DIS: Re: OFF: [Mad Engineer] Experiment 00071 - Rule Selection
Janet wrote:
EXPERIMENT 00071 RULE SELECTION
As selected on Discord #botspam, the rule for this week is Rule 2575
("The Distributor"). I affirm under penalty of No Faking that, to the
best of my knowledge, the process used in this selection had the correct
distribution.
Please send suggestions if you have them!
The text of Rule 2575 is reproduced below for convenience:
Rule 2575/3 (Power=3)
The Distributor
The Distributor is an imposed office whose holder is generally
responsible for the management of the primary Agoran fora. The
holder CANNOT be changed except without objection or by proposal.
Rules to the contrary notwithstanding, the Distributor CANNOT
deregister or be deregistered.
The device CANNOT be changed except without objection or by proposal.
DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposal 8888
On 1/29/23 16:02, secretsnail9 via agora-business wrote: > I intend, without objection, to transfer 2 ais523 stamps from the Lost and > Found Department to myself. I object. I'm not sure why a buff should retroactively apply to you. You didn't do so under a misunderstanding of the dream as-is, IIRC. -- nix Herald, Collector
Re: DIS: [agoranomic.org] How To Play Page
On 1/29/23 15:43, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: > Vote on Proposals: May want to explain PRESENT as "you just count toward > the minimum number of voters", and endorse as "you vote the same way > they do". > > Submit Proposals: May want to add "[proposal]" to the template at the > end, and also explain "if your proposal would add/change/remove any rule > with Power > 1, then you need to request an Adoption Index to match, or > it won't work". May also want to move this to "Things to Do Once You > Feel Comfortable with the Basics", along with "Run for Office". Thanks! I'll add these/integrate these soon. -- nix Herald, Collector
Re: DIS: [agoranomic.org] How To Play Page
nix wrote: I added a new page to the website, intended to give people an idea of what to do after they join. Any feedback appreciated: https://agoranomic.org/play.html Vote on Proposals: May want to explain PRESENT as "you just count toward the minimum number of voters", and endorse as "you vote the same way they do". Submit Proposals: May want to add "[proposal]" to the template at the end, and also explain "if your proposal would add/change/remove any rule with Power > 1, then you need to request an Adoption Index to match, or it won't work". May also want to move this to "Things to Do Once You Feel Comfortable with the Basics", along with "Run for Office".
Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [proposal] Slightly less self-interested proposal
Janet wrote: On 1/22/2023 1:55 PM, Janet Cobb via agora-discussion wrote: On 1/22/23 12:42, Edward Murphy via agora-discussion wrote: Janet wrote: [Currently, I'm effectively locked out of owning any actually useful stone without setting a Dream, which isn't really fair. If I attempt to Is this actually true? I thought that had something to do with auctions, which were repealed about a month ago, and any rule or regulation actually putting the Stonemason on different footing may have been repealed earlier than that (I spot-checked about four months back but didn't spot anything relevant). The Mason's stone both does nothing and will generally be owned by me, and thus count towards the 30-day lockout for getting actually useful stones. Seems like just repealing it would fix both issues. Does being the Stonemason give any advantage on the 30-day thing? Again, I suspect it was originally enacted to solve some problem that no longer exists. It would theoretically give the Stonemason first dibs after collection notices. How about just disallowing transfers within 24 hours after a collection notice, or something like that?
