Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 11:10 PM Aspen via agora-discussion wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:47 PM ais523 via agora-official > wrote: > > > > > 8658* Aspen 3.0 SLR Ratification > > Conditional: If G. and Murphy both vote FOR, then FOR, otherwise > > AGAINST. (I haven't checked it in sufficient detail to make sure that > > it's correct / nothing is broken.) > > I'm a bit frustrated by the fact this is failing (I am *not* > frustrated at any specific voters). To the best of my knowledge, there > is no recent version of the ruleset that anyone has completely checked > and signed off on. This is the read the ruleset week version from this > year, presumably the most checked of the year. I'm fairly sure there > have been erata to the ruleset since last year's RtRW version, so we > can't ratify that either. However, we haven't ratified a ruleset for > two years now, which is a pretty long time. I'm not sure what needs to > be done to get people to read and approve a version of the ruleset. I > believe that this is the best version to ratify. I would appreciate it > if someone could give me suggestions on how to get this or another > recent version of the ruleset ratified. > > There was a recent scare where it seemed possible that reenacting > rules was broken (this discussion happened entirely on Discord). It > was determined that the last ratification had happened days after the > most recent reenactment. I would really like to get a version of the > ruleset ratified soon, so we don't have to worry about problems like > that. I feel like the solution might involve leaving a version up for a while to check it. I think I've done that in the past maybe, I'm sorry for getting frustrated. I'm pretty tired and frustrated in general these days. Maybe I need to take a break for a bit. -Aspen
DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 10:47 PM ais523 via agora-official wrote: > > 8658* Aspen 3.0 SLR Ratification > Conditional: If G. and Murphy both vote FOR, then FOR, otherwise > AGAINST. (I haven't checked it in sufficient detail to make sure that > it's correct / nothing is broken.) I'm a bit frustrated by the fact this is failing (I am *not* frustrated at any specific voters). To the best of my knowledge, there is no recent version of the ruleset that anyone has completely checked and signed off on. This is the read the ruleset week version from this year, presumably the most checked of the year. I'm fairly sure there have been erata to the ruleset since last year's RtRW version, so we can't ratify that either. However, we haven't ratified a ruleset for two years now, which is a pretty long time. I'm not sure what needs to be done to get people to read and approve a version of the ruleset. I believe that this is the best version to ratify. I would appreciate it if someone could give me suggestions on how to get this or another recent version of the ruleset ratified. There was a recent scare where it seemed possible that reenacting rules was broken (this discussion happened entirely on Discord). It was determined that the last ratification had happened days after the most recent reenactment. I would really like to get a version of the ruleset ratified soon, so we don't have to worry about problems like that. -Aspen
DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8657-8664
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:40 PM Aspen via agora-official < agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote: > > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW > > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it, > and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector > is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the > valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are > conditional votes). > > ID Author(s) AITitle > --- > 8657* Murphy 3.0 Schrodinger's report > 8658* Aspen 3.0 SLR Ratification > 8659* nix, G., snail 3.0 Speak Like People > 8660* nix, G., Jason, snail 3.0 The End of Sets > 8661& nix, G., Jason, Trigon 1.0 Stamps v1.2 > 8662& snail, Jason, Telna 1.0 Birds! v2 > 8663& snail 1.0 The Hexeract > 8664& snail 1.0 Away with the massive points > > The proposal pool is currently empty. > > Legend: * : Democratic proposal. > & : Ordinary proposal. > ~ : Unsponsored proposal. > > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where > the information shown below differs from the information shown above, > the information shown above shall control. > > // > ID: 8657 > Title: Schrodinger's report > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Murphy > Co-author(s): > > > Amend Rule 2480 (Festivals) by replacing this text: > > While Agora's Festivity is 0, Festivity is tracked in the > Tailor's monthly report. Otherwise, it is tracked in the > Tailor's weekly report. > > with this text: > > Festivity is tracked in the Tailor's monthly report. In addition, > while Festivity is non-zero, the Tailor SHALL announce its value each > week; a public document purporting to be such an announcement is > self-ratifying. > > [Now that Glitter has been repealed, the existence of the Tailor's > weekly report depends solely on whether a Festival is in progress. I > would rather give up the occasional extra salary than have to deal with > the extra complexity in the ADoP's report.] > > // > ID: 8658 > Title: SLR Ratification > Adoption index: 3.0 > Author: Aspen > Co-author(s): > > > Ratify the Short Logical Ruleset published on the 8th of February, 2022, > available here [1]. > > [1] https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-official/2022-February/015653.html > > // > ID: 8659 > Title: Speak Like People > Adoption index: > Author: nix > Co-author(s): G., snail > For the record, the AI of this proposal is 3.0. The distribution is still valid. -Aspen
