas Denier 
> To: ADSM-L@vm.marist.edu,
> Date: 2014-07-07 16:00
> Subject: Backup fails with no error message
> Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
>
> We have an AIX system on which backups of a specific file system
> terminate with
> exit status 12 but with no error message indicating a reason for
> this exit status.
> If I execute the command
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN
>
> as root, I will see typical messages about the number of files
> processed and about
> specific files being backed up, followed by the usual summary
> messages. The exit
> status will be 12. The summary statistics will show a number of files
examined
> equal to about half the number of files present in the file system.
> There will not
> be any error message explaining the exit status or the failure to examine
the
> entire file system.
>
> The DCIP1_MAIN stanza in dsm.sys has some unusual features because it is
used
> to back up one of the resource groups for a clustered environment. The
stanza
> includes three 'domain' statements listing the file systems in the
> resource group.
> The stanza includes a 'nodename' option specifying the node name that
owns the
> backup files from the resource group. The stanza includes an 'asnode'
option
> specifying the node name used to authenticate sessions from the cluster
node
> involved (we and the system vendor were not able to agree on an
acceptable
> arrangement for storing a TSM password within the resource group). This
> stanza works fine for the other file systems in the same resource group,
and
> worked fine for /main/UT up until June 26.
>
> I have found two ways to circumvent the problem. One circumvention is to
run
> the command
>
> dsmc inc /main/UT/ -subdir=y -servername=DC1P1_MAIN
>
> to back up the top level directory of the file system rather than
> the file system
> as such. An 'lsfs' command shows nothing unusual about the file system;
it is
> a jfs2 file system, like all the other file systems, and uses the same
mount
> options as the other file systems. The other circumvention is to add an
> 'exclude.dir' line for a specific subdirectory of /main/UT to the
> include/exclude
> file. The subdirectory came under suspicion because it was last updated a
few
> hours after the last fully successful backup.
>
> The client code is TSM 6.4.1.0. The client OS is AIX 7.1. The TSM
> server is TSM
> 6.2.5.0 running under zSeries Linux.
>
> Does anyone recognize this as a known problem? If not, does anyone have
> suggestions for presenting the problem to TSM support? I am having
> difficulty imagini

Backup fails with no error message

2014-07-07 Thread Thomas Denier
We have an AIX system on which backups of a specific file system terminate with
exit status 12 but with no error message indicating a reason for this exit 
status.
If I execute the command

dsmc inc /main/UT -servername=DC1P1_MAIN

as root, I will see typical messages about the number of files processed and 
about
specific files being backed up, followed by the usual summary messages. The exit
status will be 12. The summary statistics will show a number of files examined
equal to about half the number of files present in the file system. There will 
not
be any error message explaining the exit status or the failure to examine the
entire file system.

The DCIP1_MAIN stanza in dsm.sys has some unusual features because it is used
to back up one of the resource groups for a clustered environment. The stanza
includes three 'domain' statements listing the file systems in the resource 
group.
The stanza includes a 'nodename' option specifying the node name that owns the
backup files from the resource group. The stanza includes an 'asnode' option
specifying the node name used to authenticate sessions from the cluster node
involved (we and the system vendor were not able to agree on an acceptable
arrangement for storing a TSM password within the resource group). This
stanza works fine for the other file systems in the same resource group, and
worked fine for /main/UT up until June 26.

I have found two ways to circumvent the problem. One circumvention is to run
the command

dsmc inc /main/UT/ -subdir=y -servername=DC1P1_MAIN

to back up the top level directory of the file system rather than the file 
system
as such. An 'lsfs' command shows nothing unusual about the file system; it is
a jfs2 file system, like all the other file systems, and uses the same mount
options as the other file systems. The other circumvention is to add an
'exclude.dir' line for a specific subdirectory of /main/UT to the 
include/exclude
file. The subdirectory came under suspicion because it was last updated a few
hours after the last fully successful backup.

The client code is TSM 6.4.1.0. The client OS is AIX 7.1. The TSM server is TSM
6.2.5.0 running under zSeries Linux.

Does anyone recognize this as a known problem? If not, does anyone have
suggestions for presenting the problem to TSM support? I am having
difficulty imagining any kind of productive interaction if I don't have a
message identifier to report.

Thomas Denier
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and 
confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named 
above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any 
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or 
urgent health care matters.


Re: Cryptic tsm error message, not sure what to do with it.

2012-04-10 Thread Neil Schofield
Gary

Problems relating to that specific file are documented here:

http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC79284

Seemingly it was a problem that Microsoft introduced in SP1 for Windows
2008 R2 and can be ignored.

Regards
Neil Schofield
Technical Leader
Yorkshire Water Services Ltd.


 

Spotted a leak?
If you spot a leak please report it immediately. Call us on 0800 57 3553 or go 
to http://www.yorkshirewater.com/leaks

Get a free water saving pack
Don't forget to request your free water and energy saving pack, it could save 
you money on your utility bills and help you conserve water. 
http://www.yorkshirewater.com/savewater

The information in this e-mail is confidential and may also be legally 
privileged. The contents are intended for recipient only and are subject to the 
legal notice available at http://www.keldagroup.com/email.htm
Yorkshire Water Services Limited
Registered Office Western House, Halifax Road, Bradford, BD6 2SZ
Registered in England and Wales No 2366682


Re: Another queer error message

2012-04-04 Thread Dwight Cook
I actually saw a flood of these type messages across multiple systems...
enough to where I raised a red flag and declared a potential virus attack.
Within minutes of sounding the alarm it was discovered that it was actually
the anti-virus team performing a "vulnerability test" of the environments.
(would have been nice if they had given me a heads up on that...)

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 2:32 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Another queer error message

Gary - You probably have some Internet miscreant going at your client port
with non-TSM software.  Windows boxes tend to be honeypots without trying.
Various systems at your site may evidence such probing, in their logs.
Given that you are at a recent TSM level, it should not be the case of more
advanced TSM software attempting to access a lower level implementation
using verbs not understood by the older client.

   Richard Sims


Re: Another queer error message

2012-04-04 Thread Richard Sims
Gary - You probably have some Internet miscreant going at your client port with 
non-TSM software.  Windows boxes tend to be honeypots without trying.  Various 
systems at your site may evidence such probing, in their logs.  Given that you 
are at a recent TSM level, it should not be the case of more advanced TSM 
software attempting to access a lower level implementation using verbs not 
understood by the older client.

   Richard Sims


Another queer error message

2012-04-04 Thread Lee, Gary
Tsm client 6.2.3 and 6.2.4 both win 2008.

Receiving messages

04/04/2012 14:42:49 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received.
04/04/2012 14:42:49 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): length=4745, verb=54,magic=20
04/04/2012 14:42:50 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received.
04/04/2012 14:42:50 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): length=4845, verb=41,magic=44
04/04/2012 14:43:07 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received.
04/04/2012 14:43:07 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): length=, verb=00,magic=02
04/04/2012 14:43:08 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): Invalid verb received.
04/04/2012 14:43:08 ANS0361I DIAG: sessRecvVerb(): length=00c8, verb=00,magic=00

When I look in the server log, there is no record of any communications during 
the specified time period.
Tsm server 5.5.4.
Soon to be upgraded to 6.3 (I hope.

Tried searching ibm site, no success.

Thanks for any assistance.



Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: Cryptic tsm error message, not sure what to do with it.

2012-04-04 Thread Robert A. Clark
The last time I saw one of these warnings, the file mentioned was being 
included via VSS in the system state backup, but there was a problem with 
the path or file name in the key entry in the registry.

(I don't remember if there was an extra space, or an extra backslash in 
there.)

If you use regedit, and search for that filename, you may find a misformed 
key. Run the search until you find no more matches, as sometimes there are 
multiple entries that need to be fixed.

Thanks,
[RC]




g...@bsu.edu 
Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
04/04/2012 08:10 AM
Please respond to
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] Cryptic tsm error message, not sure what to do with it.






Tsm client 6.2.4 on windows 2008.
Tsm server 5.5.4.

Receive the following for each nightly backup.

04/03/2012 21:26:43 ANS1417W Protected system state file 
'\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy25\Windows\System32\iscsilog.dll'
 
is backed up
to the drive file space, not system state file space.





Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 


If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you 
have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank you for your 
cooperation.  

Re: Cryptic tsm error message, not sure what to do with it.

2012-04-04 Thread Rainer Schöpf
Hi,

this message is documented for 6.3:

 
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tsminfo/v6r3/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.itsm.msgs.client.doc%2Fmsgs_client553.html

but I couldn't find it in the 6.2 infocenter.

 - Rainer



ProteoSys AG
Carl-Zeiss-Straße 51
55129 Mainz

Dr. Rainer Schöpf
Leiter Software/Softwareentwicklung

Mail:   rainer.scho...@proteosys.com
Phone:  +49-(0)6131-50192-41
Fax:+49-(0)6131-50192-11
WWW:http://www.proteosys.com/

ProteoSys AG - Carl-Zeiss-Str. 51 - D-55129 Mainz
Amtsgericht Mainz HRB 7508 - USt.-Id Nr.: DE213940570
Vorstand: Helmut Matthies (Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. André Schrattenholz
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Dr. Werner Zöllner


__

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Lee, Gary wrote:

 > Tsm client 6.2.4 on windows 2008.
 > Tsm server 5.5.4.
 > 
 > Receive the following for each nightly backup.
 > 
 > 04/03/2012 21:26:43 ANS1417W Protected system state file 
 > '\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy25\Windows\System32\iscsilog.dll'
 >  is backed up
 > to the drive file space, not system state file space.
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > Gary Lee
 > Senior System Programmer
 > Ball State University
 > phone: 765-285-1310
 > 
 >  


Cryptic tsm error message, not sure what to do with it.

2012-04-04 Thread Lee, Gary
Tsm client 6.2.4 on windows 2008.
Tsm server 5.5.4.

Receive the following for each nightly backup.

04/03/2012 21:26:43 ANS1417W Protected system state file 
'\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy25\Windows\System32\iscsilog.dll'
 is backed up
to the drive file space, not system state file space.





Gary Lee
Senior System Programmer
Ball State University
phone: 765-285-1310

 

Re: ANS1948E The Microsoft volume shadow copy system components could not be queried error message received on a 64Bit VM

2009-06-26 Thread Richard Sims

On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:09 AM, David W Daniels/AC/VCU wrote:


Has anyone received this error before? If so, what is/was the fix.
Note
the windows tech rebooted the machine several times and still got this
error. Note user is using TSM client 6.1



The List archives chronicle what we've encountered, where we've
devoted time to pursuing such.
Go to http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/
and search on the message number there.

   Richard Sims


ANS1948E The Microsoft volume shadow copy system components could not be queried error message received on a 64Bit VM

2009-06-26 Thread David W Daniels/AC/VCU
Has anyone received this error before? If so, what is/was the fix. Note
the windows tech rebooted the machine several times and still got this
error. Note user is using TSM client 6.1



** Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://infosecurity.vcu.edu/phishing.html


Re: failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Avy Wong
Joni,
  I made a mistake, yours is Window 2000. You can try submitting a PMR
to ask for support. Richard Sim pointed this out for me. Thanks Richard.


"Windows NT 5.0" (WinNT 5.0)The actual, official
designation of
 Windows 2000, as shows up in
web server


Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mohegan Sun
1 Mohegan Sun Blvd
Uncasville, CT 06382
(860)862-8164
(cell) (860)961-6976


Re: failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Avy Wong
I understand that neither Microsoft nor IBM will support Window NT related
problem. If you submit a PMR to IBM for support, they would tell you they
do not support it and close the ticket.

There are lots of not the same category errors showing up on your error
log. My guess is not one fix will fix it all. Take a look at each error and
start from there.

For example :
01/06/2008 20:05:20 ANS4987E Error processing '\\hmpg4001\c$\Documents and
Settings\perfmon\Local Settings\Application
Data\Microsoft\Windows\UsrClass.dat.LOG': the object is in use by another
process

You can do some exclusions - check with your window admin if you can first.

01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name global.asa - file
type not allowed.

Check with the server owner and ask what is this *.asa, do they need it
backed up ... if not exclude it


01/06/2008 20:03:23 ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'C:' failed with
error code: 653.
01/06/2008 20:03:23 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\hmpg4001\c$' failed

My feeling this 'failed 12' error is yelling more of the snapshot error
here.
Go google ANS1327W & ANS1228E and see what other advises out there.

Just debug it one at a time Good luck.

Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mohegan Sun
1 Mohegan Sun Blvd
Uncasville, CT 06382
(860)862-8164
(cell) (860)961-6976




 Joni Moyer
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 ARK.COM>   To
 Sent by: "ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc
 Manager"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
 .EDU> Re: [ADSM-L] failed 12 error
   message

 01/07/2008 11:15
 AM


 Please respond to
 "ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU>






Hello everyone!

I found the following info. in the dsmerror.log file, but what can be done
to fix/resolve this issue?  This is a WinNT 5.00 server with a 5.3.5.0 tsm
client.  Any ideas/suggestions?  Thanks in advance!  I usually just handle
the TSM server issues, so this is new to me.  Any help is greatly
appreciated

01/06/2008 10:24:33 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name
scripts/htimage.exe?0,0 - file type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:42 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:42 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name ~root - file type
required.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name
x.ida?=X

- file type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name
officescan/cgi/cgiChkMasterPwd.exe - file type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name catinfo?A - file
type required.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name catinfo?A - file
type required.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name catinfo?A - file
type required.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name global.asa - file
type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name null.printer - file
type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name rettest.idq - file
type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name ? - file type
required.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 isFileNameValid: Invalid file name rettest.idq - file
type not allowed.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 10:24:43 Error reading http request.
01/06/2008 20:03:23 ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'C:' failed with
error code: 653.
01/06/2008 20:03:23 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\hmpg4001\c$' failed
01/06/2008 20:03:23 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.

01/06/2008 20:03:23 ANS1377W The client was unable to obtain a snapshot of
'\\hmpg4001\c$'. The operation will continue without snapshot support.

01/06/2008 20:04:48 ANS1327W The snapshot operation for 'D:' failed with
error code: 653.
01/06/2008 20:04:49 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\hmpg4001\d$' failed
01/06/2008 20:04:49 ANS1375E The snapshot operation failed.

01/06/2008 20:04:49 ANS1377W The client was unable to obtain a snapshot of
'\\hmpg4001\d$'. The operation will continue without snapshot support.

01/06/2008 20:05:11 ANS1228E Sending of object '\\hmpg4001\c$\Documents
a

Re: failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Joni Moyer
D1E967E0E74}\2CAAD8FF-88F8-430F-AD76-3C6981483C37\D613151F-7EB8-46D1-8853-0B781E085ECE':
the object is in use by another process
01/06/2008 20:05:32 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\ADCAgent\data\proxy_manager\{8ACAB6E1-758A-49DF-8D2A-0D1E967E0E74}\B35470BC-FBBB-4D2C-9FA3-1558131E3754\61484797-8D03-4691-91B7-ED66707F71FD'
failed
01/06/2008 20:05:32 ANS4987E Error processing
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\ADCAgent\data\proxy_manager\{8ACAB6E1-758A-49DF-8D2A-0D1E967E0E74}\B35470BC-FBBB-4D2C-9FA3-1558131E3754\61484797-8D03-4691-91B7-ED66707F71FD':
the object is in use by another process
01/06/2008 20:05:43 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\devcon.exe'
failed
01/06/2008 20:05:43 ANS4007E Error processing
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\devcon.exe':
access to the object is denied
01/06/2008 20:05:44 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\regedit.exe'
failed
01/06/2008 20:05:44 ANS4007E Error processing
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\regedit.exe':
access to the object is denied
01/06/2008 20:05:44 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\hmpg4001\c$'
finished with 9 failure

01/06/2008 20:05:44 ANS1802E Incremental backup of '\\hmpg4001\c$'
finished with 9 failure

01/06/2008 20:08:26 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\MACHINE\Scripts\Startup\regedit.exe'
failed
01/06/2008 20:08:26 ANS4007E Error processing
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}\MACHINE\Scripts\Startup\regedit.exe':
access to the object is denied
01/06/2008 20:08:33 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\devcon.exe'
failed
01/06/2008 20:08:33 ANS4007E Error processing
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\devcon.exe':
access to the object is denied
01/06/2008 20:08:37 ANS1228E Sending of object
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\regedit.exe'
failed
01/06/2008 20:08:37 ANS4007E Error processing
'\\hmpg4001\c$\WINNT\SYSVOL\domain\Policies\{53C784FD-C12E-4E04-ADEF-10B1279DF52B}\Machine\Scripts\Startup\regedit.exe':
access to the object is denied
01/06/2008 20:08:49 ANS1802E Incremental backup of 'System Volume'
finished with 8192 failure

01/06/2008 20:08:49 ANS1802E Incremental backup of 'System Volume'
finished with 8192 failure

01/06/2008 20:13:12 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'WINDOWS-DAILY-INCR1' failed.
 Return code = 12.

****
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




"Avy Wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
01/07/2008 09:57 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
Re: failed 12 error message






The dsmerror/dsmsched.log files are the first place to go look what
exactly
the Failed 12 error is. Sometimes it will say 'snapshot error', sometimes
is 'Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy error', etc., At times you can do ' q
actlog=-24  search=nodename' , to look deeper into where it hangs. (note:
actlog --> fill in how far back you want in hours) .

Does anyone know a link where one can bookmark it? Thanks.


Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mohegan Sun
1 Mohegan Sun Blvd
Uncasville, CT 06382
(860)862-8164
(cell) (860)961-6976




 Zoltan
 Forray/AC/VCU
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  To
 Sent by: "ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc
 Manager"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
     .EDU> Re: [ADSM-L] failed 12 error
   message

 01/07/2008 09:46
 AM


 Please respond to
 "ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager"
     <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU>






We see these, as well.  You need to check the dsmerror/dsmsched.log files
on the client.  That is how I was able to determine the error message
associated with the rc=12 and resolv

Re: failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Avy Wong
The dsmerror/dsmsched.log files are the first place to go look what exactly
the Failed 12 error is. Sometimes it will say 'snapshot error', sometimes
is 'Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy error', etc., At times you can do ' q
actlog=-24  search=nodename' , to look deeper into where it hangs. (note:
actlog --> fill in how far back you want in hours) .

Does anyone know a link where one can bookmark it? Thanks.


Avy Wong
Business Continuity Administrator
Mohegan Sun
1 Mohegan Sun Blvd
Uncasville, CT 06382
(860)862-8164
(cell) (860)961-6976




 Zoltan
 Forray/AC/VCU
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  To
 Sent by: "ADSM:   ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
 Dist Stor  cc
 Manager"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
     .EDU> Re: [ADSM-L] failed 12 error
   message

 01/07/2008 09:46
 AM


 Please respond to
 "ADSM: Dist Stor
 Manager"
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   .EDU>






We see these, as well.  You need to check the dsmerror/dsmsched.log files
on the client.  That is how I was able to determine the error message
associated with the rc=12 and resolved the problem.




Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
01/07/2008 09:27 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] failed 12 error message






Hello everyone,

I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know what the failed 12
error message means?  And where can I find more information on why the
client failed with this error?

Scheduled Start  Actual Start Schedule Name Node
Name Status
  -
- -
01/06/08   00:00:00  01/06/08   00:12:54  WINDOWS-DAIL- HMCH1105
Failed 12

Thanks in advance!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Look up the QUERY EVENT command for more info on the results of the QUERY
EVENT command.

Also see chapter 7 in the client manual.

Best regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Product Development
Level 3 Team Lead
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/07/2008
07:23:05 AM:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know what the failed 12
> error message means?  And where can I find more information on why the
> client failed with this error?
>
> Scheduled Start  Actual Start Schedule Name Node
> Name Status
>   -
> - -
> 01/06/08   00:00:00  01/06/08   00:12:54  WINDOWS-DAIL- HMCH1105
> Failed 12
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> 
> Joni Moyer
> Highmark
> Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III
> Phone Number: (717)302-9966
> Fax: (717) 302-9826
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


Re: failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
We see these, as well.  You need to check the dsmerror/dsmsched.log files
on the client.  That is how I was able to determine the error message
associated with the rc=12 and resolved the problem.




Joni Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
01/07/2008 09:27 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
[ADSM-L] failed 12 error message






Hello everyone,

I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know what the failed 12
error message means?  And where can I find more information on why the
client failed with this error?

Scheduled Start  Actual Start Schedule Name Node
Name Status
  -
- -
01/06/08   00:00:00  01/06/08   00:12:54  WINDOWS-DAIL- HMCH1105
Failed 12

Thanks in advance!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



failed 12 error message

2008-01-07 Thread Joni Moyer
Hello everyone,

I was just wondering if anyone would happen to know what the failed 12
error message means?  And where can I find more information on why the
client failed with this error?

Scheduled Start  Actual Start Schedule Name Node
Name Status
  -
- -
01/06/08   00:00:00  01/06/08   00:12:54  WINDOWS-DAIL- HMCH1105
Failed 12

Thanks in advance!


Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Storage Mngt Analyst III
Phone Number: (717)302-9966
Fax: (717) 302-9826
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: No backup of 100 GB file, no error message

2007-12-19 Thread Michael Bartl

Orin,
I'm afraid that's not enough details to provide real help...

Did you check the incl/excl list?
Is there a domain-statement to backup a filesystem that is not a  
mountpoint (-> use virtualmountpoint)?


Regards,
Michael

Am 18.12.2007 um 18:47 schrieb Orin Rehorst:


Tried to back up 100 GB file on AIX box.
TSM server is Windows, TSM 5.3.2.

No error in TSM activity log, non on AIX box either.

Please advise.


Regards,
Orin

Orin Rehorst


--
Dipl.-Inform. (FH) Michael H. Bartl  Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpaceNet AG, Technik  Tel:  089 / 32356-151
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Fax:  089 / 32356-299
D-80807 Muenchen   http://www.space.net/

Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Alexander Grundner-Culemann
Firmensitz: München, HRB: 136055 (Amtsgericht München)
USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


No backup of 100 GB file, no error message

2007-12-18 Thread Orin Rehorst
Tried to back up 100 GB file on AIX box. 
TSM server is Windows, TSM 5.3.2.

No error in TSM activity log, non on AIX box either.

Please advise.


Regards, 
Orin

Orin Rehorst


ERROR Message on Win2003 Servers

2007-10-03 Thread andreyf
Read this topic:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.itsmfdt.doc/ans6103.htm
Can you post dsm.opt after.

+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--


ERROR Message on Win2003 Servers

2007-10-03 Thread Gideon Brown
Hello All!
 
Recently we upgraded TSM agent on Win2003 servers to version 5.4.1.0.
 
On lot's of servers were we've installed online image support & open file 
support we get an ntfs error in the system event log:
 
" 
The file system structure on the disk is corrupt and unusable. Please run the 
chkdsk utility on the volume System."
 
This message reapers again a few days after we run check disk.
 
Has anyone seen this? Does anyone know a workaround for this?
 
Many Thanks!!!
 
Gideon Brown
System Administrator
03-5319085,052-8395641
 

**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.clearswift.com
**


Re: Error Message

2007-05-02 Thread Margaret Clark
Hi John!  Google produces the same question, but no answers.  Which server is 
it?  - Margaret

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/2/2007 8:41 AM >>>
Has anyone seen this message before.  It started showing up multiple times in 
the dsmerror.log.  
(TSAFS.NLM 6.51.5 291) An invalid path was used.  
 
Thanks
 
John Bortscheller
Network Administrator
San Diego Data Processing Corporation
(858) 581-9718
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 


Error Message

2007-05-02 Thread John Bortscheller
Has anyone seen this message before.  It started showing up multiple times in 
the dsmerror.log.  
(TSAFS.NLM 6.51.5 291) An invalid path was used.  
 
Thanks
 
John Bortscheller
Network Administrator
San Diego Data Processing Corporation
(858) 581-9718
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:John Bortscheller
TEL;WORK:858-581-9718
ORG:;Enterprise Messaging Services
TEL;PREF;FAX:858-581-9830
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
N:Bortscheller;John
TITLE:Network Administrator I
END:VCARD



Re: Spurious error message with TSM for Databases (SQL)

2007-03-23 Thread Del Hoobler
Mark,

There is currently nothing you can do about this
unless you bring the database online, remove it,
or move it to a different SQL Server instance.
IBM does know about the situation and is addressing it.
Look for a future release to have an option to be able to
completely exclude databases.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 03/23/2007
10:09:34 AM:

> When I use the SQL agent (version 5.3.3.0) to back up SQL2000
> databases on a Windows 2000 server, and the SQL machine has one or
> more databases offline, I get this error message:
>
> Backup of SQL Database RefTables will not be attempted.
> SQL Database Status: StatusError768
> ACO5422E Received the following from the MS SQL server:
> [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Database 'RefTables'
> cannot be opened because it is offline. Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC
> SQLState: 42000) (HRESULT:0x800403ae)
>
> (RefTables is the offline database) in the sqlsched.log and a false
> FAILED backup report in TSM Operational Reporter. (Everything else
> backed up just dandy.) I excluded the full and log backups for this
> database with
>
>  EXCLUDE "\...\RefTables\...\*"
>
> to no avail.
>
> Is there any way to avoid this; log backups every 2 hours means this
> client generates 12 failures every day.
>
> --
> Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Senior consultant


Re: Spurious error message with TSM for Databases (SQL)

2007-03-23 Thread Richard Sims

Mark -

See past pursuits of this issue, as in:
 http://www.mail-archive.com/adsm-l@vm.marist.edu/msg62440.html

  Richard Sims


Re: Spurious error message with TSM for Databases (SQL)

2007-03-23 Thread Bell, Charles (Chip)
I asked this question a while back, and supposedly there was going to be a
fix in an upcoming TDP for SQL release. Del, is that release out? Thanks!

BTW, my way of solving was deleting the database, since the ones in my
situation were no longer going to be used. That doesn't seem to be your case.
:)

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Stapleton
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:10 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Spurious error message with TSM for Databases (SQL)

When I use the SQL agent (version 5.3.3.0) to back up SQL2000 databases on a
Windows 2000 server, and the SQL machine has one or more databases offline, I
get this error message:
 
Backup of SQL Database RefTables will not be attempted.
SQL Database Status: StatusError768
ACO5422E Received the following from the MS SQL server:
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Database 'RefTables' cannot be
opened because it is offline. Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000)
(HRESULT:0x800403ae)

(RefTables is the offline database) in the sqlsched.log and a false FAILED
backup report in TSM Operational Reporter. (Everything else backed up just
dandy.) I excluded the full and log backups for this database with
 
 EXCLUDE "\...\RefTables\...\*"
 
to no avail.
 
Is there any way to avoid this; log backups every 2 hours means this client
generates 12 failures every day.
 
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior consultant
-
Confidentiality Notice:
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information and intended only for the use of the
individual or entity named in the address. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this information is strictly
prohibited. If you received this information in error, please
notify the sender and delete this information from your computer
and retain no copies of any of this information.


Spurious error message with TSM for Databases (SQL)

2007-03-23 Thread Mark Stapleton
When I use the SQL agent (version 5.3.3.0) to back up SQL2000 databases on a 
Windows 2000 server, and the SQL machine has one or more databases offline, I 
get this error message:
 
Backup of SQL Database RefTables will not be attempted.
SQL Database Status: StatusError768
ACO5422E Received the following from the MS SQL server:
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Database 'RefTables' cannot be 
opened because it is offline. Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000) 
(HRESULT:0x800403ae)

(RefTables is the offline database) in the sqlsched.log and a false FAILED 
backup report in TSM Operational Reporter. (Everything else backed up just 
dandy.) I excluded the full and log backups for this database with
 
 EXCLUDE "\...\RefTables\...\*"
 
to no avail.
 
Is there any way to avoid this; log backups every 2 hours means this client 
generates 12 failures every day.
 
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior consultant


Re: SQL TDP error message

2007-01-04 Thread Tyree, David
All fixed, thanks

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:53 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] SQL TDP error message

David,

Go to:

http://www.ibm.com/us/

and search for:

ACO5423E

You will find your answer.

Bascially, it says you need to obtain Data Protection for SQL 5.2.1.03
or later for SQL Server 2005 support.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/04/2007
08:37:40 AM:

> TSM server running 5.3.2 on a Win2k box.
>
>
>
> We have put in a new server in running Windows 2003R2
> Standard Edition and SQL 2005. I installed TSM client 5.3.2 and got it
> configured with no problem.
>
> I then installed the TDP for SQL 5.2.1.0.
>
> When try to do a SQL backup using either the GUI or the
> command line I get the same error," ACO5423E The following string is
too
> long: CSqlApi::CopyUToN:566:1908 strlen(139
>
> 9...):7>4".
>
> I looked up ACO5423E in the archives here and got nowhere.
> Any ideas before I call support?
>
>


Re: SQL TDP error message

2007-01-04 Thread Del Hoobler
David,

Go to:

http://www.ibm.com/us/

and search for:

ACO5423E

You will find your answer.

Bascially, it says you need to obtain Data Protection for SQL 5.2.1.03
or later for SQL Server 2005 support.

Thanks,

Del



"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 01/04/2007
08:37:40 AM:

> TSM server running 5.3.2 on a Win2k box.
>
>
>
> We have put in a new server in running Windows 2003R2
> Standard Edition and SQL 2005. I installed TSM client 5.3.2 and got it
> configured with no problem.
>
> I then installed the TDP for SQL 5.2.1.0.
>
> When try to do a SQL backup using either the GUI or the
> command line I get the same error," ACO5423E The following string is too
> long: CSqlApi::CopyUToN:566:1908 strlen(139
>
> 9...):7>4".
>
> I looked up ACO5423E in the archives here and got nowhere.
> Any ideas before I call support?
>
>


Re: SQL TDP error message

2007-01-04 Thread Schaub, Steve
I believe 5.2.1.3 of the TDP is the lowest version that has SQL2005
"toleration".
Steve Schaub
Systems Engineer, WNI
BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee
423-535-6574 (desk)
423-785-7347 (cell)
***public***
 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Tyree, David
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 8:38 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] SQL TDP error message

TSM server running 5.3.2 on a Win2k box. 



We have put in a new server in running Windows 2003R2
Standard Edition and SQL 2005. I installed TSM client 5.3.2 and got it
configured with no problem. 

I then installed the TDP for SQL 5.2.1.0.

When try to do a SQL backup using either the GUI or the
command line I get the same error," ACO5423E The following string is too
long: CSqlApi::CopyUToN:566:1908 strlen(139

9...):7>4". 

I looked up ACO5423E in the archives here and got nowhere.
Any ideas before I call support? 

David Tyree
Enterprise Backup Administrator
South Georgia Medical Center
229.333.1155

txt pager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

 
Please see the following link for the BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee E-mail
disclaimer:  http://www.bcbst.com/email_disclaimer.shtm


SQL TDP error message

2007-01-04 Thread Tyree, David
TSM server running 5.3.2 on a Win2k box. 



We have put in a new server in running Windows 2003R2
Standard Edition and SQL 2005. I installed TSM client 5.3.2 and got it
configured with no problem. 

I then installed the TDP for SQL 5.2.1.0.

When try to do a SQL backup using either the GUI or the
command line I get the same error," ACO5423E The following string is too
long: CSqlApi::CopyUToN:566:1908 strlen(139

9...):7>4". 

I looked up ACO5423E in the archives here and got nowhere.
Any ideas before I call support? 

David Tyree 
Enterprise Backup Administrator 
South Georgia Medical Center 
229.333.1155

txt pager [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

Confidential Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain
confidential and privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all
copies of the original message.

 


Ie7 error message

2006-12-31 Thread Robert Ouzen Ouzen
Hi to all

 

Just install on a test machine Windows Vista + Office 2007 …. When trying to 
connect the clients via the browser (now is IE7) I got this following message 
error:

 

Runtime error!

Program: C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe

Abnormal program termination

 

I know it’s just came out and maybe not yet supported but maybe any clue !

 

Thanks in advance …. Regards and Happy new year

 

Robert Ouzen

 


Re: RC = 13 Error message when updating to WIN Client 5.3.4.8

2006-12-11 Thread Mark Stapleton
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Greg Yuzik
>I am in the process of updating my WIN2K3 clients to 5.3.4.8 (in
>accordance to the recent critical alert TSM announced a couple days ago
>APAR IC50347), and I am receiving an error message that I cannot seem
to
>find any answers to.

Please read the IBM advisory more carefully. It refers to the TSM
server, not TSM clients.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior TSM consultant


Re: RC = 13 Error message when updating to WIN Client 5.3.4.8

2006-12-11 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Go to the site in my sig, and search on ANS1009W.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

IBM Tivoli Storage Manager support web page:
http://www.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBMTivoliStorageManager.html

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 12/11/2006
11:07:24 AM:

> Good morning,
>
>
>
> I am in the process of updating my WIN2K3 clients to 5.3.4.8 (in
> accordance to the recent critical alert TSM announced a couple days ago
> APAR IC50347), and I am receiving an error message that I cannot seem to
> find any answers to.
>
>
>
> After updating my client node, I start the TSM Client Acceptor and
> instantly receive the following error message.
>
>
>
> 12/11/2006 10:29:26 ANS1009W An error occurred processing the operating
> system include/exclude statements.
>
> The error was detected while processing:
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
> otToBackup\DRM. RC = 13.
>
>
>
> I use client options for my WIN2Kx servers, so I am a little confused as
> to why the clo works with previous client and not the new one... if
> indeed that is the problem.
>
> Here is my client opt... can anyone shine some light on this for me
> please.
>
>
>
> def clo WINDOWS desc="Unknown - "
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\ntuser.dat"" force=No seq=0
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\ntuser.dat.log"" force=No
> seq=1
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\usrclass.dat"" force=No seq=2
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\usrclass.dat.log"" force=No
> seq=3
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\...\*""
> force=No seq=4
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*:\...\EA DATA. SF"" force=No
> seq=5
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\IBMBIO.COM" force=No seq=6
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\IBMDOS.COM" force=No seq=7
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\MSDOS.SYS" force=No seq=8
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\IO.SYS" force=No seq=9
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\config\...\*"
> force=No seq=10
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\Perflib*.dat"
> force=No seq=11
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\dhcp\...\*"
> force=No seq=12
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Include
> *:\...\system32\dhcp\backup\...\*" force=No seq=13
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\dns\...\*"
> force=No seq=14
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Include
> *:\...\system32\dns\backup\...\*" force=No seq=15
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir "*:\System Volume
> Information"" force=No seq=16
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir "*:\...\Temporary Internet
> Files"" force=No seq=17
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir *:\Recycled" force=No seq=18
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir *:\Recycler" force=No seq=19
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\hp\hpsmh\logs\error_log"
> force=No seq=20
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\hp\hpsmh\logs\access_log"
> force=No seq=21
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude
> c:\hp\hpsmh\data\cgi-bin\vcagent\vcagent.log" force=No seq=22
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "c:\Documents and Settings\All
> Users\Application Data\Network
> Associates\VirusScan\OnAccessScanLog.txt"" force=No seq=23
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "c:\Documents and Settings\All
> Users\Application Data\Network Associates\Common Framework\Db\*.log""
> force=No seq=24
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Include "c:\Documents and Settings\All
> Users\Application Data\Network Associates\Common
> Framework\Db\*_backup.log"" force=No seq=25
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\windows\temp\...\*" force=No
> seq=26
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\winnt\temp\...\*" force=No
> seq=27
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir c:\adsm.sys" force=No seq=28
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "exclude *:\...\*.mdf" force=No seq=29
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "exclude *:\...\*.ldf" force=No seq=30
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS SCHEDMODE "prompted" force=No seq=31
>
> def clientopt WINDOWS TXNBYTELIMIT "25600" force=No seq=32
>
>
>
>
>
> Gregory J Yuzik
>
> Senior Network Analyst
>
> ARC Resources Ltd


RC = 13 Error message when updating to WIN Client 5.3.4.8

2006-12-11 Thread Greg Yuzik
Good morning,

 

I am in the process of updating my WIN2K3 clients to 5.3.4.8 (in
accordance to the recent critical alert TSM announced a couple days ago
APAR IC50347), and I am receiving an error message that I cannot seem to
find any answers to.

 

After updating my client node, I start the TSM Client Acceptor and
instantly receive the following error message.

 

12/11/2006 10:29:26 ANS1009W An error occurred processing the operating
system include/exclude statements.

The error was detected while processing:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\BackupRestore\FilesN
otToBackup\DRM. RC = 13.

 

I use client options for my WIN2Kx servers, so I am a little confused as
to why the clo works with previous client and not the new one... if
indeed that is the problem.

Here is my client opt... can anyone shine some light on this for me
please.

 

def clo WINDOWS desc="Unknown - "

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\ntuser.dat"" force=No seq=0

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\ntuser.dat.log"" force=No
seq=1

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\usrclass.dat"" force=No seq=2

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*\usrclass.dat.log"" force=No
seq=3

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*:\microsoft uam volume\...\*""
force=No seq=4

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "*:\...\EA DATA. SF"" force=No
seq=5

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\IBMBIO.COM" force=No seq=6

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\IBMDOS.COM" force=No seq=7

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\MSDOS.SYS" force=No seq=8

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\IO.SYS" force=No seq=9

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\config\...\*"
force=No seq=10

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\Perflib*.dat"
force=No seq=11

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\dhcp\...\*"
force=No seq=12

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Include
*:\...\system32\dhcp\backup\...\*" force=No seq=13

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude *:\...\system32\dns\...\*"
force=No seq=14

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Include
*:\...\system32\dns\backup\...\*" force=No seq=15

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir "*:\System Volume
Information"" force=No seq=16

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir "*:\...\Temporary Internet
Files"" force=No seq=17

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir *:\Recycled" force=No seq=18

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir *:\Recycler" force=No seq=19

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\hp\hpsmh\logs\error_log"
force=No seq=20

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\hp\hpsmh\logs\access_log"
force=No seq=21

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude
c:\hp\hpsmh\data\cgi-bin\vcagent\vcagent.log" force=No seq=22

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "c:\Documents and Settings\All
Users\Application Data\Network
Associates\VirusScan\OnAccessScanLog.txt"" force=No seq=23

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude "c:\Documents and Settings\All
Users\Application Data\Network Associates\Common Framework\Db\*.log""
force=No seq=24

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Include "c:\Documents and Settings\All
Users\Application Data\Network Associates\Common
Framework\Db\*_backup.log"" force=No seq=25

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\windows\temp\...\*" force=No
seq=26

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude c:\winnt\temp\...\*" force=No
seq=27

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "Exclude.dir c:\adsm.sys" force=No seq=28

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "exclude *:\...\*.mdf" force=No seq=29

def clientopt WINDOWS INCLEXCL "exclude *:\...\*.ldf" force=No seq=30

def clientopt WINDOWS SCHEDMODE "prompted" force=No seq=31

def clientopt WINDOWS TXNBYTELIMIT "25600" force=No seq=32

 

 

Gregory J Yuzik

Senior Network Analyst

ARC Resources Ltd


Re: ANR8984E error message

2006-10-24 Thread James Choate
Thanks.  Its there.

tsm: TSM>help ANR8984E

---

ANR8984E The drive drive name in library library name is incapable of
performing any drive encryption operations.

Explanation: The server queried the drive's encryption capability, and
the
query failed or the query showed that the drive does not have encryption
capabilities.

System Action: The mount operation fails.

User Response: If this message occurs on a scratch mount and drive
encryption has not been utilized yet, you can turn drive encryption off
by
updating the DRIVEENCRYPTION parameter on the device class. Otherwise,
verify your hardware configuration. First, verify that all the drives in
this logical library support drive encryption. Second, verify that the
device driver controlling all of the drives in this library also
supports
drive encryption. If both the drives and the device driver support drive
encryption, call your drive hardware support. 

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:21 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: ANR8984E error message

On Oct 24, 2006, at 2:00 PM, James Choate wrote:

> We are receiving the following ANR message from TSM.
>
> I can't find any references to the message in the messages and 
> problems guide.  Nor the IBM web site.  I even tried google :( with no

> responses.
>

James - Try the most intrinsic approach:   help ANR8984E

There are occasions when a message is not even in the server repository,
but should be tried.

Richard Sims


Re: ANR8984E error message

2006-10-24 Thread Richard Sims

On Oct 24, 2006, at 2:00 PM, James Choate wrote:


We are receiving the following ANR message from TSM.

I can't find any references to the message in the messages and
problems
guide.  Nor the IBM web site.  I even tried google :( with no
responses.



James - Try the most intrinsic approach:   help ANR8984E

There are occasions when a message is not even in the server
repository, but should be tried.

   Richard Sims


Re: ANR8984E error message

2006-10-24 Thread John Monahan
You have to enable encryption at the drive hardware level as well.  See
this:

http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg27008595


__
John Monahan
Consultant Infrastructure Solutions Group
Computech Resources, Inc., a Logicalis Company
Office: 952-833-0930 ext 109
Cell: 952-221-6938
http://www.computechresources.com
http://us.logicalis.com




James Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 
10/24/2006 01:00 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" 


To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc

Subject
ANR8984E error message






We are receiving the following ANR message from TSM.

I can't find any references to the message in the messages and problems
guide.  Nor the IBM web site.  I even tried google :( with no responses.

We get the message when we turn on migration from our disk storage pool
to our newly defined 3592 encrypted storage pool.

We are running TSM 5.3.4.0  on Aix 5.3 TL5.

We have some new 3592 E05 drives.  We'd like to encrypt everything
whether it stays on-site in the primary tape stgpools or whether it goes
off-site.  We have defined a new devclass that has driveencryption = on.
We have modified our next storage pool for our current disk storage pool
(where our nightly backups land) to be the new storage pool with
encryption turned on.  When TSM trieds to migrate the data, we get the
following ANR message.

10/24/06   10:16:35  ANR8984E The drive 3592DRIVE1 (/dev/rmt4) in
library
  3584LIB is incapable of performing any drive
encryption
  operations. (PROCESS: 3)
10/24/06   10:17:20  ANR8984E The drive 3592DRIVE2 (/dev/rmt5) in
library
  3584LIB is incapable of performing any drive
encryption
  operations. (PROCESS: 3)
10/24/06   10:18:05  ANR8984E The drive 3592DRIVE3 (/dev/rmt6) in
library
  3584LIB is incapable of performing any drive
encryption
  operations. (PROCESS: 3)


Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,
~james

Here's a lil info on what things looks like

Here is what the devclass, storage pool, library, and drive/path info
look like.

>q devcla 3592edvcl f=d

 Device Class Name: 3592EDVCL
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 1
   Device Type: 3592
Format: DRIVE
 Est/Max Capacity (MB):
   Mount Limit: DRIVES
  Mount Wait (min): 5
 Mount Retention (min): 5
  Label Prefix: ADSM
   Library: 3584LIB
 Directory:
   Server Name:
  Retry Period:
Retry Interval:
Shared:
High-level Address:
  Minimum Capacity:
  WORM: No
  Drive Encryption: On
   Scaled Capacity: 100


>q stgpool 3592e_stgpool f=d

   Storage Pool Name: 3592E_STGPOOL
   Storage Pool Type: Primary
   Device Class Name: 3592EDVCL
  Estimated Capacity: 0.0 M
  Space Trigger Util:
Pct Util: 0.0
Pct Migr: 0.0
 Pct Logical: 0.0
High Mig Pct: 90
 Low Mig Pct: 70
 Migration Delay: 0
  Migration Continue: Yes
 Migration Processes: 1
   Reclamation Processes: 1
   Next Storage Pool:
Reclaim Storage Pool:
  Maximum Size Threshold: No Limit
  Access: Read/Write
 Description: Primary tape storage pool for on-site
backups
   Overflow Location:
   Cache Migrated Files?:
  Collocate?: No
   Reclamation Threshold: 100
   Offsite Reclamation Limit:
 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed: 60
  Number of Scratch Volumes Used: 0
   Delay Period for Volume Reuse: 0 Day(s)
  Migration in Progress?: No
Amount Migrated (MB): 0.00
Elapsed Migration Time (seconds): 0
Reclamation in Progress?: No
  Last Update by (administrator): ME
   Last Update Date/Time: 10/24/06   09:51:38
Storage Pool Data Format: Native
Copy Storage Pool(s):
 Continue Copy on Error?:
CRC Data: No


q libr 3584lib f=d

  Library Name: 3584LIB
  Library Type: SCSI
ACS Id:
  Private Category:
  Scratch Category:
 WORM Scratch Category:
  External Manager:
Shared: No
   LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
   Primary Library Manager:
   WWN: 500507630F0AC601
 Serial Number: 078A07440401
   

ANR8984E error message

2006-10-24 Thread James Choate
We are receiving the following ANR message from TSM.  

I can't find any references to the message in the messages and problems
guide.  Nor the IBM web site.  I even tried google :( with no responses.

We get the message when we turn on migration from our disk storage pool
to our newly defined 3592 encrypted storage pool.

We are running TSM 5.3.4.0  on Aix 5.3 TL5.

We have some new 3592 E05 drives.  We'd like to encrypt everything
whether it stays on-site in the primary tape stgpools or whether it goes
off-site.  We have defined a new devclass that has driveencryption = on.
We have modified our next storage pool for our current disk storage pool
(where our nightly backups land) to be the new storage pool with
encryption turned on.  When TSM trieds to migrate the data, we get the
following ANR message.

10/24/06   10:16:35  ANR8984E The drive 3592DRIVE1 (/dev/rmt4) in
library
  3584LIB is incapable of performing any drive
encryption
  operations. (PROCESS: 3)
10/24/06   10:17:20  ANR8984E The drive 3592DRIVE2 (/dev/rmt5) in
library
  3584LIB is incapable of performing any drive
encryption
  operations. (PROCESS: 3)
10/24/06   10:18:05  ANR8984E The drive 3592DRIVE3 (/dev/rmt6) in
library
  3584LIB is incapable of performing any drive
encryption
  operations. (PROCESS: 3)


Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,
~james

Here's a lil info on what things looks like

Here is what the devclass, storage pool, library, and drive/path info
look like.

>q devcla 3592edvcl f=d

 Device Class Name: 3592EDVCL
Device Access Strategy: Sequential
Storage Pool Count: 1
   Device Type: 3592
Format: DRIVE
 Est/Max Capacity (MB):
   Mount Limit: DRIVES
  Mount Wait (min): 5
 Mount Retention (min): 5
  Label Prefix: ADSM
   Library: 3584LIB
 Directory:
   Server Name:
  Retry Period:
Retry Interval:
Shared:
High-level Address:
  Minimum Capacity:
  WORM: No
  Drive Encryption: On
   Scaled Capacity: 100


>q stgpool 3592e_stgpool f=d

   Storage Pool Name: 3592E_STGPOOL
   Storage Pool Type: Primary
   Device Class Name: 3592EDVCL
  Estimated Capacity: 0.0 M
  Space Trigger Util:
Pct Util: 0.0
Pct Migr: 0.0
 Pct Logical: 0.0
High Mig Pct: 90
 Low Mig Pct: 70
 Migration Delay: 0
  Migration Continue: Yes
 Migration Processes: 1
   Reclamation Processes: 1
   Next Storage Pool:
Reclaim Storage Pool:
  Maximum Size Threshold: No Limit
  Access: Read/Write
 Description: Primary tape storage pool for on-site
backups
   Overflow Location:
   Cache Migrated Files?:
  Collocate?: No
   Reclamation Threshold: 100
   Offsite Reclamation Limit:
 Maximum Scratch Volumes Allowed: 60
  Number of Scratch Volumes Used: 0
   Delay Period for Volume Reuse: 0 Day(s)
  Migration in Progress?: No
Amount Migrated (MB): 0.00
Elapsed Migration Time (seconds): 0
Reclamation in Progress?: No
  Last Update by (administrator): ME
   Last Update Date/Time: 10/24/06   09:51:38
Storage Pool Data Format: Native
Copy Storage Pool(s):
 Continue Copy on Error?:
CRC Data: No


q libr 3584lib f=d

  Library Name: 3584LIB
  Library Type: SCSI
ACS Id:
  Private Category:
  Scratch Category:
 WORM Scratch Category:
  External Manager:
Shared: No
   LanFree:
ObeyMountRetention:
   Primary Library Manager:
   WWN: 500507630F0AC601
 Serial Number: 078A07440401
 AutoLabel: No
  Reset Drives: No
Last Update by (administrator): ME
 Last Update Date/Time: 10/24/06   09:55:11

q drive 3584LIB 3592DRIVE1 f=d

Library Name: 3584LIB
  Drive Name: 3592DRIVE1
 Device Type: 3592
 On-Line: Yes
Read Formats: 3592-2C,3592-2,3592C,3592
   Write Formats: 3592-2C,3592-2,3592C,3592
 Element: 257
 Drive Stat

Re: TDPO for 64-bit Solaris error message: ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit

2006-09-18 Thread Richard Sims

On Sep 18, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Reeves, Damion wrote:


...
09/18/06   11:28:50 ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed to
establish a session when PASSWORDACCESS=generate.
...


That message tells me that your TDPO is misconfigured.  I would
advise completely reviewing your TDPO client options, to assure
proper operation, particularly noting what the manual says about
Passswordaccess.

   Richard Sims


TDPO for 64-bit Solaris error message: ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit

2006-09-17 Thread Reeves, Damion
Hi All,





I was wondering if someone could assist with the following.



We have installed and configured TDPO 5.3.2 (32-bit) and TDPO 5.3.2
(64-bit) on the same Sun Solaris SPARC 5.8 system.



I have successfully completed a backup and restore to SCSI TAPE via
tdpo.opt files for Oracle 8i 32-bit and 9i 32-bit databases on this
system using TDPO 32-bit.



However, when I attempt a backup to SCSI TAPE via 64-bit TDPO for the
Oracle 10.2.0.2 64-bit database on this system I receive the following
error:



RMAN-03009: failure of backup command on t1 channel at 09/18/2006
11:28:50

ORA-19506: failed to create sequential file,
name="GISDEV_offbkp_s6_p1_t601471730_20060918_112748", parms=""

ORA-27028: skgfqcre: sbtbackup returned error

ORA-19511: Error received from media manager layer, error text:

   ANS0236E (RC2032) On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed to establish a
session when PASSWORDACCESS=generate.





Here's the output from the tdpoerror.log:



09/18/06   11:28:50 ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed to
establish a session when PASSWORDACCESS=generate.

09/18/06   11:28:50 ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed to
establish a session when PASSWORDACCESS=generate.

09/18/06   11:28:50 ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed to
establish a session when PASSWORDACCESS=generate.

09/18/06   11:28:50 ANS0236E On dsmInit, the owner is not allowed to
establish a session when PASSWORDACCESS=generate.





I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like this has something to do with the
fact the TDPO password path variable within the tdpo_GISDEV.opt file is
set to reference what appears to the 32-bit config still:



TDPO_PSWDPATH  /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin





Instead of the 64-bit config ?



TDPO_PSWDPATH  /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin64





Which would mean we are looking in the 32-bit location for the password
file (TDPO.phxtechdb01_oracle) when it doesn't exist within the 64-bit
location.



Can anyone advise ?



Regards,

Damion Reeves

Oracle Database Administrator
IT Services
Shared Business Services

SANTOS Ltd.
Santos House
91 King William St
Adelaide S.A. 5000



Santos Ltd A.B.N. 80 007 550 923
Disclaimer: The information contained in this email is intended only for the 
use of the
person(s) to whom it is addressed and may be confidential or contain
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby
notified that any perusal, use, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly
prohibited.  If you have received this email in error please immediately
advise us by return email and delete the email without making a copy.


Re: Error message

2005-12-19 Thread Prather, Wanda
Assuming you are doing this with a MOVE DATA, I'd call support.
Those errors are nasty and indicate that TSM for some reason, can't read
the aggregate you are moving FROM.


-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Luc Beaudoin
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 11:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Error message


I'm in the transfert of my IBM 3583 to my new IBM 3584 and I have some
error messages while I'm moving data from one library to the other

ANR1330E and ANR1331E

any ideas ???

Thanks

Luc Beaudoin
Network Administrator / Storage
Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D.
Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254


Error message

2005-12-19 Thread Luc Beaudoin
I'm in the transfert of my IBM 3583 to my new IBM 3584 and I have some
error messages while I'm moving data from one library to the other

ANR1330E and ANR1331E

any ideas ???

Thanks

Luc Beaudoin
Network Administrator / Storage
Hopital General Juif S.M.B.D.
Tel: (514) 340-8222 ext:8254


Re: Error Message: ANS2820E

2005-09-16 Thread Richard Sims

Timo - See that message number in 'dsmc help', at the IBM Web site,
   and in ADSM QuickFacts.

   Richard Sims


Error Message: ANS2820E

2005-09-15 Thread Timo Scheller
Hi List,

I`ve trouble with a TSM Backup Client.

Client (SuSE Linux 9.3 x86_64) 5.3.0.0 (API 64Bit)
Server (AIX 5.2) 5.1.65

Every night or at start/restart of the client I get this error:
09/16/2005 08:13:58 ANS2820E An interrupt has occurred.
The current operation will end and the client will shut down.
Sometimes I will have a nigthly Backup, sometimes not.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks for any help, suggestions or advice.

Timo Scheller


Re: ANR9999D error message?

2005-05-16 Thread Iain Barnetson
I had a similar problem, turned out to be the Qlogic card. 
The machine had happily worked away with the same config for ages, then
started throwing anr errors. There was no indication in Windows or
the Dell logs of any problem, only in TSM. Turned out to be the Qlogic
card, updating the drivers solved the prolem.



-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Desalegne Guangul
Sent: 17 May 2005 01:39
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANRD error message?

Hi Everybody!

My Environment is  TSM V 5.1.1.6 on Win2k SP4.

Did you ever found fix to the problem below?  I'm getting the same error
messages and won't let me edit the client nodes. 

Please let me know! Any one please help!

Thanks,


Greetings all!

Environment: TSM V 5.1.1.0 on Win2k SP3

While check on this AM's processes and such, one of our ITSM boxes
crashed.
This was the only error I saw that showed up in the NT event log:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   ADSMServer
Event Category: None
Event ID:   27
Date:   3/10/2003
Time:   10:46:55 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   x
Description:
TSM Server Diagnostic: ANRD: ADSM Exception Information: file =
pkthread.c, line = 2061,Code = c005, Address = 1042ecdc Attempt to
read data at address ceaa000~

Searched ADSM.ORG and found one other person having this error back in
the ADSM 3.7 days, but noone replied back apparently.  Time to call
support?
Other ideas?

This box has been rock-stable for months and has never crashed before.
No majors changes have been made to it in several weeks.  I *think*
migration was running when it crashed.





Desalegne Guangul
Regional Occupational Health
1800 Harrison St. 21st Floor
510-625-3038 or tieline 8/428-3038


?This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for
the recipients named above, and contain information that may be
confidential or privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, you
must not read, copy, use, or disclose this communication.  Please also
notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete all
copies of it from your system.  Thank you.?
--
This e-mail, including any attached files, may contain confidential and 
privileged information for the sole use of the intended recipient.  Any review, 
use, distribution, or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you are 
not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive information for the 
intended recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all 
copies of this message.


ANR9999D error message?

2005-05-16 Thread Desalegne Guangul
Hi Everybody!

My Environment is  TSM V 5.1.1.6 on Win2k SP4.

Did you ever found fix to the problem below?  I'm getting the same error 
messages and won't let me edit the client nodes. 

Please let me know! Any one please help!

Thanks,


Greetings all!

Environment: TSM V 5.1.1.0 on Win2k SP3

While check on this AM's processes and such, one of our ITSM boxes 
crashed.
This was the only error I saw that showed up in the NT event log:

Event Type: Error
Event Source:   ADSMServer
Event Category: None
Event ID:   27
Date:   3/10/2003
Time:   10:46:55 AM
User:   N/A
Computer:   x
Description:
TSM Server Diagnostic: ANRD: ADSM Exception Information: file =
pkthread.c, line = 2061,Code = c005, Address = 1042ecdc
Attempt to read data at address ceaa000~

Searched ADSM.ORG and found one other person having this error back in the
ADSM 3.7 days, but noone replied back apparently.  Time to call support?
Other ideas?

This box has been rock-stable for months and has never crashed before.  No
majors changes have been made to it in several weeks.  I *think* migration
was running when it crashed.





Desalegne Guangul
Regional Occupational Health
1800 Harrison St. 21st Floor
510-625-3038 or tieline 8/428-3038


?This message and any files or text attached to it are intended only for 
the recipients named above, and contain information that may be 
confidential or privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, you 
must not read, copy, use, or disclose this communication.  Please also 
notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete all copies 
of it from your system.  Thank you.?


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-15 Thread Timothy Hughes
Andy,

Thank you very much!

This time I went to Enterprise Management (again) and I
entered in the tsm server name that it was giving me and
this time I put in "localhost" (I swear I tried this before!) and
this time the server showed up.

Andrew Raibeck wrote:

> Timothy,
>
> 1) Silly question perhaps, but are you certain you are providing the
> server connection info for the intended TSM server?
>
> 2) When you click on "Health Monitor", do you see *any* TSM servers show
> up in the list in the right-hand pane?
>
> 3) Connect to your TSM server via the Admin CLI and run
>
>query status
>
> The first line of output is the TSM server version. The next (significant)
> line is "Server Name" followed by the name of the TSM server. What is that
> name?
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-15
> 06:22:26:
>
> > Andrew
> >
> > We upgraded our server(s) to 5.3 then installed the ISC and admin.
> > the server that I am trying to add to the Admin Center is up and
> running.
> >
> > I am trying to add a server connection by doing the following
> >
> > clicking
> >
> > 1) Health Monitor
> > 2) select server action/ click add server connection
> >
> > Adding a connection to a IBM TSM server
> >
> >  Description
> > xxx
> >
> > Administrator name
> > xx (my admin ID)
> >
> > Password
> > x
> >
> > Password (re-enter to confirm)
> > xx
> >
> > Server address
> > .xxx.xxx.xxx
> >
> > Server port
> > 1500
> >
> >  (check)  to  Unlock the ADMIN_CENTER administrator on the server to
> >   allow the health monitor to report server status. (then I'm clicking
> ok)
> >
> > Again this TSM server is up and is the only connection that I will be
> adding
> > the
> > this ISC/Admin Center and the name of the server is not "TSM" not sure
> yet
> > where it's getting that name from?
> >
> > We have other TSM servers using another network so they are
> > on a different  ISC/admin.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> >
> > > I don't know enough about the specifics of your configuration to give
> you
> > > a specific answer. Are you trying to register more than one server
> whose
> > > name is "TSM"? What are the exact steps that you have performed, from
> > > start to finish, that lead to this message being issued?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > Andy Raibeck
> > > IBM Software Group
> > > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > > The command line is your friend.
> > > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> > >
> > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> > > 11:41:11:
> > >
> > > > The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
> > > > show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
> > > > if it's been added?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across
> this
> > > > > message is of any particular use. The message seems
> self-explanatory.
> > > Is
> > > > > there a more specific problem or question that you have?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Andy
> > > > >
> > > > > Andy Raibeck
> > > > > IBM Software Group
> > > > > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > > > > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > > > > The command line is your friend.
> > > > > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> > > > >
> > > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on
> 2005-02-14
> > > > > 11:13:37:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message
> when
> > > > > > trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name
> of
> > > TSM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This server connection name has already been added to the
> > > Administration
> > > > > > Center.
> > > > > > Every server added to the Administration Center must have a
> unique
> > > name.
> > > > > > To change
> > > > > > the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage
> Manager
> > > > > > administrative client.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > AIX 5.2
> > > > > > TSM 5.3.0.1


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-15 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Timothy,

1) Silly question perhaps, but are you certain you are providing the
server connection info for the intended TSM server?

2) When you click on "Health Monitor", do you see *any* TSM servers show
up in the list in the right-hand pane?

3) Connect to your TSM server via the Admin CLI and run

   query status

The first line of output is the TSM server version. The next (significant)
line is "Server Name" followed by the name of the TSM server. What is that
name?

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-15
06:22:26:

> Andrew
>
> We upgraded our server(s) to 5.3 then installed the ISC and admin.
> the server that I am trying to add to the Admin Center is up and
running.
>
> I am trying to add a server connection by doing the following
>
> clicking
>
> 1) Health Monitor
> 2) select server action/ click add server connection
>
> Adding a connection to a IBM TSM server
>
>  Description
> xxx
>
> Administrator name
> xx (my admin ID)
>
> Password
> x
>
> Password (re-enter to confirm)
> xx
>
> Server address
> .xxx.xxx.xxx
>
> Server port
> 1500
>
>  (check)  to  Unlock the ADMIN_CENTER administrator on the server to
>   allow the health monitor to report server status. (then I'm clicking
ok)
>
> Again this TSM server is up and is the only connection that I will be
adding
> the
> this ISC/Admin Center and the name of the server is not "TSM" not sure
yet
> where it's getting that name from?
>
> We have other TSM servers using another network so they are
> on a different  ISC/admin.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Andrew Raibeck wrote:
>
> > I don't know enough about the specifics of your configuration to give
you
> > a specific answer. Are you trying to register more than one server
whose
> > name is "TSM"? What are the exact steps that you have performed, from
> > start to finish, that lead to this message being issued?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > Andy Raibeck
> > IBM Software Group
> > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > The command line is your friend.
> > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> >
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> > 11:41:11:
> >
> > > The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
> > > show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
> > > if it's been added?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across
this
> > > > message is of any particular use. The message seems
self-explanatory.
> > Is
> > > > there a more specific problem or question that you have?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Andy
> > > >
> > > > Andy Raibeck
> > > > IBM Software Group
> > > > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > > > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > > > The command line is your friend.
> > > > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> > > >
> > > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on
2005-02-14
> > > > 11:13:37:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message
when
> > > > > trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
> > > > >
> > > > > The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name
of
> > TSM.
> > > > >
> > > > > This server connection name has already been added to the
> > Administration
> > > > > Center.
> > > > > Every server added to the Administration Center must have a
unique
> > name.
> > > > > To change
> > > > > the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage
Manager
> > > > > administrative client.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > > >
> > > > > AIX 5.2
> > > > > TSM 5.3.0.1


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-15 Thread Timothy Hughes
Hi Paul,

Yes, the Server connection that I am adding is the only server
that I will be adding to this ISC/Admin. And it's claiming
that the Server with the name "TSM"? (not sure where that
name is coming from that's not name of the server) has already
been added? I have not added any server to this ISC/Admin
connection yet using my Admin ID that is what I am trying to do.

Thanks!



Paul Fielding wrote:

> I think there's cross-communication going on here.  Clarification is needed.
>
> Is the the *only* TSM server you're trying to add, and the ISC is claiming
> you've already added it, or is this an *additional* TSM server that you're
> trying to add as a connection to the ISC?
>
> regards,
>
> Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Timothy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error message when trying to install server to admin
> center
>
> > The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
> > show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
> > if it's been added?
> >
> >
> >
> > Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> >
> >> I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across this
> >> message is of any particular use. The message seems self-explanatory. Is
> >> there a more specific problem or question that you have?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> Andy Raibeck
> >> IBM Software Group
> >> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> >> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> >> The command line is your friend.
> >> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> >>
> >> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> >> 11:13:37:
> >>
> >> > Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
> >> > trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
> >> >
> >> > The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of
> >> > TSM.
> >> >
> >> > This server connection name has already been added to the
> >> > Administration
> >> > Center.
> >> > Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique
> >> > name.
> >> > To change
> >> > the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
> >> > administrative client.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Thanks in advance!
> >> >
> >> > AIX 5.2
> >> > TSM 5.3.0.1
> >


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-15 Thread Timothy Hughes
Andrew

We upgraded our server(s) to 5.3 then installed the ISC and admin.
the server that I am trying to add to the Admin Center is up and running.

I am trying to add a server connection by doing the following

clicking

1) Health Monitor
2) select server action/ click add server connection

Adding a connection to a IBM TSM server

 Description
xxx

Administrator name
xx (my admin ID)

Password
x

Password (re-enter to confirm)
xx

Server address
.xxx.xxx.xxx

Server port
1500

 (check)  to  Unlock the ADMIN_CENTER administrator on the server to
  allow the health monitor to report server status. (then I'm clicking ok)

Again this TSM server is up and is the only connection that I will be adding
the
this ISC/Admin Center and the name of the server is not "TSM" not sure yet
where it's getting that name from?

We have other TSM servers using another network so they are
on a different  ISC/admin.

Thanks


Andrew Raibeck wrote:

> I don't know enough about the specifics of your configuration to give you
> a specific answer. Are you trying to register more than one server whose
> name is "TSM"? What are the exact steps that you have performed, from
> start to finish, that lead to this message being issued?
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> 11:41:11:
>
> > The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
> > show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
> > if it's been added?
> >
> >
> >
> > Andrew Raibeck wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across this
> > > message is of any particular use. The message seems self-explanatory.
> Is
> > > there a more specific problem or question that you have?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > > Andy Raibeck
> > > IBM Software Group
> > > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > > The command line is your friend.
> > > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> > >
> > > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> > > 11:13:37:
> > >
> > > > Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
> > > > trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
> > > >
> > > > The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of
> TSM.
> > > >
> > > > This server connection name has already been added to the
> Administration
> > > > Center.
> > > > Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique
> name.
> > > > To change
> > > > the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
> > > > administrative client.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > > AIX 5.2
> > > > TSM 5.3.0.1


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-14 Thread Paul Fielding
I think there's cross-communication going on here.  Clarification is needed.
Is the the *only* TSM server you're trying to add, and the ISC is claiming
you've already added it, or is this an *additional* TSM server that you're
trying to add as a connection to the ISC?
regards,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Timothy Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2005 3:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Error message when trying to install server to admin
center

The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
if it's been added?

Andrew Raibeck wrote:
I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across this
message is of any particular use. The message seems self-explanatory. Is
there a more specific problem or question that you have?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
11:13:37:
> Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
> trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
>
> The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of
> TSM.
>
> This server connection name has already been added to the
> Administration
> Center.
> Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique
> name.
> To change
> the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
> administrative client.
>
>
> The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> AIX 5.2
> TSM 5.3.0.1



Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-14 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I don't know enough about the specifics of your configuration to give you
a specific answer. Are you trying to register more than one server whose
name is "TSM"? What are the exact steps that you have performed, from
start to finish, that lead to this message being issued?

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
11:41:11:

> The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
> show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
> if it's been added?
>
>
>
> Andrew Raibeck wrote:
>
> > I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across this
> > message is of any particular use. The message seems self-explanatory.
Is
> > there a more specific problem or question that you have?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Andy
> >
> > Andy Raibeck
> > IBM Software Group
> > Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> > Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> > The command line is your friend.
> > "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
> >
> > "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> > 11:13:37:
> >
> > > Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
> > > trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
> > >
> > > The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of
TSM.
> > >
> > > This server connection name has already been added to the
Administration
> > > Center.
> > > Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique
name.
> > > To change
> > > the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
> > > administrative client.
> > >
> > >
> > > The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance!
> > >
> > > AIX 5.2
> > > TSM 5.3.0.1


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-14 Thread Timothy Hughes
The message seems self-expanatory but why doesn't the server
show up When I click on Health monitor? or anything else?
if it's been added?



Andrew Raibeck wrote:

> I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across this
> message is of any particular use. The message seems self-explanatory. Is
> there a more specific problem or question that you have?
>
> Regards,
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM Software Group
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
> The command line is your friend.
> "Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.
>
> "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
> 11:13:37:
>
> > Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
> > trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
> >
> > The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of TSM.
> >
> > This server connection name has already been added to the Administration
> > Center.
> > Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique name.
> > To change
> > the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
> > administrative client.
> >
> >
> > The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> > AIX 5.2
> > TSM 5.3.0.1


Re: Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-14 Thread Andrew Raibeck
I'm not certain how knowing whether anyone else has come across this
message is of any particular use. The message seems self-explanatory. Is
there a more specific problem or question that you have?

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"  wrote on 2005-02-14
11:13:37:

> Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
> trying to add a server to the Admin Center?
>
> The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of TSM.
>
> This server connection name has already been added to the Administration
> Center.
> Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique name.
> To change
> the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
> administrative client.
>
>
> The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> AIX 5.2
> TSM 5.3.0.1


Error message when trying to install server to admin center

2005-02-14 Thread Timothy Hughes
Hello has anyone who installed TSM 5.3 come across this message when
trying to add a server to the Admin Center?

The specified server has been contacted and it has a server name of TSM.

This server connection name has already been added to the Administration
Center.
Every server added to the Administration Center must have a unique name.
To change
the server name, use the server console or a Tivoli Storage Manager
administrative client.


The server is not showing up as being added to the Admin Center.


Thanks in advance!

AIX 5.2
TSM 5.3.0.1


Re: Error message Server detected system error

2004-11-22 Thread Andrew Raibeck
Try looking up the messages ANS1301E. It provides a clue as to where you
might start looking for the trouble.

Regards,

Andy

Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
Internal Notes e-mail: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
"Good enough" is the enemy of excellence.

"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/21/2004
23:16:41:

> Hi
>
> Some users saved their outlook.ps on a Netware client backup by TSM ,
some
> forget to close Outlook so when the backup occurred I got this error
message:
>
> 11/19/2004 23:44:03 ANS1228E Sending of object 'SYM:
> /Users/BDOTAN/Files/Office/Outlook/outlook.pst' failed
> 11/19/2004 23:44:03 ANS1301E Server detected system error
>
> The backup status finished with:
> 11/20/2004 00:43:31 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'SCHNOVCOL3' failed. Return
code = 12.
>
> I changed in the backup group copy the copy serialization to static , no

> change still this error message .. Did is a way to contour this error

>
> My TSM server version is 5.2.3.0 and TSM client Netware 5.2.3.0
>
> Thanks in Advance , Regards
>
> Robert Ouzen
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Error message Server detected system error

2004-11-22 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
Behalf Of Robert Ouzen
>Some users saved their outlook.ps on a Netware client backup 
>by TSM , some forget to close Outlook so when the backup 
>occurred I got this error message:
>
>11/19/2004 23:44:03 ANS1228E Sending of object 
>'SYM:/Users/BDOTAN/Files/Office/Outlook/outlook.pst' failed
>11/19/2004 23:44:03 ANS1301E Server detected system error
>
>The backup status finished with:
>11/20/2004 00:43:31 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'SCHNOVCOL3' 
>failed.  Return code = 12.
>
>I changed in the backup group copy the copy serialization to 
>static , no change still this error message .. Did is a way to 
>contour this error 

The only way I know to get the outlook.pst file saved was to close
Outlook first. Your users are going to have to learn to close Outlook if
they expect to get their mail files backed up.

--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627  


Error message Server detected system error

2004-11-21 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi 

Some users saved their outlook.ps on a Netware client backup by TSM , some 
forget to close Outlook so when the backup occurred I got this error message:

11/19/2004 23:44:03 ANS1228E Sending of object 
'SYM:/Users/BDOTAN/Files/Office/Outlook/outlook.pst' failed
11/19/2004 23:44:03 ANS1301E Server detected system error

The backup status finished with:
11/20/2004 00:43:31 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'SCHNOVCOL3' failed.  Return code 
= 12.

I changed in the backup group copy the copy serialization to static , no change 
still this error message .. Did is a way to contour this error 

My TSM server version is 5.2.3.0 and TSM client Netware 5.2.3.0

Thanks in Advance , Regards

Robert Ouzen
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Netware error message

2004-11-18 Thread Troy Frank
Assuming that it's been fine up until now, I would guess that something
has changed.  Has there been any patches/service packs/new tsm clients
installed lately?  If not, you may also want to look into the newest tsa
patches (tsa16 I believe).  Another thing to look for is the cache
allocation percentage for tsafs.  It should generally be set to no more
than 10% of total memory.   TID# 10091980 may also have info relevant to
your problem.


Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/2004 8:01:12 AM >>>
Hi to all

I have a Netware Client version 6.5 service pack revision 02 , my Tsm
Client Version is 5.2.0.3 and Tsm Server Version is 5.2.3.0

I got yesterday this error message:

server NW halted Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:23:21.351 pm
Abend 1 on P00: Server-5.70.02: Page Fault Processor Exception (Error
code )

Registers:
CS = 0060 DS = 007B ES = 007B FS = 007B GS = 007B SS = 0068
EAX =  EBX = 5D394435 ECX = 650AF13A EDX = 650479E4
ESI = 6798A028 EDI = 5F845B64 EBP = 6619ECE4 ESP = 6619ECC8
EIP = A83F969B FLAGS = 00010202
Address (0xA83F969B) exceeds valid memory limit
EIP in UNKNOWN memory area
Access Location: 0xA83F969B

The violation occurred while processing the following instruction:

Running process: DSMC.NLM 10 Process

Thread Owned by NLM: DSMC.NLM
Stack pointer: 6619F018
OS Stack limit: 6618F3A0
Scheduling priority: 67371008
Wait state: 5050190 Blocked on a kernel CV

Does anybody have a clue about this error ???

Regards Robert Ouzen

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confidentiality Notice follows:

The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any)
is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for
the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If
you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution
or any action taken, or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this message in
error, please delete all electronic copies of this message (and the
documents attached to it, if any), destroy any hard copies you may have
created and notify me immediately by replying to this email. Thank you.


Re: Netware error message

2004-11-18 Thread Robert Ouzen
Frank
You are right the Netware staff installed service pack 02 , I just upgrade the 
tsm client version to 5.2.3.0 and will run tonight a backup. If I still got a 
problem will download the newest tsa patches as you suggested.
I didn't quiet understand what you mean by cache allocation percentage and how 
to do it .
Thanks for the answer.

Regards Robert 

-Original Message-
From: Troy Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 5:06 PM
To: רוברט אוזן; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Netware error message

Assuming that it's been fine up until now, I would guess that something has 
changed.  Has there been any patches/service packs/new tsm clients installed 
lately?  If not, you may also want to look into the newest tsa patches (tsa16 I 
believe).  Another thing to look for is the cache allocation percentage for 
tsafs.  It should generally be set to no more
than 10% of total memory.   TID# 10091980 may also have info relevant to
your problem.


Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/18/2004 8:01:12 AM >>>
Hi to all

I have a Netware Client version 6.5 service pack revision 02 , my Tsm Client 
Version is 5.2.0.3 and Tsm Server Version is 5.2.3.0

I got yesterday this error message:

server NW halted Wednesday, November 17, 2004 11:23:21.351 pm Abend 1 on P00: 
Server-5.70.02: Page Fault Processor Exception (Error code )

Registers:
CS = 0060 DS = 007B ES = 007B FS = 007B GS = 007B SS = 0068 EAX =  EBX 
= 5D394435 ECX = 650AF13A EDX = 650479E4 ESI = 6798A028 EDI = 5F845B64 EBP = 
6619ECE4 ESP = 6619ECC8 EIP = A83F969B FLAGS = 00010202 Address (0xA83F969B) 
exceeds valid memory limit EIP in UNKNOWN memory area Access Location: 
0xA83F969B

The violation occurred while processing the following instruction:

Running process: DSMC.NLM 10 Process

Thread Owned by NLM: DSMC.NLM
Stack pointer: 6619F018
OS Stack limit: 6618F3A0
Scheduling priority: 67371008
Wait state: 5050190 Blocked on a kernel CV

Does anybody have a clue about this error ???

Regards Robert Ouzen

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Confidentiality Notice follows:
 
The information in this message (and the documents attached to it, if any) is 
confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the 
addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are 
not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action 
taken, or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be 
unlawful. If you have received this message in error, please delete all 
electronic copies of this message (and the documents attached to it, if any), 
destroy any hard copies you may have created and notify me immediately by 
replying to this email. Thank you.


Netware error message

2004-11-18 Thread Robert Ouzen
Hi to all

I have a Netware Client version 6.5 service pack revision 02 , my Tsm Client 
Version is 5.2.0.3 and  Tsm Server Version is 5.2.3.0

I got yesterday this error message:

server NW halted Wednesday, November 17, 2004  11:23:21.351 pm
Abend 1 on P00: Server-5.70.02: Page Fault Processor Exception (Error code 
)

 Registers:
CS = 0060 DS = 007B ES = 007B FS = 007B GS = 007B SS = 0068
EAX =  EBX = 5D394435 ECX = 650AF13A EDX = 650479E4
ESI = 6798A028 EDI = 5F845B64 EBP = 6619ECE4 ESP = 6619ECC8
EIP = A83F969B FLAGS = 00010202 
Address (0xA83F969B) exceeds valid memory limit
EIP in UNKNOWN memory area
Access Location: 0xA83F969B

 The violation occurred while processing the following instruction:

 Running process: DSMC.NLM   10 Process

Thread Owned by NLM: DSMC.NLM
Stack pointer: 6619F018
OS Stack limit: 6618F3A0
Scheduling priority: 67371008
Wait state: 5050190  Blocked on a kernel CV

Does anybody have a clue about this error ???

Regards Robert Ouzen

E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: New error message after server upgrade

2004-09-03 Thread T. Lists
We upgraded from 5.2.2 to 5.2.3.0 to (among other
things) try and fix this problem.  No luck.  I've also
tried the txnbytelimit fix on the client, and again,
no luck.

If you find any other "solutions" I would be most
interested in them.

Thanks,
T.

--- Zoltan Forray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Just upgraded my AIX server from 5.2.1.3 to 5.2.3.2.
>
> Now I am seeing these error messages from various
> clients
>
> 9/2/2004 6:13:11 PM ANR1339W Session 710
> underestimated a size allocation
> request - 222MB more space was allocated to allow
> the operation to
> continue.
>
>
> I searched IBM.COM and found APAR IC37437 which
> says:
>
> RECOMMENDATION: Apply the PTF containing this fix
> once it is available.
> This is expected to be available in 5.1.9.0 and
> 5.2.2.0.
>
>
> Of the three clients that reported this error, only
> 1 is below these
> levels !
>
>
> Can someone give me more details on whether this has
> really been
> addressed/fixed in 5.2.2.x/5.2.3.x ?
>
> Was this on *ALL* client platforms ?
>
>
> Another entry I found on IBM.COM said to add:
> txnbytelimit 25600 to the
> opt file ?
>
>
> Anyone have experience with this problem/condition ?
>  We have never seen
> this, before.
>




__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail


New error message after server upgrade

2004-09-03 Thread Zoltan Forray
Just upgraded my AIX server from 5.2.1.3 to 5.2.3.2.

Now I am seeing these error messages from various clients

9/2/2004 6:13:11 PM ANR1339W Session 710 underestimated a size allocation
request - 222MB more space was allocated to allow the operation to
continue.


I searched IBM.COM and found APAR IC37437 which says:

RECOMMENDATION: Apply the PTF containing this fix once it is available.
This is expected to be available in 5.1.9.0 and 5.2.2.0.


Of the three clients that reported this error, only 1 is below these
levels !


Can someone give me more details on whether this has really been
addressed/fixed in 5.2.2.x/5.2.3.x ?

Was this on *ALL* client platforms ?


Another entry I found on IBM.COM said to add:   txnbytelimit 25600 to the
opt file ?


Anyone have experience with this problem/condition ?  We have never seen
this, before.


Re: server error message

2004-08-31 Thread Weinstein, Stephen
I saw that, but it didn't seem to apply here.  I checked the log file and it is using 
5MB of the 500MB allocated.  Same with the
database.  THe database is using 0.4% of it's allocation.

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Luc Beaudoin
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: server error message


Hi
check that link ... maybe it could help U

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg40927.html

Luc





"Weinstein, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-08-31 12:06 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:server error message


I just started having trouble with my Tivoli server 5.2.3.  I am getting
the follow error.

ANR0287W contents of the page shadow file dbpgshdw.dbt are not valid.


the tivoli manual isn't much help..

anyone have an idea what this message means and how to fix it.

thanx
steve


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager at postmaster at dor.state.ma.us.
**


Re: server error message

2004-08-31 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Hi
check that link ... maybe it could help U

http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg40927.html

Luc





"Weinstein, Stephen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-08-31 12:06 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    cc:
    Subject:server error message


I just started having trouble with my Tivoli server 5.2.3.  I am getting
the follow error.

ANR0287W contents of the page shadow file dbpgshdw.dbt are not valid.


the tivoli manual isn't much help..

anyone have an idea what this message means and how to fix it.

thanx
steve


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager at postmaster at dor.state.ma.us.
**


server error message

2004-08-31 Thread Weinstein, Stephen
I just started having trouble with my Tivoli server 5.2.3.  I am getting the follow 
error.

ANR0287W contents of the page shadow file dbpgshdw.dbt are not valid.


the tivoli manual isn't much help..

anyone have an idea what this message means and how to fix it.

thanx
steve


**
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager at postmaster at dor.state.ma.us.
**


Re: error message in my actlog ....

2004-07-20 Thread Robertson, G Louis (BearingPoint)
You are correct these files are created by the System Monitor
(http://www.jsiinc.com/SUBG/TIP3300/rh3343.htm).   We exclude them from our
backups.

Louis

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Luc Beaudoin
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: error message in my actlog 


Hi everyone

I have a lot of those in the actlog of my TSM server

ANE4987E
Error processing '\\003123a\c$\WINNT\system32\Perflib_Perfdata_5b0.dat':
the object is in use by another process


anybody knows what R those files (Perflib_perfdata ...) I think it's the
performance monitor but I'm not sure 
Should I exclude them from all my WIN2K server ...

thanks


**
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged.  Access to this email by anyone other than the
intended addressee is unauthorized.  If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, any review, disclosure, copying,
distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be taken
in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this
message to the sender and delete the message, any attachments,
and any copies thereof from your system.
**


Re: error message in my actlog ....

2004-07-20 Thread Bos, Karel
Hi,

If you take a look at the dsm.smp in the config dir of the baclient than you would see 
some default excludes. One of these is:

*Exclude *:\...\system32\Perflib*.dat.

I would exclude them.

Regards,

Karel

-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Luc Beaudoin
Sent: dinsdag 20 juli 2004 15:48
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: error message in my actlog 


Hi everyone

I have a lot of those in the actlog of my TSM server

ANE4987E
Error processing '\\003123a\c$\WINNT\system32\Perflib_Perfdata_5b0.dat':
the object is in use by another process


anybody knows what R those files (Perflib_perfdata ...) I think it's the
performance monitor but I'm not sure 
Should I exclude them from all my WIN2K server ...

thanks


error message in my actlog ....

2004-07-20 Thread Luc Beaudoin
Hi everyone

I have a lot of those in the actlog of my TSM server

ANE4987E
Error processing '\\003123a\c$\WINNT\system32\Perflib_Perfdata_5b0.dat':
the object is in use by another process


anybody knows what R those files (Perflib_perfdata ...) I think it's the
performance monitor but I'm not sure 
Should I exclude them from all my WIN2K server ...

thanks


Re: TDPO Error message

2004-06-16 Thread Slaughter, Bill
I found out that My trial has expired. and thanks to Richard Sims I
located the tdpoerror.log which was stored in the oracle install directory
(from some reason) and this log file confirmed this. Strange that it only
had one error message saying the trial has expired and numerous other
messages from each attempt we have made today.

Bill Slaughter
Tupperware
407-826-4580


-Original Message-
From: Justin Bleistein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDPO Error message

First thing is I don't mean to sound like a smartaX%, but has the free
trial expired?

1.) Are you trying to run two rman backup streams, i.e. allocating two
channels?. I know on some trial versions you can only allocate one channel.
2.) Is this Oracle 8 or Oracle 9? What o/s? 32 or 64 bit?
3.) If Oracle 8 please double check to see that the Oracle backup library
is still linked from $ORACLE_HOME/lib/libobk.so to /usr/lib/libobk.so to
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/libobk.so. I don't know why they'd be
unlinked, but just in case.
4.) Look at your rman script make sure it's pointing to the correct
tdpo.opt file.
5.) Also check the Unix file/modes permission's on the tdpo.opt files as
well as the permission's in the /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin directory
structure. (/usr/...*) if AIX.
6.) Check the nodename your using, see if the nodename in the dsm.opt file
for Oracle can authenticate into the tsm server: "dsmc q ses
-server=tdpo_server_stanza"
7.) Also check to see that the tdpo software can authenticate into the tsm
server: tdpoconf password

This is all assuming it's running on  a Unix client system?
If you run through these suggestions and everything looks good. Let me know
and I'll try to help you further.
Thanks!

--Justin Richard Bleistein
Unix/TSM System Administrator


|-+-->
| |   "Slaughter, Bill"  |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   ERWARE.COM>|
| |   Sent by: "ADSM:|
| |   Dist Stor Manager" |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   DU>|
| |  |
| |  |
| |   06/16/2004 03:22 PM|
| |   Please respond to  |
| |   "ADSM: Dist Stor   |
| |   Manager"   |
| |  |
|-+-->

>---
-------|
  |
|
  |   To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
  |   cc:
|
  |   Subject:  TDPO Error message
|

>---
---|




We are trialing TDPO so I can't call in for support yet.



This was working and starting today we are having trouble.



We started getting the following message when using TDPO.



RMAN> crosscheck backup;



RMAN-00571: ===

RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===

RMAN-00571: ===

RMAN-03002: failure of crosscheck command at 06/16/2004 11:14:31

ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name:

ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer

Linux Error: 2517: Unknown system error

Additional information: 7011

ORA-19511: Error received from media manager layer, error text:

   SBT error = 7011, errno = 2517, sbtopen: system error



Does anybody know what could be going wrong?



Or



Where I can look up these messages.



I never see the client connecting to the server in the ACTLOG.



"tdpoconf Shoeenv" command returns the following:



IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases:

Data Protection for Oracle

Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0

(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1997, 2003. All rights reserved.





DATA PROTECTION FOR ORACLE INFORMATION

 Version:  5

 Release:  2

 Level:0

 Sublevel: 0

 Platform: 32bit TDPO Linux86



TSM SERVER INFORMATION

 Server Name:  TDPO

 Server Address:   UXAS02

 Server Type:  HP-UX

 Server Port:  1500

 Communication Method: TCP/IP



SESSION INFORMATION

 Owner Name:   oracle

 Node Name:us1lxas160_rman

 Node Type:TDPO Linux86

 DSMI_DIR: /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin

 DSMI_ORC_CONFIG:  /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/dsm.opt

 TDPO_OPTFILE: /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/tdpo.opt

 Password Directory:   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/b

Re: TDPO Error message

2004-06-16 Thread Justin Bleistein
First thing is I don't mean to sound like a smartaX%, but has the free
trial expired?

1.) Are you trying to run two rman backup streams, i.e. allocating two
channels?. I know on some trial versions you can only allocate one channel.
2.) Is this Oracle 8 or Oracle 9? What o/s? 32 or 64 bit?
3.) If Oracle 8 please double check to see that the Oracle backup library
is still linked from $ORACLE_HOME/lib/libobk.so to /usr/lib/libobk.so to
/opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/libobk.so. I don't know why they'd be
unlinked, but just in case.
4.) Look at your rman script make sure it's pointing to the correct
tdpo.opt file.
5.) Also check the Unix file/modes permission's on the tdpo.opt files as
well as the permission's in the /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin directory
structure. (/usr/...*) if AIX.
6.) Check the nodename your using, see if the nodename in the dsm.opt file
for Oracle can authenticate into the tsm server: "dsmc q ses
-server=tdpo_server_stanza"
7.) Also check to see that the tdpo software can authenticate into the tsm
server: tdpoconf password

This is all assuming it's running on  a Unix client system?
If you run through these suggestions and everything looks good. Let me know
and I'll try to help you further.
Thanks!

--Justin Richard Bleistein
Unix/TSM System Administrator


|-+-->
| |   "Slaughter, Bill"  |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   ERWARE.COM>|
| |   Sent by: "ADSM:|
| |   Dist Stor Manager" |
| |   <[EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| |   DU>|
| |  |
| |  |
| |   06/16/2004 03:22 PM|
| |   Please respond to  |
| |   "ADSM: Dist Stor   |
| |   Manager"   |
| |  |
|-+-->
  
>--|
  |
  |
  |   To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
   |
  |   cc:          
  |
  |   Subject:  TDPO Error message 
  |
  
>--|




We are trialing TDPO so I can't call in for support yet.



This was working and starting today we are having trouble.



We started getting the following message when using TDPO.



RMAN> crosscheck backup;



RMAN-00571: ===

RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===

RMAN-00571: ===

RMAN-03002: failure of crosscheck command at 06/16/2004 11:14:31

ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name:

ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer

Linux Error: 2517: Unknown system error

Additional information: 7011

ORA-19511: Error received from media manager layer, error text:

   SBT error = 7011, errno = 2517, sbtopen: system error



Does anybody know what could be going wrong?



Or



Where I can look up these messages.



I never see the client connecting to the server in the ACTLOG.



"tdpoconf Shoeenv" command returns the following:



IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases:

Data Protection for Oracle

Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0

(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1997, 2003. All rights reserved.





DATA PROTECTION FOR ORACLE INFORMATION

 Version:  5

 Release:  2

 Level:0

 Sublevel: 0

 Platform: 32bit TDPO Linux86



TSM SERVER INFORMATION

 Server Name:  TDPO

 Server Address:   UXAS02

 Server Type:  HP-UX

 Server Port:  1500

 Communication Method: TCP/IP



SESSION INFORMATION

 Owner Name:   oracle

 Node Name:us1lxas160_rman

 Node Type:TDPO Linux86

 DSMI_DIR: /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin

 DSMI_ORC_CONFIG:  /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/dsm.opt

 TDPO_OPTFILE: /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/tdpo.opt

 Password Directory:   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin

 Compression:  FALSE









Bill Slaughter

Tupperware

407-826-4580



Linux Version RedHat Advanced Server 2.1

TDPO Version 5.2.0.0

TSM API 5.2.2.0

TSM Client 5.2.2.0

TSM Server 5.1.7.2 (Running on HP-UX)

Oracle Version 9.2.0


TDPO Error message

2004-06-16 Thread Slaughter, Bill
We are trialing TDPO so I can't call in for support yet.



This was working and starting today we are having trouble.



We started getting the following message when using TDPO.



RMAN> crosscheck backup;



RMAN-00571: ===

RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===

RMAN-00571: ===

RMAN-03002: failure of crosscheck command at 06/16/2004 11:14:31

ORA-19554: error allocating device, device type: SBT_TAPE, device name:

ORA-27000: skgfqsbi: failed to initialize storage subsystem (SBT) layer

Linux Error: 2517: Unknown system error

Additional information: 7011

ORA-19511: Error received from media manager layer, error text:

   SBT error = 7011, errno = 2517, sbtopen: system error



Does anybody know what could be going wrong?



Or



Where I can look up these messages.



I never see the client connecting to the server in the ACTLOG.



"tdpoconf Shoeenv" command returns the following:



IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases:

Data Protection for Oracle

Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0

(C) Copyright IBM Corporation 1997, 2003. All rights reserved.





DATA PROTECTION FOR ORACLE INFORMATION

 Version:  5

 Release:  2

 Level:0

 Sublevel: 0

 Platform: 32bit TDPO Linux86



TSM SERVER INFORMATION

 Server Name:  TDPO

 Server Address:   UXAS02

 Server Type:  HP-UX

 Server Port:  1500

 Communication Method: TCP/IP



SESSION INFORMATION

 Owner Name:   oracle

 Node Name:us1lxas160_rman

 Node Type:TDPO Linux86

 DSMI_DIR: /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/api/bin

 DSMI_ORC_CONFIG:  /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/dsm.opt

 TDPO_OPTFILE: /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin/tdpo.opt

 Password Directory:   /opt/tivoli/tsm/client/oracle/bin

 Compression:  FALSE









Bill Slaughter

Tupperware

407-826-4580



Linux Version RedHat Advanced Server 2.1

TDPO Version 5.2.0.0

TSM API 5.2.2.0

TSM Client 5.2.2.0

TSM Server 5.1.7.2 (Running on HP-UX)

Oracle Version 9.2.0


Re: Error Message - ANS1503E

2003-11-17 Thread Richard Sims
...
>passworddir /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/passwd.daily
>
>When i run dsmc command i receive the following error:
>
>/17/2003 17:12:54 TCA EXIT rc = 168
>11/17/03 17:12:54 ANS1503E Valid password not available for server
>  'TSMSERVER'.

My guess would be that either the "passwd.daily" object in your client directory
is a plain file rather than a directory, or that the directory doesn't exist.
Have a good look at that file system object for existence, type, and
permissions.  Make sure you run the password planting under user root.

  Richard Sims, BU


Error Message - ANS1503E

2003-11-17 Thread Nicolas Savva
Hi to all

I have the following definition in dsm.sys (client option file on AIX):

SErvername  tsmserver
COMMmethod TCPip
TCPPort1500
TCPServeraddress   192.168.1.100
NODENAME sap-bw
TCPNODELAY YES
passwordaccess generate
passworddir /usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/passwd.daily

When i run dsmc command i receive the following error:

/17/2003 17:12:54 TCA EXIT rc = 168
11/17/03 17:12:54 ANS1503E Valid password not available for server
'TSMSERVER'.
The administrator for your system must run TSM and enter the password to
store i
t locally.

Any ideas?

Thanks




Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and
may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person),  you
may not use, copy, distribute or deliver to anyone this message (or any
part of its contents) or take any action in reliance on it. In such case,
you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately.

If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by
e-mail or telephone and delete the e-mail from any computer. If you or your
employer does not consent to internet e-mail messages of this kind, please
notify us immediately.

All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present
in this e-mail. As we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments we recommend that you
subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use.

The views, opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this
electronic mail are not given or endorsed by Laiki Group unless otherwise
indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message.



Re: Error Message - ANS1512E

2003-11-08 Thread Zlatko Krastev
Are you receiving the message immediately when the script is run?
I would expect the message comes not from the attempt to execute the
backupnas_daily.bat file but from dsmc executable called within the
script.
Check dsmerror.log!

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Nicolas Savva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
07.11.2003 09:43
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
    Subject:Error Message - ANS1512E


Hi to all

When i am trying to run a scheduled backup i receive the following error
message:

Executing Operating System command or script:
c:\tsmscripts\backupnas_daily.bat
The process cannot access the file because it is being used by onother
process

I have looked to the Task Manager but i did not find any process that is
using the above file.

Any ideas?

Thanks




Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and
may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you
may not use, copy, distribute or deliver to anyone this message (or any
part of its contents) or take any action in reliance on it. In such case,
you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately.

If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by
e-mail or telephone and delete the e-mail from any computer. If you or
your
employer does not consent to internet e-mail messages of this kind, please
notify us immediately.

All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are
present
in this e-mail. As we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments we recommend that you
subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use.

The views, opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this
electronic mail are not given or endorsed by Laiki Group unless otherwise
indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message.



Error Message - ANS1512E

2003-11-07 Thread Nicolas Savva
Hi to all

When i am trying to run a scheduled backup i receive the following error
message:

Executing Operating System command or script:
c:\tsmscripts\backupnas_daily.bat
The process cannot access the file because it is being used by onother
process

I have looked to the Task Manager but i did not find any process that is
using the above file.

Any ideas?

Thanks




Privileged/Confidential information may be contained in this message and
may be subject to legal privilege. Access to this e-mail by anyone other
than the intended recipient is unauthorised. If you are not the intended
recipient (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person),  you
may not use, copy, distribute or deliver to anyone this message (or any
part of its contents) or take any action in reliance on it. In such case,
you should destroy this message, and notify us immediately.

If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by
e-mail or telephone and delete the e-mail from any computer. If you or your
employer does not consent to internet e-mail messages of this kind, please
notify us immediately.

All reasonable precautions have been taken to ensure no viruses are present
in this e-mail. As we cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage
arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments we recommend that you
subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use.

The views, opinions, conclusions and other information expressed in this
electronic mail are not given or endorsed by Laiki Group unless otherwise
indicated by an authorised representative independent of this message.



SV: Error message - Lotus Domino

2003-09-22 Thread Pedersen.Michael Benny MIP
Hi Richard,

U where right, the objects was not there.

Thanks

- Michael

-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 21. september 2003 19:22
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Error message - Lotus Domino


>When trying to backup tranaction logs for Lotus Domino. I got the following
>error:
>ACD0200E (Unable to open a file for reading).
>What can course this problem!
>Whar have I done wrong.

Probably, working on Sunday.  :-)

This might be because some type of Domino maintenance activity is happening
within the the backup window. From what I understand, TDP for Domino scans all
of the databases to gather info such as pathnames at the onset of the backup.
Something may have interfered with the acquisition of such info then, or
something has changed by the time TDP for Domino opens the object for backup.
The most obvious cause would be the disappearance of the object.

  Richard Sims, BU


Re: Error message - Lotus Domino

2003-09-21 Thread Richard Sims
>When trying to backup tranaction logs for Lotus Domino. I got the following
>error:
>ACD0200E (Unable to open a file for reading).
>What can course this problem!
>Whar have I done wrong.

Probably, working on Sunday.  :-)

This might be because some type of Domino maintenance activity is happening
within the the backup window. From what I understand, TDP for Domino scans all
of the databases to gather info such as pathnames at the onset of the backup.
Something may have interfered with the acquisition of such info then, or
something has changed by the time TDP for Domino opens the object for backup.
The most obvious cause would be the disappearance of the object.

  Richard Sims, BU


Error message - Lotus Domino

2003-09-21 Thread Pedersen.Michael Benny MIP
When trying to backup tranaction logs for Lotus Domino. I got the following error:
ACD0200E (Unable to open a file for reading).
What can course this problem!
Whar have I done wrong.

Please advice

- Michael


error message in tsm actlog while checking in scratch tape

2003-08-25 Thread Justin Bleistein
anyone ever see this before in the actlog while trying to checkin a scratch
tape?:

ANR2033E QUERY STGPOOL: Command failed - lock conflict.
ANR0405I Session 107371 ended for administrator ADMIN (AIX).
ANRD mmslib.c(7894): ThreadId<79> Test storage volume failed - rc =
142.
ANRD mmslib.c(7815): ThreadId<79> Could not determine if volume VR7649
in
library TSMLIB2 is defined to a storage pool.

thanks in advance!.

--Justin Richard Bleistein
Unix/TSM Systems Administrator (Sungard eSourcing)
Desk: (856) 566 - 3485
Cell:(856) 912 - 0861
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-23 Thread Anderson F. Nobre
That's curious!!! Now I'm in doubt. I think that you have to use the TSM
SCSI Device Driver. What I'm not seeing is the library device. It's
something like "lb0". If not first try to create through SMIT DEVICES ->
Tivoli Storage Manager Devices -> SCSI Attached Devices ->
Library/MediumChanger -> Add a Library/MediumChanger. Select the type ADSM
library and the controller. In your case is the controller connected on slot
1P-08. The connection address seems to be 3,0. After that try to define the
devices:
tsm> define library  libt=scsi
tsm> define path   srct=server destt=library
device=/dev/lb0
tsm> define drive   element=31
tsm> define drive   element=32
tsm> define path   srct=server destt=drive
device=/dev/mt1
tsm> define path   srct=server destt=drive
device=/dev/mt2

Regards,

Anderson

- Original Message -
From: "Scott Figgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: oops forgot the error message.


Anderson/Group -

# lsdev -Cc tape
rmt0 Available 1P-08-00-0,0 4.0 GB 4mm Tape Drive
rmt1 Available 1P-08-00-2,0 4.0 GB 4mm Tape Drive
smc0 Available 1P-08-00-3,0 IBM 7336 Tape Medium Changer
# lsdev -Cc adsmtape
mt0 Available 1P-08-00-0,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt1 Available 1P-08-00-2,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
#
I used the Webgui to define the library. But nowhere on that panel does it
ask
for any scsi ID or anything. Just a Library name and if it's shared or not.

Thanks again everyone.
Scott





They show up here.. But when I try to install the



Quoting "Anderson F. Nobre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Scott,
>
> Are you using the TSM SCSI Device Driver?
> If yes, what's the target and LUN that you are using to define the library
> device?
> Can you type the following commands and show us the output?
> # lsdev -Cc tape
> # lsdev -Cc adsmtape
>
> Regards,
>
> Anderson
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Figgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:46 AM
> Subject: oops forgot the error message.
>
>
> I'm getting this error in my Server log on AIX 5.1 with TSM 5.1.6.5 after
> defining a 7336-205 4mm Tape library. Any ideas? IBM says this library is
> supported in the BASE codeset.
>
> 06/22/03 22:54:26 ANR8843E Initialization failed for SCSI library
> AUTOLIB1 -
>the library will be inaccessible.
> 06/22/03 22:54:26 ANR8441E Initialization failed for SCSI library
> AUTOLIB1.
>
>
>
> Any help is appreciated.
> Scott Figgins
> IBM Cate
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>




-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-23 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: Scott Figgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
# lsdev -Cc tape
rmt0 Available 1P-08-00-0,0 4.0 GB 4mm Tape Drive
rmt1 Available 1P-08-00-2,0 4.0 GB 4mm Tape Drive
smc0 Available 1P-08-00-3,0 IBM 7336 Tape Medium Changer
# lsdev -Cc adsmtape
mt0 Available 1P-08-00-0,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt1 Available 1P-08-00-2,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
#
I used the Webgui to define the library. But nowhere on that panel does it ask
for any scsi ID or anything. Just a Library name and if it's shared or not.
===
 
Remember the installation steps for a library at the 5.1 level:
 
1--define library (requirements: name, libtype)
2--define devclass (requirements: library name,media type)
3--define drives (requirements: library name,element number)
4--define path for library(requirements: device definition)
5--define path for drives (requirements: library name, device definition)
 
Items #4 and #5 are new to TSM 5.1. Refer to your TSM Administrator's Guide for 
detailed instructions.
 
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-23 Thread Scott Figgins
Anderson/Group -

# lsdev -Cc tape
rmt0 Available 1P-08-00-0,0 4.0 GB 4mm Tape Drive
rmt1 Available 1P-08-00-2,0 4.0 GB 4mm Tape Drive
smc0 Available 1P-08-00-3,0 IBM 7336 Tape Medium Changer
# lsdev -Cc adsmtape
mt0 Available 1P-08-00-0,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
mt1 Available 1P-08-00-2,0 Tivoli Storage Manager Tape Drive
#
I used the Webgui to define the library. But nowhere on that panel does it ask
for any scsi ID or anything. Just a Library name and if it's shared or not.

Thanks again everyone.
Scott





They show up here.. But when I try to install the



Quoting "Anderson F. Nobre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Scott,
>
> Are you using the TSM SCSI Device Driver?
> If yes, what's the target and LUN that you are using to define the library
> device?
> Can you type the following commands and show us the output?
> # lsdev -Cc tape
> # lsdev -Cc adsmtape
>
> Regards,
>
> Anderson
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Figgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:46 AM
> Subject: oops forgot the error message.
>
>
> I'm getting this error in my Server log on AIX 5.1 with TSM 5.1.6.5 after
> defining a 7336-205 4mm Tape library. Any ideas? IBM says this library is
> supported in the BASE codeset.
>
> 06/22/03 22:54:26 ANR8843E Initialization failed for SCSI library
> AUTOLIB1 -
>the library will be inaccessible.
> 06/22/03 22:54:26 ANR8441E Initialization failed for SCSI library
> AUTOLIB1.
>
>
>
> Any help is appreciated.
> Scott Figgins
> IBM Cate
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -
> This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
>




-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-23 Thread Scott Figgins
I do have the latest ATAPE 8.2.5.0. Yes you do need it for it to define the
SMC0 media changer. I have loaded the AIX ML4 Maintenance Level. The drives
work fine with sysback and at the normal AIX level. It's just when I try to
setup the library. Thanks for your help for this Newbie at TSM :)

Scott






Quoting Dan Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Hot Diggety! Dan Foster was rumored to have written:
> > Hot Diggety! Scott Figgins was rumored to have written:
> > > I'm getting this error in my Server log on AIX 5.1 with TSM 5.1.6.5
> after
> > > defining a 7336-205 4mm Tape library. Any ideas? IBM says this library
> is
> > > supported in the BASE codeset.
> >
> > 2. What Atape version do you have?
>
> Er, I just realized that I'm not sure you need the Atape driver for a 7336,
> and most likely you don't need it. I've got an IBM 4mm library but last
> time we used it was about seven years ago when we did backups with Sysback.
>
> Do you have patches applied to AIX 5.1? Latest maintenance level is either
> ML3 or ML4.
>
> -Dan
>




-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-23 Thread Zlatko Krastev/ACIT
He does not need to use Atape for 7336, but `lsdev -Cc tape` output might
reveal some other problems. So the Anderson's approach is better :-))

Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant






Dan Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
23.06.2003 07:02
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"


To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
    Subject:Re: oops forgot the error message.


Hot Diggety! Dan Foster was rumored to have written:
> Hot Diggety! Scott Figgins was rumored to have written:
> > I'm getting this error in my Server log on AIX 5.1 with TSM 5.1.6.5
after
> > defining a 7336-205 4mm Tape library. Any ideas? IBM says this library
is
> > supported in the BASE codeset.
>
> 2. What Atape version do you have?

Er, I just realized that I'm not sure you need the Atape driver for a
7336,
and most likely you don't need it. I've got an IBM 4mm library but last
time we used it was about seven years ago when we did backups with
Sysback.

Do you have patches applied to AIX 5.1? Latest maintenance level is either
ML3 or ML4.

-Dan


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-22 Thread Anderson F. Nobre
Scott,

Are you using the TSM SCSI Device Driver?
If yes, what's the target and LUN that you are using to define the library
device?
Can you type the following commands and show us the output?
# lsdev -Cc tape
# lsdev -Cc adsmtape

Regards,

Anderson

- Original Message -
From: "Scott Figgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:46 AM
Subject: oops forgot the error message.


I'm getting this error in my Server log on AIX 5.1 with TSM 5.1.6.5 after
defining a 7336-205 4mm Tape library. Any ideas? IBM says this library is
supported in the BASE codeset.

06/22/03 22:54:26 ANR8843E Initialization failed for SCSI library
AUTOLIB1 -
   the library will be inaccessible.
06/22/03 22:54:26 ANR8441E Initialization failed for SCSI library
AUTOLIB1.



Any help is appreciated.
Scott Figgins
IBM Cate
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/


Re: oops forgot the error message.

2003-06-22 Thread Dan Foster
Hot Diggety! Dan Foster was rumored to have written:
> Hot Diggety! Scott Figgins was rumored to have written:
> > I'm getting this error in my Server log on AIX 5.1 with TSM 5.1.6.5 after
> > defining a 7336-205 4mm Tape library. Any ideas? IBM says this library is
> > supported in the BASE codeset.
>
> 2. What Atape version do you have?

Er, I just realized that I'm not sure you need the Atape driver for a 7336,
and most likely you don't need it. I've got an IBM 4mm library but last
time we used it was about seven years ago when we did backups with Sysback.

Do you have patches applied to AIX 5.1? Latest maintenance level is either
ML3 or ML4.

-Dan


  1   2   3   >