Re: [AFMUG] Email Server
Smartermail simple -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:35 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Email Server For those of you still providing your users with an email account what platforms are you using?
Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik BGP Blackhole Community
Works great -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dennis Burgess Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 8:51 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik BGP Blackhole Community Many times! www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – dmburg...@linktechs.net -Original Message- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, June 20, 2016 6:35 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik BGP Blackhole Community Has anyone used BGP and Remote-Triggered BlackHole with Mikrotik to help deal with DOS attacks? Any examples of getting it too work with Mikrotik?
Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come
We are making the push to dual stack it’s exciting John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:15 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come Hmmm, would think Godaddy would have taken care of that for me. From: Ken Hohhof <mailto:af...@kwisp.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:08 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come IPv4 only. Like www.mccowntech.com? From: Chuck McCown <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 11:01 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come Only when the end is V4 only. We hear stats that all US domains are already 60-80% V6. From: Joe Novak <mailto:jno...@lrcomm.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 9:56 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPV6 here we come are you going to be natting IPV6 > IPV4 at the edge? On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: Commencing new project: Going to attempt to provision all new customers on V6 only. This is gonna hurt.
Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 fun....
All I have is the IPv6 address configured From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2016 3:23 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IPv6 fun can u provide your config snippet ? FYI, no such issues with MT, we have quiet a few ipv6 peers running on a multiple units. Regards. Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net _ From: "John Babineaux" <john.babine...@reach4com.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 3:44:57 PM Subject: [AFMUG] IPv6 fun I am just starting an IPv6 connection with one of our upstream providers. I have a mikrotik router that they are connecting to on a fibre sfp port with ipv4 working. They gave me an IP address and I added it to the port. I am getting a “duplicate address detected” error on the IP. They swear it’s not a duplicate and Mikrotik tells me they use standards. I don’t know what to do at this point to get it right. I can unplug the port, disable then enable the port, and plug it in and it works….. but if the router reboots or if I disable the port for any reason we get the same error. I just lit up a second IPv6 connection with the same provider. It’s on a different network and it’s doing the same error. Does anyone know of a problem with Mikrotik and IPv6 or is my provider not configuring something correctly. I also don’t have a loopback on that interface because I read somewhere that it could cause that issue. ____ John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526
[AFMUG] IPv6 fun....
I am just starting an IPv6 connection with one of our upstream providers. I have a mikrotik router that they are connecting to on a fibre sfp port with ipv4 working. They gave me an IP address and I added it to the port. I am getting a “duplicate address detected” error on the IP. They swear it’s not a duplicate and Mikrotik tells me they use standards. I don’t know what to do at this point to get it right. I can unplug the port, disable then enable the port, and plug it in and it works….. but if the router reboots or if I disable the port for any reason we get the same error. I just lit up a second IPv6 connection with the same provider. It’s on a different network and it’s doing the same error. Does anyone know of a problem with Mikrotik and IPv6 or is my provider not configuring something correctly. I also don’t have a loopback on that interface because I read somewhere that it could cause that issue. John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526
Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF
There only one way I can think of to force traffic to go out one port and come back on that same port without nat. This would be done with filtering rules which I recommend making for a rainy day or the world ends and leave them disabled until needed. There is no redundancy in this and you have to force by the size of the network your advertising. Example would be the whole /24 would have to go through that network you can’t split it. Most providers prefer the largest network you can advertise. Advertising a bunch of contagious /24 may not be allowed it makes the full routing tables that much larger. John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 2:41 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF We plan on not having to ever do it. but we stacked our priority customers on one /24 so if there were service issues on one of the upstreams or if we unexpectedly saturated one we could force them to use just the one On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, John Babineaux <john.babine...@reach4com.com> wrote: I would advertise all networks on each connection. You can Prepend to an extent to help prefer traffic coming back on a certain connection. This cannot be prepended to high or some strip it off. It broke the internet once by someone putting a really large one….. If one connection is really bad and the other is really good (to many hops or very few) you will really only use one most of the time. BGP will send the traffic out of the connection that is closer. If one of the connections goes out it will stop advertising on that link to the world. The working connection will be the only one advertising. If you are expecting problems I normally filter all traffic to keep things from flapping on that connection until the work is done. ____ John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 <tel:337-783-3436%20x105> | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:20 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF thank you guys Now another question, one of our providers is solid, the other..well. What kind of issues can come up with a basic BGP implementaion (we are taking the full tables) that will hurt us. Like is there some way that even if we stop announcing one of the /24 on their circuit theyll aggregate it on their own into the /22 of the ASN? You have to remember this is the upstream that moved our bandwidth from an ethernet port to an SPF one morning without mentioning it to us and without verifying we had a module, they also send a shitface drunk tech, and for kicks one day after a failed routing migration, they went ahead and implemented the changes anyway in the middle of the week, just because they could. So any upstream BGP shenanigans I fully expect to see On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:09 PM, John Babineaux <john.babine...@reach4com.com> wrote: One more thing BGP will pass a Default route to OSPF that will propagate it so that’s how it will know. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of John Babineaux Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF It’s pretty simple. You create a connection with your up streams using your ASN and their ASN. You need ip connectivity to the other router (prob your gateway but could be another router). And a password if required or preferred. Next you setup filters to only allow what networks you want to pass upstream and what you want to accept. Then you add what networks you what to share to the world statically or to pass them from OSPF. Keep in mind they will create filters to block anything that you didn’t tell them that you will pass. If you say x.x.x.x/22 they will only allow that exact thing. You should only pass nothing lower than a /24 as most will block it. It’s your choice for full routing tables or just /8 or /16 etc. You can also get a default route if you don’t get full tables. Most of the other things I read was for getting things to work when you have to connect to the other BGP router that’s not directly connected or your gateway. ____ John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 <tel:337-
Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF
I would advertise all networks on each connection. You can Prepend to an extent to help prefer traffic coming back on a certain connection. This cannot be prepended to high or some strip it off. It broke the internet once by someone putting a really large one….. If one connection is really bad and the other is really good (to many hops or very few) you will really only use one most of the time. BGP will send the traffic out of the connection that is closer. If one of the connections goes out it will stop advertising on that link to the world. The working connection will be the only one advertising. If you are expecting problems I normally filter all traffic to keep things from flapping on that connection until the work is done. John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:20 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF thank you guys Now another question, one of our providers is solid, the other..well. What kind of issues can come up with a basic BGP implementaion (we are taking the full tables) that will hurt us. Like is there some way that even if we stop announcing one of the /24 on their circuit theyll aggregate it on their own into the /22 of the ASN? You have to remember this is the upstream that moved our bandwidth from an ethernet port to an SPF one morning without mentioning it to us and without verifying we had a module, they also send a shitface drunk tech, and for kicks one day after a failed routing migration, they went ahead and implemented the changes anyway in the middle of the week, just because they could. So any upstream BGP shenanigans I fully expect to see On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:09 PM, John Babineaux <john.babine...@reach4com.com> wrote: One more thing BGP will pass a Default route to OSPF that will propagate it so that’s how it will know. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of John Babineaux Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF It’s pretty simple. You create a connection with your up streams using your ASN and their ASN. You need ip connectivity to the other router (prob your gateway but could be another router). And a password if required or preferred. Next you setup filters to only allow what networks you want to pass upstream and what you want to accept. Then you add what networks you what to share to the world statically or to pass them from OSPF. Keep in mind they will create filters to block anything that you didn’t tell them that you will pass. If you say x.x.x.x/22 they will only allow that exact thing. You should only pass nothing lower than a /24 as most will block it. It’s your choice for full routing tables or just /8 or /16 etc. You can also get a default route if you don’t get full tables. Most of the other things I read was for getting things to work when you have to connect to the other BGP router that’s not directly connected or your gateway. ____ John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 <tel:337-783-3436%20x105> | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF I understand this, but its still a second new component to something I already am not competent in On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:25 PM, can...@believewireless.net <p...@believewireless.net> wrote: iBGP and eBGP are the same thing as far as configuration goes. (i) means you are using BGP internal to your network and (e) means you are using BGP to your providers. How you set them up is exactly the same. The only different with multi-hop is that you have to set the maximum number of hops away the BGP peer can be. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:23 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: No, I cant add any topology changes or try to bring in unfamiliar things like ibgp or mpls/vpls while bringing in something unfamiliar like BGP unless I run out of interim options On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, can...@believewireless.net <p...@believewireless.net> wrote: With Mikrotik, depending on your typology, running iBGP over layer 3 is probably better than EoIP. In the past, I wasn't happy with the way things worked over EoIP. It's now over a direct, layer 2 connection and works 100%. You
Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF
One more thing BGP will pass a Default route to OSPF that will propagate it so that’s how it will know. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of John Babineaux Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 1:08 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF It’s pretty simple. You create a connection with your up streams using your ASN and their ASN. You need ip connectivity to the other router (prob your gateway but could be another router). And a password if required or preferred. Next you setup filters to only allow what networks you want to pass upstream and what you want to accept. Then you add what networks you what to share to the world statically or to pass them from OSPF. Keep in mind they will create filters to block anything that you didn’t tell them that you will pass. If you say x.x.x.x/22 they will only allow that exact thing. You should only pass nothing lower than a /24 as most will block it. It’s your choice for full routing tables or just /8 or /16 etc. You can also get a default route if you don’t get full tables. Most of the other things I read was for getting things to work when you have to connect to the other BGP router that’s not directly connected or your gateway. John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF I understand this, but its still a second new component to something I already am not competent in On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:25 PM, can...@believewireless.net <p...@believewireless.net> wrote: iBGP and eBGP are the same thing as far as configuration goes. (i) means you are using BGP internal to your network and (e) means you are using BGP to your providers. How you set them up is exactly the same. The only different with multi-hop is that you have to set the maximum number of hops away the BGP peer can be. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:23 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: No, I cant add any topology changes or try to bring in unfamiliar things like ibgp or mpls/vpls while bringing in something unfamiliar like BGP unless I run out of interim options On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, can...@believewireless.net <p...@believewireless.net> wrote: With Mikrotik, depending on your typology, running iBGP over layer 3 is probably better than EoIP. In the past, I wasn't happy with the way things worked over EoIP. It's now over a direct, layer 2 connection and works 100%. You can run setup multi-hop BGP routing to do it over layer 3 (single setting in Winbox) but it's not as clean. Could you have the path between the two routers be layer 2 via VPLS or just using switches? On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: VPLS is not currently present, thats on my "to learn" list On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jesse DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote: The two BGP routers do not need to be on the same L2 network for the iBGP connection. Jesse DuPont Network Architect email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net Celerity Networks LLC Celerity Broadband LLC Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband On 5/3/16 10:25 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: A BGP speaker would be a router speaking BGP. In this case, most likely your routers at the edge of your network that connect to your providers. Are the routers that are between your two BGP routers capable of running BGP, resource wise? Can you do a VPLS tunnel between your two BGP routers? If not, what about a VLAN? - Mike Hammett <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> _ From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 11:13:36 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF Mike, i said helmet, explain it to me like you would a 10 year old, then dumb it do
Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF
It’s pretty simple. You create a connection with your up streams using your ASN and their ASN. You need ip connectivity to the other router (prob your gateway but could be another router). And a password if required or preferred. Next you setup filters to only allow what networks you want to pass upstream and what you want to accept. Then you add what networks you what to share to the world statically or to pass them from OSPF. Keep in mind they will create filters to block anything that you didn’t tell them that you will pass. If you say x.x.x.x/22 they will only allow that exact thing. You should only pass nothing lower than a /24 as most will block it. It’s your choice for full routing tables or just /8 or /16 etc. You can also get a default route if you don’t get full tables. Most of the other things I read was for getting things to work when you have to connect to the other BGP router that’s not directly connected or your gateway. John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:36 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF I understand this, but its still a second new component to something I already am not competent in On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:25 PM, can...@believewireless.net <p...@believewireless.net> wrote: iBGP and eBGP are the same thing as far as configuration goes. (i) means you are using BGP internal to your network and (e) means you are using BGP to your providers. How you set them up is exactly the same. The only different with multi-hop is that you have to set the maximum number of hops away the BGP peer can be. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:23 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: No, I cant add any topology changes or try to bring in unfamiliar things like ibgp or mpls/vpls while bringing in something unfamiliar like BGP unless I run out of interim options On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:13 PM, can...@believewireless.net <p...@believewireless.net> wrote: With Mikrotik, depending on your typology, running iBGP over layer 3 is probably better than EoIP. In the past, I wasn't happy with the way things worked over EoIP. It's now over a direct, layer 2 connection and works 100%. You can run setup multi-hop BGP routing to do it over layer 3 (single setting in Winbox) but it's not as clean. Could you have the path between the two routers be layer 2 via VPLS or just using switches? On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: VPLS is not currently present, thats on my "to learn" list On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Jesse DuPont <jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net> wrote: The two BGP routers do not need to be on the same L2 network for the iBGP connection. Jesse DuPont Network Architect email: jesse.dup...@celeritycorp.net Celerity Networks LLC Celerity Broadband LLC Like us! facebook.com/celeritynetworksllc Like us! facebook.com/celeritybroadband On 5/3/16 10:25 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: A BGP speaker would be a router speaking BGP. In this case, most likely your routers at the edge of your network that connect to your providers. Are the routers that are between your two BGP routers capable of running BGP, resource wise? Can you do a VPLS tunnel between your two BGP routers? If not, what about a VLAN? - Mike Hammett <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> _ From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2016 11:13:36 AM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] BGP and OSPF Mike, i said helmet, explain it to me like you would a 10 year old, then dumb it down to my level from there. I dont know what a bgp speaker is On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:10 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: Your OSPF network will just use default routes to get to your BGP speakers. Your BGP speakers with full routes will choo
[AFMUG] To strong of a signal?
What would be a signal that is to strong? -30 for a backhaul. If I have a backhaul at what point should I start turning down the power or should I do it just because? I have an Air Fiber 5 link and it's in the -30s John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526
Re: [AFMUG] To strong of a signal?
Thanks everyone for the info!!! From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:21 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] To strong of a signal? the ubnt certifier guy said -45 On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Daniel White <afmu...@gmail.com> wrote: Damage yes. Usually 0dB or something like that. Usually though your overpowering the receive at -35 or stronger. With ATPC no reason to be that hot. Thank you, Daniel White <mailto:afmu...@gmail.com> afmu...@gmail.com Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590> Skype: danieldwhite Social: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> LinkedIn: <https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84> Twitter From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 12:35 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] To strong of a signal? I have used licensed radios in the upper –20s before. Damage probably will not happen until the single digits or positive numbers. From: Josh Luthman <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 12:33 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] To strong of a signal? AF can probably handle it, but you're pushing a lot of power into the air for no reason. I'd suggest bringing it down. It will help you and your neighbors. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 2:32 PM, John Babineaux <john.babine...@reach4com.com> wrote: What would be a signal that is to strong? -30 for a backhaul. If I have a backhaul at what point should I start turning down the power or should I do it just because? I have an Air Fiber 5 link and it's in the -30s ____ John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 <tel:337-783-3436%20x105> | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 _ <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> Avast logo This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
Re: [AFMUG] OT: Vmware Vs Xen
I love proxmox! John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Faisal Imtiaz Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 1:26 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Vmware Vs Xen I know you are asking about Xen & Vmware... But, Have you looked at Proxmox ? it has everyting you are looking for. Regards Faisal Imtiaz Snappy Internet & Telecom 7266 SW 48 Street Miami, FL 33155 Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net _ From: "David" <dmilho...@wletc.com> To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2015 12:14:14 PM Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Vmware Vs Xen I am doing a home brew vmhost at home and I am tossing around using XEN vs Vmware like I use at the office. >From what I gather of Xen alot is done within the CLI but I am looking for a >client like VMware host client that will give me the gui interface to manage host on XEN Any ideas or thoughts are welcome --
Re: [AFMUG] OT: BttF
http://www.wired.com/2015/06/lexus-hoverboard-slide/ From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2015 6:11 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] OT: BttF Now someone just needs to come out with a hoverboard...and I need a trust fund. http://news.nike.com/news/nike-mag-2015
[AFMUG] Hotspot solutions?
I’m looking for a Hotspot payment gateway that a Mikrotik can auth with. I have the Mikrotik Usermanager and I want something that I don’t have to manage directly. We have very few users buying packages right now in the one test spot. I’m looking for something low cost and reliable. Any recommendations? I’m looking at http://www.hotspotsystem.com/ but I don’t know much about them. John Babineaux System Administrator REACH4 Communications | Website: <http://www.reach4com.com/> www.REACH4Com.com Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: john.babine...@reach4com.com 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526
