Re: [AFMUG] Odd routing issue

2024-01-04 Thread castarritt
I'm not sure what you are asking Steve.  I am forming multiple adjacencies
with multiple /30 networks on the same interface for ECMP load balancing
purposes on a few links.

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 7:19 PM Steve Jones 
wrote:

> are your routing IPs in a bridge with other IP addresses?
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, 10:09 AM castarritt  wrote:
>
>> Had an odd issue last night.  All 'tik OSPF routed network with routers
>> at each tower site.  Simple single area OSPF setup, no MPLS or other
>> overlay, about 700 internal routes.  Last night, some customers on APs
>> connected to specific tower routers lost connection to the internet.  Our
>> monitoring system never lost connection to any of the customer SMs or
>> anything else in our network, so no alarms were raised.  The issue lasted a
>> few hours overnight and recovered on its own without any of us getting to
>> take a look at it.  It is like the affected routers lost their dynamic
>> default route.  The affected routers appear to be randomly scattered around
>> our network.  They aren't all connected along the same backhaul paths, and
>> in one case where we had two routers at a specific site, only one of the
>> routers was affected.  This happened at the tail end of a heavy rain storm
>> that was causing a lot of OSPF topology changes as microwave links went in
>> and out of service due to rain fade.
>>
>> Anyone else seen something like this?  Is our routing table getting too
>> big for 'tik to handle with a single OSPF area?
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


Re: [AFMUG] Odd routing issue

2024-01-03 Thread Steve Jones
are your routing IPs in a bridge with other IP addresses?

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024, 10:09 AM castarritt  wrote:

> Had an odd issue last night.  All 'tik OSPF routed network with routers at
> each tower site.  Simple single area OSPF setup, no MPLS or other overlay,
> about 700 internal routes.  Last night, some customers on APs connected to
> specific tower routers lost connection to the internet.  Our monitoring
> system never lost connection to any of the customer SMs or anything else in
> our network, so no alarms were raised.  The issue lasted a few hours
> overnight and recovered on its own without any of us getting to take a look
> at it.  It is like the affected routers lost their dynamic default route.
> The affected routers appear to be randomly scattered around our network.
> They aren't all connected along the same backhaul paths, and in one case
> where we had two routers at a specific site, only one of the routers was
> affected.  This happened at the tail end of a heavy rain storm that was
> causing a lot of OSPF topology changes as microwave links went in and out
> of service due to rain fade.
>
> Anyone else seen something like this?  Is our routing table getting too
> big for 'tik to handle with a single OSPF area?
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com


[AFMUG] Odd routing issue

2024-01-03 Thread castarritt
Had an odd issue last night.  All 'tik OSPF routed network with routers at
each tower site.  Simple single area OSPF setup, no MPLS or other overlay,
about 700 internal routes.  Last night, some customers on APs connected to
specific tower routers lost connection to the internet.  Our monitoring
system never lost connection to any of the customer SMs or anything else in
our network, so no alarms were raised.  The issue lasted a few hours
overnight and recovered on its own without any of us getting to take a look
at it.  It is like the affected routers lost their dynamic default route.
The affected routers appear to be randomly scattered around our network.
They aren't all connected along the same backhaul paths, and in one case
where we had two routers at a specific site, only one of the routers was
affected.  This happened at the tail end of a heavy rain storm that was
causing a lot of OSPF topology changes as microwave links went in and out
of service due to rain fade.

Anyone else seen something like this?  Is our routing table getting too big
for 'tik to handle with a single OSPF area?
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com