Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC

[Ron M.]

Correct, we were in a CR7, not Cat IIIc capable. I think those things are
only rated to Cat II.

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:15 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

> In the case of SLC, you cannot blame the airport or the weather.  The
> airport was upgraded for the Olympics to CAT-IIIC which means you can land
> as long as you have good enough visibility to taxi.  It is full auto land
> capable.  But the aircraft and crew must also be capable and not all are.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gthcuZV8agI
>
> *From:* Ron M.
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:05 AM
> *To:* af@afmug.com
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC
>
> Actually, I almost had one of those a couple months ago, ceilings and fog
> in SLC just barely lifted above minimums enough to let us get in. Otherwise
> it would have been a DEN-PVU-SLC trip.
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>
>> That is one long flight!
>>
>> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 21, 2018 9:10 PM
>> *To:* af
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PVU-SLC
>>
>> Never been on a flight with this segment before. ..
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] PVU-SLC

[Ron M.]

Actually, I almost had one of those a couple months ago, ceilings and fog
in SLC just barely lifted above minimums enough to let us get in. Otherwise
it would have been a DEN-PVU-SLC trip.

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:34 AM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> That is one long flight!
>
> *From:* Forrest Christian (List Account)
> *Sent:* Monday, May 21, 2018 9:10 PM
> *To:* af
> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PVU-SLC
>
> Never been on a flight with this segment before. ..
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment

[Ron M.]

What I'm thinking here... don't charge the end users. Get good IP traffic
accounting and charge the upstream content providers for carrying THEIR
sourced traffic. Don't penalize the end users. ;-)

(My $0.02, can I have my change back now?)

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM, George Skorup 
wrote:

> One of our tech support guys asked me yesterday if we're going to start
> charging for access to Facebook, Netflix, etc. I was just like, dude,
> seriously? Yeah, cuz that will surely get us customers. He said, but now we
> can, so why wouldn't we? I said, but did we before NN? And then I realized
> he was just trying to annoy me. Same shit the media is doing. FUD dbag
> tactics. IT'S A TRAP!
>
> On 12/15/2017 2:59 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
>
> Exactly.  I literally see people suggesting that ISP's will charge for
> access to Facebook or charge for access to Netflix.  Not. Going. To. Happen.
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Mathew Howard" 
> To: "af" 
> Sent: 12/15/2017 3:57:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
>
> Yeah, true, there were ways to legally do it before if you really wanted
> to. Bbut more to the point, nobody is going to do something like that
> anyway, because there's no way that it would be worth the customer backlash
> they'd have to deal with.
>
> Nah, nobody is going to have the sense to feel silly about it... they'll
> just keep whining for awhile, and then forget about it. Or else, they'll
> find something that's completely unrelated that they don't like and blame
> it on the lack of NN.
>
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett  wrote:
>
>> You would have to justify that as "reasonable network management".  They
>> defined reasonable network management as being driven by technical reasons
>> rather than business reasons (paraphrased).  Not disagreeing with you, just
>> clarifying.
>>
>> The bigger loophole I saw was that transit providers were excluded from
>> all the rules.
>> Put an AS in between you and your upstream who just does filtering for
>> you.  They're a transit provider so they have no NN rules.
>>
>> It was very frustrating to witness all the crazy theories about what
>> would happen.  I wonder if anyone will have the sense to feel silly about
>> pontificating on Facebook when absolutely nothing changes.
>>
>>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Dennis Burgess" 
>> To: "af@afmug.com" 
>> Sent: 12/15/2017 3:43:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
>>
>> NN did not disallow you to block facebook, just have to disclose it.  J
>> So it really did’ent do anything.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Dennis Burgess** –** Network Solution Engineer – Consultant *
>>
>> MikroTik Certified Trainer/Consultant
>>  –
>> MTCNA, MTCRE, MTCWE, MTCTCE, MTCINE
>>
>>
>>
>> For Wireless Hardware/Routers visit www.linktechs.net
>>
>> Radio Frequency Coverages: www.towercoverage.com
>>
>> Office: 314-735-0270 <%28314%29%20735-0270>
>>
>> E-Mail: dmburg...@linktechs.net
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2017 3:24 PM
>> *To:* af 
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Our NN statment
>>
>>
>>
>> Awesome! I think I'll go block Facebook, and see how that goes...
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Steve Jones 
>> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/12/15/net_neutr
>> ality_s_end_was_mostly_celebrated_by_the_far_right.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Apparently now we ISPs can lawfully block individual sites and will do so
>> with impunity.
>>
>>
>>
>> These people with these petty ideas I dont think understand how poorly
>> granularity scales.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Josh Baird  wrote:
>>
>> I like this as well.  I was thinking it would be a good idea to put out a
>> statement..
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Paul McCall  wrote:
>>
>> Yep, that is concise and effective
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Gino A. Villarini
>> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2017 7:57 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Our NN statment
>>
>>
>>
>> What do you guys think? Lots of customers calling!
>>
>>
>>
>> Aeronet Statement on Net Neutrality
>>
>>
>>
>> AeroNet, a ISP that provides advanced Internet services to Business and
>> individuals in PR, USVI and Miami, applauds any action taken  that promotes
>>  innovation and advancement of connectivity for all consumers. In Aeronet’s
>>  17 years of history, our pricing structure has always been simple,
>> unlimited and without any toll gates.  The placement and removal of Net
>> Neutrality rules have not and will not modify our pricing policy.  We
>> maintain our commitment to provide the fastest and most reliable service to
>> our 

Re: [AFMUG] Ethernet over coax

[Ron M.]

Yeah, I ran ArcNet between my BBS computer and the NetwareLite file server
(which had the pair of 120MB RLL, Seagate ST4144R drives) for the extra
disk space... don't want to think how long ago that was now.

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> ArcNet,Token Ring, LANtastic..my memory is foggy..cough cough
>
> Jaime Solorza
> Wireless Systems Architect
> 915-861-1390
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Dustin Jurman <dus...@rseng.net> wrote:
>
>> Those were the good old days when the only tools you needed was a t
>> connector and a 50 ohm terminator.  J
>>
>>
>>
>> DSJ
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ron M.
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 23, 2017 10:11 AM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ethernet over coax
>>
>>
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10BASE2
>>
>> Been there, done that?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Harold Bledsoe <hbledso...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> It's that time again - looking for brave, er I mean beta users for an
>> ethernet over coax system.  The same one could be used for phone line later.
>>
>>
>>
>> The protocol is based on g.hn so it can support PTMP on the system.
>>
>>
>>
>> Please shoot me a note offlist and I'll get you added.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Hal
>>
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Ethernet over coax

[Ron M.]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10BASE2

Been there, done that?

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Harold Bledsoe 
wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> It's that time again - looking for brave, er I mean beta users for an
> ethernet over coax system.  The same one could be used for phone line later.
>
> The protocol is based on g.hn so it can support PTMP on the system.
>
> Please shoot me a note offlist and I'll get you added.
>
> Thanks,
> -Hal
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork

[Ron M.]

Nope, only been on this project for a little under 2 years.   Not sure how
Obregon would have any cross-border links unless lots of multihop or HF.
;-)   MXL and PDS I could see that very easily.

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Did work in first two you mentioned back in 1990s ..23GHz cross border
> links for twin plants..
>
> On Feb 19, 2017 8:57 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Right now I'm doing a lot of traveling to Piedras Negras, Cd. Obregon,
>> and Mexicali. Wee little brewery operation on which I'm doing core network
>> infrastructure... ;-)
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I might have to go to Crane and Kermit to do some consulting work for
>>> Parkhill Smith and Cooper on some water projects March I think...
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2017 8:02 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep, same one here since 1998. :-)
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Jaime Solorza <
>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Cool You run the wisp business there?   Been a while since I have
>>>>> visited
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 19, 2017 7:17 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Nah, home is in Ft Stockton.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <
>>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You on the 10?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2017 5:39 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Crap, if I saw this an hour ago, I'd already be west of Balmorhea
>>>>>>>> heading that way. :D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Pavlov is happening
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2017 3:45 PM
>>>>>>>>> *To:* Animal Farm
>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is what it should look like...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2017 3:40 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <
>>>>>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quick and dirty... Masa is most important but wife in mood having
>>>>>>>>>> contractors in house all weekend repairing water damage.   Told me 
>>>>>>>>>> to just
>>>>>>>>>> buy premade one... Will get it out of her later in week,  if I am 
>>>>>>>>>> not busy
>>>>>>>>>> invading Sweden...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork

[Ron M.]

Right now I'm doing a lot of traveling to Piedras Negras, Cd. Obregon, and
Mexicali. Wee little brewery operation on which I'm doing core network
infrastructure... ;-)

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I might have to go to Crane and Kermit to do some consulting work for
> Parkhill Smith and Cooper on some water projects March I think...
>
> On Feb 19, 2017 8:02 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yep, same one here since 1998. :-)
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Cool You run the wisp business there?   Been a while since I have
>>> visited
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2017 7:17 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nah, home is in Ft Stockton.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <
>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You on the 10?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 19, 2017 5:39 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Crap, if I saw this an hour ago, I'd already be west of Balmorhea
>>>>>> heading that way. :D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pavlov is happening
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2017 3:45 PM
>>>>>>> *To:* Animal Farm
>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is what it should look like...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 19, 2017 3:40 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Quick and dirty... Masa is most important but wife in mood having
>>>>>>>> contractors in house all weekend repairing water damage.   Told me to 
>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>> buy premade one... Will get it out of her later in week,  if I am not 
>>>>>>>> busy
>>>>>>>> invading Sweden...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork

[Ron M.]

Yep, same one here since 1998. :-)

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Cool You run the wisp business there?   Been a while since I have
> visited
>
> On Feb 19, 2017 7:17 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Nah, home is in Ft Stockton.
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> You on the 10?
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2017 5:39 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Crap, if I saw this an hour ago, I'd already be west of Balmorhea
>>>> heading that way. :D
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pavlov is happening
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2017 3:45 PM
>>>>> *To:* Animal Farm
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork
>>>>>
>>>>> This is what it should look like...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 19, 2017 3:40 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Quick and dirty... Masa is most important but wife in mood having
>>>>>> contractors in house all weekend repairing water damage.   Told me to 
>>>>>> just
>>>>>> buy premade one... Will get it out of her later in week,  if I am not 
>>>>>> busy
>>>>>> invading Sweden...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork

[Ron M.]

Nah, home is in Ft Stockton.

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> You on the 10?
>
> On Feb 19, 2017 5:39 PM, "Ron M." <ccie4...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Crap, if I saw this an hour ago, I'd already be west of Balmorhea heading
>> that way. :D
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Pavlov is happening
>>>
>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza
>>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2017 3:45 PM
>>> *To:* Animal Farm
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork
>>>
>>> This is what it should look like...
>>>
>>> On Feb 19, 2017 3:40 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quick and dirty... Masa is most important but wife in mood having
>>>> contractors in house all weekend repairing water damage.   Told me to just
>>>> buy premade one... Will get it out of her later in week,  if I am not busy
>>>> invading Sweden...
>>>>
>>>
>>

Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork

[Ron M.]

Crap, if I saw this an hour ago, I'd already be west of Balmorhea heading
that way. :D

On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Chuck McCown  wrote:

> Pavlov is happening
>
> *From:* Jaime Solorza
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2017 3:45 PM
> *To:* Animal Farm
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT... Red Chile Tamale... Pork
>
> This is what it should look like...
>
> On Feb 19, 2017 3:40 PM, "Jaime Solorza" 
> wrote:
>
>> Quick and dirty... Masa is most important but wife in mood having
>> contractors in house all weekend repairing water damage.   Told me to just
>> buy premade one... Will get it out of her later in week,  if I am not busy
>> invading Sweden...
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Agent Update

[Ron M.]

Wonder how many people are going to submit their agent as the law firm of
Dewey, Cheatem & Howe, LLP.?

On Dec 20, 2016 08:03, "Chuck McCown"  wrote:

> Is the new system up and running?
>
>
> -Original Message- From: Matt Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016
> 7:56 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: [AFMUG] DMCA Agent Update
> Has everyone updated there DMCA contact.
>
> https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/FR-2016-11-01/2016-26257
>

Re: [AFMUG] OT - waste of a domain name

[Ron M.]

Damn, someone already snagged badhombre.com. :-D

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Bill Prince  wrote:

> . I need one of� these: http://big.ly/albert-einstein-
> action-figure.html
>
> bp
> 
>
>
> On 12/14/2016 4:38 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>
> With our President-Elect doing everything �bigly�, I was disappointed
> at this waste of a domain name:
>
> �
>
> www.big.ly
>
> �
>
> Damn, I wanted to buy that �Wi-Fi Detector Shirt�.
>
> �
>
> (In case you wondered, I believe .ly is the tld for Libya)
>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] CMM5 vs Packetflux

[Ron M.]

I think the key on this would be making sure that the power supply utilized
has enough current supply to handle the load. Cambium says "Power
Consumption 70 W typical, 80 W peak (up to 110 W max with AUX port PoE
enabled)" so assuming 56-59VDC power supply, you would need one that could
supply up to 8 amps of current... or two at 4 amps each if I'm
understanding the PowerA/PowerB inputs. PowerInjector+Sync website
documentation only says max 1A per port, but it sounds like that may be
conservative?

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:03 AM, Tushar Patel  wrote:

> Forrest,
>
> If we use powerinjector + sync for Powering Medusa,
>
> Since the power requirement is very high, how many medusa's can we power
> using gigabit power injector? Can we power 4 Medusa using gigabit power
> injector?
>
> Tushar
>
>
> On Dec 14, 2016, at 11:07 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
> li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
>
> Yes, sync over power is on the PacketFlux roadmap.  We're exploring
> different options as far as manufacturing goes.   The short version:  This
> isn't as simple as just adding some off-the-shelf electronic components.
>
> However, we've got a really easy solution for you:
>
> http://store.packetflux.com/syncbox-junior-aux-port-version/
>
> Just hook up the aux port directly into this unit with a straight through
> CAT5 cable.  Then turn on uGPS power in the Medusa.   This unit gets power
> from the radios.   It also supports up to *four* medusas, or 450i's.
>
> You can power the medusa in any of several different ways The stock
> power supply, a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync, some of Chuck's products,
> etc.
>
> -forrest
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Brian Sullivan  > wrote:
>
>> Other than supporting Sync over power for Medusa, what else does the new
>> CMM5 give you over the competition?
>>
>> http://www.doubleradius.com/Manufacturers/Accessories_34/
>>
>> Is Sync over power for 450m on the Packetflux roadmap?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>   
>   
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] CMM5 vs Packetflux

[Ron M.]

I like the idea/capability of using the PowerInjector+Sync to power and
sync medusa because we also have some regular 450APs and (yeah...) a few
AP100s still running... being able to daisy-chain two or three injectors
with a single sitemonitor has lots of promise... and lets me ditch the CMM4
currently being used.  I'll note that we have never used the Mot/Cambium
ethernet switch anyway, so that has never been a component to the
equation... rather the not being able to do gigabit through the CMM4 has
been an issue.

I had already put together a preliminary list of PFlux stuff that we would
need to order for the towers... time to get with the business/ops manager
and start moving that direction.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:

> Yes, sync over power is on the PacketFlux roadmap.  We're exploring
> different options as far as manufacturing goes.   The short version:  This
> isn't as simple as just adding some off-the-shelf electronic components.
>
> However, we've got a really easy solution for you:
>
> http://store.packetflux.com/syncbox-junior-aux-port-version/
>
> Just hook up the aux port directly into this unit with a straight through
> CAT5 cable.  Then turn on uGPS power in the Medusa.   This unit gets power
> from the radios.   It also supports up to *four* medusas, or 450i's.
>
> You can power the medusa in any of several different ways The stock
> power supply, a PacketFlux PowerInjector+Sync, some of Chuck's products,
> etc.
>
> -forrest
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Brian Sullivan  > wrote:
>
>> Other than supporting Sync over power for Medusa, what else does the new
>> CMM5 give you over the competition?
>>
>> http://www.doubleradius.com/Manufacturers/Accessories_34/
>>
>> Is Sync over power for 450m on the Packetflux roadmap?
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Forrest Christian* *CEO**, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc.*
> Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602
> forre...@imach.com | http://www.packetflux.com
>   
>   
>
>