Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Installing it on a new stack today, will let you know... On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Matt wrote: > Are you using Proxmox 4.x yet? My experience with it has not been all > that great. Proxmox 3.x I think will be EOL before long though. > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > >> In Cermak there are many places you can't get more power, so there's the >> lost opportunity cost. I can't imagine that Pis are better than a >> virtualized system, but I've never used them. Proxmox would be good for >> those types of light weight loads. >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> -- >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45:10 PM >> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> Power is how expensive? >> >> At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, >> I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with >> the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse >> city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air >> conditioning. >> >> Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet >> >> one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W >> >> You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible >> >> if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month >> >> $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per >> kWh >> >> >> so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 >> kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really >> make a difference to use a raspberry pi? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: >> >>> I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, >>> though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of >>> failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or >>> something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building >>> with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off >>> and save a good chunk of money every month. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >>>> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >>>> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >>>> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy >>>> via the application too … I completely get that .. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >>>> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they >>>> take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty >>>> fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying >>>> after too many writes? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, an
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
I had some problems with snapshots in 4.x, but an update fixed that. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Matt" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:49:46 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Are you using Proxmox 4.x yet? My experience with it has not been all that great. Proxmox 3.x I think will be EOL before long though. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: In Cermak there are many places you can't get more power, so there's the lost opportunity cost. I can't imagine that Pis are better than a virtualized system, but I've never used them. Proxmox would be good for those types of light weight loads. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Eric Kuhnke" < eric.kuh...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45:10 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Power is how expensive? At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air conditioning. Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per kWh so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really make a difference to use a raspberry pi? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire < gra...@vntx.net > wrote: I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off and save a good chunk of money every month. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant power etc… could be blades or physical servers. Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via the application too … I completely get that .. From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after too many writes? On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire < gra...@vntx.net > wrote: I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any other internal or external server I've set up. On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: +100 on that one … From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Unbound. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Matt" < matt.mailingli...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM Subject: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer Bind or PowerDNS?
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Are you using Proxmox 4.x yet? My experience with it has not been all that great. Proxmox 3.x I think will be EOL before long though. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > In Cermak there are many places you can't get more power, so there's the > lost opportunity cost. I can't imagine that Pis are better than a > virtualized system, but I've never used them. Proxmox would be good for > those types of light weight loads. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------ > *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45:10 PM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > Power is how expensive? > > At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, > I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with > the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse > city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air > conditioning. > > Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet > > one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W > > You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible > > if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month > > $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per kWh > > > so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 > kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really > make a difference to use a raspberry pi? > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: > >> I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, >> though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of >> failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or >> something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building >> with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off >> and save a good chunk of money every month. >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart >> wrote: >> >>> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >>> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >>> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >>> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >>> >>> >>> >>> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via >>> the application too … I completely get that .. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >>> >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>> >>> >>> >>> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they >>> take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty >>> fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying >>> after too many writes? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire >>> wrote: >>> >>> I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform >>> any other internal or external server I've set up. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart >>> wrote: >>> >>> +100 on that one … >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
one of the problems of a NUC (or a similar thing from Asus, MSI, other taiwanese vendors) is that many of them use 19VDC input and their own 120VAC brick power supplies. It's not like you can just feed a couple dozen of them with 12VDC on 12AWG stranded wire. On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Depends on the hardware configuration of the VM stack, but a nuc based > systems would, for sure, have better physical redundancy. Similar to a > chassis based system, minus the chassis itself being a potential failure > point. The would still be layers of inefficiencies, but as with anything > there are tradeoffs. > On Mar 22, 2016 10:11 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Why not virtual machines? Granted there is some overhead for the >> hypervisor but better use of the platform and simply full disaster recovery. >> On Mar 22, 2016 9:34 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: >> >>> Small footprint, can fit many in 2u. Low power draw, high performance. >>> They do dissipate quite a bit of heat though. They would make good compute >>> nodes. >>> On Mar 22, 2016 9:21 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: >>> >>>> Those NUC thingies are really cute, but the latest ones seem very very >>>> pricey. What am I missing? >>>> >>>> *From:* Eric Kuhnke >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>> >>>> Power is how expensive? >>>> >>>> At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north >>>> america, I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... >>>> That's with the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt >>>> generators, diverse city power feeds, and taking into account the >>>> building's cost for air conditioning. >>>> >>>> Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet >>>> >>>> one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W >>>> >>>> You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible >>>> >>>> if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month >>>> >>>> $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per >>>> kWh >>>> >>>> >>>> so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is >>>> 11.16 kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it >>>> really make a difference to use a raspberry pi? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, >>>>> though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of >>>>> failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or >>>>> something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building >>>>> with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off >>>>> and save a good chunk of money every month. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >>>>>> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >>>>>> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >>>>>> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy >>>>>> via the application too … I completely get that .. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >>>>>> >>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they >>>>>> take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pr
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Depends on the hardware configuration of the VM stack, but a nuc based systems would, for sure, have better physical redundancy. Similar to a chassis based system, minus the chassis itself being a potential failure point. The would still be layers of inefficiencies, but as with anything there are tradeoffs. On Mar 22, 2016 10:11 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" wrote: > Why not virtual machines? Granted there is some overhead for the > hypervisor but better use of the platform and simply full disaster recovery. > On Mar 22, 2016 9:34 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: > >> Small footprint, can fit many in 2u. Low power draw, high performance. >> They do dissipate quite a bit of heat though. They would make good compute >> nodes. >> On Mar 22, 2016 9:21 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: >> >>> Those NUC thingies are really cute, but the latest ones seem very very >>> pricey. What am I missing? >>> >>> *From:* Eric Kuhnke >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>> >>> Power is how expensive? >>> >>> At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, >>> I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with >>> the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse >>> city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air >>> conditioning. >>> >>> Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet >>> >>> one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W >>> >>> You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible >>> >>> if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month >>> >>> $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per >>> kWh >>> >>> >>> so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is >>> 11.16 kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it >>> really make a difference to use a raspberry pi? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, >>>> though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of >>>> failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or >>>> something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building >>>> with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off >>>> and save a good chunk of money every month. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >>>>> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >>>>> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >>>>> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy >>>>> via the application too … I completely get that .. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >>>>> >>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they >>>>> take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty >>>>> fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash >>>>> dying >>>>> after too many writes? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform >>>>> any other internal or external server I've set up. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 28
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Why not virtual machines? Granted there is some overhead for the hypervisor but better use of the platform and simply full disaster recovery. On Mar 22, 2016 9:34 PM, "Josh Reynolds" wrote: > Small footprint, can fit many in 2u. Low power draw, high performance. > They do dissipate quite a bit of heat though. They would make good compute > nodes. > On Mar 22, 2016 9:21 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: > >> Those NUC thingies are really cute, but the latest ones seem very very >> pricey. What am I missing? >> >> *From:* Eric Kuhnke >> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45 PM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> Power is how expensive? >> >> At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, >> I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with >> the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse >> city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air >> conditioning. >> >> Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet >> >> one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W >> >> You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible >> >> if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month >> >> $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per >> kWh >> >> >> so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 >> kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really >> make a difference to use a raspberry pi? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: >> >>> I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, >>> though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of >>> failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or >>> something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building >>> with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off >>> and save a good chunk of money every month. >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >>>> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >>>> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >>>> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy >>>> via the application too … I completely get that .. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >>>> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they >>>> take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty >>>> fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying >>>> after too many writes? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform >>>> any other internal or external server I've set up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> +100 on that one … >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Unbound. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> - >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>> >>>> >>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> *From: *"Matt" >>>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>>> *Sent: *Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM >>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>>> >>>> For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer >>>> Bind or PowerDNS? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Small footprint, can fit many in 2u. Low power draw, high performance. They do dissipate quite a bit of heat though. They would make good compute nodes. On Mar 22, 2016 9:21 PM, "Ken Hohhof" wrote: > Those NUC thingies are really cute, but the latest ones seem very very > pricey. What am I missing? > > *From:* Eric Kuhnke > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > Power is how expensive? > > At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, > I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with > the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse > city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air > conditioning. > > Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet > > one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W > > You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible > > if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month > > $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per kWh > > > so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 > kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really > make a difference to use a raspberry pi? > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: > >> I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, >> though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of >> failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or >> something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building >> with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off >> and save a good chunk of money every month. >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart >> wrote: >> >>> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >>> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >>> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >>> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >>> >>> >>> >>> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via >>> the application too … I completely get that .. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >>> >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>> >>> >>> >>> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they >>> take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty >>> fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying >>> after too many writes? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire >>> wrote: >>> >>> I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform >>> any other internal or external server I've set up. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart >>> wrote: >>> >>> +100 on that one … >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >>> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>> >>> >>> >>> Unbound. >>> >>> >>> >>> - >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> -- >>> >>> *From: *"Matt" >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM >>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >>> >>> For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer >>> Bind or PowerDNS? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Those NUC thingies are really cute, but the latest ones seem very very pricey.
What am I missing?
From: Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Power is how expensive?
At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, I've
calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with the
building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse city power
feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air conditioning.
Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet
one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W
You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible
if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month
$900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per kWh
so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 kWh
consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really make a
difference to use a raspberry pi?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire wrote:
I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, though
I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of failure, but
they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or something to
eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building with our fiber, and
by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off and save a good chunk of
money every month.
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for servers
… YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I need redundant
disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant power etc… could be
blades or physical servers.
Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via
the application too … I completely get that ..
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take
up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and now
they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after too many
writes?
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire wrote:
I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any
other internal or external server I've set up.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart
wrote:
+100 on that one …
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Unbound.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
From: "Matt"
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM
Subject: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer
Bind or PowerDNS?
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
In Cermak there are many places you can't get more power, so there's the lost opportunity cost. I can't imagine that Pis are better than a virtualized system, but I've never used them. Proxmox would be good for those types of light weight loads. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Eric Kuhnke" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:45:10 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Power is how expensive? At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air conditioning. Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per kWh so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really make a difference to use a raspberry pi? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire < gra...@vntx.net > wrote: I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off and save a good chunk of money every month. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant power etc… could be blades or physical servers. Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via the application too … I completely get that .. From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after too many writes? On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire < gra...@vntx.net > wrote: I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any other internal or external server I've set up. On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: +100 on that one … From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Unbound. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP From: "Matt" < matt.mailingli...@gmail.com > To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM Subject: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer Bind or PowerDNS?
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Power is how expensive? At one of the largest carrier hotels/biggest IX points in north america, I've calculated the cost of power to be around 23 cents/kWh... That's with the building providing multiply redundant 2 megawatt generators, diverse city power feeds, and taking into account the building's cost for air conditioning. Based on these calculations for a high density, high power colo cabinet one 208V 30A circuit = 6240W You can use about 85% of that safely, so you've got 5304W load possible if you use 5304W for a month 24x7 you've got 3946kWh consumed in a month $900/month for that electrical circuit divided by 3946 = 22.8 cents per kWh so uhm... a 15W Intel NUC sized thing running solid for a month is 11.16 kWh consumed in a month, or about $2.50 of electricity. Does it really make a difference to use a raspberry pi? On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 6:26 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: > I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, though > I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of failure, > but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or something > to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building with our > fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off and save a > good chunk of money every month. > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: > >> I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for >> servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I >> need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant >> power etc… could be blades or physical servers. >> >> >> >> Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via >> the application too … I completely get that .. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> >> >> Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take >> up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and >> now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after >> too many writes? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: >> >> I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any >> other internal or external server I've set up. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart >> wrote: >> >> +100 on that one … >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> >> >> Unbound. >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> -- >> >> *From: *"Matt" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer >> Bind or PowerDNS? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
I haven't had any of them die on me from SD card write failure yet, though I've been worried about it. I keep spares of everything in case of failure, but they're cheap enough you could set up a huge VRRP cluster or something to eliminate any down time. Power is expensive at the building with our fiber, and by using Pis I'm able to keep the air conditioner off and save a good chunk of money every month. On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: > I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for servers > … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I need > redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant power > etc… could be blades or physical servers. > > > > Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via > the application too … I completely get that .. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Matt > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > > > Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take > up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and > now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after > too many writes? > > > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: > > I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any > other internal or external server I've set up. > > > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart > wrote: > > +100 on that one … > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > > > Unbound. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > > *From: *"Matt" > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer > Bind or PowerDNS? > > > > > > >
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
I like Raspberry Pi units … but I wouldn’t think of using them for servers … YMMV .. I think of them more as “useful toys”…. For servers I need redundant disc (minimum two Intel SSD w/hardware RAID1), redundant power etc… could be blades or physical servers. Now one could argue that for something like DNS, you have redundancy via the application too … I completely get that .. From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 12:34 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after too many writes? On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire mailto:gra...@vntx.net> > wrote: I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any other internal or external server I've set up. On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart mailto:p...@paulstewart.org> > wrote: +100 on that one … From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Unbound. - Mike Hammett <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> _ From: "Matt" mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM Subject: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer Bind or PowerDNS?
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Was thinking about moving some servers to Raspberry Pi. I like they take up very little rack space and power and with quad cores are pretty fast and now they support Centos. Have you had any issues with flash dying after too many writes? On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Graham McIntire wrote: > I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any > other internal or external server I've set up. > > On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart > wrote: > >> +100 on that one … >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett >> *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> >> >> Unbound. >> >> >> >> - >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> -- >> >> *From: *"Matt" >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM >> *Subject: *[AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver >> >> For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer >> Bind or PowerDNS? >> >> >> > >
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
I run unbound on 2 raspberry Pi 2's, and they consistently outperform any other internal or external server I've set up. On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Paul Stewart wrote: > +100 on that one … > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett > *Sent:* Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > > > Unbound. > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > -- > > *From: *"Matt" > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver > > For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer > Bind or PowerDNS? > > >
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
+100 on that one … From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 11:32 AM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver Unbound. - Mike Hammett <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> _ From: "Matt" mailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> > To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM Subject: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer Bind or PowerDNS?
Re: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver
Unbound. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP - Original Message - From: "Matt" To: af@afmug.com Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 10:29:19 AM Subject: [AFMUG] PowerDNS vs Bind for Resolver For a simple non-authorative resolver running on Centos do most prefer Bind or PowerDNS?
